Showing posts with label DAM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DAM. Show all posts

Monday, 7 August 2017

'Social action or social media' asks Michael Netto

'Social media is no replacement for social action', says 

Michael Netto*, former regional President of Unite on Gibraltar

PEOPLE need to stop using social media in order to let off steam and direct their complaints to the unions who can do something to remedy them.

This is the opinion of Michael Netto, who has recently retired from his positions in Gibraltar Unite the Union, and whose efforts in the union movements have been second to none in the community, especially during May Day celebrations.

Netto started getting involved in the unions leafleting households to inform the public leading to his participation in the first real general strike for workers' rights and conditions in 1972.  'Whereas nowadays we have internet, when I was 16 I would go with brother and father handing out leaflets door-to-door about any issue which the union at the time wanted to highlight,' he said.

He stepped up his participation in the unions after finishing his studies at the technical college, where he remember the festivities at this time of the year:  
'The May Days of those years were done in the Regal Cinema where issues of the public and private sector were highlighted through films and documentaries that described the military coups in Chile or the strikes in England.
'However, the conditions of workers, both in Gibraltar and the rest of Europe were not what they were today. Even with the economic crisis now, they aren't as degrading with very little consideration for health and safety or employment rights back then.'

For workers


He recalled a May Day in the 1980s, which he spent picketing the South Depot of the MoD's Department of the Environment where a UK duty manager with a very colonial attitude tried to run over one of the union's shop stewards:  'Everybody was saying that unless that guy wasn't sent back to the UK we wouldn't start work and even though the MoD didn't shift him immediately, he was moved to the North Depot before finally being sent back after a couple of months.'
Netto, who headed the Trade and General Worker's Union (TGWU), constantly fought the GSD's decision to move May Day to the first Monday of the month, as along with its successors, Unite the Union, they felt that what was being celebrated were all the past victories for all our workers.
'We take for granted the 40-hour week, health and safety, maternity and paternity rights which among 1001 things have been achieved through union struggles all over the world," he continued. "Gibraltar has still got many rights that have been lost in many parts of Europe and there are still many things that need to be achieved so we are keen to maintain the May Day tradition.'
When the GSLP (Gib. Socialist Labour Party)/ Liberals came to office in 2011 they not only reinstated May Day but also chose to celebrate Worker's Memorial Day, reinforcing that desire to honour the unions' efforts, and those individuals that have lost their lives at work.
'In line with other European countries, political parties that pursue progressive ideas tend to do events on May 1,' said Netto.  'Unfortunately, there's only one party that has done that and that's the GSLP/Liberals, reflecting a very good relationship between them and Unite.'
He described the current Government having been 'more courageous' than the GSD ever was in pursuing worker issues both in the public and private sectors.

'Guerilla typists'

 Netto said he gets very disappointed with the way that ex-union activists criticise Unite's activities in the street or social media:  'I'm retired now but I intend to contribute in one way or another to the trade union movement rather than take on this bitterness that only aims to bring down the trade union movement.'
While he recognises that the trade unions locally and abroad are different to what they were in yesteryear, he believes that change has come because society itself has shifted.
'We no longer measure the success of the unions by the number of strikes we've had," said Netto. "Moreover, the way we do things has changed and people prefer to go to a lawyer than a union to the extent that sometimes our achievements work against us because people don't feel aggrieved anymore.
'Not only that but while previously workers would discuss their issues in the workplace or with the union, nowadays they become 'guerilla typists'. They explain their issue on social media to make themselves feel good rather than taking further action to find solutions.'

                                                                                      05-05-15 PANORAMAdailyGIBRALTAR
*   Michael Netto was a member of the anarcho-syndicalist Direct Action Movement (DAM), when he was working in England in the early 1980s, and his father, who became Regional Secretary of the then Gibraltar Branch of the British Transport & General Worker Union in the 1980s was a member of the Syndicalist Workers' Federation (SWF) in the 1960s.
gibraltarpanorama.gi/mobile/displayarticle.aspx?smid=15209&aid=118306 

Friday, 11 March 2016

Gibraltar & the Spanish Civil War


ON the 17th, February 2016, the Gibraltar branch of Unite
the Union held a  symposium at the John Mackintosh Hall
Gibraltar is about to add to the story of the role played
by Gibraltar during the Spanish Civil War.  Several retired
members of Unite were involved, including Alfred Sacramento,
Alfred Olivero, and Michael Netto, who all helped to set up the undertaking.
The Gibraltarian, Mr. Netto was himself a member of the British
anarcho-syndicalist Direct Action Movement (DAM) in the 1970s. 
The Gibraltar Chronicle reported (17/02/16):
'With close to 500 people attending tonight’s symposium
at the John Mackintosh Hall Gibraltar is about to
add to the story of the role played by Gibraltar during the
Spanish Civil War.  Historians Dr Gareth Stockey,
Dr Chris Grocott and Professor Pepe Algarbani,
all experts in the field will form part of the
symposium which will include an interview, exclusively recorded
for the event, with Professor Paul Preston author of the
book ‘The Spanish Holocaust’.
On the 24th, February 2016, the following report appeared in the Gibraltar Chronicle by

