Showing posts with label Ashley Dearnley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ashley Dearnley. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 January 2019

Turning A Blind Eye

by Les May

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL recently published it’s global rankings on public sector transparency. In the past the UK has been in eighth position.  Now we have dropped out of the top ten most transparent nations.  This fall suggests that we should not be complacent in tackling misconduct in public life.

Larger issues such as the suspension from Parliament of Ulster MP Ian Paisley for failing to declare two jaunts paid for by the Sri Lankan government reach the national press and are quickly stamped upon.  These are not the major problem. It’s the complacency about the ‘drip, drip, drip’ of seemingly minor issues of misconduct which leads to increasing distrust of institutions, officials and politicians, and ultimately to a decline in standards in public life.

In recent years Rochdale has had two issues of complacency with regard to somewhat dodgy goings on at the ballot box.  In 2016 a ‘marked register’ went missing under mysterious circumstances in the Spotland and Falinge ward.   I use the word ‘mysterious’ deliberately because no police investigation followed what might have been deliberate theft after a council officer simply declared it ‘lost’.  Other towns take matters like this seriously.

The second was a Rochdale Councillor for the same ward who admitted improperly soliciting a postal vote and then using it to vote twice in the May 2018 local election. Both of these are serious offences.  Again the two offences were treated with complacency. Instead of looking at the seriousness of the crime, which he should have done, Labour leader Allen Brett turned a blind eye to this and chose to look only at the nature of the punishment received; an admission of guilt, a police caution and no jail sentence.

In October 2018 Tory leader Ashley Dearnley raised this matter in a full Council meeting.   Unanimously Labour voted against the Dearnley motion, which is interesting.  Now I know that not all Labour councillors were so complacent as Brett about this example of electoral fraud.  The fact that the Labour vote was unanimous suggests to me that Labour councillors were instructed to vote in a particular way.  That such things do happen can be gleaned from the comment of the ex Labour councillor for Balderstone & Kirkholt who said, ‘I was being told how to vote, being threatened ...’ after resigning from Labour and joining the LibDems.

Allen Brett may have been able to brush this piece of misconduct under the carpet and keep his disgraced councillor onside in August 2018, but it may yet end in tears for Labour.

Last May the ward I live in came close to a serious upset for Labour.  Very unexpectedly the young Tory candidate came close to beating the Labour incumbent.   If he decides to stand again this year and chooses to make an issue of Allen Brett’s obvious willingness to support a Councillor who admitted electoral fraud who knows what might happen? 

******** 

Tuesday, 25 December 2018

ROCHDALE-GATE: CITY OF SHAME!


CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO SEE VIDEO OF FULL COUNCIL
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFFKrkQaKqw&feature=youtu.be
To see The Rochdalian more clearly left click on image

Councillor Ashley Dearnley:  ‘Mr. Mayor, I take no pleasure… in Rochdale being reported in the Rotten Boroughs section of “Private Eye”.’


Northern Voices editorial comment:

CARL Faulkner by creating this YOU TUBE video has accomplished a magnificent work of art, which penetrates to the roots of Rochdale's sad political panorama in all its sordid reality.  It may well even be a microcosm that represents a wider crisis in our culture; that a civil administration like Rochdale town council clasps a self-confessed electorial fraudster like Faisal Rana to its breast is itself an assault on common decency.

The motion proposed by the Tory leader, Ashley Dearnley in the video was a strikingly meek and humble presentation urging Faisal Rana merely to 'consider his postion', having admitted his fraud.  But if the Tories are meek, then the failure of the Liberal Democrats, to utter a dicky bird on the night of the vote was pathetic.

The situation in Rochdale has not been helped by the craven nature of the local press of late.  None of the local media is holding our representatives on the council to account.  The Rochdale Observer is a tired shell of its former self that rarely features a letter's page, and ROCHDALE ONLINE has not only abandoned its letter's section but has now shoved its whole letter's archive down the Orwellian Memory Hole forever.

