Showing posts with label Benefit Cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benefit Cuts. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 April 2019

Benefits For Older People Under Attack!

Hard-hitting report demands end to winter fuel payments, free TV licences and bus passes » Government should abandon triple-lock that guarantees pension increases, says Lords committee » Age UK agrees more should be done to help young people – 




Lords committee report says it is time to cut back dramatically on free bus passes and winter fuel payments for elderly people.

A call for pensioners’ benefits – including free TV licences, bus passes and winter fuel payments – to be scrapped or scaled back has been made by a parliamentary committee.

Ministers have been urged to tilt the balance between the generations back towards younger groups because the spending power of retired people has now overtaken many workers in their twenties and thirties.

Help should be stepped up for younger people in the jobs and housing markets, the Lords Committee on Inter-generational Fairness and Provision also argued in a report published today. The peers said that age-based benefits and allowances had been justified to tackle pensioner poverty, but that the time had come to cut them back dramatically.

They said the free TV licences for all over-75s should be phased out, with the Government left to decide whether to subsidise them against a broader measure of household income. Free bus passes and winter fuel payments – currently £200 for under-80s and £300 for over-80s – should become available five years after a claimant reaches pension age, they added.

Their report called for an end to the so-called “triple lock”, which guarantees the state pension rises by the highest of inflation, wage growth or 2.5 per cent. It should be replaced with annual increases to pensions in line with average earnings, the peers argued, while better-off workers over pension age should continue to make national insurance contributions if they are still working.

The committee chairman, Lord True, said benefits needed to be re-balanced towards the young to prepare the country for 100-year lifespans.

We are calling for some of the outdated benefits based purely on age to be removed,” he said. 

Policies such as the state pension triple lock and free TV licences for over-75s were justified when pensioner households were at the bottom of the income scale, but that is no longer the case.”

Ministers were condemned in the peers’ report for doing too little to ease the shortage of affordable homes for young people to buy and rent.

The Government was urged to give councils greater freedom to build homes and to tailor policies to meet the housing needs of younger adults.
Peers also argued that ministers should boost funding for further educational and vocational training.

Friday, 8 March 2019

Tameside Council security tell Tameside Councillors to move on!


A SMALL group of protesters who meet each week to give out free food parcels and benefit advice to the unemployed and homeless, outside Ashton-under-Lyne Jobcentre, were told to move on yesterday by the local police and Tameside Council security personnel, after they arrived outside the new Tameside One building, in Market Place, Ashton.  The building now accommodates Ashton library, Tameside Council's Customer Services, Citizens Advice, Cash Box Credit Union and Jobcentre Plus.

Among those who were told to move on by burly Tameside security staff, were two Tameside Councillors and Cabinet members - Oliver Ryan, Executive Member (Children Services) and Leanne Feeley, Executive Member (Lifelong Learning).  A former Tameside Mayor, Michael Ballagher, was also among the group as was Nigel Morgan, Chief Executive Officer, Tameside Citizens Advice Bureau.

Charlotte Hughes, a single parent from Ashton-under-Lyne, who leads the group 'Tameside Against The Cuts', later wrote on her blog:


'We arrived as normal at 10am outside the new Jobcentre.  It was pouring down with rain which didn’t help things either.
'The minute that we arrived the police arrived, they must have been waiting for us. At first they were quite happy for us to stand outside the Jobcentre in the plaza area because it had been deemed a public place, however a member of the local authority decided differently.  We were told that we had to stand in the area near the steps downstairs...  Of course that the Jobcentre don’t want us there so they’ve probably had words with someone, you know how these things go.  Despite this’ll we will be back outside the Jobcentre next week.
'We help people, hand food parcels out and support people…  All things that the DWP should do.  Whilst we were there local councillors who were standing with us weren’t impressed with us being moved.  Believe me we will be back.'
Ms Hughes also believes that some disabled people may have difficulty accessing the Jobcentre because of the stairs both in and outside the building and the small lift that some people might be unable to use because of its restricted space.  She was also critical of the lack of signs in the building indicating where to locate services and the lack of privacy in the library.  Apparently, one member of the public complained to her that DWP staff were seen "milling round the library and looking at what people were doing."

Although Labour have been in power in Tameside for the last forty years, the borough has one of the worst records for food poverty in the North West.  It looks like Tameside Council might live to regret having invited Jobcentre Plus into their new administrative centre. 

***************

Thursday, 30 March 2017

Rochdale Unite's Job Centre Protest!

Brian Bamford - NV Joint-Editor (far-right)
 

FROM 9am this morning until lunch-time, the Rochdale Unite Community Branch set up a stall across the road from Rochdale Jobcentre, and issued leaflets protesting against unfair benefit cuts. 
Besides members of the local branch the secretary of the Greater Manchester County Association and another colleague were in evidence, and a delegate from Tameside Trade Union Council came over to offer support.
While I was there several claimants endorsed the campaign and were advised by the activists on the stall.
This was a national day of action against unfair benefit cuts, and Unite the Union issued the statement below:

Thursday 30 March 2017
National Day of Action Against Sanctions
JOIN US
 
More and more people are facing benefit sanctions. 300,000 people have had their benefits suddenly stopped by sanctions in the last 12 months.

