Monday, 11 November 2013

Holodomor: Eightieth Anniversary of Man-Made Famine

The association of Ukrainians in Great Britain has helped to launch a book reporting on the events surrounding the Ukrainian famine in 1933.
The Rochdale branch of this organisation was the first group within the UK to publicise it and had previously pushed the council to place a memorial remembering the disaster outside Rochdale Town Hall.

The book titled ‘Eyewitness to the Holodomor’ is written by Ray Gamache and talks about the discoveries made by former Foreign Adviser Gareth Jones.
The book is the first academic work on Gareth Jones. It informs the reader how Gareth was the first person to bring the famine to the attention of the general population and the first to blame the Soviet Union for the part they played in causing the famine.

At one time the rural population of Ukraine was dying at a rate of 25,000 per day. The land which was known as the breadbasket of Europe had been ravaged by a man made famine of unprecedented scale.

It is hoped the release of this book and the publicity it’s getting from the Ukrainians currently based the United Kingdom will help in the aim of trying to get the UK government to recognise this as genocide.

It’s only recently that countries such as the United States and Canada have actually recognised it as genocide. This has recently been discussed by MPs in the United Kingdom and it’s hoped they will follow the example set by the USA and Canada.

Many people within Ukrainian communities had thanked Gareth Jones for speaking out against the famine when many of their family members had no voice and simply couldn’t speak out.

Taras Melnyk, a member of the Holodomor committee and part of the Ukrainian community within Rochdale, said: “This famine has always been close to the people of Rochdale, we hope the book raises awareness of the tragedy.

'The fact that it’s being discussed in the House of Parliament is a positive step for certain.'

The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомор, "Extermination by hunger" or "Hunger-extermination";[2] derived from 'Морити голодом', "Starving someone" [3]) was a man-made famine in the Ukrainian SSR and adjacent Cossack territories in 1932 and 1933. During the famine, which is also known as the "Terror-Famine in Ukraine" and "Famine-Genocide in Ukraine",[4][5][6] millions of Ukrainians and Cossacks died of starvation in a peacetime catastrophe unprecedented in the history of Ukraine.[7]
The estimates of the death toll by scholars varied greatly. Recent research has narrowed the estimates to between 1.8[8] and 5[9] million, with modern consensus for a likely total of 3–3.5 million.[10] According to the decision of Kyiv Appellation Court, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million famine deaths, and a 6.1 million birth deficit.[11]
Scholars disagree on the relative importance of natural factors and bad economic policies as causes of the famine and the degree to which the destruction of the Ukrainian peasantry was premeditated on the part of Joseph Stalin.[7][12][13][14] Some scholars and politicians using the word Holodomor emphasize the man-made aspects of the famine, arguing that it was genocide; some consider the resultant loss of life comparable to the Holocaust.[15] They argue that the Soviet policies were an attack on the rise of Ukrainian nationalism and therefore fall under the legal definition of genocide.[16][17][18][19][20] Other scholars argue that the Holodomor was a consequence of the economic problems associated with radical economic changes implemented during the period of liquidation of private property and Soviet industrialization

Blacklist Demo at Alder Hey

THIS morning (Saturday 9th Nov), 60 activists demonstrated outside Alder Hey Hospital construction project in Liverpool in protest at the continued blacklisting of union activists and the denial of union facilities on the project. The demonstration was called by the Blacklist Support Group at the anti-union attitude being adopted by the main contractor on the site Laing O'Rourke (LOR) and its wholly owned electrical subsidiary Crown House. The company has refused to negotiate with construction unions over rates of pay or safety and has even denied union officials access onto site to speak to workers. The construction unions UNITE, UCATT and GMB all had members on the protest.

The protest came only a day after the announcement of the death of a construction worker on the Laing O'Rourke Francis Crick medical research centre project in Kings Cross.

Unite assistant general secretary, Gail Cartmail said: "This fatality is a tragedy and our condolences go out to the bereaved family and friends.
'This is a harsh reminder of the importance of high standards of health & safety in an industry that is extremely dangerous. Trade unions have a role to play in maintaining safe working environments but Laing O'Rourke has bizarrely banned Unite officials from their sites. There is no place for anti-trade union behaviour in an industry where we should be working together in the interests of safety. We urge Laing O'Rourke and its subsidiary Crown House to give Unite access to the sites to support workers and help make improvements where necessary.' 
LAING O'Rourke is one of the eight major contractors who are defendants in the High Court on November 29th for their role in the blacklisting conspiracy in a claim being brought by Guney Clark and Ryan solicitors and are one of the firms that last month announced a scheme to compensate blacklisted workers. Blacklist Support Group walked out of the first negotiations with representatives of the blacklist compensation scheme describing the proposals as a 'publicity stunt'.
On the TUC Day of Action on Blacklisting on November 20th, the Blacklist Support Group has announced that it will be targeting another Laing O'Rourke site, the Cheesegrater in Leadenhall Street in the City of London (possibly the most recognisable building under construction in the UK today). 
Steve Acheson - blacklisted electrician & chair of the Blacklist Support Group said:
'Laing O'Rourke may pretend they have turned over a new leaf by their involvement in the compensation scheme but they show their true colours every day by their anti-union actions on building sites across the UK. They appear to be pathologically predisposed to victimise worker prepared to stand up for basic rights such as safe conditions or wages.
Laing O'Rourke, Crown House and the other blacklisting firms have attempted to destroy our working lives and genuine trade unionism in the building industry.   Until blacklisted workers are able to gain long term employment on major projects, everything else is just window dressing and we will continue to hound these wretches.'
Roy Bentham - blacklisted joiner from Liverpool & spokesperson from the Blacklist Support Group said:
'Our message is simple. Our message is clear.
Full compensation which reflects the human rights violations and suffering of blacklisted workers.
Employment for those workers on major contracts for which they've been previously excluded.
And lastly a full independent inquiry into this whole tawdry scandal with no stones left unturned whatsoever.'  
Blacklist Support Group
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/groups/blacklistSG/
__________________________________________________