Thus it has now been left to this regional Blog and Carl Faulkner, a local independent investigator and a relentless critic of the Rochdalian polluted political culture, to throw this scandal into relief.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFFKrkQaKqw&feature=youtu.be

********


Thursday, 25 October 2018

Rochdale's Futile Politics & Grandstanding!

by Brian Bamford
DURING a meeting of Rochdale Council four years ago on Wednesday the 15th, October 2014, the Tory leader Ashley Dearnley moved an amendment to a Labour motion on Gaza calling for Israel and Hamas to negotiate a permanent ceasefire and as expected the his amendment failed.  Councillor Dearnley described such motions on foreign policy as 'futile' and 'merely grandstanding'.

Last Wednesday, Councillor Dearnley had no trouble supporting an equally futile Labour motion to strip the former councillor Cyril Smith of the Freedom of the Borough of Rochdale.  Last week, it was grandstanding galore as almost every tin-pot politician in town dived-in to join the virtue signaling demonisation of Smith..  
 
Tony Lloyd MP for Rochdale commented on Revolution News that Hopefully this does send out a strong signal, even though very, very late on, that they were wronged, they were and have become survivors of what made them victims and I hope it does give them some recognition that society is on their side and not on the side of those who committed crime.'
Meanwhile, Allen Brett the Labour leader of Rochdale Council moving the motion to strip Cyril Smith of his honour, and other Labour councillors, happily sat alongside a now notorious vote-rigger, Faisal Rana, who has failed to stand down following a police caution for his crimes.

When Cyril Smith was first named by the community newspaper Rochdale Alternative Paper (RAP) in May 1979, Private Eye (11th May 1979) was later to report:
'There is not an important newspaper or TV station on the land that has not received a copy of the May issue of the Rochdale Alternative Paper (RAP), one of the few community newspapers to have flourished in recent years.  The centre page article, entitled ‘Strange Case’, describes some unusual behaviour on the part of Cyril Smith, Rochdale’s newly-returned Liberal MP.  The allegations are substantiated by a number of sworn statements and carefully recorded interviews, but they have so far not been published anywhere else.'

Then on the 18th, March 2015 in The Guardian, the former co-editor of RAP, John Walker, wrote:
'The political honours scrutiny committee drew Margaret Thatcher’s attention to the Smith files in 1988, prior to her agreeing to a knighthood for him.  She could have intervened, but chose to honour him – a further insult to his victims.
'Rochdale council made Smith a freeman of the borough, named a room in the town hall after him and, in a ceremony attended by the current MP Simon Danczuk, put up a blue plaque in his honour – now taken down, apparently to prevent vandalism.  More rubbing the noses of many victims in their misery, on their home patch.'

It's funny how so many politicians like Brett, Lloyd and the rest of their hangers-on have change their tune after so many decades.

And the same week that members of the Huddersfield grooming gang were sentenced, the experience of endured as a consequence of Agenda Item 14 in the Rochdale Council document relating to 'Freedom of the Borough-the late Cyril Smith', must have felt to the supporters of Parents Against Grooming (PAG) present in Rochdale Town Hall like once bitten twice shy.
**********

FOR MORE ON ROCHDALE FULL COUNCIL MEETING SEE VIDEO BY

Streamed live on 17 Oct 2018
https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=CPOKwjhnh5k&u...

Wednesday, 17 October 2018

Rochdale Council Stands By Voting Fraud

Will We Never Learn? 
by Brian Bamford 
 
Faisal Rana (second right) a Master of Multiple Vote etc.