Many of whom have been plunged into poverty, unable to heat their homes or even eat. How is this meant to help prepare people for work?
 
Benefit sanctions must be fought against


These sanctions are cruel and handed out for ridiculous reasons such as:
  • Arriving minutes late to a meeting 
  • Not applying for jobs when waiting to start a new job!
  • Missing an appointment on the day of the funeral of a close family member.
- See more at: http://www.unitetheunion.org/growing-our-union/communitymembership/day-of-action-against-sanctions/#sthash.jpQGFLNQ.dpuf

Thursday, 10 September 2015

Man Arrested At Ashton Jobcentre Following Suicide Threat !



We have received reports that yesterday (Wednesday 9/9/15), a man walked into Ashton-under-Lyne, Jobcentre, at approximately 4.00 pm in the afternoon and was seen to pour a liquid over his head and threaten to set himself alight. We understand that the incident may have been linked to the man having had his benefits previously sanctioned by staff at the Jobcentre. Witnesses report that the building was immediately evacuated and the emergency services summoned, including the ambulance and fire services.

Today, at around 2.15 pm, police officers arrested a further man (see above picture) inside Ashton Jobcentre. When asked about the circumstances of the arrest, a police officer, politely declined to comment.

Wednesday, 1 July 2015

TORIES ACCUSED OF FUDGING FIGURES ON BENEFIT DEATHS!

"The Tories are trying to 'fudge' figures on welfare cuts deaths in a shock dossier which claims they're too 'emotive', Mirror Online can reveal.
Iain Duncan Smith's department is waging a legal fight against a request for the figures, claiming it'll reveal them in its own time."
For more on this story click on Mirror Online:

Thursday, 14 May 2015

"FIVE MORE YEARS OF TYRANNY!"

Charlotte Hughes stood for the  Green Party as their Parliamentary candidate for the seat of Ashton-under-Lyne, in the May 2015 General Election. A local community campaigner and social activist, Charlotte runs a blog called 'The Poor Side of  Life'. The following article which we are publishing in full, is taken from her blog:




"Shocked could be a word that I could use, but I won’t. Thatcher got voted in for a second and third term in Parliament despite much opposition. So then the Tory party got re elected it wasn’t so much of a shock, it felt like something had died in our country. Yes the Tories have regained their power and will no doubt use this power, unopposed by anyone to inflict the worst damage that has ever been known to the poorest in society. 

I was interviewed by a local paper whilst at the election count and the reporter said to me “How would you feel if the conservatives won the election?” I said that I would feel sick, I would cry. I would not be crying for myself  I would be crying for the people of this country. A country that will be systematicically destroyed and taken apart by the Tory party for the benefit of the rich. I don’t use the name that the Tory party have rebranded themselves with. The very name conservative does not suit them. The definition of the word conservative is to not like change, to be quiet. Well they are going to do exactly the opposite. We know this. They plan to dismantle this country as we know it bit by bit, piece by piece. Every single safety net that we have relied on will soon be gone. If it doesn’t benefit the rich then it will no longer exist. Make no mistake they don’t care for anyone who isn’t one of them.

My first experience of the Tory party began when Mrs thatcher came into power. Even as a child I knew that this would be bad. For the first time in my life I felt what it was like to be poor. We had holes in our shoes, filled by cardboard and had no money for anything other than to exist. If it wasn’t for my grandparents we wouldn’t have had new clothes. My father was an engineer, a trade he didn’t really like but it was a job and we depended on it. Back then we had local industry, and we depended on that industry. I was told that the Tory party were bad, they only looked out for themselves and he was right. As a result there was strikes, but as a child I knew that what they were fighting for was right. I remember arguing with my parents about this. But I always had this belief that we must stand up for what is right.

So what now? Do the people who have voted in this government again realise exactly what they have voted for? I doubt that they do. Many I suspect have read and believed the mainstream news and voted as a result of the innacurate stories in the newspapers. Here’s a list of what will most likely happen, now there is no one to stand in their way.

The snoopers charter will be passed. Say goodbye to your privacy.
The NHS will be sold. There is opposition to this and Caroline Lucas is the head of this opposition. I hope that she gets enough backing to prevent the sale of our precious NHS.
TTIP will happen. This will have vast implications on our country as a whole.
Zero hour contracts will increase. More likely they will become the norm.
The benfit sanctioning regime will become worse, if it possibly can.
Homelessness will increase massively.
No social housing will be built. 
The human rights act will be scrapped.
Climate change investments will be slashed.
The BBC TV license will be scrapped and a subscription based service introduced.
Employment regulations will be slashed, they will merge regulators and cut costs.
The Tory party want to reduce seats in parliament to 600 from 650. This will be pushed through as a priority, making it difficult for another party to get into power in 2020.
There will be a referendum in Europe.
Fracking plans will go ahead. 

Cameron’s majority is wafer thin and he now only has a majority of 10 very rebellious back benchers to whip. Maybe this will work in our favour….
What can we do now? 

