Showing posts with label Poll Tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poll Tax. Show all posts

Friday, 14 September 2018

A Question of Council Tax

by Les May

THE Poll Tax is widely regarded as the most iniquitous piece of legislation in modern times.  But it had one virtue which we are apt to forget.   It was that if you are entitled to vote in local elections you should be prepared to contribute to the services the your town provides.

Its replacement, Council Tax, alleviated the major flaw in the Poll Tax, the differing abilities of families to pay.  Nonetheless the idea that there is at least a tenuous link between voting in local elections and paying your Council Tax lingers on.  Which brings me to the question of Councillor ‘Two Votes Rana’.

We have all been expressing our outrage that a Councillor can so blatently breach electoral law and not think it a resigning issue.  But there is another way of looking at this. Here’s the question.

Did Faisal Rana pay the Council Tax levied for the year 2018/19 on the property which is identified by the address he used to vote a second time on 3 May 2018?

Over to you Councillor Rana.   Please enlighten us.

********* 

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Eulogy for James Petty: Anarchist & Anglican


by Susan Ewens

MOST of you here today will know Jim only in his incarnation as a priest of the Anglican Catholic Church.  Some of us have known him longer and are aware of the extraordinarily wide extent of his other interests and pursuits that made him such a very special person.  I am going to tell you about a few of the aspects of Jim’s life and interests that you may not have been aware of. 

When Jim died he was still full of life and had he been living in a city with a decent Teaching hospital and higher standards of GP care I am sure he would still be alive today and would have received care appropriate to his health needs. But that is all water on the under the bridge and we all have to learn to do without his companionship, his passionate interests and his lively mind.

Jim was born in 1933, in Burnley, the year that Hitler came to power in Germany.  Burnley was then one of the biggest cotton spinning towns in the world and, like much of Lancashire, had a large Roman Catholic population thanks  to the Irish immigration of the 19th and early 20th century. There was also a  strong strain of Anglican partisanship in the region thanks to leading lights of the County having sided with King Charles I in the Civil War and subsequently supported the Jacobite cause as the Stuarts tried to regain the British throne from the  Hanoverians.   So, in a relatively small town there was a considerable level of religious polarisation both between Anglicans and Roman Catholics and between the non-conformist Protestants and the rest.  Jim could not help but be influenced by this local religious culture. He was educated in Church of England Primary schools.  In fact nearly all Burnley’s children were and still ARE educated in Church Primary Schools either Roman Catholic or Anglican and many of them in church run Secondary Schools, too.

Tragedy hit Jim’s family when he was only 7 years old in July 1940. His beloved father, Morris, a Lance-Sergeant in the East Lancs Regiment, was killed in an accident.  He would often speak with feeling of the upheaval in his young life as his widowed mother embarked upon a series of house moves round the town with him and his younger sister Barbara, as she slowly came to terms with the loss of her husband, at the same time fending off proposals from her husband’s family to "adopt" Jim.  The in-laws were relatively well-off and thought it was obvious that they could give Jim a better upbringing than his now single mother.  Their pressures were however resisted by Mona.  Jim, surprisingly perhaps, called his mother by her fist name, Mona!  I don’t know at what stage in his life this habit started!  I met Jim when he was 40 years old and what soon became noticeable  to me was the frequency with which he mentioned the early trauma of losing his father and the subsequent trail round Burnley from rented house to house with his widowed mother with the good quality family furniture being sold along the way.  It was a miserable time for Jim, the child, and he was indelibly marked by it.

If Mona had given in to her in-laws’ pressures it is possible that Jim would have had a different life after the tragedy of his father’s early death.  He would probably have gone to a grammar school and stayed on to take the school certificate leaving exam at age 16.  He could have stayed on into the sixth form and gone to university if he was lucky.  He may even have been a part of the emigration of part of his father’s family to Australia and we could have been deprived of his presence here in the North of England altogether! But as things turned out he did none of these things and his life took an altogether different trajectory. 
Jim’s mother remarried after the war a man called Ben Wright who had been, if I remember correctly, a professional soldier in both the First and Second World wars. Later another sister, Christine, was added to the family. Jim was not keen on his new stepfather at first but eventually, and I cannot say how many years it took, he became very attached to him and never ceased to praise him for the way he behaved towards his ready-made family.  Jim remained the apple of his mother’s eye,  a matter which did not go unnoticed by his sisters! Not that he was spoilt by his mother, far from it, she was apparently a rather severe parent!