The current printed issue of NORTHERN VOICES No.14, is now available for sale at all our usual outlets in the North of England and beyond - see below. This issue N.V.14 has a Tameside Eye story about how Tameside has a history of involvement in blacklisting, it also contains an interview by Barry Woodling with George Tapp - the Salford electrician injured in May on an anti-blacklist picket. The Voices has been in the forthfront of the campaign against the blacklist since 2003 and the DAF dispute at Manchester Piccadilly, its editor, an electrician, was on the blacklist of the Economic League in the 1960s, and there was an attempt to blacklist him while he was working in Gibraltar in both 1964 and 1967, but at the time this intervention by the Foreign Office was resisted by the Gibraltarian authorities, and the Gibraltar Transport & General Workers Union.
Postal subscription: £5 for the next two issues (post included). Cheques made payable to 'Northern Voices' should be sent c/o 52, Todmorden Road, Burnley, Lancashire BB10 4AH.
Tel.: 0161 793 5122.
email: northernvoices@hotmail.com

Unite General Secretary's Election Query

Jerry Hicks lodges complaint after revelation that Unite sent over 158,000 ballot papers to 'former members' 
 
What follows is a press statement from Jerry Hicks which Northern Voices' publishes without comment:
 
JERRY Hicks, Len McCluskey’s only rival in this year's election for Unite General Secretary has lodged a complaint calling for the result to be annulled after it emerged that 158,000 ballot papers were sent to members no longer paying fees. And it may result in the election having to be re-run.

Len McCluskey, 63, won the election in April with a margin of 60,000 more votes than his opponent Jerry Hicks, who surprised everybody by polling nearly 40% of the vote. Remarkable given that he [Jerry Hicks] remains unemployed following his unlawful sacking for Trade Union activities by Rolls Royce in 2005. 

But Jerry Hicks is complaining that between the end of December last year and January this year the union increased the number of potential voters in the leadership race by about 158,000. He has written to the trade union watchdog – the Certification Officer - to ask how "former trade union members" could be allowed to vote in the leadership election.

During the election there were some attempts to slur the name of Jerry Hicks, and these matters are also included in the complaint.

 
The certification officer has wide-ranging powers and in 2011 forced construction union UCATT to re-run a leadership election, declaring the vote invalid. The Barrister acting against UCATT on that occasion was Jody Atkinson, and he is now representing Jerry Hicks on a ‘pro bono’ basis [free of charge].   Mr Atkinson said  'it appeared that Unite had been balloting people who had left the union, most likely because they had not paid their subscriptions. And it seems that ballot papers have been sent to people who have not been members for years.'
 
In an interview with ‘The Guardian’s Randeep Ramesh’ Jerry Hicks said 'that he was told by Electoral Reform Services, which oversaw the union ballot, that Unite had identified "there was a group of "members" who the Union had considered no longer to be members of the union' but 'it was decided that they should be treated as continuing members and therefore for the purpose of the election eligible to vote'.  More interestingly it might be that as many as 77,000 of the 158,000 ballot papers had no postal address at all, so what on earth happened to them?. 

Jerry Hicks said he wanted 'Unite's leadership to explain why people who weren't members of the Unite union could vote in the election of its General Secretary. So far I've been offered no explanation.'
Jerry Hicks, said Mr McCluskey called the 'snap election' after the union's Executive Council last September changed the rule book to raise the retirement age of senior officials to 67 and an attempt was made to double the number of branch nominations required to stand in a leadership election from 50 to 100.

Adding 'They thought that would deter me but they failed. I am an ordinary member who managed to get more than 150 nominations," The leadership got arrogant about their own power. They are paid six figure sums and have lost touch with ordinary members.'
Len McCluskey, who has been Unite's General Secretary since 2010, had called the election early arguing he did not want to take to the hustings in the run up to the general election in 2015. Labour's biggest donor by far is Unite, which has provided 20%, about £12m, of party donations since the election. 