All anti austerity parties need to now join together in solidarity. We need to put aside any differences and work together. By doing this we will form a very powerful opposition indeed. We didn’t quite get it right before the election but we can do now. And the Labour Party needs to become the left wing party that it used to be. They will gain more support if they stop cosying up to austerity ideas and plans. They need to start saying no. By supporting all people again not just working people. We also need to look at the SNP and learn from them. They started as a small minority party but have grown massively. 

We can survive this, and we will by joining together. If you work join a union, if you don’t join unite in the community. The Tory party will try and attack the unions as much as possible now. And whilst they haven’t acted as strongly as they should have done in the past I feel that they will start to act more strongly now. There’s strength in numbers and we need to remember that. 

Always remember that a compliant society is easy to control, a non compliant society isn’t easy to control. So let’s not make this easy for them. "






Thursday, 12 March 2015

"Pregnant, sanctioned and hungry": Ashton Jobcentre slated for abominable behaviour!

The weekly protests outside  Ashton Jobcentre have now been taking place for over seven months.
They began last August, when  19-year-old Eleanor Coulthard, from Ashton-under-Lyne, was sanctioned for a third time, after telling an employer that she was 23-weeks pregnant. Previously, she had been sanctioned when the jobcentre said that she was not doing enought to find work. Although Eleanor had only been claiming Jobseeker's Allowance for 3 months, she was sanctioned for a third time after the Jobcentre told her that she shouldn't have mentioned her pregnancy during an interview for an unpaid work placement, with  B&Q at the Snipe Retail Park in Ashton-under-Lyne.

The government deny that they have national targets for sanctions. Government employment minister, zero-hours champion, Esther McVey, recently told a parliamentary select committee: "there are no sanction targets, there is no harassment." Yet the PCS union says that  Jobcentre workers, based on staff surveys, are put under pressure to make sanction referrals and are rewarded for sanctioning claimants. Mark Serwotka, General Secretary, of the PCS union told the Work and Pensions Select Committee that:

"Assaults on staff have increased dramatically since the regime was tightened up and what we now see is civil servants, many of whom are fantastically low paid - 40% would be entitled to universal credit, becoming a target because people think they are to blame."

In the recent Channel 4 'Dispatches' programme - 'Britain's Benefit Crackdown' broadcast last Monday, two former Jobcentre workers from Leicester told how they had been disciplined for not meeting sanction targets. Alan Davis, a DWP personal adviser told the programme - "The pressure was enormous, I just felt what they were asking me to do, was totally wrong - they were asking me to 'hammer people' who in their own way were doing their best to get a job..."

Among those who appeared on the programme was plucky Eleanor Coulthard, now the proud mother of baby Malachi, who attended his first Jobcentre protest two weeks ago. She told 'Dispatches' that because of the stress that she was put under by Ashton Jobcentre she developed Bell's Palsy, a facial paralysis associated with stress and gave birth five weeks prematurely. Eleanor added:

"I don't think pregnant women should be sanctioned because its not just you it's affecting. There's an unborn child that's growing inside you, that needs food, and nourishment from you. And if you're not getting it, the baby is not getting it."

One of those who was 'hammered' by the Jobcentre and was referred to in the 'Dispatches' programme, was ex-solider, David Clapson, from Stevenage, Herts. A type one diabetic, David died skint and starving, five days after Jobcentre officials axed his benefits: he had £3.44 in his bank account. An autopsy found that he had no food in his stomach and had died of ketoacidosis, caused by a lack of insulin. Having no food or electricity, David had been unable to store insulin in his fridge safely. His sister, Gill Thompson, told the programme that leaving a type one diabetic with no money was tantamount to passing a death sentence on them.

Last Thursday, a jobseeker at Ashton Jobcentre, told us that he had been sanctioned for 3 months, because he arrived 2 minutes late for an interview. When he later complained about his benefit advisor being 15 minutes late for an appointment, he was told shut up or he would be sanctioned again.

Although the weekly Ashton Jobcentre protests have attracted support from a number of groups, including the Green Party,  Labour party  members in Tameside have been conspicuously absent. Indeed, one Tameside Labour councillor, and gravy train rider, who is known to own at least two Spanish villas, has referred to Eleanor's mother, Charlotte Hughes, the Green Party parliamentary candidate for the Ashton constituency, as the 'bag lady'. He recently tweeted that she should get a job instead of protesting outside Ashton Jobcentre.

Monday, 16 February 2015

Man arrested at Jobcentre for representing vulnerable jobseeker!

We are publishing below a recent briefing from Boycott Workfare:

"SOLIDARITY WITH UNEMPLOYED ACTIVIST ARRESTED FOR REPRESENTING A JOBSEEKER
TAKE PART IN A DAY OF ACTION AT JOBCENTRES BRITAIN-WIDE 25 FEBRUARY 2015
Scottish Unemployed Workers Network activist Tony Cox was arrested on 29th January after Arbroath Jobcentre management called police to stop him representing a vulnerable jobseeker. We urge you to join a Day of Action on 25th February at Jobcentres round Britain to show your solidarity.