Jim’s schooling ended when he was 15 despite his intellectual promise being recognised by his teachers and his being top of the class in nearly every subject.  Nevertheless, the process of self education via his voracious reading habit aided by his wonderful memory for detail never ceased throughout his life and served him well.

So, instead of the Grammar school and the university Jim’s intellectual life proceeded via the Anglican Church ( he was already a Church Warden in his teens) the Independent Labour Party, the Trade Union Movement (where he was a shop steward already in his teens and subsequently a member of Burnley Trades Council), and via various political clubs and evening classes. His intellectual ability as a competent self-taught seeker after knowledge with all the makings of a true historian was not lost on his evening class tutors and I think I am correct in saying that he was offered adult University entrance to an Oxford College in spite of lacking formal qualification.  This he turned down because by then he was married and he considered the financial insecurity and upheaval of such a change too risky.  

It was an awfully wrong decision!  Jim was made for academe and would have loved the life of a scholar with the cut and thrust of debate in the Senior Common Room and the life of a Don.  If he had grasped this opportunity when it was presented to him it may have been James Petty and not David Starkey presenting riveting TV programmes about the Tudors and Stuarts!  And you can be sure the message would have been altogether more complex than the version usually presented. I don’t understand what sort of inhibition prevented him from taking up this marvellous offer.  Perhaps the same stubbornness and sense of duty that led him to insist on leaving school at age 15 when he could have stayed on longer and matriculated.

His interests, apart from the history of Christianity, the English Reformation and Working Class politics encompassed MANY other fields of study. One was the American Revolution.  Here, his voracious reading and capacity for absorbing detail led him to a different perspective from that we usually hear about militant colonial patriots against the tyrannical British Crown.  In fact, Jim called the American Revolution 'The First American Civil War' because  the colonial population loyal to the Crown were equally balanced against those who wanted independence. 

Many loyalists returned to England after the war impoverished by the loss of their property and livelihoods in America and many others trekked north into Canada to join the British colonies there.  I cannot tell you what joy Jim experienced a few years ago when, quite by chance, when exploring a church in Chester, we came upon an 18th century stone memorial  plaque set high on an interior wall detailing the return of the unfortunate deceased from New York, where he was a prosperous merchant and member of the colonial government, to poverty back home in England as a result of the loss of the American colonies. Today we would call him a refugee.   Jim was always able to cast a necessarily sceptical light on the distortions and omissions of the historical record in those fields in which he had taken a deep interest.  His take on the North American 'Loyalists' was particularly of interest to correspondents of his in the United States, developed courtesy of the Internet, who find the “authorised version” of their own nation’s history sadly deficient in the background details that Jim loved.  Well, the devil is always in the detail, isn’t it?  Jim was a master of the details which often escape notice when historians and popularisers generalise about the broad sweeps of events.

From the Independent Labour Party (ILP) and Peace Pledge Union Jim developed into an Anarcho-Syndicalist and was thus fascinated by the Russian Revolution and the Spanish Civil War in which Anarchists played a part.  In the study of these two 20th century revolutions Jim acquired his scepticism of the Marxist version of history and Marxist political tactics.  He was never starry-eyed about the Hard Left’s totalitarian, anti-democratic tendencies. 

Jim’s Anarchism and Anarcho-syndicalism was never just an intellectual, historical study.  It informed all his practical politics, too.  There were no working class causes in Burnley or the country at large that Jim was not involved in - from the formation of Residents Associations in areas proposed for 'slum clearance' in Burnley, to the Anti motorway Action Group opposing the route of the M65 motorway through North East Lancs; from  the opposition to the SPUC campaign against abortion, to the North East Lancs Campaign Against Racism supporting the growing Pakistani population in North East Lancs, and, of renewed topicality today,  the 'Get Britain Out' campaign of the First Referendum against Common Market Membership in 1975.   He was also busy writing political pamphlets and journal articles and often delivering them door to door while being a regular seller of the Anarchist Journal 'Freedom' and 'Peace News' in Burnley Town Centre.  He inspired the launch of 'The Burnley Voice' magazine in the 1970s written and produced by Burnley Anarchist Group, which ran to SIX editions before folding!  

