Showing posts with label Greater Manchester Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greater Manchester Police. Show all posts

Monday, 3 May 2021

Manchester Mayor, Andy Burnham: 'No failure!'

OVER a week ago, on the 22nd, April Jennifer Williams quoted Andy Burnham as saying 'I don't consider it a failure' as he desperately scrambles to keep his job as Greater Manchester Mayor and Police Commisioner in the Mayoral elections this comming Thursday.
In the Manchester Evening News Ms. Williams writes: 'If there is one subject generating political heat during the 2021 mayoral campaign, it is policing.'
She continues:
'Since 2017 GMP, for which the mayor has political oversight, has been on a rollercoaster. Against the backdrop of huge cuts to officer numbers and the level of crime you might expect in the second largest force in the country, the Manchester Arena atrocity occurred days after the mayor took office, with all the trauma that entailed. But GMP has also faced, and continues to face, serious questions over its leadership’s competence and culture over an extended period.'
Over the years in which Burnham has had oversight for the Greater Manchester Police the force has had a flood of failings for which he denies responsiblity. 'Not me Gov!' has been his general war cry.
In the last four years, there have been worries over the development of a computer system iOPS and its impact on officers and victims; whistleblowers have have warned of cultural failures; the damaging verdict of the public inquiry into Anthony Grainger’s shooting, which found evidence from senior officers was 'seriously misleading' and 'lacked candour'; failures to submit evidence to the early stages of the Manchester Arena inquiry in 2019; and a string of critical inspectorate reports in 2018, 2019 and twice in 2020, most of them highlighting failures to protect vulnerable people.
As we puruse this series of blunders by the GMP, we now learn of a publicity photo currently circulating in which Mr. Burnham poses promoting a notorious self-confessed election fraud in Rochdale, Councillor Faisal Rana, who has since his exposure as a multiple vote swindler has cheerfully climbed the greasy pole of Labour Party politics. Some pundits are now suggesting that this election fraud is in-line to replace the aging Tony Lloyd when he steps down as Rochdale MP. If so, it seems that Andy Pandy will be available to help out.
Meanwhile, Andy has managed to delay any disclosure of a special 'root and branch' report which is said to be 'shocking' and has it is claimed 'uncovered years of woeful failures at Greater Manchester Police'. Fortunately for Andy, the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and the Mayor's office are at present refusing to release the report, claiming it wouldn't bebe 'appropriate' until the new chief has had chance to work out his response to it. As the new chief, Mr Watson, wont be taking on his job till the end of May it means that Andy Burnham won't have to explain what going on before this week's election.
Very convenient!
*******************************************************

Monday, 15 March 2021

Boris Johnson started International Women's Week by claiming he's a feminist !

by Andy Wastling
(We Don't Need This) Fascist Groove Thang [1] by Andrew Wastling
THREE days after International Women's Day and the night before Mothers Day his police are directed to brutally attack peaceful female protestors. Johnson's actions seem to be totally out of step with his alleged aspirations or intentions?
This week parliament will vote on Priti Patel's new policing law, effectively destroying the right to protest.Our democracy ( such that it is !) is being gradually eroded as this rogue and toxic Westminster cabal drives towards an increasingly neo-fascist and authoritarian state. This is an existential struggle between the forces of progress and the sinister forces of reaction. One the British working class seem destined to lose if we do not rise from our political torpor and apathy. In Greece , Spain , Italy , Germany and France the workers have been on the streets in force for many months. Governments should be afraid of their people not the other way round.
A peaceful vigil in Manchester by the Emmeline Pankhurst statue passed entirely without incident (despite the background presence of two police vans full of overtime eager GMP officers). The women behind Right To Walk MCR had originally also hoped to hold a covid safe vigil but following conversations with Manchester City Council and GMP were told that they would also receive fines if it went ahead. Despite GMP's dicktact telling protestors that they were unable to proceed with a vigil for Sarah Everard and #ReclaimTheseStreets as well as a virtual online event .The restricted and entirely peaceful , disciplined and socially distanced vigil took place as indeed also happened in Nottingham, and Birmingham, as they did elsewhere outside of the capital with no police harassment or intimidation whatsoever.Right to Walk Manchester have published an Open Letter online demanding an : Everard's Law. From stricter punishments for harassment and catcalling, to better lighting and increased security cameras, our ambition is to create safer communities so that women are more protected. Can be signed at : Petition · An Open Letter for Everard's Law · Change.org
A demonstration has been called at 5pm, tomorrow ( 15 March ), Parliament Square , London And no doubt further national and local vigils and protests are being organised this weekend Cressida Dick, speaking about Sarah’s murder days ago, expressed her shock and said our job is to patrol the streets and to protect people. But at this vigil, her officers did the exact opposite. A petition calling for her to go can be signed below.
https://r.ippl.es/cressida-dick-resign/
APPENDIX:
(1). (We Don't Need This) Fascist Groove Thang was written by Heaven 17 members Martyn Ware, Ian Craig Marsh and Glenn Gregory and included on their 1981 debut album Penthouse and Pavement. It was the first single released by the band. In the lyrics fascism and racism are described in an ironic fashion, using the lexicon of funk music.
******************************************************************