We must fight back against this clear attempt to intimidate claimants and deny us the right to be accompanied and represented. Tony will be in court in Forfar on 25th February facing charges of “threatening behaviour, refusing to give his name and address and resisting arrest”. That same day we call on people to descend on jobcentres round Britain to show their solidarity with Tony and distribute information to claimants urging them to exercise their right to be accompanied and represented at all benefits interviews.
As we face unprecedented sanctions and benefits cuts, it’s more important than ever that we support each other and stand up to the DWP bullies. The Scottish Unemployed Workers Network, Dundee Against Welfare Sanctions and other groups have established a strong presence at the Jobcentres in Dundee and in nearby towns and cities like Arbroath, Perth and Blairgowrie, supporting claimants in opposing sanctions and harassment.

On 29 January Tony was accompanying a vulnerable woman claimant, who suffers from severe dyslexia and literacy problems. The claimant, D, had been signed up to the Universal Job Match (UJM), the computerised job search system, and was being forced to complete five job searches per day, the pressure of which had led to her having several panic attacks. Tony proposed that D’s UJM account be closed, and that her number of job searches be significantly reduced. The adviser refused to consider this, and so Tony and D met with the Jobcentre manager.

The manager likewise refused to even look at the issue, falsely claiming that all jobseekers had to be registered with UJM. She even suggested to D that she should arrange another meeting without Tony or any other witness or rep present. Despite the pressure D was being put under by the manager, she replied that she would not attend another meeting without Tony. At this point the manager demanded that Tony leave the building or the police would be called. Tony refused to leave, but the meeting ended when it was agreed that a further meeting be arranged to discuss the issue further. Tony was arrested after he left the Jobcentre.
The right of claimants to be accompanied to interviews, and for the accompanier to have the right to speak, has been established by groups like Edinburgh Coalition Against Poverty, who have forced the DWP locally and Britain-wide to apologise for calling the police on ECAP reps, and to affirm claimants’ right to representation. The DWP clearly state “Claimants accessing Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) benefits and services can have someone to accompany them to act on their behalf…”

The attack on benefits and claimants is part of the austerity assault on the entire working class. We call on all unemployed and claimants groups, anti cuts and anti austerity groups, human rights groups, workplace activists, and all working class people, waged and unwaged, to show solidarity with Tony and the right of the unemployed and all claimants to organise collectively to fight back.
Visit your local Jobcentre on 25th February with banners and placards and distribute leaflets to claimants on Tony’s case and the right to be accompanied to all benefits interviews."
Please add the support of your group/organisation: email admin@scottishunemployedworkers.netecap@lists.riseup.net
And don’t forget Disabled People Against Cut’s Day of Action the following week on 2 March!

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Ashton jobseeker sanctioned for three-months for making a spelling mistake!

In his magnificent book " Religion and the rise of Capitalism", R.H. Tawney, stated: "Most tyrannies have contented themselves with tormenting the poor." You could say that this just about sums up the prevailing ideology that dominates policy within this wretched Tory led coalition government which is hell-bent on turning us into doormats for billionaires. The UK might be the sixth richest country on earth but last year, over 1 million sought help from the charity run foodbanks.

One of the things that is driving people to turn to foodbanks, is the staggering rise in the number of people on benefits who are being sanctioned. We also seeing an increase in the rate of suicides that are linked to benefit cuts and sactions which are often both unfair or possibly illegal. The emphasis is  now  on what the Jobcentre calls "off-flow" which measures the number of people coming off benefits and not necessarily the number who go into jobs. Campaigning groups like Tameside Against the Cuts, are now being set up across the country in opposition to the social injustice that is being meted out to unemployed people in receipt of state benefits. Last week (Thursday) one member of the group spoke to  a jobseeker who was sanctioned by the Ashton Jobcentre for three-months for making a spelling mistake. It is to be hoped that this person was told to appeal and to apply for a hardship payment. The following account by Charlotte is copied from her blog, the Poor Side of Life:

"You couldn’t make it up… Well actually it’s become the norm to be sanctioned for making a spelling mistake. A gentleman who spoke to us on our Thursday demo told us that he was put on a three month sanction at Ashton Under Lyne Jobcentre for making a spelling mistake. He wasn’t given a chance to correct it, or a chance to explain it. He was told very bluntly “we are sanctioning you for spelling this word incorrectly on a form. This will prevent you from getting work so therefore is a sanctionable offence”. This man received a three month sanction for this so called offence. No one bothered to ask him if he was dyslexic or had any other issues which may have prevented him from spelling the word correct. Neither is it a crime to spell a word incorrectly. Indeed we are all human and are prone to making mistakes. This is shocking but had become the norm at this Jobcentre and jobcentres up and down the country. It reminded me of why Jobcentres were created in the first place. They were created to help you find work. They also used to help you fill in forms and make telephone calls if this was required. They were very productive places in those days, you stood a chance of finding work and not being sanctioned. I prefer to call Jobcentres sanction centres now as their main aim is to get people off benefits in any way possible. If bullying, sanctioning, coercing claimants to commit suicide and taking away a persons every means of survival is needed to do this then they will do this…. They have targets to reach, and reach them they will by whatever means possible. "

Monday, 26 January 2015

Bedroom Tax campaigner goes to Supreme Court!