GIBRALTAR played a very significant role in the unfolding of the Spanish Civil War, particularly in the early months according to Dr Chris Grocott. One of the key note speakers at the Unite Symposium, he spoke of how in the opening days of the Spanish Civil War virtually all communications between British diplomats in Spain and the British Government were relayed through Gibraltar. A lecturer in Management and Economic History at the University Of Leicester, School Of Management, Dr Grocott, has written several articles and book chapters on the history of Gibraltar examining aspects of its politics, industrial relations, and economic development.
In an interview with the Chronicle he said it was in Gibraltar that the first British response to events in Spain had to be formulated.
'Ironically, the Colonial Authorities decided to adopt a position of official neutrality whilst at the same time working behind the scene to assist the rebels whilst prevaricating at requests for assistance from the Spanish Government.  Effectively, of course, this became Britain’s position more generally once the non-intervention treaty was signed,' he says
Dr Grocott who has studied Gibraltar for over fifteen years is looking forward to the symposium and acknowledges he is always happy to talk about the “very interesting history of its people”.
He believes the Spanish Civil War period remains fascinating because one can see so many of the international debates over Spain being played out in Gibraltar too.
'We also have very rich archival material both in Gibraltar and in Britain to help understand this period. Excitingly, there also appears to be increasing amounts of material relevant to Gibraltar and the Civil War being discovered in the Spanish archives and in private collections. Whilst in recent years there have been some excellent histories of Gibraltar and the Spanish Civil War written, what is exciting is that there is definitely more to learn,' he says.
Although presently his research often takes him far away from Gibraltar’s history he is now combining the history of Gibraltar with the history of industrial relations.
With Gareth Stockey (who will also be in Gibraltar) and Jo Grady he is looking at anarchist movements in Gibraltar and the Campo in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Their next project will be to look at how the Transport and General Workers’ Union, now Unite, came to displace anarchist organisations from Gibraltar’s industrial relations scene in the aftermath of the Great War of 1914-18.
Talking about the Spanish Civil War he suggests it is clearly still a period of history which affects life in Spain tremendously.
'At a grand level, policies such as the Law of Historical Memory remind us of what is at stake in relation to the events of 1936-39.  But even little things keep the events and participants of the Civil War in people’s minds such as monuments and street names.  In other words, for many the Civil War is actually hard to forget.
'However, in many of the older histories of Gibraltar, the Spanish Civil War is often ignored, or else seen as a breaking point between Gibraltar and Spain. This was not the case, as Gareth Stockey has persuasively argued, and events such as this commemoration of life in Gibraltar during the Civil War help us to reclaim this past.'
Dr Grocott believes that in many ways, the Spanish Civil War was uniquely Spanish in its origins. But the themes and ideological contrasts of the Civil War – democracy and dictatorship, fascism and communism, regionalism and nationalism, caught the imagination of people in Europe and globally.
'For many, the politics of the Civil War spoke not only to the conflicts that were going on in Spain but also to those which they faced every day themselves.  or governments, the Civil War was not so much a “dry run” as a proxy for their foreign policy goals – the UK and France attempting to avoid war, Germany and Italy flexing their military might, and the Soviet Union struggling to come to terms with how to deal with capitalism and fascism, both economic and political systems its rulers profoundly disagreed with,' he adds
'Much of this international political landscape was swept away after 1945, but Franco remained and so too did the ability of the politics of the Civil War to speak to the convictions of people far beyond Spain.'
And of his own contribution to the symposium he looked at what had been written about Gibraltar and the Spanish Civil War and asked how we might broaden the debate out.
'We know that the TGWU campaigned actively on behalf of the Republic but given the diversity of political positions in Spain, might we now re-interpret some of the events of the Civil War years and suggest ways that we can identify more complex political positions playing out in Gibraltar’s history?' he asks.
This year represents the anniversary of the Spanish Civil War, but it also holds a new beginning – the inaugural academic year of the University of Gibraltar, he continues:
'I think having a university in Gibraltar invites us to think about the history of Gibraltar as an academic subject.  What themes are important to examine, and what debates do we want to have?'
Dr Grocott also looked at the changing ways in which historians have seen the Civil War in the past thirty years or so.
'Traditionally historians have viewed Gibraltarian’s sympathies in the Civil War to have been filtered through an ‘us and them’ lens.  In reality, I will suggest that the connections between Gibraltar and Spain were so close that the response to the Civil War was raw and heartfelt; we need to decide how we are going to integrate that into the writing of Gibraltar’s history and question why it isn’t already part of it.'
In Spain, of course, the Civil War was utterly crucial, he adds.
'The repression in the years following the Civil War led to death or to exile for many Spaniards.  Internationally, the dictatorship provided support for the United States and Britain in the Cold War, but this relationship was one of necessity given the perceived Soviet threat.  But closer to Gibraltar, the obvious outcome of the Civil War – economic ruin in Spain and the need to deflect domestic discontent outwards – led to increased tension at the Gibraltar-Spain frontier from 1954 and, as we all know, its closure from 1969 for well over ten years.'
He also suggested that in some ways, it is easier to focus on the cleavages between Gibraltar and Spain since 1939.
'The closure of the frontier, the Spanish propaganda campaign against Gibraltar, and the vicissitudes Gibraltarian politicians have faced in dealing with international organisations such as the United Nations all go a long way to helping us forget that up until 1954 the relationship between Gibraltar and the surrounding hinterland was very close.  Events such as this commemoration of the anniversary of the outbreak of the Civil War remind us of the personal ties that existed at the time between people in Gibraltar and in Spain.'
And he added how these ties were on-going and cruelly disrupted – at times severed – during the closure of the frontier.
'It’s natural to hope that this event will help people to reflect on the relationship between Gibraltar and the Campo.'

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Eulogy for James Petty: Anarchist & Anglican


by Susan Ewens

MOST of you here today will know Jim only in his incarnation as a priest of the Anglican Catholic Church.  Some of us have known him longer and are aware of the extraordinarily wide extent of his other interests and pursuits that made him such a very special person.  I am going to tell you about a few of the aspects of Jim’s life and interests that you may not have been aware of. 

When Jim died he was still full of life and had he been living in a city with a decent Teaching hospital and higher standards of GP care I am sure he would still be alive today and would have received care appropriate to his health needs. But that is all water on the under the bridge and we all have to learn to do without his companionship, his passionate interests and his lively mind.