After the fall of Franco and the restoration of constitutional government in Spain Jim led the British contingent of the International Workers Association convened in Madrid in the Spring of 1984. He also later visited Catalonia and Barcelona with fellow British Anarchists to make contact with Spanish Anarcho Syndicalists campaigning to regain control of the substantial property confiscated from their trade unions by the Franco regime.  

He was also active in the solidarity campaign that surrounded the long running series of disputes involving miners which culminated in the year long Miners’ Strike of 1984-85.  And he was involved in supporting the struggle of the print unions against the Murdoch press and the move of newspaper production to Wapping in 1986.  He was also involved in the anti-Poll Tax agitation that galvanised the country in 1990 when the Thatcher government tried to extend the Property Tax,  previously paid by householders only,  to the whole adult population. It was deemed particularly unfair on young adults of 18 years and over.   This was probably the only national campaign that Jim was involved in that was actually a resounding popular success.  The Poll Tax was repealed! 

 Here is what  an anarchist comrade wrote about Jim in 2004:

'The other major figure, who we may call the "FATHER OF NORTHERN ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM", was and is Jim Petty from BURNLEY.  He was National Secretary of the Direct Action Movement in the 1980s at the time of the miners' strike in which he was very active and he was on the DAM Policy Committee which met in Rochdale in the early 1980s.  He never missed an opportunity to get involved in disputes both local and national: like the Grundwick dispute and the campaign against the attempts to set up anti-trade union newspapers.  He helped to develop anarchism in Burnley over many years with John, Judith, Eileen, Reg and others: organising meetings and campaigns for local workers and immigrant labour.  He was prominent in the campaign against the Poll Tax in the 1990s.  Now he is on the Editorial Panel of NORTHERN VOICES and wrote a remarkable essay in the magazine entitled 'Burnley: the architects of squalor'.  
Jim detested the uninspiring local political class of all parties that had permitted Burnley to decline to such a state.

Another historical passion of Jim’s was the South African Anglo-Zulu Wars of 1879.  In the 1990s he visited South Africa twice with Jennifer Taylor and spent several weeks visiting the sites of the battles where the Zulus massacred the British Army’s redcoats.  Jim demonstrated himself as such an expert on the Anglo Zulu Wars that he was subsequently awarded honorary membership of the Royal Geographical Society after displaying his unparalleled knowledge of the Zulu campaigns under the leadership of General Buller to groups of fellow enthusiasts also visiting the historical battle sites and equally  passionate about the history as he was himself.  

Surprisingly, Jim had enrolled as a boy soldier in the Army soon after leaving school.  I do not know how or why this came about.   But he was such a bookworm as a child that the past was more real to him than the present and he admitted that he had fondly imagined himself either in the Palestine Police or  General  Buller’s Fontier Light Horse fighting Zulus in South Africa or on the Indian North West Frontier!  I think the prospect of being shipped off to Korea in 1951 concentrated his mind, however,  and he found that the reality of Army life was not nearly as exciting or as interesting as the books of derring-do he devoured so avidly all his life and well into old age. Anyway, one of his aunts bought him out of his military service contract and, like most Burnley folk in the 1950s he went to work in the mill where, perhaps surprisingly, he was apprenticed to a well-paid skilled trade as a 'stripper and grinder', an engineering job maintaining textile machinery.  

This was probably the only time in his life that Jim enjoyed a reasonable level of remuneration for his labour. He was part of the skilled 'aristocracy of labour'.  Alas, it was in an industry that was in terminal decline in Lancashire and his prosperity was short lived. After he left the textile industry it was pretty mediocre remuneration for the rest of his working life.  Though the wages were poor satisfaction for Jim was in being part of the Labour Movement trying create a more just society. He was a shop steward nearly all his working life until his retirement from Lucas Aerospace in ...?.  

But he had other jobs, along the way, too.  For example at the Burnley Street Lighting Department.  This involved long periods out doors on foot checking and maintaining the street lamps which must have been mainly gas then and he was pretty much his own boss for much of the time.  I recall him telling me about being asked by an old lady in a rural area if he wouldn’t mind cleaning her windows  to which he agreed and he kept on cleaning them for her whenever he was in the vicinity, and all for free!  Then there was the time he was sent to disconnect a lamp that would not turn itself on and off as required.  When he got there to do the job he was begged NOT to disconnect it by a nearby housewife  who told him her husband was paralysed in bed and liked to watch the shadows cast by the flickering gas light on the walls and ceiling of his room at night.  This was before there was a TV in every room.  Of course, Jim complied.