Manchester tenant Meryvn Drage  (57) of Bradford Court in Moston, has appealed against the Bedroom Tax.

His case has been taken all the way to
the highest court in Britain, the supreme Court (House of Lords). A date for this hearing has yet to be set.
 
Meryvn is being represented by the Public Law Defenders. His is a test case. The outcome will have an effect all the other appeals against the Bedroom Tax. That is the reason so many other appeals have been held up. 

Solicitor Ann McMurdie, from Public Law Defenders will give an update on the challenges to the Bedroom Tax in the Courts.

Like many who have been hit by the Bedroom Tax, Mervyn has a number of mental health conditions. To be forced to move away from his home would have a detrimental effect on his life and his health.

Mervyn has joined marches and protest against the Bedroom Tax since its introduction in April 2013.

The legal speak for his appeal is:

'The 
Claimant is a 56 year old sole tenant of a three bedroom flat initially allocated to him in 1994 when it was hard to let. He has a number of physical and mental health problems including depression, anxiety and OCD together with persecutory delusions from time to time. His condition is aggravated by stress and changes of routine and his disability means that it would be unreasonable to move or share occupation of his flat.'

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

Jobcentre staff complain of being intimidated by religious cleric!


 Although most English folk regard Christmas as the season of goodwill, there wasn't much goodwill on display at Ashton-under-Lyne Jobcentre, when a wreath was laid outside the Jobcentre the week before Christmas.

The wreath was laid in memory of those people whose deaths have been linked to the government's austerity policies and benefit sanctions. To mark the event, the Rev. David Grey (pictured with police officer), a former friar from Gorton monastery spoke and called on Jobcentre staff to show humanity and compassion towards the unemployed.

After speaking, Rev Grey, entered the Jobcentre to offer staff  free counselling. We understand that this was abruptly refused. Shortly after, the police arrived and Rev. Grey was told that a complaint had been made by the Jobcentre staff who had claimed that they had felt intimidated and harassed by the Rev Grey, who was dressed in a monks' habit.

The protests outside the Jobcentre having been taking place since last August after a 19-year-old girl had her benefit stopped after telling an employer she was 23-weeks pregnant. Last month, the Morning Star newspaper, reported that G4S staff working at the Jobcentre had threatened protestors with violence. According to the report, a G4S guard was heard to say: "I'm going out there to punch them."

Sunday, 21 December 2014

Protestors lay wreath at Ashton Jobcentre: staff called upon to show humanity and compassion!


Around 20 protestors including members from TAMESIDE AGAINST THE CUTS, Tameside Stop The Bedroom Tax & the Cuts, Tameside Unemployed Workers Alliance, Tameside Trades Union Council, & Tameside Green Party, gathered outside Ashton-under-Lyne Jobcentre on Thursday. These regular Thursday afternoon demonstrations, have been taking place since August, after a 19-year-old girl from Ashton had her benefit stopped after she informed an employer B&Q (where she'd been sent by the Jobcentre to work unpaid) that she was 23-weeks pregnant. More recently, a 32-year-old jobseeker was told by staff at Ashton Jobcentre that his benefit would be stopped if he continued to participate in the protest outside Ashton Jobcentre against unfair and illegal sanctions.

On Thursday, a wreath was laid outside the Jobcentre to highlight how benefit sanctions and cuts have led to suicides. A list of people whose deaths have been linked to benefits cuts, which was taken from the 'Black Triangle Campaign', was read out to the public. A representative from the trade union UNISON, also read out a letter that he was delivering to Ashton Jobcentre objecting to unfair sanctions and the beastly inhuman treatment that is being meted out jobseeker's. Rev. David Grey, a former friar of Gorton Monastery, dressed in a monks habit, made a speech outside the Jobcentre calling upon Jobcentre staff to show humanity and compassion towards the unmployed.

Although the government deny that there is a policy of targeting people for sanctioning, it is known that staff face disciplinary action if they don't sanction enough people. At one Jobcentre, Easter egg prizes were offered to staff who had sanctioned the most people.

While the UK is ranked as the sixth richest country on earth, a recent all-party report on foodbanks, has warned that Britain is 'stalked by hunger' caused by low pay, growing inequality and a harsh benefit sanctions as well as social break-down. The report says that benefit sanctions are the single biggest reason why the poor are resorting to foodbanks.

Ian Duncan Smith, Secretary for Work and Pensions, denies that welfare cuts are connected to financial hardship and suicides. He has accused Britain's largest food bank network, the Trussell Trust, of scaremongering. Other well-fed Tories have also scoffed at reports of hungry Britain, claiming that the poor don't know how to cook or that greater awareness of food banks, has led to increased demand. Yet the report says that severe hunger is leading to malnutrition and that there has been an increase in people scavenging for leftovers in restaurant and supermarket skips. Despite this indictment against Duncan Smith's vendetta against the poor and vulnerable, he was voted the most influential lay Roman Catholic by readers of the Tablet in 2010.

On Wednesday, a Labour motion to scrap the bedroom tax, was defeated in the Commons by 298 votes to 266, after 35 slimey LibDems, voted with the Tories to retain the tax despite promising earlier this year, to ditch the policy.