Jim was born in 1933, in Burnley, the year that Hitler came to power in Germany.  Burnley was then one of the biggest cotton spinning towns in the world and, like much of Lancashire, had a large Roman Catholic population thanks  to the Irish immigration of the 19th and early 20th century. There was also a  strong strain of Anglican partisanship in the region thanks to leading lights of the County having sided with King Charles I in the Civil War and subsequently supported the Jacobite cause as the Stuarts tried to regain the British throne from the  Hanoverians.   So, in a relatively small town there was a considerable level of religious polarisation both between Anglicans and Roman Catholics and between the non-conformist Protestants and the rest.  Jim could not help but be influenced by this local religious culture. He was educated in Church of England Primary schools.  In fact nearly all Burnley’s children were and still ARE educated in Church Primary Schools either Roman Catholic or Anglican and many of them in church run Secondary Schools, too.

Tragedy hit Jim’s family when he was only 7 years old in July 1940. His beloved father, Morris, a Lance-Sergeant in the East Lancs Regiment, was killed in an accident.  He would often speak with feeling of the upheaval in his young life as his widowed mother embarked upon a series of house moves round the town with him and his younger sister Barbara, as she slowly came to terms with the loss of her husband, at the same time fending off proposals from her husband’s family to "adopt" Jim.  The in-laws were relatively well-off and thought it was obvious that they could give Jim a better upbringing than his now single mother.  Their pressures were however resisted by Mona.  Jim, surprisingly perhaps, called his mother by her fist name, Mona!  I don’t know at what stage in his life this habit started!  I met Jim when he was 40 years old and what soon became noticeable  to me was the frequency with which he mentioned the early trauma of losing his father and the subsequent trail round Burnley from rented house to house with his widowed mother with the good quality family furniture being sold along the way.  It was a miserable time for Jim, the child, and he was indelibly marked by it.

If Mona had given in to her in-laws’ pressures it is possible that Jim would have had a different life after the tragedy of his father’s early death.  He would probably have gone to a grammar school and stayed on to take the school certificate leaving exam at age 16.  He could have stayed on into the sixth form and gone to university if he was lucky.  He may even have been a part of the emigration of part of his father’s family to Australia and we could have been deprived of his presence here in the North of England altogether! But as things turned out he did none of these things and his life took an altogether different trajectory. 
Jim’s mother remarried after the war a man called Ben Wright who had been, if I remember correctly, a professional soldier in both the First and Second World wars. Later another sister, Christine, was added to the family. Jim was not keen on his new stepfather at first but eventually, and I cannot say how many years it took, he became very attached to him and never ceased to praise him for the way he behaved towards his ready-made family.  Jim remained the apple of his mother’s eye,  a matter which did not go unnoticed by his sisters! Not that he was spoilt by his mother, far from it, she was apparently a rather severe parent!

Jim’s schooling ended when he was 15 despite his intellectual promise being recognised by his teachers and his being top of the class in nearly every subject.  Nevertheless, the process of self education via his voracious reading habit aided by his wonderful memory for detail never ceased throughout his life and served him well.

So, instead of the Grammar school and the university Jim’s intellectual life proceeded via the Anglican Church ( he was already a Church Warden in his teens) the Independent Labour Party, the Trade Union Movement (where he was a shop steward already in his teens and subsequently a member of Burnley Trades Council), and via various political clubs and evening classes. His intellectual ability as a competent self-taught seeker after knowledge with all the makings of a true historian was not lost on his evening class tutors and I think I am correct in saying that he was offered adult University entrance to an Oxford College in spite of lacking formal qualification.  This he turned down because by then he was married and he considered the financial insecurity and upheaval of such a change too risky.  

It was an awfully wrong decision!  Jim was made for academe and would have loved the life of a scholar with the cut and thrust of debate in the Senior Common Room and the life of a Don.  If he had grasped this opportunity when it was presented to him it may have been James Petty and not David Starkey presenting riveting TV programmes about the Tudors and Stuarts!  And you can be sure the message would have been altogether more complex than the version usually presented. I don’t understand what sort of inhibition prevented him from taking up this marvellous offer.  Perhaps the same stubbornness and sense of duty that led him to insist on leaving school at age 15 when he could have stayed on longer and matriculated.

His interests, apart from the history of Christianity, the English Reformation and Working Class politics encompassed MANY other fields of study. One was the American Revolution.  Here, his voracious reading and capacity for absorbing detail led him to a different perspective from that we usually hear about militant colonial patriots against the tyrannical British Crown.  In fact, Jim called the American Revolution 'The First American Civil War' because  the colonial population loyal to the Crown were equally balanced against those who wanted independence. 

Many loyalists returned to England after the war impoverished by the loss of their property and livelihoods in America and many others trekked north into Canada to join the British colonies there.  I cannot tell you what joy Jim experienced a few years ago when, quite by chance, when exploring a church in Chester, we came upon an 18th century stone memorial  plaque set high on an interior wall detailing the return of the unfortunate deceased from New York, where he was a prosperous merchant and member of the colonial government, to poverty back home in England as a result of the loss of the American colonies. Today we would call him a refugee.   Jim was always able to cast a necessarily sceptical light on the distortions and omissions of the historical record in those fields in which he had taken a deep interest.  His take on the North American 'Loyalists' was particularly of interest to correspondents of his in the United States, developed courtesy of the Internet, who find the “authorised version” of their own nation’s history sadly deficient in the background details that Jim loved.  Well, the devil is always in the detail, isn’t it?  Jim was a master of the details which often escape notice when historians and popularisers generalise about the broad sweeps of events.