Saturday, 9 November 2013

Bristol Radical History Group

Details of upcoming Nov/Dec events, see you there.... Remembering the Dublin Lockout 1913-2013 Speaker: John Newsinger Date: Thursday 14th November, 2013 Time: 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm Venue: Room 202/203, Tony Benn House (Unite), Victoria Street, Bristol BS1 6AY Price: Donation http://www.brh.org.uk/site/events/remembering-dublin-lockout-1913-2013/ Book Launch: In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and the Crisis of Capitalism Speaker: George Caffentzis Date: Tuesday 19th November, 2013 Time: 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm Venue: Hydra Bookshop, 34 Old Market St, Bristol, BS2 0EZ Price: Donation http://www.brh.org.uk/site/events/in-letters-of-blood-and-fire/ The Game of Drones Date: Saturday 30th November, 2013 Time: 2:00 pm to 3:30 pm Venue: Hydra Bookshop, 34 Old Market St, Bristol, BS2 0EZ With: Heathcote Williams, Alan Cox, Price: Donation Film screening of Game of Drones: The President and the White House Fly (Handsome Dog Productions, 2013). Investigative poem on topical issue of ‘Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’. Written by Heathcote Williams; Narration and Montage by Alan Cox; produced by Margaret Cox. Screening will be introduced by anti-Drone campaigner John from Bath Activist Network. About Heathcote Williams: "I'd say the overwhelming feature of these poems and perhaps of Williams' whole oeuvre is a sense of the development of an argument, either in favour of a cause or in opposition to what he clearly perceives as either an idiocy or a malign government or establishment force. Yet he's rarely narrowly didactic and at his best his 'argument', whatever that may be, comes through experience and the development of empathy and understanding. In this sense he's a bit like George Orwell and Charles Dickens, using language as a weapon on behalf of the defenceless and in defence of sanity. Yet there's also a delight in language for its own sake, not something he takes to excess but it's there nonetheless and his writing is all the better for it." (Huxley Scientific Press) Handsome Dog Productions: Anarcho-Pacifist documentary filmmakers supporting the work of one of the best and most neglected living English poets - Heathcote Williams - and pioneering a new art form bringing ponetry to the screen. Heathcote's work uses "language as a weapon on behalf of the defenceless and in defence of sanity". Why was Charles I executed? Justice, liberties and popular petitioning in 1648-49 Date: Monday 2nd December, 2013 Time: 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm Venue: Hydra Bookshop, 34 Old Market St, Bristol, BS2 0EZ With: Norah Carlin Price: Donation The regicide of 1649 has often been presented by books, articles and TV dons as the result of religious beliefs related to the King's role as a 'Man of Blood', whose own blood must be shed to deliver England from the taint of killing and the fear of God's vengeance. However the evidence suggests a far more sophisticated political response rooted in the concepts of 'Justice and Liberties' displayed in both public and military petitions. 'Justice' signified what we would now call war crimes trials (and not just of the king), while the word 'liberties' was used at the time to describe far-reaching and permanent constitutional reforms. Norah Carlin will present her new research into this fascinating period, when not only the monarchy but the Parliament which had sat for the past eight years were confronted for their crimes. Norah Carlin lectured in history at Middlesex Poly/University for her whole career, retiring in 2002 to her home town of Edinburgh. She is the author of The Causes of the English Civil War, published by Blackwell's in 1999 , a number of journal articles on the Levellers, Cromwellian attitudes to Ireland and similar themes; and contributed a great diversity of articles over many years to International Socialism, Socialist Review and Socialist Worker. _______________________________ Brhmob mailing list Brhmob@brh.org.uk http://www.brh.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/brhmob

Friday, 8 November 2013

News from Blacklist Support Group

1. Blacklist compensation scheme UCATT give an accurate summary of the scheme: http://www.ucatt.org.uk/blacklisting-compensation-scheme-travesty-justice Report of BSG meeting about the scheme: http://industrialreporter.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/breaking-news-anti-blacklist-campaigners-walk-out-of-compensation-talks/ 2. Helen Steele - working class hero Sued by McDonalds - Spied on by undercover police - Blacklisted by the construction industry We are proud to have her on our team http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/perfect-boyfriend-undercover-police-officer-2677256 3. TUC Day of Action - November 20th Every union in the UK is supporting the TUC Day of Action - contact your local region to see what is planned or about transport to the big events. Direction Action and Official TUC events are taking place in London, Edinburgh, Cardiff, Manchester and other undisclosed addresses across the UK. Blacklist Meeting inside the House of Commons in the afternoon. http://www.tuc.org.uk//workplace-issues/employment-rights/health-and-safety/own-pay-clean-tuc-day-action-blacklisting 4. High Court first ever hearing - November 29th Blacklist Support Group support the Guney Clark & Ryan solicitors legal claim. This will be the first time a blacklisting cases has been heard in the High Court. Expect lots of media coverage.
 __________________________________________________

The current printed issue of NORTHERN VOICES No.14, is now available for sale at all our usual outlets in the North of England and beyond - see below. This issue N.V.14 has a Tameside Eye story about how Tameside has a history of involvement in blacklisting, it also contains an interview by Barry Woodling with George Tapp - the Salford electrician injured in May on an anti-blacklist picket. The Voices has been in the forthfront of the campaign against the blacklist since 2003 and the DAF dispute at Manchester Piccadilly, its editor, an electrician, was on the blacklist of the Economic League in the 1960s, and there was an attempt to blacklist him while he was working in Gibraltar in both 1964 and 1967, but at the time this intervention by the Foreign Office was resisted by the Gibraltarian authorities, and the Gibraltar Transport & General Workers Union.
Postal subscription: £5 for the next two issues (post included). Cheques made payable to 'Northern Voices' should be sent c/o 52, Todmorden Road, Burnley, Lancashire BB10 4AH.
Tel.: 0161 793 5122.
email: northernvoices@hotmail.com

Thursday, 7 November 2013

Greater Manchester Repossessions Bonanza

TODAY the Manchester Evening News reported a 1,000 repossession orders of people's homes. It went on to announce: 'Thousands of families had to be given emergency shelter by charities or councils - and experts warn that benefit reforms such as the 'bedroom tax' will only make the problem worse.' Last year, there were 3,668 cases when the court bailiffs were authorised to forcibly gain entry to homes and change the locks. Altogether there were over 10,000 repossession orders issued by the Greater Manchester courts last year. Don't be surprised if this kind of thing leads to social and political trouble in the years ahead.

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

Portsmouth Shipyard to Close

SHIPYARDS in SCOTLAND have won out against the southern yard at Portsmouth it was reported this morning. This looks like a sop to the Scottish referendum over independence. Had they closed one of the two Scottish yards it would have been a gift to Scottish nationalism. The Financial Times reports today: 'Although the company (BAE Systems) will not want to have large assets located in a foreign country should Scotland choose to become independent, the government will also be keen to make sure that it does not look like Scottish workers are being punished for decisions made in Westminter.' Ther two Scottish yards are Govan and Scotstoun.

African Jamboree Radio Programme

THE radio programme African Jamboree is broadcast every Saturday on the local radio station 96.9 All FM. (Levenshulme local radio).   The programme discusses African politics, economics, history etc together with the playing of African music.    There is also a segment dedicated to the latest developments in British politics.   Furthemore one of Northern Voices' citizen journalists is a regular studio guest.    It is well worth listening to.   Every Saturday from 3pm to 5pm.