The weekly protests outside Ashton Jobcentre, have attracted a great deal of attention from citizen journalists working within social media. Yet the local Tameside newspapers the Tameside (PRAVDATISER)  Advertiser  and the New Charter owned, Tameside Reporter and Chronicle, have shown scant interest in the campaign despite receiving regular briefings. A visit to Ashton Jobcentre made by Rachell Reeves, Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and council leader, Kieran Quinn, in October, did however, receive press coverage.
https://foodpovertyinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/food-poverty-feeding-britain-final.pdf

Sunday, 5 October 2014

Man with epilepsy hangs himself following threats to cut his benefits. How does IDS sleep at night?

Tragic: Trevor Drakard

We are publishing below an article from the Daily Mirror by Jeremy Armstrong.

"A man with permanent brain damage and ‘uncontrolled’ epilepsy hanged himself after being ordered to take part in ‘work related activity’ or risk his benefits being cut.

Trevor Drakard was panic-stricken at the thought he would have to find a job when he could suffer a severe attack at any time.The shy 50-year-old suffered from meningitis at five months old which left him brain damaged, causing severe epilepsy first seen when he was just six. He suffered countless attacks throughout his life, never went 10 days without a fit and would fall ‘like a tree’ to the ground.

Despite heavy medication, he was regularly taken to hospital and had suffered a broken nose, cheekbone, jaw, lost his front teeth and split his head open after hitting pavement during attacks.
Even disabled employer Remploy - where he worked for six years - deemed his condition so severe he had to leave.

Yet ConDem reforms meant he received a letter saying his Incapacity Benefit was being replaced with £112.05-a-week ‘Employment and Support Allowance’. It stated he had to attend a ‘Work Related Activity Group”, or his benefits could be hit.
Shortly before his suicide, he wrote a heart-rending note begging DWP chiefs not to change his status.

He told them: “I have never been able to work due to my epilepsy. I had a job at Remploy but I lost my job because they could not longer cope with my attacks.”But a June 23 standard Benefits Agency letter informed him his appeal had been rejected.

His family struggled to gain detailed medical records of his multiple hospital visits down the years to make a second appeal. He was given a month to get the information, and, as the deadline approached, became more and more worried. On July 19, anxious parents Doreen, 80, and Tom, 86, went to his home in Sunderland, Tyne and Wear - and made the horrific discovery of his body hanging in his bedroom. They say there is ‘no doubt whatsoever’ the stress of the benefits changes caused his suicide.

Tom, a retired marine engineer, said: “Trevor had meningitis as a baby, and it was caused by the scar on his brain. He had his first epileptic attack when he was six. He did not know when a fit would come, it was completely random. He would have two or three in a short space of time, he did not go ten days without one. Trevor would get so anxious about little things, that was a feature of this condition - we would tell him not to worry, but he just could not help it.”

His parents had been helping with the second appeal to the DWS on the eve of his suicide.

“They asked for his full history but he had countless attacks in his life time, it was despicable really,” said Doreen, who ran a wool shop as well as bringing up Trevor and siblings Michael, 51, and Pam, 48. “He often hit the pavement when he fell, there must have been hundreds of occasions when he ended up in hospital. On the day he died, we went around for him to sign the appeal letter we had been working on the day before. The door was open, the curtains were closed, so I thought he must have been poorly.”

Fighting back tears, her husband added: “He was here on the Friday, and we went around the next morning and we found him like that... “It was such a shock, what shocked us more than anything the way he did it. He had panicked because of the benefit changes.There is no doubt that is why he did it. You cannot bring him back.”

The Drakards agreed to speak out to raises awareness of benefit cuts, and how devastating their impact can be on the vulnerable in society. Trevor worked at Remploy until he was 30, but his condition was deemed so severe he left after six years. He had saved up enough to buy his own home, and with the help of around £100-a-week in Incapacity Benefits, lived an independent life.

The first letter about the change in his benefits arrived in March this year. Due to his condition, Trevor was ‘beside himself’ with worry over it. Doreen explained:

“We went to Citizens Advice Bureau, we explained we could never get his medical records together in a time needed to appeal. He was on the bare minimum really, but the benefits agency said they intended to change it because he needed to look for work. He had to attend a job interview, and this work group, or his money could be stopped. Trevor did not know from day to day how he was going to be, and if he would take a fit, so this just stressed him even more. He was worried about taking a job in case he had attacks. He lost teeth, broke his jaw, cheekbone, he was always in accident and emergency with his injuries. We tried to explain, his GP had just retired and so had his consultant in Sunderland, it made it hard to get his history.”

His family helped make his home ‘safe’, with a specially made bed, cushions scattered to break any falls, and child-safe furniture. “He had been alone for 19 years, he never had a girlfriend but he had helped us, did gardening, wood work, loved bird watching, photography and walking,” added Tom, a grandfather-of-five. “He wrote his own letter of appeal - but they told him they would not change their minds.”