Saturday, 19 December 2020

Manchester Chief Constable quits as force is put into special measures for 'outstandingly bad' results

Labour Mayor Andy Burnham says 'SORRY' promises to improve!
LAST THURSDAY the Greater Manchester Police force (GMP) was placed into an "advanced phase" of monitoring, after inspectors found it had failed to record 80,000 crimes in a year.
Yesterday, the Chief Constable Ian Hopkins, who earlier revealed he was on sick leave, said he would now step down with immediate effect.
Inspectors had said GMP's service to victims of crime was a "serious cause of concern".
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) said it was left 'deeply troubled' over how cases handled by GMP were closed without proper investigation.
It said about 220 crimes a day went unrecorded in the year up to June 2020.
Victims' Commissioner for England and Wales, Dame Vera Baird, told BBC Radio 4's PM programme that the force's failures were "outstandingly bad".
She said crimes like stalking and coercive control were "profoundly traumatising" and victims needed "not only the support of police to get orders restraining the perpetrator and to take them to court, but they also need to be safeguarded and referred to appropriate victim's services".
She added that "none of that was happening" and vulnerable people had "simply been deserted".
In a statement, Mr Hopkins has said that these are "challenging times" for the Greater Manchester Police and he believed a chief constable should oversee the force's 'long-term strategic plan' to address the issues raised from "start to finish".
Mr Hopkins revealed on Wednesday he had been suffering from labyrinthitis - an inner-ear infection which affects balance - since the end of October.
He said "given my current ill health", he would bring his retirement, which he was due to take in autumn 2021, forward, adding that it had been "an honour to serve the public for 32 years".
Mr Hopkins has been chief constable of GMP since October 2015, leading a force of almost 7,000 officers.
"Throughout my career, I have been committed to achieving the best outcomes for the people I serve [and] the decision to stand down is not one I have taken lightly, but I feel the time is right," he said.
The Blame Game Continues!
Meanwhile, the Conservative MP for Bolton West Chris Green has urged Andy Burnham, who oversees policing in the area, to step down.
Earlier, Mr Green said Mr Burnham should 'resign now' as he has 'absolute responsibility for policing, its failures'.
'His role ultimately is to ensure that GMP is delivering. He is in a position if he doesn't think GMP is performing and is delivering then he can challenge and if necessary he can sack the chief of police,' he said.
'That is Andy Burnham's power over policing in Manchester. He has absolute authority.'
But the Labour mayor said he would not be stepping down.
Following the publication of the daming report earlier in the week, and Mr Burnham had apologised on behalf of the Greater Manchester Police.
'I would like to say sorry to all of the victims of crime who have found that the service has not been good enough. We owe it to them to improve and we will and we will do it fast,' he said.
The 'Culture of Arrogance and Cover-ups'
A former GMP detective Maggie Oliver, who resigned over the way grooming cases in Rochdale were handled by the force, has said she and two ex-colleagues had a meeting with Mr Burnham in 2018 to highlight "serious concerns" and were "treated with contempt".
She said they gave him 26 examples of victims being failed by GMP, including "people dying as a result of gross neglect" and he "basically slammed the door in our face".
There was a "culture of arrogance and cover-ups" at the force, she said, and a "radical overhaul" was needed.
Ms Oliver said victim's "trust in the police had gone" and her charity, she claimed the Maggie Oliver Foundation, was "drowning in cries for help" from people who "have nowhere else to turn".
Sir Richard Leese, Manchester City Council leader, said the watchdog's findings indicate there are "major issues" that need to be addressed.
"I think it kind of says it all that GMP so far have not put up a spokesperson to explain what the situation is, what's been going on," he added.
In a statement released on Wednesday, the mayor and deputy mayor said they were "putting in place the necessary actions to improve standards of service to victims of crime in Greater Manchester".
Mr Burnham announced that a dedicated hotline for victims who have any complaints was also being set up.
**************************************

Friday, 17 April 2020

Police Response to COVID-19


by Les May
The text below is part of a press release regarding the release of a report by the Home Affairs Committee. I have added my emphasis. The full report can be downloaded from the link at the bottom of the page.
As a result of the COVID-19 epidemic, the police are charged with enforcing unprecedented regulations and restrictions on movement and gatherings in order to save lives and protect the NHS, according to a new report from the Home Affairs Committee.
The report into policing during the epidemic has concluded that the early response from the police has overall been proportionate and effective, and that it is important that any errors and problems continue to be swiftly corrected so that public trust is maintained.
The committee supports the police strategy to engage, explain and encourage, with enforcement as a last resort, and strongly welcomes the vital work of police officers across the country to support the NHS and save lives. It says that adherence to the regulations will ultimately depend on public support and on maintaining the principle of policing by consent.
Given the pace at which the new regulations had to be implemented, the Committee concludes that some early errors were not surprising. It welcomes police forces making public corrections and apologies when mistakes are made, and calls on them to ensure training and proper checks are in place.
The report was finalised before the latest publication College of Policing guidance on reasonable excuses to leave home, and the release of enforcement data from police forces this week which shows a wide variation between 380 enforcement notices served by Lancashire police and 38 enforcement notices served by Greater Manchester Police. The report calls for regular monitoring by the NPCC* and College of Policing where there is significant divergence in the use of enforcement measures.
The report highlights the importance of parks and green spaces during lockdown, especially for families with children and those in urban areas who don’t have gardens or outdoor space, and raises concern about parks being closed to everyone because some people are deliberately flouting social distancing regulations, without first trying enforcement measures against those individuals. It urges police forces and local authorities to work in partnership to see whether proper enforcement action can help keep parks and green spaces open for everyone else instead.
*National Police Chiefs' Council