Then he had a job at  Dunn and Co, Gentleman’s Outfitters in Burnley. He really enjoyed selling quality clothes and was offered the job of manager despite his youth. He himself always wore good tweed jackets, handsome waistcoats, “interesting” hats and the best shoes he could afford.  The first time I saw him he was wearing a mustard and brown check hacking jacket and a deer stalker hat.  His ambition lately was to obtain a Sherlock Holmes style caped Inverness overcoat and I did try to get one for him for Christmas last year but unfortunately I was outbid on ebay.  Jim was very disappointed about that failure, I’m sorry to say.  I wish I had managed to win the bidding because I know it would have given him much joy!  

For a year in the mid-1970s Jim joined me in setting up and running a small cafe in Burnley’s St James’s Street.  Catering is very hard, demanding work and requires practical skills apart from chatting to the customers which was Jim’s forte and the prospect which had beguiled him into proposing the scheme in the first place.  So, after a year of meagre wages for him and no wages for me Jim decided to back out of the project with the insightful words that it was “keeping us both in poverty”.  Jim was accepted back into his former job at Lucas which he picked up where he had left off and was altogether much happier in his own office with the essential outside telephone line where he could plan and execute his political campaigns virtually at his leisure. Jim was happy at Lucas.  It was Burnley’s main employer with several different factory sites round the town and a big workforce which was almost like a large squabbling family.  He was full of stories about it as well as about the machinations between various political groupings in and around the Trade Union movement.

Something else I have not mentioned yet is that for several years Jim was also National President of the Jacobite Society an organisation devoted to the memory and cause of the Stuart  pretenders to the  British throne.  Extraordinary, you might think, for an anarchist  also to be an upholder of the rights of a dynastic line.  But Jim was able to trace the Stuart line down to the present day through generations of European royalty and aristocracy.  Of course, his abiding interest centred on Charles I, the defender of Anglicanism and the Church of England against the takeover of the church and state by Puritans and Protestants which ended in the Civil War and the Dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell.  King Charles the Martyr is an Anglican saint as you all know!  Jim was an expert in the whole of the very long English Reformation from Henry VIII, through the reigns of Edward, Bloody Mary and Elizabeth, James I, Charles I, the English Civil War, The Restoration and the subsequent takeover by Dutch William and his English Stuart cousin Mary, AKA “The Glorious Revolution”.  It lasted well into the Hanoverian period with the two 18th century Jacobite Risings in favour of the Stuarts.  

The Scottish connection of the Stuart monarchs and Pretenders may account for Jim’s attraction to Scotland. He often spent a week’s holiday in Edinburgh during the Edinburgh Festival in August with his longtime friend and member of the Burnley Labour Party Les Marsden.  Everything was done on the cheap. They camped in a small tent.  The mind boggles!

Alongside this rich intellectual and political life, the younger Jim had also found time to go courting and to get married to Mary in 19..(?).  It was not easy getting married to Mary because she was from a staunch Roman Catholic family and her mother, who Jim always called Mrs Richardson (?), took exception to Jim’s political activities.  It cannot have helped that Mary was a music teacher at one of Burnley’s Roman Catholic high schools and was herself somewhat in the public eye just as Jim was.  Back in the 1950s it was a big step for a Roman Catholic to get permission to marry a non-catholic. The non-catholic spouse had to promise to raise the children as Roman Catholics and also had to attend classes with a Roman Catholic priest prior to the marriage in order to learn the essentials of the religion they were marrying into.

Well, as an Anglican Church Warden at St Catherine’s, Jim was a rather slippery fish for Burnley’s Roman Catholic priesthood to land I think we can all easily imagine what these pre-marital lessons in the Roman faith must have been like!  surely the RC’s will have learnt more from Jim than he from them?  He will have delighted in pointing out to them in the politest of possible ways their misunderstanding of both the history of the English Reformation and of the relationship between the Anglican Church and their 'New Church of Trent' as he delighted in calling it.  But as the appointed day of the wedding approached (Easter?) with the cake baked and the dresses made the RC clergy had still not conceded that Jim had jumped over the required hoops to marry Mary in their church.  Jim’s version of events was that he made an ultimatum!  If they were not married on the appointed day in a Roman Church they would be married in an Anglican one so the priests had better get a move on and give their consent!  