Trevor’s brother Michael, of Leeds, added: “The system is not appropriate for someone like Trevor, who really needs help. “It was never about the money. He did not drink, smoke, he had the most frugal existence - he probably had about ten shandies a year. He may have ended up on about the same in benefits. But he could not cope with the stress of thinking he had to make himself available for work. There is no doubt whatsoever that is what caused his death.”

Olive Marrs, 65, a retired social worker, said she and Trevor’s other neighbours were ‘disgusted’ at how he had been treated. She added: “He was a lovely man. He was quite obviously vulnerable, so depressed about his benefits.”

Coroner’s officer Neville Dixon told the inquest into Trevor’s death earlier this month that he had been warned his benefits could be stopped. He added: “He had been feeling very down, due to the stress.”

Senior Sunderland coroner Derek Winter was satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt that Mr Drakard had been responsible for his own death. The city’s Labour MP Julie Elliot said: “Sadly, the removal of benefits to genuinely sick people is becoming all too common, having a devastating impact on “The system is not fit for purpose. The Government needs to act now to stop anymore tragedies occurring and causing unnecessary hardship to people.”

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

Tory Bedroom Tax eviction widow forced to sleep with COWS!

We are publishing below an article by Nick Dorman, which appeared in the Sunday People on 27 September 2014:

"A widow who is going blind was forced to live in a field with cattle after she was evicted from her home of 30 years ­because she couldn’t ­pay a £210 Bedroom Tax bill.

Carol Sutherland, 56, covered herself with a plastic sheet and hay in a ­desperate bid to keep dry and warm, writes Nick Dorman in the Sunday People. She had to dig a hole under a hedge to use as a toilet.
And her weight plunged to 6½st as she struggled to survive after being kicked out of her two-bed council flat.

The scandal is yet another example of the misery caused by a tax the Sunday People has been campaigning to have scrapped since it became law in 2012. Its latest victim Carol said: “I’d lived in my lovely flat for 30 years and even though I didn’t have much, I had a roof over my head and my dignity.

“When I was in the field I could not believe it had come to that. I cried so much I didn’t have any tears left.”
Bailiffs booted Carol out after she told a housing officer she couldn’t ­afford the £11.35-a-week spare-room penalty imposed as part of Tory Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare shake-up.

Carol had been struggling to get by on a widow’s pension of just £90 a month since a heart attack killed her husband Peter in 2001. Her rent and council tax were covered for her by public money.
But everything else – including power bills – was funded from her pitiful £3-a-day pension.



Carol’s plight meant she was eligible for further housing ­benefits and employment ­support allowance.
But she insisted she didn’t know about them because no one had ever mentioned them to her.
Carol (pictured) who gave up trying to have children after a string of miscarriages – said: “Things went pear-shaped after my husband died and I started losing my sight with cataracts.
“I just about managed on his pension without claiming ­anything else.
“When I started getting letters from the council I couldn’t read them. I asked them to send the details in bigger print – but they never did.

“So I ignored them until a housing officer turned up and told me I was in arrears with bedroom tax payments.
“I told him I couldn’t afford it and the next thing I knew the bailiffs were at the door.”
Carol, who has depression, claimed she was given an hour to pack up her possessions as the flat in Waddington, Lincs, was cleared in April.
She said: “I was in such a state I couldn’t find the only picture I have of my mum and dad.

“I had to tell the bailiffs I couldn’t afford to pay for any of my stuff to go into storage so they might as well take it all – which they did.”

She gave a neighbour her pet canary and went to stay with a friend, having lost touch with her own family.
But a week later she moved out, spent a night in a bus-shelter, then built her rudimentary camp in a cow-field. Carol said: “My friend would have lost her housing benefits if I’d carried on staying with her so I decided the field was my only solution.”

The decision was not as bizarre as it sounds because as the daughter of an agricultural labourer she had grown up on a farm helping with animals as well as planting and picking crops.
Recalling her time living rough, Carol said: “I’d walk round the village by day and at night I’d go to the field and bed down under the plastic.

“When I needed the loo I’d dig a hole in a hedgerow and I didn’t bother combing my hair or washing.” She added: “You don’t think it’s mad when you’re as low as I was then.”

Carol was finally rescued by worried Waddington friends who took her to the church of St Mary-le-Wigford in nearby Lincoln, the base of a charity helping the vulnerable.

City councillor Jackie Kirk, who helps to run the project, found Carol a bed at a shelter for the homeless.
Jackie said: “Carol is a remarkably brave woman. She worked all her life and after her husband died she was eligible for Employment Support Allowance and Discretionary Housing Payments. “

But as many vulnerable people discover too late, if you don’t know you’re entitled and don’t ­apply you end up as a victim of the system.”


And Carol said: “I’d like David Cameron to spend a day with me so he could see the impact his government’s Bedroom Tax has on people like me who already live below the poverty line."

Tuesday, 14 January 2014

'Bedroom Tax' loophole could see up to 40,000 exempted!

Working age tenants who live in social housing, may be exempt from the 'Bedroom Tax' if the have lived in the same house since before before 1996 and have been claiming housing benefit continuously since then.

