Showing posts with label Direct Action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Direct Action. Show all posts

Monday, 2 November 2020

Freedom: Anna Kleist & Spring Cleaning

by Brian Bamford
ON the 30th, October, a writer called Anna Kleist wrote on the FREEDOM website complaining of 'anarchist smugness' following the defeat of what she called 'the first mass movement for socialism this country has seen in decades': the Corbynista experiment which seemingly ended last December after the General Election. She was refering to the gloating of London anarchists in the FREEDOM bookshop following the result coming through.
According to Anna it amounted to a good dose of 'I told you so'!.
This is how she colourfully described the scene in the FREEDOM BOOKSHOP at the time:
'While these bilious has-beens represent a particularly grotesque extreme of anarchist opinion, their unabashed joy at Corbyn’s defeat is not so far different from the smug “we told you so” that has, for the most part, constituted “the anarchist response” to December’s election results. One might have hoped that anarchists would have had something useful to say following the defeat of the first mass movement for socialism this country has seen in decades. Sadly, with one or two minor exceptions, all we seem to have produced are some rather tiresome Urban 75 posts about how we’re so wise and everyone else is pathetic and naïve.'
Following a brief consideration of the history of British anarchism she bitterly concluded:
'
'My contention is that we in the British anarchist movement are way overdue such a period of radical reassessment. Capitalism is in crisis, fascism is in the ascendency and yet we have never been more politically irrelevant. Now is not the time for smugness or schadenfreude. It is time for us to turn our “ruthless criticism” back upon ourselves.'
JON BIGGER Knows Best: Having the Key to the Universe!
SUCH criticism couldn't go unchallenged by those clever dicks who reckon to know better; one such 'Jon Bigger'* only the very next day scolded Anna thus:
'Yesterday, Freedom published a piece encouraging anarchists not to be smug, instead looking inwards at how we have failed to build a mass movement. I agree, but standards and principles matter. Let the last few years be a lesson about principles, as much as it is a lesson in building a mass movement.'
Yet to the non-partisan observer British anarchism is a political non-entity, as indeed Ms. Kleist described it in her brief contribution: the best thing it used to be able to do was to run bookfairs, but nowadays it can't even accomplish that. Despite what the Community of Scholars at Loughborough University claim, seldom has British anarchism been more ineffectual. Only if you count Extinction Rebellion can it claim any significance or real relevance today.
FREEDOM and SPRING CLEANING ANARCHISM
CURIOUSLY the editor of FREEDOM [Vernon Richards?] writing on the January 31,1953 in an editorial entitled 'SPRING CLEANING ANARCHISM' asked:
'IS anarchism, the denial of the State, of the right to rule, a merely negative doctrine? Should it not put forward also a positive contribution to political, social and economic theory? Such questions have periodically been asked since the time when the parliamentary Marxists of the eighties and nineties first accused anarchism of being a negative conception.'
At that time, almost 60 years ago, the FREEDOM editor was responding to a correspondent, R. A. M. Gregson, who had called for 'a Revaluation of Ideas' making a plea for 'recapitulation. for a re-evaluation of M basic ideas, and evolving new ones'. Mr. Gregson wrote: 'Destructive criticism, is easier than the expression of posit!ve beliefs and proposals.' Following this up with the claim: 'The literature of the movement . . .intents itself with protestations on the one hand and yearnings after past revolutionaries on the other.'
The FREEDOM editor then asks:
'How does such criticism apply to FREEDOM? To keep ideas up to date is an important function of a paper such as this, and it is always important to be on guard against the hardening of ideas into dogma, of their losing their significance through mere repetition. To do so all the more necessary since fundamental anarchist ideas have to changed much over the years, much that Godwin wrote over a century and a half ago could not usefully be added to to-day.'
Here the Freedom editor recognises the real dilemma for an editor who has sat perhaps too long in the editor's chair and is in danger of a cookbook approach to every unfolding event. Many of the publication on the left fall into this trap of repetitous cliques and dogma. Anna Kleist may not have fully grasped the real problems, but I venture to say, she can see things more sharply than the more mature than Jon Bigger with his plea for 'standards and principles'. The Direct Action Movement [DAM] to which I was once affilated in the 1980s spent time endlessly debating its 'Aims & Principles' but i never had a policy directed at the real world. The Anna Kleist approach is refreshing as the Gregson analysis was in 1953 because their assessments detect some seen but unnoticed features of the current crisis in the anarchist tribe.
* 'Jon Bigger' was a post-graduate at Loughborough University.
***********************************************************************

Saturday, 19 September 2020

Regarding Stuart Christie by Martin Gilbert

I ONLY met him once. It was outside the gates of Speakers Corner, Hyde Park, in 1963, Stuart had only been in London a short while. His accent was so thick I had difficulty understanding him. We were both selling papers. I had PEACE NEWS, and SANITY, (now long-gone, published by national CND). Also, we were both selling FREEDOM, a very different paper from what it has declined into. Stuart indicated that the papers were selling very well. Soon, we were were both busy chatting with different people and I never saw him again.
When he was arrested [in August 1964] reactions were very mixed. Predictabley, the media’s response was something like”….typical anarchists...”. Young CNDers and our fellow travellers showed 100% solidarity with Stuart. We had an old motor coach to aid our campaigning, so drove to Blackpool for the Labour party conference.
Readers may know that back then CND was much more establishment oriented. The line was only to approve of traditional methods of getting our messages across. This was years before national CND voted to support non violent direct action; thanks to the women at Greenham Common in 1980. So instead of following the (then) strict line we lobbied for Stuart’s release. Old campaigners were furious with us. In mitigation we claimed, incorrectly, that he was only carrying literature; which was also illegal in Franco’s Spain.
Lessons were gained from it all. One was awareness of the extent of Franco’s spies. Also, how open we and other groups were to infiltration from different kinds of Cops. But too much caution can only lead to quietism.
martin gilbert Sept. ‘20

Monday, 14 September 2020

Stuart Christie: an insider's study of an authentic classical anarchist by Brian Bamford - Part Two