European Echoes at Genk & Grangemouth

Primitive Politics of Little England & the intellectual Eunuchs’! WHAT often passes for the left in Britain today is basically anti-European or with Bob Crow and his RMT union crudely just no2eu, and the same goes for the rump Socialist Party, formerly Militant. This is the primitive politics of little England and the political Eunuchs. Yet, when we contrast two recent industrial disputes: that of Ineos at Grangemouth in Scotland where the workers and their union, Unite, was decisively beaten last week, and that of the car workers at Ford in Genk, near Limburg in Belgium, were the ACV union forced the employers to negotiate a respectable settlement. Why did the Belgium ACV union prove a more substantial foe than Britain's Len McCluskey and Unite? The explanation is that the trade union tradition in much of Europe is often more in tune with a culture of 'initiativa' in so far as the workers in places like Belgium, France, Spain, Greece, Italy, operate in a more unpredictable way using political initiative and cunning to defeat their employers. Often these European workers are less disciplined and law-abiding than the Brits. And sometimes they don't even pay their union dues so readily as their English brothers, but they are often more courageous, that means less afraid of the police, than the Anglo-Saxon and the German trade unionists. At Grangemouth almost as soon as Fred Radcliffe announced his plan to close the oil plant in Grangemouth, Mr. McCluskey, his stewards and the workforce caved-in. At Genk, a year ago when Ford decided on closure of the plant in December 2014, the Belgium workers immediately set-up barricades at the factory gates, and according to Jack Ewing in yesterday's International Herald Tribune set about 'penning up 6,000 newly built Mondeo cars, S-Max minivans and Galaxy vans that had already been promised to customers – creating a traffic jam that would effectively shut down production for months – the workers were not going to make things easy for Ford.' This action forced Ford to deal with the union. Ford ultimately got a settlement in Genk but the cost was high at $750 million merely to settle with the 4,000 blue-collar workers, or just about $190,000 per worker. The cost for the white-collar workers will make it higher. Jack Ewing in the International Herald Tribune [IHT] writes: 'That cost of layoffs is substantially higher than in the United States, where Ford set aside $374 million in 2009 to cover severance costs for 2,400 workers, or about $155,000 each. Moreover, European labor law is much more favorable to unions than in the United States and tends to support workers in their tradition of militancy. In Genk, workers prevented the plant from operating normally for more than four months and received unemployment benefits for some of the time they did so.' Genk is a city of 65,000, many of them descendants of Italians, Turks or Moroccans who came decades ago to dig coal. The closure of Ford at Genk will let Ford consolidate production and mean that the next generation of production of Mondeo, the Kuga SUV, the S-Max and some other vehicles at a factory in Valencia in Spain. But justified or not, this decision has left a sense betrayal in Genk that has enraged people with the result that Mr.Dries, the mayor, was seriously anxious about violence. The IHT reports; 'Two weeks after Ford announced the closing, about 170 Belgium workers rode chartered buses to the main Ford plant in Cologne, Germany, where top management was meeting. The workers threw firecrackers and burned tire outside the factory gate. About a dozen people were arrested after they managed to break through security and into the Ford grounds in an unsuccessful effort to confront Mr. Odell.' The Belgium union officials say most of the protesters were peaceful and that 'the rowdiness was just the Belgium way of doing things'. Peter Kunnen, a lead negotiator for theACV-CSC union that represents Ford workers, said: 'A tire in Belgium – that is no problem [but] in Germany this is a big problem,' It is important to understand that if British trade unionism is to become more successful it will have to adopt other tactics that are more European. But this is too much for the rather narrow, small-minded and amatuer British left to grasp.

Blacklist Talks Lead to Walk Out

THE first talks to take place between blacklisted workers and representatives of the blacklist compensation scheme last night ended in acrimony as the delegation from the Blacklist Support Group walked out of the meeting in disgust at what they described as "piss take" proposals. The Blacklist Support Group delegation, made up exclusively of blacklisted workers, Dave Smith, Steve Kelly and Roy Bentham, met with John Taylor ex-chief executive of ACAS, Richard Slaven (partner, Pinsent Mason solicitors) and Daryl Taylor who were representing the blacklist compensation scheme. The meeting held at the offices of Pinsent Masons solicitors in the City of London ended in acrimony when the delegation of blacklisted workers walked out following blunt exchanges. Roy Bentham, blacklisted joiner from Liverpool and UCATT member said: 'These are not proposals designed for genuine negotiations. It is a piss take masquerading as a publicity stunt. We were not prepared to continue with the charade. The blacklist compensation scheme press release claims they are making this offer because of their altruistic concerns for blacklisted workers. If the firms have really turned over a new leaf, they can prove it by offering jobs to blacklisted workers on Crossrail and other major construction projects. Blacklisting breached our human rights, forced us into years of unemployment and made our families suffer financially. Why is a celebrity whose phone has been hacked, worth so much more than the human rights of a building worker? If there was any justice in the world, the directors implicated should be on their knees begging our forgiveness. We will settle for offers of employment, full compensation and a public inquiry into this squalid conspiracy. These blacklisting wretches have the brass neck to offer us a thousand pounds in compensation. They can shove their grand, right up their profit margin.' Attached pic (L-R) Steve Kelly, Dave Smith, Roy Bentham Blacklist Support Group video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlCa8yQmZ70 blog: www.hazards.org/blacklistblog facebook: http://www.facebook.com/groups/blacklistSG/

Grass Roots Left: 'For a rank & file free from interference of appointed full-time officials'