Housing experts estimate that up to 40,000 households could be affected and the cost of refunds could run into the millions of pounds, along with associated legal costs and compensation for families who had to pay removal companies to move out of their homes. All could be eligible for refunds worth on average at least £640 per claimant, credited to their rent account.

According to the Guardian, this would have applied to Stephanie Bottril, of Solihull, who took her own life in May last year, after blaming the government's 'Bedroom Tax' for making her life impossible. In a circular to Housing Benefit Staff, the DWP have confirmed that some tenants are exempt under this loophole which they are intending to close.

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

'Boycott Workfare' - Review of Action taken in 2013!


We are publishing below the latest briefing from .'Boycott Workfare'

"The workfare industry annual conference disrupted with a very loud noise demo. Salvation Army in Edinburgh – the main users of Mandatory Work Activity in the city –blockaded for two hours. An anti-sanctions action in Germany. Solidarity with claimants subject to the farcical pilot of Universal Credit. The petition for all sanctions to be scrapped hit 10,000 signatures. Tea and information outside job centres. Workfare users picketed in WalesScotland and England. All this in just one week in 2013 – a year in which ordinary people made workfare’s progress a whole lot more rocky.
Targeting workfare exploiters
In 2013, your actions online and on the streets meant these brands stepped back from workfare: Shoe Zone, The Red Cross, Capability Scotland, Marriott Hotels, Superdrug, Argos, Wetherspoons and Debenhams.
In April, we helped expose that at least one Homebase store was using 25 placements at a time to save hundreds of hours on their payroll, and cutting existing workers’ hours as a result. Thousands of people took action online and outside Homebase stores across the UK, and just one month later, the company withdrew from the scheme (though we’re chasing up reports that it’s since reappeared in their Willesden store).

Haringey Solidarity Group showed how effective it can be when local people take on workfare exploiters on their doorstep. When they discovered Homes for Haringey was using workfare to maintain its estates, action at board meetings and local council meetings stepped up the pressure. The result? Those working for Homes for Haringey will now be paid.
Disrupting industry events
When the workfare industry has met, campaigners have been there too – to unpick their doublespeak and make sure the real-life consequences of their decisions can’t be forgotten. When thinktank Policy Exchange supported sanctions being extended to people in work on low incomes, rolling disruption meant their event was (in the words of its organiser) “ruined”. In Manchester, delegates to the Welfare to Work Convention were met with protests at their lavish dinner at the Hilton. Iain Duncan Smith and Mark Hoban have both faced hecklers during speeches on welfare ‘reform’.
Reducing the number of placements
When the Work Programme was launched in June 2011, it was promised that those finishing it would be directed onto a six month long workfare scheme, the Community Action Programme. However, no such scheme was launched in June 2013 probably because it was not feasible after we persuaded so many charities to end their involvement.
In the government’s appeal against the Information Commissioner’s ruling that it must reveal those using workfare labour, the Department for Work and Pensions argued: “The activities of campaign groups and the results of negative publicity meant that… “a great many placement organisations” had ceased to offer placements. That in turn reduced the numbers of opportunities available across both programmes with a loss of many placements and prospective new placements being at risk.”
The DWP’s appeal revealed that one subcontractor has complained about a loss of 100 placements per week in its area alone. The cost of each Mandatory Work Activity placement has doubled since we made it so much more difficult to find placements.
They know the public don’t want to see jobs replaced by workfare
The Taxpayers’ Alliance felt the need to slander Boycott Workfare in its ‘Work for the Dole’ “report”, commenting that because of our success in persuading charities to withdraw, it is vital that “the public case for the morality and the economics of the [workfare] scheme is very strongly made”. The government has used our campaigning as the explicit reason for turning down Freedom of Information requests about who is using workfare.
We know that the government and workfare industry see our activities as a genuine threat to workfare’s viability. This means that in 2014, we have the opportunity to make sure the schemes do indeed become unworkable.
Every success against workfare is because ordinary people take action.

Workfare has the backing of the three main political parties, their thinktanks, the welfare to work industry (which only exists because of the public money handed to it), and the companies, charities and councils who are able to cut their wages bills by using unpaid work. Some professionals e.g. psychologists also make money from supporting workfare, while others e.g. some public health professionals, remain silent instead of speaking out.
But against this stand the people who face the impact of workfare in our lives: the threat of sanctions and the hunger they bring for people sent on workfare; the loss of paid work as workfare is used instead; the threat of workfare with no time limit for people found ‘fit to work’ by the disgusting Atos assessment; and the toll all this takes on our wellbeing. With workfare even touted for people on low incomes in part-time work, few people can afford to ignore its threat.
The actions of Cait Reilly and Jamie Wilson in the courts deserve special mention here. These two people pursued justice to the Supreme Court – where workfare schemes were ruled to have been unlawful. Faced with this challenge, the government, supported by Labour, enacted unprecedented retroactive legislation to rewrite history. Being found unlawful hasn’t been enough to stop workfare, but our actions can be.
For workfare to succeed, it needs companies, charities and councils to co-operate. We’ve shown that we can make sure it’s not worth their while to do so. Osborne wants 6 month workfare placements in charities and the public sector to become the norm from April 2014. We can make sure they don’t.
Take action in 2014