SHRUGGING-off a Tory motion tonight in which the mover quoted the inclusion of Rochdale in the Rotten Borough's column of Private Eye, Rochdale's Labour Council rejected the appeal of Tory leader Councillor Ashley Dearnley, in which he complained about 'the recent acceptance of a police caution relating to an electoral offence, and the consequential damage caused to public confidence in local democracy...'
Rochdale's Labour Leader Councillor Allen Brett, fresh back from his trip cementing relations with the Feudal Pakistani regime, said that while he was 'disappointed' in Councillor Rana's 'mistake' in multiple voting, when it was discovered he'd voted twice.  Since then both the Councillor, and the Council itself had co-operated fully with the police.   Now, it seems, he has been sufficiently punished by having to accept a caution from the police.

At the time of writing it is still not clear what precise type of caution has been accepted by Councillor Rana, and the police have yet to be forthcoming on this.

Meanwhile on the 10th, September, Martha Robinson Complaints Administrator of the Labour Party wrote to a local lad Carl Faulkner, saying that it was not a matter for her and concluding  'I would suggest that it is unlikely that the council will be taking any further action in regards to this matter, as it appears to have been investigated and resolved in full....'
Tonight her prediction of the smooth resolution of this matter was fully confirmed in the Rochdale Council Chamber by the members present.  
Whether the people of Rochdale will continue to have confidence in democracy as a result of this unsavoury business is unclear.  One thing is certain is that the activities that the now Councillor Faisal Rana committed prior to his election struck at the heart of British democracy.

This looks like another attempt by the Rochdale Council to sweep the political dirt under the carpet.  More so since another item on the agenda (Agenda Item 14) was  entitled 'Freedovm of the Borough Review - the late Cyril Smith'.   Curiously, one of the Key Points for Consideration in this Review is that 'there was considerable local disquiet about the way in which Cyril Smith behaved towards children and young people at Cambridge House and elsewhare'.   
But the existence of this ongoing public disquiet was a direct consequence of the tendency of the authorities in Rochdale, including the Labour Party, to look the other way and ignore the allegations of what was going on at Cambridge House and perhaps elsewhere.  Judging by what happened tonight over their attitude to the multiple voting of Faisal Rana it would seem that they haven't learnt their lessons from that folly.

***********

Saturday, 13 October 2018

Rochdale Tory motion mocks multiple voting


A Correction!

by Les May

IN my article ‘A Breach of Trust!’ I said that the silence of the Rochdale Conservative opposition was effectively condoning the behaviour of Labour Councillor Faisal Rana who as we now all know actively solicited, and made use of two ballot papers in the May elections.


This was unfair.  After this offence came to light Tory Councillor Ashley Dearnley arranged for a motion to appear on the agenda of the Council meeting to be held on Wednesday 17 October.

The motion to be moved by Councillor Dearnley and seconded by Councillor Holly reads as follows:
The Communities of Rochdale deserve to have confidence in our democratic processes.  In light of his recent acceptance of a police caution relating to an electoral offence, and the consequential damage caused to public confidence in local democracy, this Council calls upon Councillor Faisal Rana to consider his position as an elected member of this authority.’

Lib Dem Councillor Andy Kelly has informed me that after the offence came to light he too wrote to the Chief Executive about this matter.

***********

Thursday, 14 December 2017

No Double Yellow Lines for Rochdale Blacklist Co.

AT LAST night's full council meeting of Rochdale MBC held in the Gothic revival Town Hall, Tory Councillor Pat Sullivan tabled a question about problems encountered by the contractor maintaining the highways in Rochdale.  Councillor Sullivan's quiery was:
'Recently contractors [Balfour Beatty] were putting yellow lines down and were unable to complete the job as two cars were parked.  Should the contractor not put notes out the night before in order to make sure that the work can be completed?'

Even Councillor Ashley Dearnley, Leader of Conservative Group and Shadow Portfolio Holder for Regeneration, got involved.  These construction companies are not always competent themselves, the building firm Carillion which has a partnership with Tameside MBC once claimed it couldn't repair the leaking roof of Ashton Library because it didn't have a long enough ladder at its disposal.

In March 2015, Rochdale Council took out a Highways Maintenance Contract with Balfour Beatty until 2020.