[Third] National conference in Birmingham. Saturday 9th November 2013: 12 noon to 4pm. Comfort Inn Conference room Station Street, B5 4DY. Birmingham City centre Opposite New St Station: Also only a short walk from Snow Hill & Moor St stations. This meeting is open to members of UNITE the union, their families & friends. Fellow trade unionists who are supporters the Grass Roots left initiative are also most welcome to attend. Refreshments are available from the hotel's bar on the ground floor. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unite, leverage & Grangemouth: Jerry Hicks BBC Radio 5 live 1st Nov on the Victoria Derbyshire programme: http://bbc.in/1aqxb5r http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03ffflz then "Listen Now" & wind fwd to 1hr 20mins

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Anti-Workfare Protest in Ashton-under-Lyne

TODAY some 20 protesters demonstrated outside Ashton Job Centre calling on customers to 'BOYCOTT WORKFARE'. The response of the cliants was mostly sympathetic, but the management called the police who tried to keep order in the street outside as people handed out leaflets insisting that there be 'No Work for Dole - Only Work for pay'. This action was supported by the Tameside Unemployed Workers Alliance, Tameside Trade Union Council (TUC) and the Manchester Peoples Alliance. A loud hailer was employed to castigate the staff of the job centre for supporting the 'forced labour' policy of the current government and banners were raised. The leaflet declares: 'The DWP continues to refuse to publish the names of charities and businesses where tens of thousands of unemployed people are being made to work without pay.' It seems that already Wetherspoons, Argos, Shoezone, The Red Cross, and Superdrug have dropped out of the scheme since the begining of this year. At one point a crowd of young sympathisers congregated across the street to shout their support for the protest. Because of the success of this event it is likely that the will be other such protests. Visit Boycott Workfare www.boycottworkfare.org

Monday, 4 November 2013

Scruffy Workmen in Hoodies Wreak Havoc in Lovely Hampshire Village : Bosses say: 'Industrial Strife, NOT IN MY BACKYARD!'

IS NO WHERE safe these days from those hordes of the uncouth horny-handed labourers. The miners can knock shit out of each other in our Northern towns and at Olgreave or up North in Sunderland, but now these people are invading the land of the southern swine at Lymington Town Sailing Club, or Limewood Hotel in the New Forest, or Highclere Castle in Hampshire where Downton Abbey was filmed, damn-it, this is all too much for the likes of southerners such as journalist Dominic Lawson, the brother of Nigella, in yesterday's Sunday Times, David Cameron in Parliament this week, and editor Paul Dacre's Daily Mail. These grimy-faced tribes of northern working-men have been descending on the doorsteps of managing directors and frightening the horses. It seems that this Leverage campaign by the Unite union is having a significant effect , because according to Dominic Lawson in yesterday's Sunday Times: 'that last week a manager at Grangemouth petrochemical facility in Stirlingshire – which had been besieged by the union's activists. It was during the school holidays and the director was telephoned by his wife to be told that a “mob” had appeared on their doorstep. Children in the street had apparently also been co-opted by this band of brothers “to portray me as someone evil... it had quite an impact on my kids. It is hard to find words for the lunacy of their behaviour.' Another director from the same firm Ineos has described his plight to the Daily Mail [31st, Oct. 2013} thus: 'They have send [sic] flying squads of protesters to dozens of businesses we have links with. The[y] put leaflets through the door of pretty much every house in Lyndhurst where we have our headquarters. My daughter received a poster explaining what a terrible person I am.' 'Lunacy' indeed! We know that these folk who run and write in newspapers like the Sunday Times, The Sun, and the Daily Mail, who are themselves incomers in leafy Cotswold places like Chipping Norton and Morton-in-the-Marsh don't want to have their lunches spoiled at their favourite restaurants by gangs of protesters waving banners and even in one case carrying an effigy of a giant rat. We all now know thanks to the widespread publication of the activities of some residents in the Home Counties whereby friends and neighbours of David Cameron such as Rebekah Brooks, former chief executive of News International, and Andy Coulson, former editor of the now defunct News of the World, may dwell in these leafy towns swap horses and shag each other's arses off. In The Diary of a Chambermaid, the French writer Mirabeau puts words in the mouth of Mademoiselle Célestine who draws the conclusion which the reader is also invited to draw: 'However much riffraff are vile, they are never as vile as decent people'.

Saturday, 2 November 2013

Blacklist Group To Target Laing O'Rourke

THE Blacklist Support Group is targeting Laing O'Rourke at the Cheesegrater construction project as part of the TUC Day of Action on blacklisting. Assemble 7am - Wednesday 20th November Laing O'Rourke Cheesegrater Leadenhall Street City of London (Nearest tube: Liverpool Street) One of the most high profile building sites in the UK is being targeted because Laing O'Rourke and their wholly owned electrical subsidiary Crown House are both proven subscribers to the Consulting Association blacklist. Laing O'Rourke are a defendant in the High Court claim being brought by Guney Clark & Ryan solicitors on behalf of blacklisted workers and supported by the Blacklist Support Group. Crown House was one of the major electrical contractors that attempted to cut electricians wage rates by 35% when they pulled out of the JIB national agreement during the failed BESNA fiasco in 2012. Organise transport - Bring your banners- let's make this one a major set piece in the battle against the blacklist Spread the word - splash it all over social media This is an official TUC Day of Action on blacklisting - we need to mobilise to make sure the blacklisting firms get the message. Own Up! Clean Up! Pay Up! Jobs for blacklisted workers Fully independent public inquiry No public contracts for blacklisting firms

Thursday, 31 October 2013

Supreme Court dismisses the Government’s Appeal on the “Back to Work” Regulations!

We are publishing a recent press release issued by Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) concerning the recent decision by the supreme court to dismiss the Government's appeal on the 'Back-to-Work' Regulations.