ANARCHISM IS not a very well understood doctrine in British politics. I realised this when Tameside Trade Union Council first published a booklet commemorating the 60th anniversary of the Spanish Civil War in 2006 with Durruti on the cover. The then delegates of the Greater Manchester County Association of Trade Union Council clearly didn't appreciate the publication at the time, but during the meeting a large party of French trade unionists from the CGT [communist] happened to be present and while many of the local English trade unionists held back the French delegation waded-in to buy up most of the commemorative booklets we had to hand, and even later following me to the toilets to get extra copies.
It struck us at the time how utterly frigid the English trade unionists were compared to their French 'communist' CGT comrades.
This thought occurs to me now as I now with sadness write my friend and comrade, Stuart Christie's obituary. I remember that sometime after Stuart wrote the first volume of his autobiography 'GRANNY MADE ME AN ANARCHIST', I wrote a critique of it entitled 'God Help the Anarchist movement that Needs Heroes'. This in turn led to a bitter altercation between me and Stuart on the website 'Libcom' in which I believe he labelled me 'an arsehole'. However, in 2006, it was a measure of Stuart's nobility that when I invited him to write an introduction to Tameside TUC's Spanish commemorative booklet he had no hesitation in agreeing to do the job.
He probably did it because he knew me from when I first met him in Paris in August 1964, when he was about to go on to embrace the risky venture in his ill-fated journey to Madrid and ultimately to a Spanish jail for his part in a proposed attempt to assassinate General Franco. At that time we were all staying in a 'safe house' with Germinal Garcia at his apartment near Place de la République*. My wife Joan and I were returning from Spain, having first worked in Denia, Alicante throughout 1963, and later on in early 1964 moved on to La Linea on the border with Gibraltar where I worked for the MOD at the Gibraltar airport. While in Denia my eldest lad was born at the clinica there in September 1963. While in Spain and later Gib. we had taken photos of the conditions in the shanty towns in Barcelona and we sent back reports on working conditions over there for the FIJL publication Nueva Senda. At that time we were being debriefed, and thought Stuart may have been on a similar mission to us, but soon found out that they had other plans for him. At one stage he asked for our advice and was naturally interested in our own experiences.
Stuart was still in Carabanchel jail [Madrid] when my family again returned to Spain in early 1967 on our way to work in Gibraltar having had difficulties working as an electrician in Rochdale following my involvement supporting the national engineering apprentice strikes in November 1964 and February 1964. Having been blacklisted by the British MOD and throughout Gibraltar with private companies with contracts with the MOD and other contracts with the British authorities the only place on the Rock that I had a serious chance of work was with the Gibraltar City Council, supported by the Transport & General Worker's Union and Albert Risso who had close links with Sir Joshua Hassan the Chief Minister.
The anarchists on Gibraltar at that time were active within the Transport & General Workers Union and were basically anarcho-syndicalists. Stuart identified with the syndicalists, and had fallen under the influence of Bobby Lynn who he says 'had become the backbone of the Glasgow anarchist movement'. I'd stayed with Bobby Lynn in the Gorbals in 1961 and he gave me his copy of 'The Sexual Revolution' by Wilhelm Reich. Bobby was a member of the Syndicalist Worker's Federation when I stayed with him in 1961. As news leaked of Stuart's arrest Peter Turner [FREEDOM EDITOR] had contacted Bobby Lynn in Glasgow and up there they had assured him that Stuart was so dedicated to the peace movement and that it was not likely that he was guilty as claimed by the Spanish authorities. This may have influenced the report in the syndicalist Direct Action which took the line that he must be innocent, and Wynford Hicks on behalf of the anarchists argued on TV news that he was probably the victim of an 'agent-provocateur'. Another Freedom editor Vernon Richards argued more sensibly that it mattered little whether Stuart was innocent or guilty the anarchist position should be to support him.
For my part I knew what had taken place, but anticipating returning to work in Spain and expecting to continue to help the group of young Spanish exiles of the FIJL involved with the failed attempt, I decided to remain silent. Stuart himself had not been prudent before his departure for Spain and had actually participated in a BBC2 program entitled 'Let Me Speak' hosted by Malcolm Muggeridge. Muggeridge, who had been a friend of George Orwell, had often identified morally and intellectually with Tolstoy and anarchism.
In his autobiography 'MY GRANNY MADE ME AN ANARCHIST'[2004] Stuart documents the sequence of events in the summer of 1964: 'In mid-July Salvador and Bernado [Gurucharri] told me I should be ready to leave for Paris by the end of the month. Everything was now in hand for my trip to Spain. Shortly before I left... I was invited to appear on what later turned out to be, for me, an almost disastrous chat show called Let Me Speak, on ...BBC2. Having a small spectrum of anarchists, with me and another young lad called Vincent Johnson representing the "revolutionary anarchists" Muggeridge asked me if I was sincere in my revolutionary aims...would I, for instance, given the opportunity, assassinate Franco?" It was an unlucky shot in the dark, for that was pretty damn close to what I was hoping to do. What could I say but yes?.'
It is an extraordinary admission for a revolutionary anarchist to make! I doubt that the Spaniards I knew in Paris or in Spain in the 1960s would have made such a confession on the BBC or before going on a mission such as Stuart anticipated. It's almost as if he had a death wish or secretly wanted to get caught. When we knew him in Paris in August 1964 he was hopelessly naive and clearly knew little of the reality of everyday Spanish life or working conditions. He struggled to pronounce the Spanish word for 'workers'.
On page 107 of his autobiography he writes: 'I may not have been wise or competent in what I did or the way I went about it, but I did not have the benefit of hindsight'.
Never mind 'hindsight' given what he had done did he have the benefit of foresight or even a glimpse of common sense? I say this knowing, as Stuart did, that other people suffered as a consequence of what he did and the mistakes that he and his handlers made at the time. I also say this as a friend of Stuart who exchanged correspondence with him regularly over the last few years, and had documented and detailed our differences in my earlier pamphlet. One thing that troubles me is not that he wore a kilt, but that he sported a war resister badge of a broken rifle on his chest while walking around Paris in 1964 as he carried our one-year-old son Deon. He told us that he'd visited Paris the year before in the Spring; it was more 'romantic' than in August. Being romantic was probably what attracted most people to Stuart as it was part on his charm.
Yet, when we had visited Ken Hawkes, then secretary of the Syndicalist Workers Fed., and his wife before we went to Spain in February 1963, the worst winter since 1947, they treated us to a bottle of Champagne as we'd just got married and reminded us to remove our Ban the Bomb badges before we left their house on Parliament Hill for Spain. I wonder why none of us thought to urged Stuart Christie to take off his tell-tale War resister badge?
I suppose that in August 1964, we were all a bit intoxicated by the atmosphere of a time in which Franco had just celebrated 25-years of peace, and a pale-faced Salvador Gurucharri and others had just been released from jail. In Paris, at that time, we were all in high spirits as things seemed to be moving in the right direction.
While there Stuart met other major figures in the exiled Spanish anarchist movement, the organised FIJL [Fed. of young libertarians] around the Internal Defence (DI), and including militants of long standing like Octavio Alberola* and Luis Andres Edo.
In his autobiography he describes what he did as 'the act of an adolescent' and he quotes a verse from Longfellow:
'A boy's will is the wind's will, and the thoughts of youth are long, long thoughts.' [page 120]
On reflection he goes on to admit: 'Now it will seem like to many a foolish, naive, impulsive act...'
and 'I cannot claim, either, that it was entirely altruistic - my motives were certainly in part a desire for excitement and adventure.'
On reflection he goes on to admit: 'Now it will seem like to many a foolish, naive, impulsive act...'
Essentially he was doing what we had done a year earlier when we went to Spain to escape from what then seemed like dreary Manchester; he was he says not satisfied with what would now be called 'gesture politics' of petitions and protests, and sought to engage directly with a struggle in Spain. Foresight or prudence would make cowards of us all; it was not part of his engaging personality at that time. It set Stuart outside the smelly little left wing orthodoxies which he left behind. Yet it led him to get a 'GO TO JAIL' card to a Madrid prison cell, and was for him a life changing event.
Once in Paris Stuart had made contact with the action groups of the exiled Spanish anarchist movement, organised around Internal Defence (DI) and involving militants of long standing like Octavio Alberola and Luis Andres Edo. As such during his disastrous mission he was later arrested in Madrid and charged with the possession of explosives. These were intended for an attempt on Franco’s life and he was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. Thanks to a continuing international pressure he was freed after 3 years.
Why was General Franco and the Francoist regime so susceptible to international public opinion in the 1960s?
I think it was in his book 'The Face of Spain' [1950] that Gerald Brenan tried to explain the mellowing of the Franco regime. In that book he explained how the Falange and those who adhered to Franco began invest in real estate and escape the relative poverty of the 1940s and 1950s. We too quickly forget that it was not just the Spanish working-class that suffered after the Civil War, but the Spanish middle-classes experienced insecurity also. My boss Senor Such told me of how in the 1940s everyone in the fishing village where I lived and worked in 1963-4 had suffered depravation after the war and some had to eat cats. Later on it had become possible to make some progress and by the time we got there in the early 1960s things were looking up as the tourists began to arrive and with the development building work on the costas things were much more prosperous for many including the low-level Falangists. This allowed some softening of the regime which may some helped Stuart Christie escape with what turned out to be a relatively short sentence of 3-years in the end. Had he been arrested some ten years earlier for the same offence it may have been an altogether different story, but by the mid-1960s the supporters of the Franco regime felt much more secure than they had been during the Second World War or in its aftermath when to some extent Spain had been isolated internationally.
* FOOTNOTE: In the early hours of 11 May 2011, 86-year-old Germinal García, a militant of the Juventudes Libertarias (FIJL) and the Paris Local Federation of the CNT in the 1950s and 1960s, passed away (in Paris). At the end of the Spanish Civil War, 13-year old Germinal had been interned in Argeles-sur-Mer concentration camp where an unknown English woman, to whom he was ever grateful, cared for him. Stowing away on a Danish freighter, the Kitty Skov, from the port of Barcelona, he escaped to the United States, where he remained for a time in New York, passing himself off as a French citizen, returning later to France to became active in the anti-Francoist struggle. Shunning the limelight, but always in the background with his strong sense of solidarity, Germinal’s apartment in the Rue Lancry was a safe haven for comrades who had escaped from Franco’s Spain — and for guerrillas such as Quico Sabaté whenever he was in Paris (it was also used by Stuart Christie prior to his trip to Spain in 1964). For that and for his ongoing service to the libertarian movement, Germinal won the respect and friendship of all who knew him. With his passing, we have the satisfying memories and the privilege of having known the friendship of a good comrade. Germinal’s remains were cremated in Paris on 17 May 2011.
Octavio Alberola, May 12, 2011 SEE ALSO https://www.facebook.com/TheOrwellSociety The Orwell Society - Home | Facebook The Orwell Society. 1.4K likes. The Orwell Society aims to promote the understanding and appreciation of the life and work of George Orwell. Join here:... www.facebook.com