The works Balfour Beatty will do includes jobs for the repair and minor improvement work to the Council's highways infrastructure, including it seems double yellow lines.

What was not mentioned at last night's Council meeting was that the Rochdale Council has a contract with a firm labelled a blacklister by the Information Commissioner's Office [ICO].

The ICO website states:
'During 2008/09 the ICO carried out an investigation into employment blacklisting in the construction industry.  As part of that investigation, the ICO seized information from a company called The Consulting Association.  Some of the information we seized amounted to a 'blacklist' of individuals who were considered to pose a risk to their employers if employed within the construction industry.'

No doubt Labour Councillor Allen Brett, the newly crowned leader of Rochdale Council (not to mention his predecessor Richard Farnell) has forgotten what one of their earlier predecessor Colin Lambert said in 2013:  'Rochdale MBC wanted no truck with companies who blacklist workers and trade unionists'.

Ofcourse, it was Colin Lambert's friend, the deceased Labour MP, Jim Dobbin, who in 2012 sponsored the early day motion:
'That this House is aware of the campaign led principally by the trades unions, the GMB, UNITE, UCATT and others for justice for blacklisted workers, many of whose lives have been ruined by the secretive and malicious practice which has denied them employment in their industry without them having either the knowledge or privilege of being able to see or challenge information listed against them; believes such practices to be fundamentally wrong and against the very principles of freedom and democracy; and calls on the Government to condemn such behaviour and consider introducing new legislation to prohibit such practices.'

These days with Rochdale Council still under the control of Farmell's Labour Party cronies like Councillor Brett, companies such as Balfour Beatty with a history of blacklisting trade unionists are now on easy street being awarded fat public contracts by uncaring Labour councils like Rochdale MBC.


Friday, 17 March 2017

Electoral Fraud & the Doubting Thomas's at NV!

Hello Brian,

I have looked at the Milkstone and Deeplish result from 2015 and to be honest I don't agree with you. There are plenty of local wards up and down the UK which are so strong for one party that they frequently poll over three quarters of the total vote.
I would refer you to the work of Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher, who are both professors of Politics at Plymouth University who have been compiling and analysing local election results for over 30 years. In their studies you will see that there are in fact wards in Britain where the winning party gets over 80 percent of the vote and in some cases over 90 percent.
Indeed, in our own borough I refer you to the result in West Middleton ward in 2012, where my comrade Lil Murphy was re-elected. She polled 82.2 percent of the vote in that election which is higher than the 77.7 percent in Milkstone and Deeplish just 3 short years later. Now I do know you were writing articles for Northern Voices back in 2012, so why did you not presume there was something wrong with that result?
In that same year my comrade Billy Sheerin won Castleton with 75.1 percent of the vote, may I ask why you didn't see fit to question that result?
In 2008, Councillor Ashley Dearnley held Wardle and West Littleborough for the Tories with 80.4 percent of the vote, yet you didn't cast aspersions on that result.
Indeed only last May in 2016 my comrade Liam O'Rourke won North Heywood with almost 72 percent of the votes cast, why do you not question that result?
So as you can see there are plenty of examples in this day and age of candidates polling well into the 70 and 80 percent zone, yet for some reason you choose to single out the good people of Milkstone and Deeplish ward. What is so different about Milkstone and Deeplish ward that for some reason you question the result there while you don't question the other examples I have provided you with?