From the Independent Labour Party (ILP) and Peace Pledge Union Jim developed into an Anarcho-Syndicalist and was thus fascinated by the Russian Revolution and the Spanish Civil War in which Anarchists played a part.  In the study of these two 20th century revolutions Jim acquired his scepticism of the Marxist version of history and Marxist political tactics.  He was never starry-eyed about the Hard Left’s totalitarian, anti-democratic tendencies. 

Jim’s Anarchism and Anarcho-syndicalism was never just an intellectual, historical study.  It informed all his practical politics, too.  There were no working class causes in Burnley or the country at large that Jim was not involved in - from the formation of Residents Associations in areas proposed for 'slum clearance' in Burnley, to the Anti motorway Action Group opposing the route of the M65 motorway through North East Lancs; from  the opposition to the SPUC campaign against abortion, to the North East Lancs Campaign Against Racism supporting the growing Pakistani population in North East Lancs, and, of renewed topicality today,  the 'Get Britain Out' campaign of the First Referendum against Common Market Membership in 1975.   He was also busy writing political pamphlets and journal articles and often delivering them door to door while being a regular seller of the Anarchist Journal 'Freedom' and 'Peace News' in Burnley Town Centre.  He inspired the launch of 'The Burnley Voice' magazine in the 1970s written and produced by Burnley Anarchist Group, which ran to SIX editions before folding!  

After the fall of Franco and the restoration of constitutional government in Spain Jim led the British contingent of the International Workers Association convened in Madrid in the Spring of 1984. He also later visited Catalonia and Barcelona with fellow British Anarchists to make contact with Spanish Anarcho Syndicalists campaigning to regain control of the substantial property confiscated from their trade unions by the Franco regime.  

He was also active in the solidarity campaign that surrounded the long running series of disputes involving miners which culminated in the year long Miners’ Strike of 1984-85.  And he was involved in supporting the struggle of the print unions against the Murdoch press and the move of newspaper production to Wapping in 1986.  He was also involved in the anti-Poll Tax agitation that galvanised the country in 1990 when the Thatcher government tried to extend the Property Tax,  previously paid by householders only,  to the whole adult population. It was deemed particularly unfair on young adults of 18 years and over.   This was probably the only national campaign that Jim was involved in that was actually a resounding popular success.  The Poll Tax was repealed! 

 Here is what  an anarchist comrade wrote about Jim in 2004:

'The other major figure, who we may call the "FATHER OF NORTHERN ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM", was and is Jim Petty from BURNLEY.  He was National Secretary of the Direct Action Movement in the 1980s at the time of the miners' strike in which he was very active and he was on the DAM Policy Committee which met in Rochdale in the early 1980s.  He never missed an opportunity to get involved in disputes both local and national: like the Grundwick dispute and the campaign against the attempts to set up anti-trade union newspapers.  He helped to develop anarchism in Burnley over many years with John, Judith, Eileen, Reg and others: organising meetings and campaigns for local workers and immigrant labour.  He was prominent in the campaign against the Poll Tax in the 1990s.  Now he is on the Editorial Panel of NORTHERN VOICES and wrote a remarkable essay in the magazine entitled 'Burnley: the architects of squalor'.  
Jim detested the uninspiring local political class of all parties that had permitted Burnley to decline to such a state.

Another historical passion of Jim’s was the South African Anglo-Zulu Wars of 1879.  In the 1990s he visited South Africa twice with Jennifer Taylor and spent several weeks visiting the sites of the battles where the Zulus massacred the British Army’s redcoats.  Jim demonstrated himself as such an expert on the Anglo Zulu Wars that he was subsequently awarded honorary membership of the Royal Geographical Society after displaying his unparalleled knowledge of the Zulu campaigns under the leadership of General Buller to groups of fellow enthusiasts also visiting the historical battle sites and equally  passionate about the history as he was himself.  

Surprisingly, Jim had enrolled as a boy soldier in the Army soon after leaving school.  I do not know how or why this came about.   But he was such a bookworm as a child that the past was more real to him than the present and he admitted that he had fondly imagined himself either in the Palestine Police or  General  Buller’s Fontier Light Horse fighting Zulus in South Africa or on the Indian North West Frontier!  I think the prospect of being shipped off to Korea in 1951 concentrated his mind, however,  and he found that the reality of Army life was not nearly as exciting or as interesting as the books of derring-do he devoured so avidly all his life and well into old age. Anyway, one of his aunts bought him out of his military service contract and, like most Burnley folk in the 1950s he went to work in the mill where, perhaps surprisingly, he was apprenticed to a well-paid skilled trade as a 'stripper and grinder', an engineering job maintaining textile machinery.  

This was probably the only time in his life that Jim enjoyed a reasonable level of remuneration for his labour. He was part of the skilled 'aristocracy of labour'.  Alas, it was in an industry that was in terminal decline in Lancashire and his prosperity was short lived. After he left the textile industry it was pretty mediocre remuneration for the rest of his working life.  Though the wages were poor satisfaction for Jim was in being part of the Labour Movement trying create a more just society. He was a shop steward nearly all his working life until his retirement from Lucas Aerospace in ...?.  

But he had other jobs, along the way, too.  For example at the Burnley Street Lighting Department.  This involved long periods out doors on foot checking and maintaining the street lamps which must have been mainly gas then and he was pretty much his own boss for much of the time.  I recall him telling me about being asked by an old lady in a rural area if he wouldn’t mind cleaning her windows  to which he agreed and he kept on cleaning them for her whenever he was in the vicinity, and all for free!  Then there was the time he was sent to disconnect a lamp that would not turn itself on and off as required.  When he got there to do the job he was begged NOT to disconnect it by a nearby housewife  who told him her husband was paralysed in bed and liked to watch the shadows cast by the flickering gas light on the walls and ceiling of his room at night.  This was before there was a TV in every room.  Of course, Jim complied.