Tuesday, 7 May 2019

Just Pick Up The Litter

by Les May

IN 1960 I joined the Young Socialists and as soon as I was old enough voted Labour. I still do.   But I also had a subscription to ‘Freedom - the Anarchist Weekly’What interested me was what is usually called ‘Direct Action’; don’t wait for someone else to do it for you, do it for yourself. It stlll does.  Don’t just grumble that there’s a lot of litter in the street, pick it up and put it in the waste bin.  That’s practical anarchism at work.

As a practical political philosophy I concluded that like Marxism its a dead duck, but for a diametrically opposite reason.  Marxist governments can plan roads and build power systems, but can’t make sure there are enough toothbrushes in the shops.  You need markets for that because markets are the way that information about shortages is fed back from consumers to producers.

At least some of the brands of Anarchism would be able to solve the toothbrush problem, but I am sceptical that it could ever solve the problem of building a power grid. (And please don’t trot out the ‘We would keep it local’. That’s fine so long as there’s a wind blowing to turn your local turbine.  And when it isn’t … ?)

It was all a long time ago. Nowadays I content myself with counting the self righteous jargon words in pieces like that below.


I don’t see this bunch changing the world.

******************

Tuesday, 15 January 2019

Quarter of a million Yellow Vest protesters take to streets


protestor in lost 5 teeth and fractured his jaw when a police flash ball hit his face point blank in the protest.


Quarter of a million Yellow Vest protestors hit streets
Police in the capital used water cannon and tear gas as scuffles broke out at the Arc de Triomphe, on the ninth consecutive weekend of protests.
Some 84,000 demonstrators were recorded nationwide, an increase compared with last week, official figures show.
The nationwide protests were initially triggered by the rising price of fuel.
They have since widened to include anger at the cost of living, with a wide-ranging list of other demands.
Thousands of officers were deployed across Paris, which has previously seen street clashes and vandalism, to tackle the protesters, and parts of the city centre were blocked off by riot police.
Some 8,000 demonstrators were on the streets - more than in the past two weekends, when authorities counted just 3,500 people on 5 January and 800 on 29 December, according to interior ministry figures.
Some 156 protesters were arrested, and as of 21:00 local time (20:00 GMT), 108 remained in custody, police said.
By nightfall, there had not been the looting or burning of cars as seen in previous weeks.
There were also thousands of protesters in the cities of Bordeaux and Toulouse in southern France as well as Strasbourg in the east and the central city of Bourges, the site of another major rally, where more than 6,000 people took to the streets.
Nationwide, 244 people were arrested, of which 201 remained in custody, police said.
Some 80,000 police officers were deployed nationwide to face the protesters.
French President Emmanuel Macron has said a national debate is due to kick off on 15 January in response to weeks of protests by the "gilets jaunes" - so-called because of the high-visibility jackets they wear.
It will be held publicly in town halls across France and on the internet, and will focus on four themes: taxes, green energy, institutional reform and citizenship.
Source: BBC News 12 January 2019

Thursday, 5 April 2018

Jack Stevenson Obituary

by Donald Rooum 
JACK Stevenson died on Easter Sunday.  