Yours sincerely 

Neil Emmott 

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

£900,000 more to find says Rochdale ONLINE

The local website ROCHDALE ONLINE estimates that the new councillor's
allowances voted through by Labour and the Conservatives will cost near
an additional £900,000:
The massive increase in councillors' allowances - voted for by councillors at last week's full council meeting - means the total cost of the allowances paid to councillors will rise to just under £900,000, an additional £172,600 per year.
The basic allowance (BA) for each of the 60 councillors will be £10,451 (a 34% increase).
However, the basic allowance increase has a cascading effect on many other 'extra' allowances, known as a special responsibility allowances (SRA) - these are paid on top of the basic allowance.
Half of all councillors receive a special responsibility allowance.
The SRA of council leader Richard Farnell is calculated as three times the basic allowance. The others are calculated as a percentage of the leader's SRA.
The massive rise in the basic allowance gave the leader an additional rise in SRA, which in turn gave the other councillors in receipt of a special responsiblility allowance an additional rise*.
For example, the Leader of the Opposition Conservative Party, Ashley Dearnley, will now receive a basic allowance of £10,451 plus an SRA of £10,974, a total of £21,425 (previously BA of £7,812 + SRA of £9,372 = £17,184).

Friday, 16 December 2016

Council Chamber Jibe: 'Jobs for the Comrades'


DEMONSTRATORS outside Rochdale Town Hall at the full council meeting of Rochdale MBC were chanting '34% and we can't pay the rent!' last Wednesday night.  It was the reaction of the unions and UKIP supporters to the proposed rise in stipend allowances for councillors on Rochdale Metropolitan Council. 

Inside, Councillor Andy Kelly accused Richard Farnell, the leader of Rochdale's Labour Council for giving jobs to the comrades by paying a stipend to assistant portfolio holders as well as Cabinet members. 

These days the 'comrades' seems to include Ashley Dearnley and his little tribe of Tories because they joined with Labour to vote for the increase.  It was noticeable that some Labour councillors stayed away and gave their apologies last Wednesday. 

In the end only the two Liberal Democrat councillors, Councillors Andy Kelly and Irene Davidson, voted against the increase.  It was suggested that the proposal to increase allowances was brought forward now because next year there will not be elections for the council, and it is hoped by Labour that by the time of the next elections the public will have forgot what happened last Wednesday.

Friday, 29 July 2016

The Hegemony of Horrible Hugs:


Dearnley & Danczuk!
By Brian Bamford




The Deadly Embrace of Dearnley (left) & Danczuk (right) 
AT LAST night's full Council meeting in Rochdale's Gothic Style Town Hall (which was described by Councillor Andy Kelly, the Liberal leader, as resembling 'an Oscars Ceremony'); the Labour council leader Richard Farnell waddled across the Chamber reminding me of an earlier figure who dominated the politics of Rochdale.  That is the now disgraced former politician Cyril Smith!  With his droll humour Farnell began to annunciate the history and meaning of the office of Alderman, before some past dignitaries were awarded the honorary office by the Mayor of Rochdale.  Farnell's address was seconded by the leader of the Conservative group Ashley Dearnley (pictured above with another 'disgraced Rochdale politician' Simon Danczuk).
Councillor Dearley lives at Ashley Dearnley Court, New Road, Dearnley, Littleborough.   What has been clear in recent times is the remarkable hegemony of power politics in Rochdale, particularly between the local Labour Party and the Tories.  The deadly embrace of the two blue-suited politicians in the photo above is not curious for the fact that the now suspended Rochdale Labour MP, Simon Danczuk, has is right arm around Ashley Dearnley's shoulders but it is anthropologically strange because Ashley Dearnley appears to be welcoming the embrace.
Few politicians, given Mr Danczuk's recent record of both a political and personal nature, would cheerfully have Simon Danczuk anywhere near their person.  It would certainly give me the creeps! 
And yet, both the politicians above clearly know that they are being photographed alongside the Tory Party Banner and seem to be enjoying the experience.  Indeed, at last night's council meeting Councillor Dearnley referred to Simon Danczuk as 'our independent MP for Rochdale' in almost glowing terms.
What is going on?
Well, there is no evidence that Danczuk would be embraced by the Tory Party if he attempted to join as some have suggested.  To suggest that Danczuk is a loose cannon would be an understatement. 
The critic, Malcolm Muggeridge, once suggested that all Prime Ministers fall into one of two categories – clergymen or bookies.  It is clear that Simon Danczuk would not pass muster as a clergyman; more like a bookies-runner!
My observations suggest that in some of our northern towns that the Councils are made up of self-serving gangs of politicians who establish one-party-states.  Tameside has been sited as one example of this.  Rochdale may well be becoming another.  The game of playing footsie seems to prevail between various political groups.  It is noticeable that Farnell is patronising when dealing with the Liberal Dem. leader, Andy Kelly, but respectful when he addresses the Tory leader, Dearnley.
What we have here is a kind of political and cultural Hegemony in which, as at the end of George Orwell's book 'Animal Farm', it becomes difficult to distinguish between the Pigs and the Men; if that is not a sexist observation, perhaps I should add 'women'.