Then he had a job at  Dunn and Co, Gentleman’s Outfitters in Burnley. He really enjoyed selling quality clothes and was offered the job of manager despite his youth. He himself always wore good tweed jackets, handsome waistcoats, “interesting” hats and the best shoes he could afford.  The first time I saw him he was wearing a mustard and brown check hacking jacket and a deer stalker hat.  His ambition lately was to obtain a Sherlock Holmes style caped Inverness overcoat and I did try to get one for him for Christmas last year but unfortunately I was outbid on ebay.  Jim was very disappointed about that failure, I’m sorry to say.  I wish I had managed to win the bidding because I know it would have given him much joy!  

For a year in the mid-1970s Jim joined me in setting up and running a small cafe in Burnley’s St James’s Street.  Catering is very hard, demanding work and requires practical skills apart from chatting to the customers which was Jim’s forte and the prospect which had beguiled him into proposing the scheme in the first place.  So, after a year of meagre wages for him and no wages for me Jim decided to back out of the project with the insightful words that it was “keeping us both in poverty”.  Jim was accepted back into his former job at Lucas which he picked up where he had left off and was altogether much happier in his own office with the essential outside telephone line where he could plan and execute his political campaigns virtually at his leisure. Jim was happy at Lucas.  It was Burnley’s main employer with several different factory sites round the town and a big workforce which was almost like a large squabbling family.  He was full of stories about it as well as about the machinations between various political groupings in and around the Trade Union movement.

Something else I have not mentioned yet is that for several years Jim was also National President of the Jacobite Society an organisation devoted to the memory and cause of the Stuart  pretenders to the  British throne.  Extraordinary, you might think, for an anarchist  also to be an upholder of the rights of a dynastic line.  But Jim was able to trace the Stuart line down to the present day through generations of European royalty and aristocracy.  Of course, his abiding interest centred on Charles I, the defender of Anglicanism and the Church of England against the takeover of the church and state by Puritans and Protestants which ended in the Civil War and the Dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell.  King Charles the Martyr is an Anglican saint as you all know!  Jim was an expert in the whole of the very long English Reformation from Henry VIII, through the reigns of Edward, Bloody Mary and Elizabeth, James I, Charles I, the English Civil War, The Restoration and the subsequent takeover by Dutch William and his English Stuart cousin Mary, AKA “The Glorious Revolution”.  It lasted well into the Hanoverian period with the two 18th century Jacobite Risings in favour of the Stuarts.  

The Scottish connection of the Stuart monarchs and Pretenders may account for Jim’s attraction to Scotland. He often spent a week’s holiday in Edinburgh during the Edinburgh Festival in August with his longtime friend and member of the Burnley Labour Party Les Marsden.  Everything was done on the cheap. They camped in a small tent.  The mind boggles!

Alongside this rich intellectual and political life, the younger Jim had also found time to go courting and to get married to Mary in 19..(?).  It was not easy getting married to Mary because she was from a staunch Roman Catholic family and her mother, who Jim always called Mrs Richardson (?), took exception to Jim’s political activities.  It cannot have helped that Mary was a music teacher at one of Burnley’s Roman Catholic high schools and was herself somewhat in the public eye just as Jim was.  Back in the 1950s it was a big step for a Roman Catholic to get permission to marry a non-catholic. The non-catholic spouse had to promise to raise the children as Roman Catholics and also had to attend classes with a Roman Catholic priest prior to the marriage in order to learn the essentials of the religion they were marrying into.

Well, as an Anglican Church Warden at St Catherine’s, Jim was a rather slippery fish for Burnley’s Roman Catholic priesthood to land I think we can all easily imagine what these pre-marital lessons in the Roman faith must have been like!  surely the RC’s will have learnt more from Jim than he from them?  He will have delighted in pointing out to them in the politest of possible ways their misunderstanding of both the history of the English Reformation and of the relationship between the Anglican Church and their 'New Church of Trent' as he delighted in calling it.  But as the appointed day of the wedding approached (Easter?) with the cake baked and the dresses made the RC clergy had still not conceded that Jim had jumped over the required hoops to marry Mary in their church.  Jim’s version of events was that he made an ultimatum!  If they were not married on the appointed day in a Roman Church they would be married in an Anglican one so the priests had better get a move on and give their consent!  

 When his son Iain came along in 1960 he was duly baptised and educated in the Roman Catholic faith which must have been a bit of a challenge for Jim, but as far as I can tell he accepted it in good faith!  I guess he would have some satisfaction though in knowing that Iain is now a ‘lapsed’ Roman Catholic with no time for “papsts”.  Iain followed Mary’s interests into a career in music but he cannot have failed to reap the educational and intellectual benefit in his schooldays from his father’s bookish, intellectual pursuits.  While Mary and Iain made music in the music room where Mary’s grand piano held pride of place, Jim read his books in the lounge or printed out  political leaflets on an old duplicating machine in the spare bedrooms upstairs.

Jim was not an ideal parent, I’m afraid and after Mary’s sudden death in 1989 the older he got the worse and more remote his relationship with his son became.  Jim kept his life compartmentalised to a great extent and I don’t think anyone, except Iain himself, realised just how dire Jim’s performance as a father became.  If he had been something of an absentee father courtesy of his political activism during Iain’s childhood and adolescence Iain subsequently became an absentee son especially after he moved to live in The Netherlands.  He did return to visit friends in London but Burnley was not on his itinerary.

When he was offered redundancy from Lucas before reaching retirement age Jim accepted it with alacrity and took the opportunity to become a priest of the Church of England and was ordained in 19...?.  When the Synod voted in favour of ordaining women Jim left the Church of England and helped to set up the Anglican Catholic Church in England and it was to this 'project' that Jim devoted much of the rest of his life while still keeping in touch with Anarchist politics. 