An electrician by trade, and a keen gardener of vegetables on his allotment, Jack was prominent among London anarchists and in the 1960s.  Among other achievements, he was the founder, treasurer, and inconspicuous donor to the Sit-Down-Or-Pay-Up fund.  Which subsidised legal expenses and fines of supporters of the Committee of One Hundred anti-bomb campaign, mostly charged with obstructing traffic.
****** 
 
The Jack Stevenson I knew!

by Brian Bamford 

 I first attended a meeting of the London Anarchist Group in November 1961, and that’s when I first heard Jack Stevenson speak at a meeting.  Laurens Otter was there, and I’d already known Laurens for over a year, through my acquaintance with him on the Coast-to- Coast March against nuclear weapons up North, and at other meetings and conferences associated with Ban the Bomb and the Labour Party.  During the London Anarchist meeting, as I recall, there was a disagreement between Jack and Laurens over the the latter’s willingness to court imprisonment and submit passively to the authorities during his campaign with the Direct Action Committee at Holy Lock.


Jack, as I recall, asked Laurens why he and the others imprisoned for the offences in Scotland hadn’t attempted to escape, as that, according to Jack, would have been the anarchist thing to do. Laurens said at the time that they had been asked to give their word that they would not attempt to escape, but they had refused to do so.


Both Jack and his wife, Mary, were close to the anarcho-syndicalist wing of anarchism. Consequently, Jack was among that group of anarchists and syndicalists who in late 1960 wrote a letter to Freedom calling for a conference of Rank & File workers*.  Among those promoting this conference were such figures as Peter Turner, a carpenter and later one of the editorial staff of Freedom; Brian Behan, also a carpenter; Ken Weller, a shop steward in the car industry and member of a group, initially known as Socialism Reaffirmed, which published a journal, The Agitator; Ken Hawkes the national secretary of the Syndicalist Workers Federation (SWF); Bill and Joan Christopher (see ‘A Radical Born on Bastille Day'); and of course the electrician, Jack Stevenson.


I spoke to Joan Christopher about the death of Jack Stevenson last night, and we remembered that when I interviewed her a year ago that we had reminisced about her and Bill’s friendship with Jack and Mary Stevenson. How they disagreed about how Bill and Jack Stevenson had had so many disputes over their tastes in Jazz. Peter Turner, who witnessed these disputes was always going on to me about these disagreements over music.


Joan had said ‘we all had a passion for Jazz! But when were living at Cumberland Road, we made it open-plan, and on Jack Stevenson’s advice bought a Pye Black Box. We liked Bruck, Mendelssohn, Mahler and Oscar Peterson.’ The Joan said: ‘It was through Jack Stevenson we came to know the track by Jack Teagarden called “Tribute to Sydney Bechet”.’

At that point Joan started to hum the tune, and she said movingly: ‘I want that played at my funeral’

Strangely enough the last time I saw Jack and Mary Stevenson was at Peter Turner's funeral in London, and Laurens Otter was there as well.

*  The National Rank & File Group (NR&FM) of militants had some effect in the early 1960s.   In 1961, Peregrine Gerard Worsthorne was to be appointed as the first deputy editor of The Sunday Telegraph; a job with fewer responsibilities than its title implies, and he rang Jim Pinkerton, then the international secretary of the Syndicalist Workers Federation, to ask about the National Rank & File grouping.  It was in his column in the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Worsthorne gave some critical coverage to the NR&FM entity at the time.  Years later, Peter Turner told me that with the dramatic rise in the 1960s of the anti-nuclear Ban-the-Bomb movement around CND and the Committee of 100, the industrial struggle was sidelined and the Nat. Rank & File groping of militant was absorbed into the C. of 100.

******
 

Thursday, 31 August 2017

War on the Home Front (part one)


by Chris Draper
WHILST British workers concentrated on killing German workers at Passchendaele back home loyal servants of the State used every trick in the book to frighten and torture 16,000 conscientious objectors into uniform. The Church of England assisted as recruiting sergeant and despite their hallowed reputation, a third of Quakers signed up to exterminate their fellow man.

The organised labour movement colluded with the killing but rebel socialists and anarchists refused to bang the jingo drum and here in the North West thirteen brave anarchists confronted the rabid State and refused to bear arms.

Atheists go to Hell Conscription started in 1916 and the only individuals the State considered fit for ‘conscientious objection' (CO) were pacifists obeying orders from GOD. Political objections were derided and dismissed so anarchists were on a hiding to nothing appealing to the authorities.  Once conscription began everyone was deemed to have enlisted so if you didn’t turn yourself in you would be arrested, fined and handed over to the military.  Any refusal to follow orders then led to court martial and imprisonment with hard labour, usually for 112 days for a first offence.

On completion of this sentence you were handed back to the military and the whole cycle recommenced with subsequent sentences extended up to two years and continuing even after hostilities Workers’ Playtime Thirteen anarchists from the North -West of England defied the draft and refused to fight. This was a pretty good contribution, comprising more than a third of the total AC’s (Anarcho-Conchies) from the whole of England. This comparative strength
derived from the influence of the Stockport Workers Freedom Group (WFG)
.
The group started up in 1913 and the following February opened their own clubrooms at 18 Park Street, Hazel Grove, with funds provided by millionaire anarchist and Kodak director, George Davison.  WFG proved a powerhouse of anarchist propaganda and in September 1913 under the auspices of the group, Guy Aldred delivered a series of eight open-air lectures in Stockport’s ‘Armoury & Mersey Squares” on revolutionary topics from, ‘Capitalism and the Child’ to ‘Direct Action, Legislation and the Social War’ .

Once conscription started Aldred was himself imprisoned as a conchie but the Stockport comrades were ready primed to resist
.
Gone Fishing

Legislation enacting Conscription received Royal Assent on 27 January 1916 In Stockport magistrates Court, ‘Inspector Billinge said that on February 1 the Chief Constable took out a warrant under the Defence of the Realm Act to search the premises, 18 Park Street occupied by the Workers Freedom Group or Anarchist Club’. The police failed to arrest anyone on that occasion but seized, ‘a number of documents and pamphlets, many of which were of a revolutionary nature and, no doubt, cry prejudicial to recruiting’
.
The Chief Constable wanted to destroy everything but Herbert Holt , a leading member of WFG, argued their literature should be returned. Although magistrates agreed Holt could retain a few titles for some inexplicable reason they incinerated:  ‘Down With Conscription’, ‘The International Anarchist Manifesto on the War’ and ‘Apes and Patriotism!’ Patriotic Apes.

Hazel Grove police had already removed thousands of similar pamphlets from Langley Cottage, the Hazel Street home of another WFG club member, commercial traveller WilliamJackson. Jackson was grassed up by patriotic member of the local community, John James Warren after William gave him a publication entitled, ‘Unite Against the British Prussians’. Warren testified that in January he’d been a passenger on a train from Manchester to Hazel Grove when Jackson was handing out these pamphlets to passengers. Warren claimed he’d previously seen him giving them out in London Road, Hazel Grove. As a God-fearing jingo he obeyed his patriotic duty and took a copy down to Hazel Grove police station who’d responded with a raid on Jackson’s home. In court, William argued for return of the haul removedfrom his house, which included, “2,000 pamphlets headed, Unite Against the British Prussians–500 pamphlets headed, Fight Against Conscription–100 pamphlets headed, ‘An Appeal to Socialists–and 36 pamphlets headed, A General Strike’.