Today in a landmark decision the Supreme Court has dismissed the Government’s appeal against the Court of Appeal’s unanimous findings in February that the Regulations[1] under which most of the Government’s “Back to Work” schemes were created were unlawful and should be quashed.
The original case was brought by our clients Cait Reilly, who was made to stack shelves in Poundland for two weeks[2], and Jamie Wilson, who was stripped of his Jobseeker’s allowance for 6 months after refusing to participate in a scheme[3] which required him to work 30 hours a week for six months for free.
In an important judgment the Supreme Court held that:
  1. The Court of Appeal had been right to quash the Regulations on the basis that the Secretary of State, Iain Duncan Smith, has acted beyond the powers given to him by Parliament by failing to provide, any detail about the various “Back to Work” schemes in the Regulations. (paras
  2. On the facts of Jamie Wilson’s case he had, in any event, been provided with invalid notice under the Regulations as the DWP failed to specify the details of what he was required to do by way of participation in the Back to Work Scheme. In line with standard notices issued at that time he was merely informed that he had to do perform “any activities” requested of him by the private provider, Ingeus. (paras 43-52)
In relation to a cross-appeal brought by the Claimants, the Court found that:
  1. Although the Government does not have a duty to publish a policy about each of its Back to Work schemes, it is under a duty as a matter of fairness to provide jobseekers with enough information about the relevant scheme so that they can make informed and meaningful representations as to whether a scheme is appropriate before a decision is made. This information must, of course, be provided before any notice requiring a jobseeker to participate on a particular scheme is served. Any failure to provide adequate information is likely to invalidate any notice given making it unlawful for the DWP to require a person to participate on a scheme and impose benefits sanction if they do not participate. As a result of this finding we will be seeking the full repayment of benefits unlawfully stripped from our client Jamie Wilson. (paras 58 – 75)
  2. That the imposition of the work condition in this case does not fall within the ambit of Article 4 of the ECHR which protects the right of individuals to be free from forced labour. (paras 76-90)
The judgment of the Supreme Court has been complicated because in March 2013 the Government rushed emergency legislation - The Jobseekers (Back to Work Act) 2013 - through parliament. This Act retrospectively amended the law and effectively overturned the Court of Appeal’s judgment. The Supreme Court was moved to comment in its judgment that this placed the Government in the “rather unattractive” position of “taking up court time and public money to establish that a regulation is valid, when it has already taken up Parliamentary time to enact legislation which retrospectively validates the Regulation” (para 40).
Public Interest Lawyers have already issued judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of the retrospective legislation which we will now seek to expedite.[4]
Notwithstanding the above, the findings of the Supreme Court on the Claimants’ cross appeal were not academic. The requirement on the DWP to provide jobseekers with adequate information about the schemes has far reaching implications as all jobseekers who, like Jamie, were not provided with adequate information will able to seek the repayment of their benefits. We will also be considering carefully whether we will appeal the Court’s finding on Article 4 ECHR to the European Court of Human Rights. 
Following the judgment, Cait Reilly stated:
“I am really pleased with today’s judgment which I hope will serve to improve the current system and assist jobseekers who have been unfairly stripped of their benefits. I brought these proceedings because I knew that there was something wrong when I was stopped from doing voluntary work in a local museum and instead forced to work for Poundland for free. I have been fortunate enough to find work in a Supermarket but I know how difficult it can be. It must be time for the Government to rethink its strategy and actually do something constructive to help lift people out of unemployment and poverty.” 
Phil Shiner, head of Public Interest Lawyers said:
“Once again the Department for Work and Pension’s flagship Back to Work schemes have been found wanting. Today’s ruling from the Supreme Court is of huge constitutional and practical significance. My firm will now get on with challenging, by judicial review, the retrospective legislation which was shamefully rushed through Parliament by Iain Duncan Smith in March of this year.” 

Another View on Grangemouth from Tony Gosling

Re: Stevie Deans, as Tony I think said, the police investigation came up with nothing. However, after resigning yesturday, the police are now going through his emails that show he was using company time to do Labour Party business - though why that is a police matter seems extraordinary. So what, sackable offence to be doing something other than your actual work you are paid to do, but how is it breaking the law?

Unite are accused of messing up, but they already capitulated some days before the company announced it was closing. They called off the strike over Dean's victimisation, as they described it. The Scottish Socialist Party: 'After talks broke down at [mediation service] Acas, the company said they intended to "go over the heads of the union" straight to the workers to ask them to sign up to new contracts on worse terms by 6pm on Monday 21 October. Unite and the shop stewards called on workers to refuse to sign and over 70% of trade union members at the site supported the union's call. This indicates that pressure from the shop floor and the stewards changed the union's direction at this stage.'

I don't blame Unite here. They were powerless. What happened at Grangemouth was that the employer went on strike, and it looks like they manipulated a situation over Deans (knowing the union would hold a strike-ballot over their dialogue with him which the union intepreted as victimisation, suddenly presenting the workers with a fait-accomplie over the workers pay and conditions having walked away from ACAS mediation and planning for the cold-shot down in an orchestrated way over many months). SSP again: 'There is clear evidence that Ineos, in all likelihood in conjunction with the UK government, had been preparing for a confrontation with the union. The stockpiling and the importation of fuel to mitigate the impact of the strike and the inevitable shutdown of the plant were at an advanced stage, even before the strike was announced. This alongside an attempt to decapitate the union leadership at the plant indicated the lengths the company was prepared to go to.'

'In the run-up to the 48-hour strike Ineos announced they were going to put the plant into a prolonged "cold shutdown" rather than a short hot shutdown. In other words, a signal that they intended to keep the plant closed, effectively a lockout of the workers.'