The internet is a great thing, isn’t it?  As soon as Jim became computer literate he started participating on various religion and history message boards and spreading the benefits of his learning amongst people who were largely unaware of the Petty interpretation of the historical relations between the Roman and Anglican Churches as well as other wider historical controversies.  Jim obtained enormous satisfaction from these intellectual disputes which provoked him constantly to renew his own knowledge from his marvelous personal library.

You may not have taken Jim for a horseman but he was.  I am not sure how he acquired the skill to ride a horse but he did and he owned three horses over the years - Seamus, a grey gelding, Carina a mare and finally Angus, a pony for whom Jim aspired to obtain a small cart so he could do a little “light carting” and take people for rides on high days and holidays.  Sadly this ambition did not come to pass because of the need for a licence and insurance but it remained a fond dream that Jim liked to toy with.  

Jim had loads of stories to tell about his experiences and adventures while out riding - like confrontations with motorcar owners who thought they had the right of way over horses on the road, and property owners who denied that the path outside their house or across their field was a bridle way when Jim knew it was.  And like the adventures of the 'Cliviger Light Horse', as Jim called them, a gang of rather wild local children on ponies, for whom Jim somehow  became the responsible adult with the duty of protecting them from harm while galloping round the countryside!  Iain was a member of the Cliviger Light Horse and Jim recalls, despite Mary’s injunction to look after him, turning round to see young Iain cantering along with the reins in his teeth while searching for something in his pocket.  Looking after the horses and riding was one of the few things that brought Jim and Iain together. 

Then there was the time when Carina was in season and attracted the attentions of a nearby stallion who broke away from his irate owner, jumped a gate and proceeded to chase and try to mount Carina while Jim was still in the saddle!  That was both frightening and funny in retrospect!  There was a time when Seamus was moved from his grazing in Stoneyholme to another field the other side of town nearer to where Jim lived. Seamus, was lonely though, and missed his horse companions back in Stoneyholme.  One Saturday afternoon Jim received a phone call from the Police about a large grey horse walking unaccompanied through Burnley town centre and did he know anything about it?  On another occasion Jim was riding down a street where a baker was delivering bread and cakes on wooden trays balanced on his head.  Seamus just helped himself to a few teacakes as he passed.

At the same time that he had Angus the pony Jim also acquired two goats and some hens all of which lived on a piece of land land near to Jim’s home in Hollin Hill.  Strangely, he could not bring himself to drink the goat milk or eat the hen’s eggs himself but he liked to keep the animals anyway. He was also suffering from the worst stage of his Meuniere’s Disease at the time and recalled waking up from a dizzy spell lying on the grass with the pail of goat milk spilled on the ground and the goat licking his face! 

Jim was a great lover of dogs and from his childhood to his death there was always a dog or dogs in his home.  His walks with his dogs were an important part of his recreation and it was a trial for him when his mobility problems prevented him from walking as far and as fast as he would have liked.  A lovely story he had heard that Jim liked to repeat was about a dying man who had a “near death” experience in which all the dogs he had ever owned appeared to him in a dream and they all went walking in the fields together.  Jim certainly hoped that this was true and that he too would be reunited with all his doggie pals.  He had no doubt that dogs have souls and will be waiting for us in heaven.    
In hindsight, Jim’s life looks like an ongoing series of battles against the odds and often against the tide of history. Running through it like the main colour in a tapestry is his Anarchism and Trade Unionism and life-long fight against injustice.  But there is also his passion for the minutiae of history alongside Boy’s Own tales of adventure and his championing of lost causes like that of the American Empire Loyalists,  the Martyred King Charles I and the Jacobites, and his defence of the disgraced General Buller who was scapegoated for the debacle of the Zulu Wars.  Jim had a commemorative plate with Buller’s face on it on his China rack!  Then there was his abiding passion for Anglicanism which culminated in his ordination and his support for the cause of traditional Anglican teaching in the face of the modernising neo-Anglicans who now dominate the Church of England.  Though he believed in social justice Jim did not hold that Equal Opportunities Legislation had any role to play in modifying centuries' old religious teaching or practice.


So I guess we have to assume that he was temperamentally disposed heart and soul to defense of the underdog and defence of his principles.  He enjoyed being part of a 'cause', a 'movement' and a 'struggle' and did enjoy occasional victories.  Yes, Dear Jim, you will be remembered for all your passionate battles against the odds, at least for as long as your friends and supporters survive and historians of the future delve into the treasury of paper and internet archives to which you have contributed.


Wednesday, 5 August 2015

Jim Petty: Radical Working-man Dies


Born Burnley 6th, March 1933, died in Blackburn Hospital 10th, July 2015:

Married to Mary (died 1989), one son Iain survives him.


WHEN we call Jim Petty a radical northern anarchist we haven't even begun to describe his nature as a man and human being.  Radical anarchism and decency grew in his soul as  remarkable human being.  His early interest in politics was in the Labour Party but he never voted Labour after the 1970s.  Later he joined the Independent Labour Party (ILP), and was active as a shop steward in both textiles, where he worked as a stripper and grinder, and later at Lucas in engineering.  Jim Petty was on the industrial committee of Committee of 100 from 1960 to 1961, where he came in contact with the anarcho-syndicalists of the Syndicalist Workers Federation (SWF) - at the time the journalist Ken Hawkes was its national secretary.   

In the 1960s, Sydney Silverman was the radical socialist MP for the nearby Nelson and Colne constituency.  Silverman was instrumental in pushing a law through parliament to abolish capital punishment later in that decade.  Consequently the local ILP in Burnley, Nelson and Colne was perhaps closer to the Labour Party at that time than other branches elsewhere in the country. 