Unfortunately magistrates ordered the destruction of all these classics but on the plus side, they
did return, ‘Tariff Reform Monthly Notes’!

Hard Won Lessons
Anyone intending to claim “Conscientious Objection” was permitted until 24 June 1916 to appeal to a local ‘Military Service Tribunal (MST)’ but ten of our conchies just ignored their call-up papers and waited to be arrested as “absentees”. Of the remaining three, one lad was yet under-age and the two that applied to have their conscience adjudged by MST soon found their trust was misplaced.

Twenty-six year old lithographer Arthur Helsby applied to St Helen’s MST as soon as conscription began, requesting exemption but offering to serve in the Royal Army Medical Corps (RAMC). Instead he was conscripted into the army’s ‘Non-Combat Corps (NCC)’ and on 25, March 1916carted off to Kinmel army camp in North Wales for military training.

Helsby soon learned ‘non-combatant’ didn’t exempt him from the war machine. The NCC were obliged to wear khaki, obey military orders, dig trenches, load munitions– ‘soldiers without guns' constantly the butt of insults and abuse from regular troops.  When Arthur objected, on Monday 29 May 1916 he was covertly ‘rendered’ over to the killing fields of France for the army’s cunning plan was to transport CO’s over to the battlefield and terrify them into submission..

Refusing orders under fire would then invite court -martial and death by firing squad . Thirty-four of Arthur’s fellow CO’s in France were formally condemned to death be fore their sentences were commuted to 10 years imprisonment after details of this army deception became public.  So Helsby wasn’t shot but for refusing to go on parade was subjected to 28 days of the notorious 'Field Punishment Number One', which involved being spread -eagled and chained to a field gun wheel, or fixed posts, and was routinely described as 'crucifixion'.

On 10 June Arthur was court martialled at Calais and sentenced to two years imprisonment with hard labour, Initially incarcerated in a military prison at Rouen, on 4 July 1916 Helsby was conveyed, in irons, back to England to serve his time at Winchester civil prison. Public outcry over the army’s ‘extraordinary rendition’ prompted the authorities to commute Arthur’s sentence and he was released from Winchester on the 29 August 1916, having served barely two months of a two year sentence. He was bloodied but unbowed Manchester MST.

Thirty-two year old shipping clerk William Greaves made his application for absolute exemption to Manchester MST on 20 September 1916. Like Helsby, he was nevertheless conscripted into the NCC.  He avoided being sent to France but didn’t accept this NCC role and pressed his absolutist claim through both County and Central Tribunals to no good effect. Formally consigned to the Royal Welsh Fusiliers he was first court-martialled at Oswestry and sentenced to serve 6 months in Shrewsbury Prison.   On his release from Shrewsbury he was returned to Oswestry, court-martialled again and then sentenced to a two-year stretch at Liverpool’s Walton Gaol.

I am an Anarchist!’

Oldham-born Walter Barlow, a twenty-one year old “hat leather cutter”, of 2 Stream Terrace, Victoria Road, Stockport put his call-up papers in the bin and was arrested as an absentee. 
 
Unintimidated, on Tuesday 13 June 1916 he told magistrates, ‘I am an anarchist and do not believe in the government of men by men’. Walter went on to expose the cynical function of MST’s in dividing and defusing the peace movement, explaining ‘tribunals were used to smash opposition to the Military Services Act’. Predictably, the magistrates were unpersuaded, fined him 40s. and decreed he be handed over to the military but the military never got their man.

For the duration of WWI Walter Barlow went AWOL.

Collar the Lot

With gaping holes apparent in the conscription net and the last opportunity past to appeal for exemption, the Stockport authorities planned a return to 18 Park Street and this time seize more than just pamphlets.

Anarchist Club Raid–Capture of Absentees at Stockport’ yelled the Manchester Evening News of 22 September 1916’.
Herbert Holt, William Hopkins, William Jackson and Charles Warwick arrested for dodging the draft.
These four were hauled up before magistrates along with a character the authorities couldn’t then identify but we already know as our recently returned hero from France and Winchester comrade Arthur Helsby!

The Stockport constabulary informed the press that this mysterious character was ‘evidently a man of foreign extraction’, which seems a harsh judgement on a man born in Liverpool.
During ongoing enquiries the other four anarchists were each fined 40s. and handed on to the military.
Once the police resolved Arthur’s identity he was carted of to Leeds Prison before being restored to the farcical conscription treadmill and returned to “his regiment” at Kinmel Camp. Four further anarchists were rapidly rounded up in raids in and in and around the WFG clubrooms but I’ll identify them (a long with the two further AC’s) and unravel the rest of this fascinating tale in part two (coming soon on the NV website).
Peace & Love
Christopher Draper

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Eulogy for James Petty: Anarchist & Anglican


by Susan Ewens

MOST of you here today will know Jim only in his incarnation as a priest of the Anglican Catholic Church.  Some of us have known him longer and are aware of the extraordinarily wide extent of his other interests and pursuits that made him such a very special person.  I am going to tell you about a few of the aspects of Jim’s life and interests that you may not have been aware of. 

When Jim died he was still full of life and had he been living in a city with a decent Teaching hospital and higher standards of GP care I am sure he would still be alive today and would have received care appropriate to his health needs. But that is all water on the under the bridge and we all have to learn to do without his companionship, his passionate interests and his lively mind.

Jim was born in 1933, in Burnley, the year that Hitler came to power in Germany.  Burnley was then one of the biggest cotton spinning towns in the world and, like much of Lancashire, had a large Roman Catholic population thanks  to the Irish immigration of the 19th and early 20th century. There was also a  strong strain of Anglican partisanship in the region thanks to leading lights of the County having sided with King Charles I in the Civil War and subsequently supported the Jacobite cause as the Stuarts tried to regain the British throne from the  Hanoverians.   So, in a relatively small town there was a considerable level of religious polarisation both between Anglicans and Roman Catholics and between the non-conformist Protestants and the rest.  Jim could not help but be influenced by this local religious culture. He was educated in Church of England Primary schools.  In fact nearly all Burnley’s children were and still ARE educated in Church Primary Schools either Roman Catholic or Anglican and many of them in church run Secondary Schools, too.