Friday, 21 August 2015

Rochdale Mental Health Campaign Open Letter

Dear Northern Voices,

We would be extremely grateful if you could help syndicate our open Mental Health Campaign Group Letter to local Rochdale politicians in the hope we can maximize publicity on this vital local issue to our service users and the wider mental health community in and around Rochdale , Heywood and Middleton ?

To date only Mark Holinrake has replied and pledged his support.


Further wider syndication and media coverage would be a real boost to our campaign objectives,. Thank you.

Yours in solidarity,

Andrew  (Wastling).


OPEN LETTER: To
Simon Danczuk  MP , Liz Mc Innes MP ,
Councillor Richard Farnell , Head of Rochdale Labour Group ,
Councillor Andrew Kelly , Head of Rochdale Liberal Democrat Group
Mark Hollinrake Rochdale and Oldham Green Group
Councillor Ashley Dearnley Leader of Rochdale Conservative Group

_____________________________________________________________

RBUF
Rochdale Borough Users Forum
142 Drake Street
Rochdale
OL16 1PU
 

Simon Danczuk  MP , Liz Mc Innes MP ,
Councillor Richard Farnell , Head of Rochdale Labour Group ,
Councillor Andrew Kelly , Head of Rochdale Liberal Democrat Group
Mark Hollinrake Rochdale and Oldham Green Group
Councillor Ashley Dearnley Leader of Rochdale Conservative Group
 
Dear Elected Representative [s],
 
Could we the undersigned please take this opportunity to thank you for the excellent ongoing support you have given to people with mental health issues in the past.
 
Today we would like to draw your attention, if we may, to two pressing issues relating to people with mental health issues in Rochdale, Middleton & Heywood in the hope that you can all pledge your continued support to members of our mental health Service Users community, many of whom face great distress and anxiety over some elements of the governments Welfare Reform process.
 
Foremost in our minds is our growing concern that the proposed £31 MILLION pounds in cuts to Public Services at Rochdale Council which will without doubt impact disproportionately on vulnerable people with mental health issues, as well as many others within the wider community, that such cuts will have a massive direct impact upon.
 
Secondly we are deeply concerned that 100 people days [1] with mental health problems are having their Welfare benefits” sanctioned “– stopped for periods of time - by the Department of Work & Pensions [DWP].These sanctions have a massive impact on people already struggling with periods of unemployment. But as I am sure you will all be very aware the impact on people already struggling with mental health issues can be catastrophic.
 
We’d like to draw your attention to latest report from New Economy that records the latest DWP sanctions figures made available for the period 22 October until the 31 December 2013. These statistics lists Rochdale Job Centre, Fleece Street as having the third highest rate for sanctioning benefit claimants in the whole of Greater Manchester. Of the 4,078 people being sanctioned at Rochdale Job Centre 40% were sanctioned without being told why these sanctioned were imposed by Claimant Advisers.
 
Locally the figures break down at:
 
Rochdale Job Centre Plus, Fleece Street - 4,078
 
Middleton Jobcentre Plus - 1,484
 
Heywood Job Centre Plus, Taylor Street – 972
 
A total of 6534 in all. Across the Greater Manchester, the Manchester East & West area had 24,072 “adverse” sanctions. Of these the majority by far were in the 18-24 year age group totalling 246, 592 individuals. With 91,603 in the 25-29 year old age group.
 