 When his son Iain came along in 1960 he was duly baptised and educated in the Roman Catholic faith which must have been a bit of a challenge for Jim, but as far as I can tell he accepted it in good faith!  I guess he would have some satisfaction though in knowing that Iain is now a ‘lapsed’ Roman Catholic with no time for “papsts”.  Iain followed Mary’s interests into a career in music but he cannot have failed to reap the educational and intellectual benefit in his schooldays from his father’s bookish, intellectual pursuits.  While Mary and Iain made music in the music room where Mary’s grand piano held pride of place, Jim read his books in the lounge or printed out  political leaflets on an old duplicating machine in the spare bedrooms upstairs.

Jim was not an ideal parent, I’m afraid and after Mary’s sudden death in 1989 the older he got the worse and more remote his relationship with his son became.  Jim kept his life compartmentalised to a great extent and I don’t think anyone, except Iain himself, realised just how dire Jim’s performance as a father became.  If he had been something of an absentee father courtesy of his political activism during Iain’s childhood and adolescence Iain subsequently became an absentee son especially after he moved to live in The Netherlands.  He did return to visit friends in London but Burnley was not on his itinerary.

When he was offered redundancy from Lucas before reaching retirement age Jim accepted it with alacrity and took the opportunity to become a priest of the Church of England and was ordained in 19...?.  When the Synod voted in favour of ordaining women Jim left the Church of England and helped to set up the Anglican Catholic Church in England and it was to this 'project' that Jim devoted much of the rest of his life while still keeping in touch with Anarchist politics. 

The internet is a great thing, isn’t it?  As soon as Jim became computer literate he started participating on various religion and history message boards and spreading the benefits of his learning amongst people who were largely unaware of the Petty interpretation of the historical relations between the Roman and Anglican Churches as well as other wider historical controversies.  Jim obtained enormous satisfaction from these intellectual disputes which provoked him constantly to renew his own knowledge from his marvelous personal library.

You may not have taken Jim for a horseman but he was.  I am not sure how he acquired the skill to ride a horse but he did and he owned three horses over the years - Seamus, a grey gelding, Carina a mare and finally Angus, a pony for whom Jim aspired to obtain a small cart so he could do a little “light carting” and take people for rides on high days and holidays.  Sadly this ambition did not come to pass because of the need for a licence and insurance but it remained a fond dream that Jim liked to toy with.  

Jim had loads of stories to tell about his experiences and adventures while out riding - like confrontations with motorcar owners who thought they had the right of way over horses on the road, and property owners who denied that the path outside their house or across their field was a bridle way when Jim knew it was.  And like the adventures of the 'Cliviger Light Horse', as Jim called them, a gang of rather wild local children on ponies, for whom Jim somehow  became the responsible adult with the duty of protecting them from harm while galloping round the countryside!  Iain was a member of the Cliviger Light Horse and Jim recalls, despite Mary’s injunction to look after him, turning round to see young Iain cantering along with the reins in his teeth while searching for something in his pocket.  Looking after the horses and riding was one of the few things that brought Jim and Iain together. 

Then there was the time when Carina was in season and attracted the attentions of a nearby stallion who broke away from his irate owner, jumped a gate and proceeded to chase and try to mount Carina while Jim was still in the saddle!  That was both frightening and funny in retrospect!  There was a time when Seamus was moved from his grazing in Stoneyholme to another field the other side of town nearer to where Jim lived. Seamus, was lonely though, and missed his horse companions back in Stoneyholme.  One Saturday afternoon Jim received a phone call from the Police about a large grey horse walking unaccompanied through Burnley town centre and did he know anything about it?  On another occasion Jim was riding down a street where a baker was delivering bread and cakes on wooden trays balanced on his head.  Seamus just helped himself to a few teacakes as he passed.

At the same time that he had Angus the pony Jim also acquired two goats and some hens all of which lived on a piece of land land near to Jim’s home in Hollin Hill.  Strangely, he could not bring himself to drink the goat milk or eat the hen’s eggs himself but he liked to keep the animals anyway. He was also suffering from the worst stage of his Meuniere’s Disease at the time and recalled waking up from a dizzy spell lying on the grass with the pail of goat milk spilled on the ground and the goat licking his face! 