Tragedy hit Jim’s family when he was only 7 years old in July 1940. His beloved father, Morris, a Lance-Sergeant in the East Lancs Regiment, was killed in an accident.  He would often speak with feeling of the upheaval in his young life as his widowed mother embarked upon a series of house moves round the town with him and his younger sister Barbara, as she slowly came to terms with the loss of her husband, at the same time fending off proposals from her husband’s family to "adopt" Jim.  The in-laws were relatively well-off and thought it was obvious that they could give Jim a better upbringing than his now single mother.  Their pressures were however resisted by Mona.  Jim, surprisingly perhaps, called his mother by her fist name, Mona!  I don’t know at what stage in his life this habit started!  I met Jim when he was 40 years old and what soon became noticeable  to me was the frequency with which he mentioned the early trauma of losing his father and the subsequent trail round Burnley from rented house to house with his widowed mother with the good quality family furniture being sold along the way.  It was a miserable time for Jim, the child, and he was indelibly marked by it.

If Mona had given in to her in-laws’ pressures it is possible that Jim would have had a different life after the tragedy of his father’s early death.  He would probably have gone to a grammar school and stayed on to take the school certificate leaving exam at age 16.  He could have stayed on into the sixth form and gone to university if he was lucky.  He may even have been a part of the emigration of part of his father’s family to Australia and we could have been deprived of his presence here in the North of England altogether! But as things turned out he did none of these things and his life took an altogether different trajectory. 
Jim’s mother remarried after the war a man called Ben Wright who had been, if I remember correctly, a professional soldier in both the First and Second World wars. Later another sister, Christine, was added to the family. Jim was not keen on his new stepfather at first but eventually, and I cannot say how many years it took, he became very attached to him and never ceased to praise him for the way he behaved towards his ready-made family.  Jim remained the apple of his mother’s eye,  a matter which did not go unnoticed by his sisters! Not that he was spoilt by his mother, far from it, she was apparently a rather severe parent!

Jim’s schooling ended when he was 15 despite his intellectual promise being recognised by his teachers and his being top of the class in nearly every subject.  Nevertheless, the process of self education via his voracious reading habit aided by his wonderful memory for detail never ceased throughout his life and served him well.

So, instead of the Grammar school and the university Jim’s intellectual life proceeded via the Anglican Church ( he was already a Church Warden in his teens) the Independent Labour Party, the Trade Union Movement (where he was a shop steward already in his teens and subsequently a member of Burnley Trades Council), and via various political clubs and evening classes. His intellectual ability as a competent self-taught seeker after knowledge with all the makings of a true historian was not lost on his evening class tutors and I think I am correct in saying that he was offered adult University entrance to an Oxford College in spite of lacking formal qualification.  This he turned down because by then he was married and he considered the financial insecurity and upheaval of such a change too risky.  

It was an awfully wrong decision!  Jim was made for academe and would have loved the life of a scholar with the cut and thrust of debate in the Senior Common Room and the life of a Don.  If he had grasped this opportunity when it was presented to him it may have been James Petty and not David Starkey presenting riveting TV programmes about the Tudors and Stuarts!  And you can be sure the message would have been altogether more complex than the version usually presented. I don’t understand what sort of inhibition prevented him from taking up this marvellous offer.  Perhaps the same stubbornness and sense of duty that led him to insist on leaving school at age 15 when he could have stayed on longer and matriculated.

His interests, apart from the history of Christianity, the English Reformation and Working Class politics encompassed MANY other fields of study. One was the American Revolution.  Here, his voracious reading and capacity for absorbing detail led him to a different perspective from that we usually hear about militant colonial patriots against the tyrannical British Crown.  In fact, Jim called the American Revolution 'The First American Civil War' because  the colonial population loyal to the Crown were equally balanced against those who wanted independence. 

Many loyalists returned to England after the war impoverished by the loss of their property and livelihoods in America and many others trekked north into Canada to join the British colonies there.  I cannot tell you what joy Jim experienced a few years ago when, quite by chance, when exploring a church in Chester, we came upon an 18th century stone memorial  plaque set high on an interior wall detailing the return of the unfortunate deceased from New York, where he was a prosperous merchant and member of the colonial government, to poverty back home in England as a result of the loss of the American colonies. Today we would call him a refugee.   Jim was always able to cast a necessarily sceptical light on the distortions and omissions of the historical record in those fields in which he had taken a deep interest.  His take on the North American 'Loyalists' was particularly of interest to correspondents of his in the United States, developed courtesy of the Internet, who find the “authorised version” of their own nation’s history sadly deficient in the background details that Jim loved.  Well, the devil is always in the detail, isn’t it?  Jim was a master of the details which often escape notice when historians and popularisers generalise about the broad sweeps of events.

From the Independent Labour Party (ILP) and Peace Pledge Union Jim developed into an Anarcho-Syndicalist and was thus fascinated by the Russian Revolution and the Spanish Civil War in which Anarchists played a part.  In the study of these two 20th century revolutions Jim acquired his scepticism of the Marxist version of history and Marxist political tactics.  He was never starry-eyed about the Hard Left’s totalitarian, anti-democratic tendencies. 

Jim’s Anarchism and Anarcho-syndicalism was never just an intellectual, historical study.  It informed all his practical politics, too.  There were no working class causes in Burnley or the country at large that Jim was not involved in - from the formation of Residents Associations in areas proposed for 'slum clearance' in Burnley, to the Anti motorway Action Group opposing the route of the M65 motorway through North East Lancs; from  the opposition to the SPUC campaign against abortion, to the North East Lancs Campaign Against Racism supporting the growing Pakistani population in North East Lancs, and, of renewed topicality today,  the 'Get Britain Out' campaign of the First Referendum against Common Market Membership in 1975.   He was also busy writing political pamphlets and journal articles and often delivering them door to door while being a regular seller of the Anarchist Journal 'Freedom' and 'Peace News' in Burnley Town Centre.  He inspired the launch of 'The Burnley Voice' magazine in the 1970s written and produced by Burnley Anarchist Group, which ran to SIX editions before folding!  

After the fall of Franco and the restoration of constitutional government in Spain Jim led the British contingent of the International Workers Association convened in Madrid in the Spring of 1984. He also later visited Catalonia and Barcelona with fellow British Anarchists to make contact with Spanish Anarcho Syndicalists campaigning to regain control of the substantial property confiscated from their trade unions by the Franco regime.  

He was also active in the solidarity campaign that surrounded the long running series of disputes involving miners which culminated in the year long Miners’ Strike of 1984-85.  And he was involved in supporting the struggle of the print unions against the Murdoch press and the move of newspaper production to Wapping in 1986.  He was also involved in the anti-Poll Tax agitation that galvanised the country in 1990 when the Thatcher government tried to extend the Property Tax,  previously paid by householders only,  to the whole adult population. It was deemed particularly unfair on young adults of 18 years and over.   This was probably the only national campaign that Jim was involved in that was actually a resounding popular success.  The Poll Tax was repealed! 

