Not very long ago, I got into a
conversation with a young Asian lad in my local library. He told me that he was
a pupil at Stockport Grammar School, which I understand is a fee-paying
independent school. He told me that he was at the school on a scholarship which
greatly impressed me. I said to him that he'd obviously secured a place at the
school on his wits and abilities and not on his parents' ability to pay the
fees.
I knew one young girl who was the
daughter of a friend, who attended Oldham Hulme Grammar School. She told her
father that many of her contemporaries struggled with the academic work and
were only at the school because their parents could afford the fees. She
thought many of them weren't really grammar school material at all. Her father
told me that this was probably correct but the school needed the money. I then
said to him but what if you're an intelligent child and your parents can't
afford the fees? He said to me, that if that was the case, you shouldn't apply
in the first place. I thought this a strange comment coming from a man who
professed to believe in something called the 'meritocracy', which I think is a complete fallacy.
The comprehensive system of education
was a failed attempt to introduce a form of egalitarianism into the British
state education system and to increase social mobility. Many middle-class
parents are prepared to sell their homes and to relocate to other areas where
there are better performing schools for their children. This not only drives up
house prices but increases demand for school places in better state schools and
limits access to less affluent families.
Bridget Philipson, Labour's education
minister, said recently that the state education system had failed "white working-class children", but
I've been hearing this for most of my life. When I was at primary school, we all
seemed to know which of our contemporaries were likely to go to the grammar school.
Yet, if you read 'The Uses of Literacy'
by Richard Hoggart, it is clear that for some working-class children from poor
backgrounds, like Hoggart, selection by the 11+ examination and education
grants, did lead to upward social mobility.
A man that I know who was at primary
school with me in the early 1960s, said to me only recently, that if your
father wore overalls, you weren't going anywhere in those days. I would caution
anyone against being too fatalistic. I think we should always use our best
endeavours, but he obviously saw the education system has one huge con-trick
and a racket for the middle-classes. He might well have a point. A student that
I met at Manchester University, who was from Wakefield, once said to me that
he'd been there a week and that I was the first person that he'd spoken to who
had a northern accent. I know of one female student who spoke with a Geordie
accent, who was interviewed for a place at Oxford University, and was asked
what made someone like her think she could come to place like this. I was told
of another female student that attended an interview at Oxford, who was asked
how many bedrooms her father's house had.