Jim was a great lover of dogs and from his childhood to his death there was always a dog or dogs in his home.  His walks with his dogs were an important part of his recreation and it was a trial for him when his mobility problems prevented him from walking as far and as fast as he would have liked.  A lovely story he had heard that Jim liked to repeat was about a dying man who had a “near death” experience in which all the dogs he had ever owned appeared to him in a dream and they all went walking in the fields together.  Jim certainly hoped that this was true and that he too would be reunited with all his doggie pals.  He had no doubt that dogs have souls and will be waiting for us in heaven.    
In hindsight, Jim’s life looks like an ongoing series of battles against the odds and often against the tide of history. Running through it like the main colour in a tapestry is his Anarchism and Trade Unionism and life-long fight against injustice.  But there is also his passion for the minutiae of history alongside Boy’s Own tales of adventure and his championing of lost causes like that of the American Empire Loyalists,  the Martyred King Charles I and the Jacobites, and his defence of the disgraced General Buller who was scapegoated for the debacle of the Zulu Wars.  Jim had a commemorative plate with Buller’s face on it on his China rack!  Then there was his abiding passion for Anglicanism which culminated in his ordination and his support for the cause of traditional Anglican teaching in the face of the modernising neo-Anglicans who now dominate the Church of England.  Though he believed in social justice Jim did not hold that Equal Opportunities Legislation had any role to play in modifying centuries' old religious teaching or practice.


So I guess we have to assume that he was temperamentally disposed heart and soul to defense of the underdog and defence of his principles.  He enjoyed being part of a 'cause', a 'movement' and a 'struggle' and did enjoy occasional victories.  Yes, Dear Jim, you will be remembered for all your passionate battles against the odds, at least for as long as your friends and supporters survive and historians of the future delve into the treasury of paper and internet archives to which you have contributed.


Thursday, 19 February 2015

Ernest Rodker on Radical Action

Commonweal Lecture 2015

VETERAN activist and cabinet-maker, Ernest Rodker, addressed the problems and opportunities for those of us who regarded ourselves as radicals in the last half of the 20th century, last Tuesday night, at Bradford University.  It was pointed out that this Commonweal lecture was being held on the precise anniversary on the 17th, February 1958, of a meeting of CND which ultimately resulted in Cannon Collins calling on those present to go down to Downing Street to protest against, what was then known as 'the Bomb'.   Mike 'Randle', who was introducing the talk by Ernest described how while he was outside Number 10, he saw Ernest on the ground being beaten by the police and was told to 'Shut up!', when he questioned their conduct.

Later, in 1961, Mike and Ernest renewed their friendship when they spent time in prison together.  By that time Cannon Collins, who had initiated the provocative Downing Street protest in 1958, was to oppose Bertrand Russell's proposals for civil disobedience and direct action which had led to the formation of the Committee of 100.   

Ernest used graphic images of news reports and pictures to show events and historic posters of the time by people like the poster-designer Robin Field.  This continued later when he came to deal with  the 'Stop the 70s Tour' of the South African rugby and cricket teams.  At that time sport became an issue of protest in a way it hadn't previously, except perhaps for the rare case of suffragettes before the First World War.   Despite all the challenges the Labour Government's Home Secretary, James Callaghan, assured us that 'the tour is going to go ahead!'   

The Springboks arrived in November 1969 and stayed in the Park Lane Hotel, and the tour ended following protests in February 1970.  At the time of the cricket tour John Arlott, the then famous cricket commentator, announced that he would not cover the tour, and on the 22nd, May the tour was cancelled.

Ernest mentioned that had at the time,  had contact with Peter Hain and his family.  Peter Hain was later to write of the protests:
'I, along with many others, was outraged at their moral cowardice and hypocrisy, and helped form the Stop The Seventy Tour (STST) campaign to organise non-violent direct action protests against the tour.  These initially focused on country wide demonstrations against 25 matches of a South African rugby tour to Britain in the winter of 1969-70.  The campaign against the racism of South African sport took off with mass protests that quickly escalated to become a national and international controversy.  Eventually the pressure caused the MCC to cancel the cricket tour - by far the biggest victory the anti-apartheid movement had achieved. Australia and New Zealand soon followed suit in rugby as well as cricket, and white South Africa was expelled from the Olympics. ' 

On the 1st, April 1990, the Poll Tax was launched by the Thatcher government, initially in Scotland, where about 1 million refused to pay the tax.  This was merely the springboard to what was to happen on its introduction in England, where ultimately a riot ensured in London as well as mass refusals to pay the tax.  The consequences of this were that Margaret Thatcher left office in 1991, and John Major proclaimed:  'The Poll Tax is un-collectable!'   