 Here is what  an anarchist comrade wrote about Jim in 2004:

'The other major figure, who we may call the "FATHER OF NORTHERN ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM", was and is Jim Petty from BURNLEY.  He was National Secretary of the Direct Action Movement in the 1980s at the time of the miners' strike in which he was very active and he was on the DAM Policy Committee which met in Rochdale in the early 1980s.  He never missed an opportunity to get involved in disputes both local and national: like the Grundwick dispute and the campaign against the attempts to set up anti-trade union newspapers.  He helped to develop anarchism in Burnley over many years with John, Judith, Eileen, Reg and others: organising meetings and campaigns for local workers and immigrant labour.  He was prominent in the campaign against the Poll Tax in the 1990s.  Now he is on the Editorial Panel of NORTHERN VOICES and wrote a remarkable essay in the magazine entitled 'Burnley: the architects of squalor'.  
Jim detested the uninspiring local political class of all parties that had permitted Burnley to decline to such a state.

Another historical passion of Jim’s was the South African Anglo-Zulu Wars of 1879.  In the 1990s he visited South Africa twice with Jennifer Taylor and spent several weeks visiting the sites of the battles where the Zulus massacred the British Army’s redcoats.  Jim demonstrated himself as such an expert on the Anglo Zulu Wars that he was subsequently awarded honorary membership of the Royal Geographical Society after displaying his unparalleled knowledge of the Zulu campaigns under the leadership of General Buller to groups of fellow enthusiasts also visiting the historical battle sites and equally  passionate about the history as he was himself.  

Surprisingly, Jim had enrolled as a boy soldier in the Army soon after leaving school.  I do not know how or why this came about.   But he was such a bookworm as a child that the past was more real to him than the present and he admitted that he had fondly imagined himself either in the Palestine Police or  General  Buller’s Fontier Light Horse fighting Zulus in South Africa or on the Indian North West Frontier!  I think the prospect of being shipped off to Korea in 1951 concentrated his mind, however,  and he found that the reality of Army life was not nearly as exciting or as interesting as the books of derring-do he devoured so avidly all his life and well into old age. Anyway, one of his aunts bought him out of his military service contract and, like most Burnley folk in the 1950s he went to work in the mill where, perhaps surprisingly, he was apprenticed to a well-paid skilled trade as a 'stripper and grinder', an engineering job maintaining textile machinery.  

This was probably the only time in his life that Jim enjoyed a reasonable level of remuneration for his labour. He was part of the skilled 'aristocracy of labour'.  Alas, it was in an industry that was in terminal decline in Lancashire and his prosperity was short lived. After he left the textile industry it was pretty mediocre remuneration for the rest of his working life.  Though the wages were poor satisfaction for Jim was in being part of the Labour Movement trying create a more just society. He was a shop steward nearly all his working life until his retirement from Lucas Aerospace in ...?.  

But he had other jobs, along the way, too.  For example at the Burnley Street Lighting Department.  This involved long periods out doors on foot checking and maintaining the street lamps which must have been mainly gas then and he was pretty much his own boss for much of the time.  I recall him telling me about being asked by an old lady in a rural area if he wouldn’t mind cleaning her windows  to which he agreed and he kept on cleaning them for her whenever he was in the vicinity, and all for free!  Then there was the time he was sent to disconnect a lamp that would not turn itself on and off as required.  When he got there to do the job he was begged NOT to disconnect it by a nearby housewife  who told him her husband was paralysed in bed and liked to watch the shadows cast by the flickering gas light on the walls and ceiling of his room at night.  This was before there was a TV in every room.  Of course, Jim complied.

Then he had a job at  Dunn and Co, Gentleman’s Outfitters in Burnley. He really enjoyed selling quality clothes and was offered the job of manager despite his youth. He himself always wore good tweed jackets, handsome waistcoats, “interesting” hats and the best shoes he could afford.  The first time I saw him he was wearing a mustard and brown check hacking jacket and a deer stalker hat.  His ambition lately was to obtain a Sherlock Holmes style caped Inverness overcoat and I did try to get one for him for Christmas last year but unfortunately I was outbid on ebay.  Jim was very disappointed about that failure, I’m sorry to say.  I wish I had managed to win the bidding because I know it would have given him much joy!  

For a year in the mid-1970s Jim joined me in setting up and running a small cafe in Burnley’s St James’s Street.  Catering is very hard, demanding work and requires practical skills apart from chatting to the customers which was Jim’s forte and the prospect which had beguiled him into proposing the scheme in the first place.  So, after a year of meagre wages for him and no wages for me Jim decided to back out of the project with the insightful words that it was “keeping us both in poverty”.  Jim was accepted back into his former job at Lucas which he picked up where he had left off and was altogether much happier in his own office with the essential outside telephone line where he could plan and execute his political campaigns virtually at his leisure. Jim was happy at Lucas.  It was Burnley’s main employer with several different factory sites round the town and a big workforce which was almost like a large squabbling family.  He was full of stories about it as well as about the machinations between various political groupings in and around the Trade Union movement.

Something else I have not mentioned yet is that for several years Jim was also National President of the Jacobite Society an organisation devoted to the memory and cause of the Stuart  pretenders to the  British throne.  Extraordinary, you might think, for an anarchist  also to be an upholder of the rights of a dynastic line.  But Jim was able to trace the Stuart line down to the present day through generations of European royalty and aristocracy.  Of course, his abiding interest centred on Charles I, the defender of Anglicanism and the Church of England against the takeover of the church and state by Puritans and Protestants which ended in the Civil War and the Dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell.  King Charles the Martyr is an Anglican saint as you all know!  Jim was an expert in the whole of the very long English Reformation from Henry VIII, through the reigns of Edward, Bloody Mary and Elizabeth, James I, Charles I, the English Civil War, The Restoration and the subsequent takeover by Dutch William and his English Stuart cousin Mary, AKA “The Glorious Revolution”.  It lasted well into the Hanoverian period with the two 18th century Jacobite Risings in favour of the Stuarts.  

The Scottish connection of the Stuart monarchs and Pretenders may account for Jim’s attraction to Scotland. He often spent a week’s holiday in Edinburgh during the Edinburgh Festival in August with his longtime friend and member of the Burnley Labour Party Les Marsden.  Everything was done on the cheap. They camped in a small tent.  The mind boggles!

Alongside this rich intellectual and political life, the younger Jim had also found time to go courting and to get married to Mary in 19..(?).  It was not easy getting married to Mary because she was from a staunch Roman Catholic family and her mother, who Jim always called Mrs Richardson (?), took exception to Jim’s political activities.  It cannot have helped that Mary was a music teacher at one of Burnley’s Roman Catholic high schools and was herself somewhat in the public eye just as Jim was.  Back in the 1950s it was a big step for a Roman Catholic to get permission to marry a non-catholic. The non-catholic spouse had to promise to raise the children as Roman Catholics and also had to attend classes with a Roman Catholic priest prior to the marriage in order to learn the essentials of the religion they were marrying into.