Most worryingly across the whole of the United Kingdom there were 49,827 disabled people who were sanctioned by the DWP.
 
We are also firmly of the belief that:
 
“Sanctioning someone with a mental health problem for being late for a meeting is like sanctioning someone with a broken leg for limping [2] as well as being deeply worried at the latest DWP proposals to class Sanctioned Jobseekers with mental health issues as NOT vulnerable unless they have an accompanying physical health problem, as described in Welfare Weekly, “Sanctioned Job Seekers with Mental Health Problems are not “vulnerable” says DWP” – Weekly Welfare, 06. VIII, 2015– please see link at: http://www.welfareweekly.com/sanctioned-jobseekers-with-mental-health-problems-are-not-vulnerable-says-dwp/ [3].
 
Currently people suffering the most severe mental illnesses are likely to receive Employment and Support Allowance [ESA] and it is estimated that 23% of JSA claimants have a mental health condition.
 
Could we urge you to make public representations on our behalf to Rochdale Council to express our profound concerns at the proposed levels of cuts to services as well as to please ask the Department of Works & Pensions directly what guidelines they have in place to safeguard claimants with mental health issues, and the exact definition they use to identify those local claimants with mental health issues.
 
Your help with this would be very much appreciated by all of us. We would also very much welcome the opportunity to send a delegation of our newly relaunched Mental Health Campaign Group members  to meet with you personally at your earliest convenience that suits you to discuss these serious issues of concern to us. Thank you.
 
Yours faithfully
 
RACHEL GINNELLY   - CEO, Rochdale Borough Users Forum Chief Executive Office

MICK AYRTON -   Voice Programme Coordinator

RYAN COWAN Chair, RBUF Board of Trustees

MIKE JONES - Vice Chair RBUF Board of Trustees

DANIEL - RBUF Technical Assistant
NISBA - Project Assistant for RBUF
ALAN TICE - RBUF Member

STEVE TOMLINSON – RBUF Office Volunteer

PETER WILDMAN – RBUF Mental Health Trainer / RBUF Rep

SARAH HARPER – RBUF Office Volunteer

Larissa Marshall – RBUF Service User

ANDREW WASTLING - Chair, Mental Health Campaigns Group

YASMIN KENYON - RBUF Housing & Homeless Rep

PETER WILDMAN – RBUF Mental Health Trainer / RBUF Rep

RASHIDA JORDAN - RBUF Service User / Volunteer

DONNA HOMES - RBUF Service User / Blue Pits Band

RICHARD OUTRAM – Policy & Research Adviser Liberal Democrat Group

DR. JAMES MC CREADY – OL12 9RZ

VAL PUSLOW - OL10 4SG

MARK HOLDEN - OL11 1JZ

NATASHA KIRBY – Rochdale Solutions – OL16

KATHTYN RENNIE -Rochdale Possibilities

AZFAR MAHMOOD- OL11 1FW

NICK ROGERS – M5 4LW

TONY GILL – OL16 5QJ

MIKE MOORES – OL16 3DN

MICHELLE CLEGG – OL11 2AW

BILL JACOBS – M24 2UU

SUSAN TURNER – REAG/ Cornerstone – OL2 7PY

JOHN CALLAGHAN – RBUF Service User

APPENDIX:
 

[1]. “More than 100 mentally ill people a day have their benefits sanctioned “, The Independent – please see link at:

 
 
[3]. “Sanctioned Job Seekers with Mental Health Problems are not “vulnerable” says DWP” – Weekly Welfare, August VIII, 2015 – please see link at: http://www.welfareweekly.com/sanctioned-jobseekers-with-mental-health-problems-are-not-vulnerable-says-dwp/