In the run-up to the strike Ineos was claiming the plant was "in financial distress" and losing £10 million a month. SSP: 'Unite, however, asked Richard Murphy, an accountant and a campaigner against corporate tax-dodging to review Ineos' public accounts, which themselves will not tell the true story. Murphy found Ineos Chemicals Grangemouth Ltd has added one-off measures to make the accounts look bad, including a write-off in the valuation of the petrochemical plant - in other words it was worthless. The same petrochemical plant that is now described as having a bright future of at least 15 to 20 years.  Ineos which is particularly opaque and labyrinthine through the deliberate use of sub companies, including the use of off-shore tax havens to hide profits and avoid tax. Already in 2010 Ineos moved its headquarters from Britain to Switzerland to cut its tax bill.'

'Murphy found that Ineos' accounts imply that they expect to make £500 million from Grangemouth alone by 2017 and that operating profits grew by 56% last year. Murphy says that Grangemouth chemicals made £7 million profit last year and £6 million the year before.'

"Unlike any other company they decided to factor in investment as a loss", said Murphy. "They are using accounting rules I don't recognise. They are using numbers I can't find in any actual published accounts." Ineos internationally also made a profit of over £2 billion in 2012.

As part of the deal Ineos will be bailed out to the tune of £134 million in Scottish and UK government grants and loan guarantees. The company claims it needs this to ensure a £300 million investment at Grangemouth over the next few years.

The reality of a billionaire hedge-fund owner holding a whole country's fuel supply to ransom is thought-provoking in the midst of a situation where there is much talk of nationalisation of the energy market in the UK.

In terms of the workers, perhaps the worst concession Unite have agreed to in backing down has been that they have also signed away an agreement that allowed for full time union representation on site.

Another important issue is the ethics of Ineos' new business strategy for the Grangemouth plant. The new investment is to build a new gas processing factory and tankers to ship shale gas from the States, where the dash for shale-gas without environmental controls has wrought massive impacts on the water-courses and local communities' health, not-to-mention the massive effects of global warming from methane gas released into the air. If this was a nationalised plant, maybe through a campaign of public information disclosing theses facts the utilisation of this gas would not be sanctioned.

The case for nationalisation and how the UK's membership of the EU prevents that, as well as the issue of labour flexibility in the global competitive race to the bottom has been eloquently described by former national president of the RMT Alex Gordon in Tuesday's edition of the Morning Star. I don't agree with everything he says, but do about nationalisation of public utilities (and industries/sectors in national strategic interest) and leaving the EU to have to do so. Read below:

To Fight Austerity we must quit the EU, by Alex Gordon
Tuesday 29th, Morning Star
Ref:
http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/a-5d48-To-fight-austerity-we-must-quit-the-EU#.UnFtkFN8oQI

Reciting Reactionary Rhetoric

Socialist Party Scotland Cheer-leading to the Grangemouth Abyss  
 
LEN McCluskey and Unite have delivered us glorious disaster in their handling of the Grangemouth dispute last weekend.  Last Friday on Any Questions on Radio Four Bob Crow of the RMT said that this would not mean the end of trade unionism as we know it.  On the 29th, October after a long silence the Socialist Party Scotland issued a long-winded rationalisation for the delivery of a serious disaster for the British trade union movement – perhaps the most significant defeat since the collapse of the miners strike in 1985.  
 
Could it have been different?  Will this be a turning point for trade union rights?  Will Len McCluskey become another dishevelled Arthur Scargill figure in the 21st century – a tired and forlorn politics?  
 
The Grangemouth débâcle beautifully underlines the hopeless reactionary rhetoric of British trade unionism and what has come to called the left in Britain.  Practically the whole of the left in this country and particularly the British trade unions are ruled by a reactionary instinct.  Analysing the Grangemouth failure the Socialist Party Scotland declares [29th, Oct. 2013]: 
'In the absence of a fighting strategy by Unite to save the plant, including the occupation of the site and the building of a mass campaign across Scotland to demand that the Scottish/ UK governments nationalise Grangemouth, the pressure proved too great for the shop stewards to resist.'  
 
The left in Britain, as represented by the trade unions, protest movements and left parties, has long been a reactionary force in so far as it has always tended to react to an agenda set by the establishment, the government or the employers.  It does not have an agenda or serious strategy of its own.  Thus when the current coalition government enforced cuts the left because it has no plan of its own is forced to go on the defensive and fight the cuts with umpteen fragmented organisations – this Pavlovian Dog reaction by the Socialist Party resulted in the disintegration of the National Shop Stewards Network [NSSN] in 2011.  This automatic and mechanical quality of the British left stems from something special detected in some of the north European organised working class by such writers as Ignazio Silone and George Orwell:  Silone in his book 'School for Dictators' links it to 'Zumarcherien' (a marching together approach to class war) – a kind of mechanical politics of the German and British worker founded in the kind of work in big factories – Silone uses this concept of the north European worker as automaton to explain the better performance of the Spanish and Catalan workers in resisting the imposition of Fascism in 1936:  the Spaniards with their different cultural and political background rooted in the peasant and the artisan were better able to use their initiative and trade unions to challenge authoritarian regimes than those left-wing parties and trade unions with a more Prussian and Germanic mentality in north Europe.  
 
Today, the Socialist Party Scotland explanation to what went wrong at Grangemouth is to blame the Labour Party  and Ed Miliband personally: 
'This shows yet again that today Labour does not support workers in struggle and that Unite should come out clearly in favour of a new mass workers' party, public ownership and a real political alternative to the austerity agenda.'  
 