The early 1960s was also a time when the ILP nationally; Brian Behan's Workers Party; Solidarity; some of the Freedom anarchists like Peter Turner, Jack and Mary Stevenson; Commonwealth and the Syndicalist Workers' Federation  formed the National Rank & File Workers' Movement.  The Rank & File Workers' Movement existed for little more than two years and attracted the attention of the Sunday Telegraph columnist Perigrine Worsthorne, but the success of the direct action peace movement protests around the Committee of 100 distracted most activists away from industrial Rank & File activism.  At the time of the Spies for Peace campaign exposing the Regional Seats of Government in 1963, the Burnley activists around Jim helped to reproduce the state secrets that the spies had made available on that year's CND March, and the Times of London ran a headline:  'Anarchists Take Over'.

Jim Petty, although he was involved in the campaigns of the peace movement, was very much a working-class anarchist all his life.  While he was in textiles he clashed with the then regional officer of the National Union of Textile & Allied Worker's Union (NUTAWU), Joe King, based in Accrington.  Sections of the NUTAWU, which was the spinner's and the strippers and grinder's trade union, had no proper shop stewards to represent them and the officials tended to be close to the bosses.  Later, when he working in engineering at Lucas Aerospace in Burnley, Jim was a member of the Transport & General Worker's Union, and about that time he was secretary of  Burnley Trade Union Council. 

He married Mary, a secondary school teacher in the Burnley area, she supported the Labour Party.  When Mary died he had friendships with Susan & Jenny, both who were at one time involved with Burnley anarchists. 

By the early 1980s, Jim had become a member of the Syndicalist Workers Federation (SWF), and later went on to become the first national secretary of the Direct Action Movement (DAM), after  Dave Thompson the SWF  national secretary stepped down.  This was a time when the anarcho-syndicalists were on a roll, and membership of the DAM began to rise in the run up to the miner's strike.  Jim Petty led the British contingent of the International Congress of the International Workers Association (IWA / AIT), when it convened in Madrid in the Spring of 1984.   It was essentially under Jim Petty's influence as its national secretary, that the British DAM gained some serious status in the international movement and built up a grass-roots membership across the country.  The DAM during the 1980s,  was at its most effective as a protest group and political force.  During the Miner's Strike in 1984-85 at the Congress for Industrial Action in Burnley, the then deputy leader of the NUM, Peter Heathfield, and Dave Douglass spoke about the strike on the same platform.  So successful were the Burnley anarchists that there was constant rivalry with out other left groups so much so that the Communist Party sabotaged an attempt to support the Shrewsbury pickets, and Jim's T&G Branch came to have the greatest number of party political levy 'opt outs' to the Labour Party. 

When Jim left office as national secretary the DAM changed it name to the 'Solidarity Federation' (Sol. Fed.) in 1994;  it then tried to represented itself as an imitation trade union body emphasising 'syndicalism' and playing down the anarchist vision.  Jim Petty and other members of the Burnley section took a dim view of these changes, which they regarded as wrong-headed and foolish. Jim though he was a trade unionist for most of his life was cynical about the British trade union set-up generally which he regarded as irredeemably reformist, and even reactionary in the sense that rather than create a vision and set an agenda of its own, the British trade unions merely responded to the agenda set by the bosses and the state. 

Jim Petty not only had experience in the trade union movement and radical politics, but he was involved in the Church of England as a member in the Anglo-Catholic Church, he was a lay reader and was later was ordained as a Father in the faith.  His own father had been also a member of the Church of England.  This extra dimension helped Jim to swim in social circles outside the narrow political ghetto, and the Burnley anarchists were able to build up connections and become an influence within ethnic communities in Burnley in the 1970s and 80s. 

Jim Petty remained a disgruntled member of the Solidarity Federation until 2005, when he was expelled by e-mail after his branch in Preston hounded him out of the Sol. Fed.  The formal reasons given for  his expulsion were mixed up with complaints relating his links to his Church and its distaste for abortion; Jim himself disagreed with his Church policy over this matter.  After his expulsion from the Sol. Fed. a derogatory photo was published of Jim in a dog-collar on libcom providing Holy Communion to his parishioners.  Following this a leading member of the Sol Fed. in Manchester, Ron Marsden, boasted to others that he had written to the Church hierarchy at which Jim was a Minister to acquaint them with his association with the anarchist movement, presumably with the intention of getting Jim defrocked.    

Jim told me years later that he had had an interview with the Dean who showed him the letter of denunciation, and asked Jim:
'Are these friends of yours?'.    

To which Jim replied ruefully 'Yes!'.

Jim always told me that he always believed that the real grounds for his dismissal from Sol. Fed. were to do with him addressing a conference of the Northern Anarchist Network (NAN) in Hebden Bridge in 2004 on racial problems in Burnley.  By that time Jim had also participated on the editorial panel of Northern Voices, and had written a remarkable eye witness report on the 'race' riots in Burnley for NV.   He helped to organise several NAN conferences in Burnley including the one in December 2012 at which Barry Woodling and others moved the Burnley Declaration which gained 150 signatures berating the conduct of the organisers of the Manchester Anarchist Bookfair in operating a blacklist against some supporters of the Northern Anarchist Network.  

As I write this, I have just returned from Tolpuddle, where I learned from a member of the IWW that the Solidarity Federation which once expelled James Petty 'imploded' two years ago.  Is it not ironic that the organisation that once excluded Jim is itself now politically virtually in ruins, and Jim's enemy Ron Marsden is helping claimants at Salford Unemployed Centre.

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

How the police infiltrated 'Class War' and Direct Action Movement'!

IN an article in today's Guardian newspaper, it was reported that the police body the 'National Domestic Extremism Unit' (NDEU), is currently monitoring by surveillance techniques, intercepts, some 9,000 people who they have deemed 'domestic extremists'. The police have confirmed that many of the people held in the NDEU database, have no criminal record. Moreover, the term 'domestic extremist' has no legal basis in English law and has been completely invented by the police authorities. The disclosures about the nature of spying in Britain, has come at a time when it has also been revealed by the NSA whistleblower, Edward Snowden, that CCHQ have been monitoring global phone and internet traffic under 'Project Tempora'. 