Ernest described a  local campaign to save from closure the local school of Chestnut Grove in Balham as part of a series of school closures.   This was successful, as for the most part was his part in the scheme pursued between 1971 and 1981 to convert Dormobiles into vehicles to smuggle literature and duplicators into Czechoslovakia, which functioned until they got rumbled in 1981.  Less successful was Ernest's role in the campaign against pit closures and open-cast mining, culminated in digging holes looking for coal protests on Michael Heseltine's paddock.  

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

Huge queues outside courts as thousands prosecuted over arrears

THOUSANDS of low-income earners are being hauled into court to pay council tax bills in a vicious attack on Britain’s most vulnerable families.  In a new measure branded 'Poll Tax Mk 2', an estimated 1.9 million people who did not previously have to pay the tax are now liable for between 10 and 30 per cent of the full bill, reports the Mirror. And queues have formed outside courts as Britain’s poorest respond to threatening demands to pay. 


The Government’s latest attack on the poor is a result of the introduction in April of the Welfare Reform Act. Families have been shocked that local authorities have started chasing up bills for the next 12 months so soon after the introduction of the sweeping ­changes due to Government cutbacks. Since April 1 council tax benefit has been replaced by council tax support, and responsibility for that is switching from central government to councils. 

Hilary Benn, Shadow Secretary for Local Government, said:
'We warned the Government that their Poll Tax Mark 2 would lead to people on low incomes being chased through the courts for sums of money that they simply don’t have. “It will push some into the arms of payday lenders and loan sharks. But David Cameron and George ­Osborne refused to listen and went ahead at the same time as they cut the top rate of tax. How out of touch can you get?'

Around 232 local authorities have devised schemes that will demand council tax from everyone regardless of ­income and only 58 will retain current levels of support. In a snapshot survey of councils in England and Wales it has been found they are wasting no time in chasing struggling families for the money. Tameside council in Greater Manchester has issued 3,691 summons to households who paid NO council tax before the changes.

Single parent Charlotte Hughes, 41, received a summons saying she had to pay £141.66. When she arrived at Tameside Magistrates' Court, she found dozens of people queuing outside. She said:
'My priority is finding money to get food for my child. Other people might not think it is much money but it is for me.  It was humiliating going to court. We had to queue up before we were herded into a room. It was like a cattle market.' 

In Cornwall around 20,000 people who previously had their council tax paid in full are now being asked to pay at least 25 per cent. Six thousand are now in arrears and 1,000 have had a court ­summons so far. 

This week Cornwall’s council finance portfolio holder Alex Folkes said: “In the case of the very poorest, that is very bad news.   'Anyone who has problems, get in touch. We will listen. We don’t want people to go down the court system.'

Last year Peterborough City Council issued summons to 3,538 households but this figure has doubled since the new welfare reforms. 

The Resolution Foundation, a non-profit research organisation, said in a recent report that a typical bill had risen by between £100 and £250 a year, but some it could be as much as £600 more. 

Alex Hurrell, a senior analyst at the foundation, said:
'We warned that thousands of low-paid working people would face the biggest increases in council tax.  Now we’re seeing councils with dwindling ­resources chase some of the hardest-pressed people in the country.  Sadly we’re likely to see more scenes like these in the coming months and years.' 

In a typical example on Friday 1,079 liability ­orders were issued at Truro magistrates court on behalf of Cornwall Council to people who hadn’t paid their council tax. Many were first-timers ­unable to foot the bill. 

Jason Simmons, 46, from Redruth, was summoned to court for non-payment. He said:
'I’ve managed to pay £30 of it, but there is no way I’ll be able to pay the rest.'

Thursday, 21 March 2013

Thousands threatened with eviction in UK by Tory 'Bedroom Tax'!



Opposition to the Tories iniquitous bedroom tax is increasing daily. Although there have been no riots as of yet, parallels have never the less been drawn with the campaign against Thatcher's dreaded poll tax, which was ultimately defeated because of mass opposition to it by people who took to the streets in their thousands to protest.