This statement is an example, yet again, of the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the British left and our national trade unions.  The Socialist Party Scotland is reassuring: 
'Socialist Party Scotland completely rejects the idea put about by the crowing capitalist media that the union has been smashed at Grangemouth.  Unite has made a big mistake in singing up to a three-year no-strike deal at Grangemouth... Against the backdrop of a no-strike agreement it is vital that Unite rebuilds its strength and its membership at Grangemouth...'  
 
This is voice of despair, the voice of the politics of the automaton of the unthinking 'mass-party man' steeped in a kind of Prussian totalitarian mind-set to which Orwell and Silone often referred.  These people have yet to learn the lessons of Arthur Scargill and the defeat of the miners in 1985:  Thatcher then had a transformation strategy then in the Ridley plan, and Scargill and the miners were fighting to defend the pits and save the status quo, essentially a conservative position which Scargill fought tactically.  Today the battle at Grangemouth was a tactical from the beginning and it was one that Unite couldn't win.  Wee must wait to see if the Socialist Party continues to back Len McCluskey in future.  Over two years ago Bob Crow the RMT leader and a political crony of the Social Party was treated to a fish and chip lunch by the Financial Times famous 'Lunch with the FT' column and he declared that the flat fish 'haliburt is good for your brains', well the British left is desparately short on brains so perhaps the Socialist Party and McCluskey should stuff themselves with haliburt in future.

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Warrington Bus Company Strike

ALONGSIDE the numerous national strikes taking place over the next few weeks by university staff, firefighters, postal workers and others, please also note the important dispute below in Warrington and attend the workers' picket lines if you can.

Unite the Union members at Network Warrington bus company are striking against a pay freeze. They have announced a further 3 days’ strike action after rejecting the ‘insulting’ offers of management. 
 
On the company board sit several leading Labour councillors, whose main action seems to be to denigrate the union and help management enforce the pay freeze! 
In contrast, suspended Labour councillor Kevin Bennett is speaking up for the workers. Kevin says:
'On Monday 28th October, at a packed meeting of over 100 employees, the latest offer was emphatically rejected by the members. A spokesperson for Unite the Union told me that 'there are untruths being put out by senior managers and board members that there were only 30 members at the meeting, this is a lie, Unite the Union and it's members are playing strictly by the rules, which is more than can be said for the senior management.' 
 
The Unite spokesperson also said that 'although the Chief Executive and the board are saying there's no money, but yet another accountant has been appointed, where are they getting the money to pay for this? 
 
Unite members have agreed to further action that will result in three consecutive days of strike action on 13th, 14th and 15th November. It has also been alleged that Ms. Slavin, who has stood in for Mr. Squires as Chief Executive of Network Warrington since his departure, has warned the board that if she is not made Chief Executive officially she will resign.
Join the picket lines on 13-15 November, at the Network Warrington depot, Wilderspool Causeway, Warrington town centre.

Charlie Pottin's Comment on the historic takeover of the NSSN

CHARLIE Pottin's comment below on the Socialist Party coup inside the National Shop Stewards Network [NSSN] in 2011, that resulted in the departure of the syndicalists and independent socialists 19th, February 2011.  It now seems that the results of this historic takeover by the Socialist Party has ultimately led to the folly of the the Grangemouth massacre of trade union rights in which the NSSN has ended up on the losing side and which may have lasting detrimental consequences for the British trade union movement:
Charlie Pottinssaid...
I don't know about all 89 who voted against the SP resolution reconvening at the pub, I was a delegate from Brent TUC and voted against (as mandated) but didn't know about the meeting afterwards so didn't attend.
Remembering how the SP walked out of the Socialist Alliance when the SWP got a majority, I found it ironic that they charged others with wanting to take their ball away when they didn't like a decision. I was also amused to hear an SP member in Unison complain that the SWP and others had backed a "Labour Party supporter" in preference to him in union elections, when exactly the same charge could be levelled at the SP members in my own union, Unite, who voted for Len McCluskey rather than Jerry Hicks. I remarked on this to Jerry when I saw him later in the meeting, I think he too had found it amusing.
Anyway, the SP's move seems to have gone as I anticipated, despite their success in mobilising an overwhelming vote majority, they are left holding a hollow victory. Instead of creating a unified anti-cuts movement under their leadership they have succeeded in splitting the National Shop Stewards Network.
It will be ironic if the SWP who were the main butts of their denunciations are the only ones to stay. And if after such fierce denunciation they can try to erect some facade of unity for the Trade Union and Socialist Coalition (assuming that's still on).
Meanwhile back on the cuts front I am sure a united movement is emerging in each locality, usually centred on trades councils and community campaigners, and from what I can see, SP members and SWPers alike are like the rest of us, being drawn into working class activity without worrying about the empire-building rivalry which pre-occupies leaders of sects.

Assassination & the British National Character

CONSIDERING the failed attempt by Guy Fawkes and his fellow Catholics to assassinate King James I, and blow up the House of Lords, puts me in mind of a dispute over 'national character' between the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein (who studied aeronautics at Manchester University) and a colleague Norman Malcolm as the war with Germany approached in 1939. 

A newspaper vendor's sign announced that the British had attempted to assassinate Hitler, and Wittgenstein commented that he would not be surprised if it were true.  Norman Malcolm demurred claiming such an act was incompatible with British 'national character', Wittgenstein reacted angrily to this 'primitive remark', and said:
'... what is the use of studying philosophy if all that it does for you is to enable you to talk with some plausibility about some abstruse questions of logic, etc., & if it does not make you more conscientious than any... journalist in the use of the DANGEROUS  phrases such people use for their own ends.'

Wittgenstein was concerned about jingoism and as he was a fan of the cinema at that time this caused him a problem because it was the custom then to play the national anthem at the end of the film, at which point the audience was expected to rise to their feet and stand respectfully still.  This was a ceremony that Wittgenstein could not abide, and he would dash out of the cinema before it could strike up.