The government says that there is always a balance to be struck between protecting civil liberties and privacy as well as protecting the security of people in this country. One can perfectly understand this, if the people being monitored, were people who had fallen under suspicion, but this is not always the case. We know from past whistleblowers who have worked for the security services, such as MI5, that the organisation spies on British citizens. Former MI5 officer, Michael Bettaney, claimed that MI5 "cynically manipulated the definition of subversion". Cathy Massister, also an MI5 officer, revealed that the organisation spied on CND and trade union leaders and former MI5 officer, Miranda Ingram, claimed that "counter espionage is the acceptable face of MI5 and that working in 'F' branch, means spying on one's fellow citizens and engaging in activities of dubious legality."

The following piece which we are publishing, has been taken from Ian Bone's blog. It concerns recent revelations about the infiltration of political groups by police officers working within the 'Special Demonstration Squad' (SDS). It is an excerpt from  'Undercover' by Paul Lewis and Rob Evans.

WHAT ‘UNDERCOVER’ SAYS ABOUT ANARCHIST INFILTRATION:

Thanks to Chris Mitchell for this excerpt from ‘Undercover’ by Paul Lewis and Rob Evans:

'As Black prepared to start his covert mission, senior officers in the SDS were deciding on his future undercover role.  They were constantly working out which political groups needed infiltrating and which officers would make suitable spies. Initially, Black was lined up to become an anarchist.  At least three SDS officers had already been embedded in anarchist groups in the early 1990s.  One was in a small anarchist group called the Direct Action Movement (DAM), which had existed since 1979. Its associates believed capitalism should be abolished by workers organising themselves at the grassroots level, a political philosophy known as anarcho-syndicalism dating back to the late 1890s. One confidential Special Branch document states that a detective constable who worked as an SDS spy "successfully" infiltrated DAM between 1990 and 1993.'

Another group of interest to the SDS was the better-known Class War, which achieved some notoriety after it was set up in the 1980s.  Anarchists linked with Class War produced a newspaper of the same name, styling it Britain’s most unruly tabloid.  At its zenith, it was reputedly selling 15,000 copies per week.  It provoked a lather of indignation from the right-wing tabloid press, which was enraged by the publication’s tongue-in-cheek promotion of violence against the wealthy.  One front-page headline suggested that the newly married Duke and Duchess of York were ‘Better Dead Than Wed’, while the birth of Prince William was greeted with ‘Another Fucking Royal Parasite’.  A third showed the then prime minister Margaret Thatcher with a hatchet buried in her head.

A regular feature was the ‘hospitalised copper’ page – a photograph of a police officer being assaulted. ‘We loved that. But it was done with humour, so even though it was violent, it didn’t come across as psychotic violence,’ says Ian Bone, Class War’s loudest advocate.  There was an element of pantomime about the group – in their ‘Bash the Rich’ demonstrations, supporters were invited to march into affluent areas of London such as Kensington and Hampstead.

Bone, a wiry sociology graduate with small round glasses who was once dubbed ‘Britain’s most dangerous man’ by the press, said later that no rich people were actually ‘bashed’‘but it felt good walking down there. We gave a lot of abuse and shouts and they did cower, a few of them, behind their curtains.’  The SDS viewed Bone and his friends as considerably more sinister. The unit posted at least two undercover police into the group.

'One was in place in February 1992 when he had a meeting in a London safe house with David Shayler, the MI5 officer later jailed for breaking the Official Secrets Act after leaking details of alleged incompetence in the secret services.  Shayler had at that time been assigned to investigate whether Class War posed a threat to British democracy.  The SDS officer supplied intelligence to the Security Service, and had become an official MI5 informant, designated the code number M2589.

According to Shayler, the ‘peculiar arrangement’ in which the SDS officer lived the life of an anarchist for six days a week, returning only occasionally to his friends and family, had ‘affected the agent psychologically’.
Shayler recounts:
‘After around four years of pretending to be an anarchist, he had clearly become one. To use the service jargon, he had gone native.  He drank about six cans of Special Brew during the debrief, and regaled us with stories about beating up uniformed officers as part of his “cover”.  Partly as a result, he was “terminated” after the 1992 general election.  Without his organisational skills, Class War fell apart.’

According to Black, the true story was a little different. He says the SDS officer in question was a ‘top end’ operative who served the unit well. During the encounter with the MI5 officer, he acted the part of a coarse anarchist because he had little time for Shayler, who was perceived to be a ‘desk wanker’ – though Black concedes that ‘some MI5 desk officers who came out to talk to us were superb and we had a very, very good relationship with them’. A second SDS officer was later sent into Class War, but it became apparent the group was fading out. Rather ignominiously for the anarchists who wanted to tear down the state, the SDS concluded they could no longer justify spending money to infiltrate them.

Hence, in 1993, when Black was due to begin his life as an anarchist protester, the plan was suddenly changed. Black was disappointed; he had spent months perfecting his persona as an anarchist. ‘It was all based around the fact that I was a half-German anarchist with tenuous connections to the Baader-Meinhof group. It sounds ridiculous when you say it and it’s hard to imagine that it would stand up to scrutiny, but it would have,’ he says. ‘I used lots of elements of my own life to ensure it came across realistically.’

Instead, weeks before he was due to be deployed, he was called into the office by the head of the SDS. ‘The boss pulled me in and said:  "This anarchist work you’ve been doing, absolutely spot on.  I don’t think I’ve ever seen anybody work so hard on their cover. First class. Now you can fucking forget all about it because you are not going into the anarchists. We’ve got something else in mind".’