Well, as an Anglican Church Warden at St Catherine’s, Jim was a rather slippery fish for Burnley’s Roman Catholic priesthood to land I think we can all easily imagine what these pre-marital lessons in the Roman faith must have been like!  surely the RC’s will have learnt more from Jim than he from them?  He will have delighted in pointing out to them in the politest of possible ways their misunderstanding of both the history of the English Reformation and of the relationship between the Anglican Church and their 'New Church of Trent' as he delighted in calling it.  But as the appointed day of the wedding approached (Easter?) with the cake baked and the dresses made the RC clergy had still not conceded that Jim had jumped over the required hoops to marry Mary in their church.  Jim’s version of events was that he made an ultimatum!  If they were not married on the appointed day in a Roman Church they would be married in an Anglican one so the priests had better get a move on and give their consent!  

 When his son Iain came along in 1960 he was duly baptised and educated in the Roman Catholic faith which must have been a bit of a challenge for Jim, but as far as I can tell he accepted it in good faith!  I guess he would have some satisfaction though in knowing that Iain is now a ‘lapsed’ Roman Catholic with no time for “papsts”.  Iain followed Mary’s interests into a career in music but he cannot have failed to reap the educational and intellectual benefit in his schooldays from his father’s bookish, intellectual pursuits.  While Mary and Iain made music in the music room where Mary’s grand piano held pride of place, Jim read his books in the lounge or printed out  political leaflets on an old duplicating machine in the spare bedrooms upstairs.

Jim was not an ideal parent, I’m afraid and after Mary’s sudden death in 1989 the older he got the worse and more remote his relationship with his son became.  Jim kept his life compartmentalised to a great extent and I don’t think anyone, except Iain himself, realised just how dire Jim’s performance as a father became.  If he had been something of an absentee father courtesy of his political activism during Iain’s childhood and adolescence Iain subsequently became an absentee son especially after he moved to live in The Netherlands.  He did return to visit friends in London but Burnley was not on his itinerary.

When he was offered redundancy from Lucas before reaching retirement age Jim accepted it with alacrity and took the opportunity to become a priest of the Church of England and was ordained in 19...?.  When the Synod voted in favour of ordaining women Jim left the Church of England and helped to set up the Anglican Catholic Church in England and it was to this 'project' that Jim devoted much of the rest of his life while still keeping in touch with Anarchist politics. 

The internet is a great thing, isn’t it?  As soon as Jim became computer literate he started participating on various religion and history message boards and spreading the benefits of his learning amongst people who were largely unaware of the Petty interpretation of the historical relations between the Roman and Anglican Churches as well as other wider historical controversies.  Jim obtained enormous satisfaction from these intellectual disputes which provoked him constantly to renew his own knowledge from his marvelous personal library.

You may not have taken Jim for a horseman but he was.  I am not sure how he acquired the skill to ride a horse but he did and he owned three horses over the years - Seamus, a grey gelding, Carina a mare and finally Angus, a pony for whom Jim aspired to obtain a small cart so he could do a little “light carting” and take people for rides on high days and holidays.  Sadly this ambition did not come to pass because of the need for a licence and insurance but it remained a fond dream that Jim liked to toy with.  

Jim had loads of stories to tell about his experiences and adventures while out riding - like confrontations with motorcar owners who thought they had the right of way over horses on the road, and property owners who denied that the path outside their house or across their field was a bridle way when Jim knew it was.  And like the adventures of the 'Cliviger Light Horse', as Jim called them, a gang of rather wild local children on ponies, for whom Jim somehow  became the responsible adult with the duty of protecting them from harm while galloping round the countryside!  Iain was a member of the Cliviger Light Horse and Jim recalls, despite Mary’s injunction to look after him, turning round to see young Iain cantering along with the reins in his teeth while searching for something in his pocket.  Looking after the horses and riding was one of the few things that brought Jim and Iain together. 

Then there was the time when Carina was in season and attracted the attentions of a nearby stallion who broke away from his irate owner, jumped a gate and proceeded to chase and try to mount Carina while Jim was still in the saddle!  That was both frightening and funny in retrospect!  There was a time when Seamus was moved from his grazing in Stoneyholme to another field the other side of town nearer to where Jim lived. Seamus, was lonely though, and missed his horse companions back in Stoneyholme.  One Saturday afternoon Jim received a phone call from the Police about a large grey horse walking unaccompanied through Burnley town centre and did he know anything about it?  On another occasion Jim was riding down a street where a baker was delivering bread and cakes on wooden trays balanced on his head.  Seamus just helped himself to a few teacakes as he passed.

At the same time that he had Angus the pony Jim also acquired two goats and some hens all of which lived on a piece of land land near to Jim’s home in Hollin Hill.  Strangely, he could not bring himself to drink the goat milk or eat the hen’s eggs himself but he liked to keep the animals anyway. He was also suffering from the worst stage of his Meuniere’s Disease at the time and recalled waking up from a dizzy spell lying on the grass with the pail of goat milk spilled on the ground and the goat licking his face! 

Jim was a great lover of dogs and from his childhood to his death there was always a dog or dogs in his home.  His walks with his dogs were an important part of his recreation and it was a trial for him when his mobility problems prevented him from walking as far and as fast as he would have liked.  A lovely story he had heard that Jim liked to repeat was about a dying man who had a “near death” experience in which all the dogs he had ever owned appeared to him in a dream and they all went walking in the fields together.  Jim certainly hoped that this was true and that he too would be reunited with all his doggie pals.  He had no doubt that dogs have souls and will be waiting for us in heaven.    
In hindsight, Jim’s life looks like an ongoing series of battles against the odds and often against the tide of history. Running through it like the main colour in a tapestry is his Anarchism and Trade Unionism and life-long fight against injustice.  But there is also his passion for the minutiae of history alongside Boy’s Own tales of adventure and his championing of lost causes like that of the American Empire Loyalists,  the Martyred King Charles I and the Jacobites, and his defence of the disgraced General Buller who was scapegoated for the debacle of the Zulu Wars.  Jim had a commemorative plate with Buller’s face on it on his China rack!  Then there was his abiding passion for Anglicanism which culminated in his ordination and his support for the cause of traditional Anglican teaching in the face of the modernising neo-Anglicans who now dominate the Church of England.  Though he believed in social justice Jim did not hold that Equal Opportunities Legislation had any role to play in modifying centuries' old religious teaching or practice.


So I guess we have to assume that he was temperamentally disposed heart and soul to defense of the underdog and defence of his principles.  He enjoyed being part of a 'cause', a 'movement' and a 'struggle' and did enjoy occasional victories.  Yes, Dear Jim, you will be remembered for all your passionate battles against the odds, at least for as long as your friends and supporters survive and historians of the future delve into the treasury of paper and internet archives to which you have contributed.