In the North West 43% of people living in council or housing association homes who receive housing benefit will be affected. Around 110,000 will be worse off by £728 a year when the bedroom tax comes into effect in April. Hundreds of thousands face the threat of eviction if they cannot pay the tax which applies to all people of working age in receipt of housing benefit who live in social housing and who are deemed to have spare bedrooms.

Although the Tory-led government say this measure is necessary to free-up social housing that is under-occupied i.e. spare bedrooms so that people can move to smaller dwellings and to save money, the current demand for housing is such that there are not enough one or two bedroom properties for people to move to. Critics of the bedroom tax, say this severe shortage of social rented housing, will drive people into the private rented sector and will increase the housing benefit bill.

In Tameside, the Registered Social Landlord (RSL), New Charter Housing Trust Ltd, own around 14,500 properties and it is expected that the bedroom tax will have a direct impact on 1,700 New Charter tenants. New Charter boss, Ian Munro, believes that the tax is 'unfair and incompetent' and he has written to the Prime Minister calling on him to axe the bedroom tax. In his letter which was published in the New Charter owned Tameside Reporter, he pleaded on behalf of his tenants:

"Tenants are telling us that they are very worried not only about being able to meet household bills, but also the prospect of being forced out of what is more than a house - it is their home....Equally (the changes) are incompetent as they will not achieve the Government's objective of better use of social housing, and in forcing a migration to the private sector will increase rather than reduce the Housing Benefit bill."

Some time ago, New Charter which was formed in 2000, to own and manage former council homes in Tameside, set up a 'Specialist Welfare Reform Advice Team' (SWAT) to advise tenants about their available options concerning the bedroom tax. Although neither Munro or the SWAT 'sink or swim' team, have given assurances that tenants who fail pay their bedroom tax will not be evicted, it is known that the team who have carried out 1,800 tenant interviews since last August, have advised tenants to eat less to economise in order to pay their Tory bedroom tax. In Manchester, Eastlands Homes another RSL, have written to their tenants asking them if they can afford to smoke, drink, play bingo and afford Sky TV, as well as pay their bedroom tax.

While it is understandable that New Charter and Eastlands Homes tenants should feel affronted by being asked to eat less food or to forgo fags and booze to pay their Tory bedroom tax, it should be clear that despite what boy George says about us all being in it together, it is people on benefits, public expenditure cuts and job losses in local government that are paying off the budget deficit brought about by the incompetence and greed of bankers and governments. Despite cuts in benefits and public services, the government last year cut  taxes for their rich chums by £3bn-a-year. In April, 8,000 millionaires are due to receive an average tax cut of over £107,000. It  also estimated that tax evasion in this country costs the exchequer around £70bn-a-year in lost revenue.

One New Charter tenant affected by the Tory bedroom tax, is 56-year-old Steve Fisher, from Dukinfield, who has lived at his two bedroom home since 1984. As a self-employed person who currently receives £52 pw in Working Tax Credit (WTC), he has been told by Tameside Council that he must pay £12 pw bedroom tax because he has a bedroom extra to his needs and £13 pw council tax, out of his £52 pw income. Mr. Fisher who is campaigning against the bedroom tax, told NV blog:

"Under the Council Tax Benefit scheme (CTB), which has now been abolished, I received full council tax and housing benefit because I am on a low income. Some years ago, I chose to go self-employed rather than claim unemployment benefit, but am now penalised by changes to council tax and the introduction of the bedroom tax. Tameside Council have replaced CTB with their very own 'Council Tax Support Scheme' (CTSS) which presumes that as a self-employed person, I am receiving a far greater income that I do and therefore, they expect me to pay full council tax. As from April, everyone with exception of pensioners, who is in receipt of a council tax discount, will have pay at least 20% of council tax. This measure introduced by a Labour council, attacks some of the weakest and poorest members of the community.  Although the Labour council in Tameside are cutting jobs and services and increasing the council tax this year by 3.5%, the council refuses to reduce the number of Tameside councillors or to cut its own allowances and perks. What this council and government are seeking to do, is nothing short of daylight robbery."

Anyone interested in joining Mr. Fisher's campaign against the bedroom tax, can contact him at starlord@starlord-enterprises.freeserve.co.uk