Who Really Speaks for British Jews?

by Les May

 

THE Jewish Chronicle (JC) wants to be seen as the only authentic voice of British Jews. Yesterday (Tuesday 9 July) its website carried a piece headed ‘The Guardian's long standing and shameful tradition of promoting antisemitism denial’ with the sub-heading ‘For decades, Britain's most prominent left-wing paper has promoted those denying antisemitism on the wider left, contributing to today's toxic climate for British Jews’.

https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/the-guardian-s-latest-letter-continues-their-long-tradition-of-promoting-antisemitism-denial-1.486275

What becomes clear in reading this is that the writer’s concern is that people, including Labour people, are willing to take information about the opinions of Jewish people from sources other than the JC and the people who write for it.  In particular the writer does not like the Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL) which is dismissed as a ‘tiny minority of far-left Jews’.

And what does this ‘tiny minority of far-left Jews’ actually have to say when providing guidance about what constitutes antisemitism?

‘Free speech is legally protected. Within these legal limits political discourse can be robust and may cause offence. There is no right not to be offended. The fact that some people or groups are offended does not in itself mean that a statement is antisemitic or racist. A statement is only antisemitic if it shows prejudice, hostility or hatred against Jews as Jews.’

‘Criticising Zionism or Israel as a state does not constitute criticising Jews as individuals or as a people, and is not evidence of antisemitism.’

‘Drawing such parallels (with Nazi Germany or apartheid South Africa) can undoubtedly cause offence; but potent historical events and experiences are always key reference points in political debate.  Such comparisons are only antisemitic if they show prejudice, hostility or hatred against Jews as Jews.’

If you want to check that I am not just quoting selectively then visit the website below.  You’ll find a robust attitude to antisemitism.

https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/statement/antisemitic-misconduct/

If you actually talk to people about antisemitism in the Labour party they are baffled.   It simply is not part of their experience, they’ve not seen it, they’ve not heard it, they have no idea what all the fuss is about.  Note here that I am not saying that people who are prejudiced against Jews as Jews are not to be found in the Labour party or amongst its supporters. Such people exist in all walks of life and I doubt the Labour party is exempt.

The people who write for the Jewish Chronicle seem to think that the vast majority of voters actually care about the writer’s opinions and so will be swayed in how they vote.  I doubt that the majority of people care one little bit.   This isn’t antisemitic,  it’s just that we do not feel inclined to take these people as seriously as they take themselves. And we are not going to accept at face value the JC’s exaggerated claim of ‘a toxic climate for British Jews’.

************

Ernest Rodker on Radical Action

Commonweal Lecture 2015

VETERAN activist and cabinet-maker, Ernest Rodker, addressed the problems and opportunities for those of us who regarded ourselves as radicals in the last half of the 20^th century, last Tuesday night, at Bradford University.  It was pointed out that this Commonweal lecture was being held on the precise anniversary on the 17^th, February 1958, of a meeting of CND which ultimately resulted in Cannon Collins calling on those present to go down to Downing Street to protest against, what was then known as 'the Bomb'.   Mike 'Randle', who was introducing the talk by Ernest described how while he was outside Number 10, he saw Ernest on the ground being beaten by the police and was told to 'Shut up!', when he questioned their conduct.

Later, in 1961, Mike and Ernest renewed their friendship when they spent time in prison together.  By that time Cannon Collins, who had initiated the provocative Downing Street protest in 1958, was to oppose Bertrand Russell's proposals for civil disobedience and direct action which had led to the formation of the Committee of 100.   

Ernest used graphic images of news reports and pictures to show events and historic posters of the time by people like the poster-designer Robin Field.  This continued later when he came to deal with  the 'Stop the 70s Tour' of the South African rugby and cricket teams.  At that time sport became an issue of protest in a way it hadn't previously, except perhaps for the rare case of suffragettes before the First World War.   Despite all the challenges the Labour Government's Home Secretary, James Callaghan, assured us that 'the tour is going to go ahead!'   

The Springboks arrived in November 1969 and stayed in the Park Lane Hotel, and the tour ended following protests in February 1970.  At the time of the cricket tour John Arlott, the then famous cricket commentator, announced that he would not cover the tour, and on the 22^nd, May the tour was cancelled.

Ernest mentioned that had at the time,  had contact with Peter Hain and his family.  Peter Hain was later to write of the protests:
'I, along with many others, was outraged at their moral cowardice and hypocrisy, and helped form the Stop The Seventy Tour (STST) campaign to organise non-violent direct action protests against the tour.  These initially focused on country wide demonstrations against 25 matches of a South African rugby tour to Britain in the winter of 1969-70.  The campaign against the racism of South African sport took off with mass protests that quickly escalated to become a national and international controversy.  Eventually the pressure caused the MCC to cancel the cricket tour - by far the biggest victory the anti-apartheid movement had achieved. Australia and New Zealand soon followed suit in rugby as well as cricket, and white South Africa was expelled from the Olympics. ' 

On the 1^st, April 1990, the Poll Tax was launched by the Thatcher government, initially in Scotland, where about 1 million refused to pay the tax.  This was merely the springboard to what was to happen on its introduction in England, where ultimately a riot ensured in London as well as mass refusals to pay the tax.  The consequences of this were that Margaret Thatcher left office in 1991, and John Major proclaimed:  'The Poll Tax is un-collectable!'   

Ernest described a  local campaign to save from closure the local school of Chestnut Grove in Balham as part of a series of school closures.   This was successful, as for the most part was his part in the scheme pursued between 1971 and 1981 to convert Dormobiles into vehicles to smuggle literature and duplicators into Czechoslovakia, which functioned until they got rumbled in 1981.  Less successful was Ernest's role in the campaign against pit closures and open-cast mining, culminated in digging holes looking for coal protests on Michael Heseltine's paddock.