****************************************

Sunday, 3 November 2019

Letter to the Ed. from a Rochdale resident

 Editor:  This morning NV received the e-mail below
from a local lady.  Because the correspondent is clearly 
afraid, we have decided to withhold her name.

Good morning Brian,

Thank you for sending this [the post: 'When is a Hate Crime not a Hate Crime?'], I've read the article and the Blogspot and I'm still shocked that this hasn't been reported as a hate crime, because it most certainly is!

https://www.gmp.police.uk/news/greater-manchester/news/news/2019/october/Four-men-have-been-jailed-for-their-part-in-a-brutal-gang-attack-which-left-a-man-with-life-changing-injuries-after-being-hit-with-an-axe-in-Rochdale/

As the article states, if it had been reversed then it most surely would have been. I'm so fed up with everyone being scared of saying the wrong thing! Why is it in the interests of the community to lessen the impact of the story when it's Asian against white, but fully reported as a hate crime if it's the other way around? 

The problem is, we're not told 'everything' we're protected from knowing the truth about our areas/places we live in, because of fears there will be repercussions, but there has to be fairness in what's reported. 

When the grooming gangs were sentenced, all those years ago, I saw a group of men and women with placards gathered around the takeaway shop in Heywood. They weren't causing disruption, but the placards said things like "rapists get out" and "not in our town". There was a high police presence and as soon as new people arrived they were dispersed/sent home quickly. All of which I saw as I completed the short drive through the town centre. The thing is, I wasn't aware of why they were there, I looked for a news story but there wasn't one. Of course, the story did eventually break nationwide but it was a good while after.

Maybe 'they' think we couldn't handle knowing the truth? maybe it would start unrest? but this has to stop!  The speed at which the first man gathered up so many people to help him is scary.  The fact that they have weapons to hand, they can just 'grab and go', is incredibly frightening and as I said to you last night, would now make me think twice about helping someone I thought might be in need 
Bit by bit these sorts of incidents are breaking down the local and general community spirit and at a base level the normal feelings of empathy you have for a fellow human being.

Anyway, enjoy your Sunday.
Thanks,
Name redacted 
****************

Tuesday, 4 June 2019

Election Fraud Rewarded with Finance Job

Why is 'Two Votes' Rana Welcome on Rochdale Town Council?
Cllr. 'Two Votes' Faisal Rana

LABELLED by Private Eye as a 'Rotten Borough' because of its Council's tolerant acceptance of Cllr. Faisal Rana's mis-doings in helping himself to two postal votes when he was elected in May 2018 local elections, the Rochdale Labour Party has now decided to reward him with the Cabinet position of Assistant Portfolio Holder for Finance.  

It is not the first time that the self-confessed fraud Cllr. Rana has held this position, he was in the job before he accepted a caution from the Greater Manchester Police for election fraud.  As a concession he humbly stood down at that time, and it was argued that he had been punished for his untoward behaviour at the time.

Fortunately the Lib Dem and Conservative opposition to the Labour Party administration on Rochdale Council is about as floppy as a bunch of wet lettuces and are unlikely to refuse to work with the blatant fraudster Cllr. Rana the Councillor for Spotland and Failinge ward.  When a no confidence motion against Cllr. Rana was put to the Rochdale Council, the Labour Councillors, as expected backed the fraudster, but for some reason the leader of the Lib Dems didn't show for the vote.

It should in fairness to Cllr. Rana be pointed out that he has a large property portfolio in Rochdale and beyond,. This may have impressed the council leader Allen Brett and perhaps is the reason he got the assistant Finance portfolio job.
We must await further developments to see if anyone has the guts to oppose Cllr. Rana's new appointment.  Who knows perhaps Rochdale Council will again come to the attention of Private Eye's Rotten Borough's coloumn?.

*************


Saturday, 18 May 2019

Trouble at Tommy Robinson event in Oldham

Muslim Defence League Confront Tommy Robinson in Limeside Oldham.
(Picture Joel Goodman/LNP)

Tommy Robinson, ex- leader of the English Defence League, who is now an adviser to Gerald Batten, the current leader of UKIP, was today expected to appear in Oldham just as social media showed conflict between his supporters and opponents of his views. 

The Greater Manchester Police said a 'number of objects were thrown' and there was damage to two police vehicles.

Police said there were no reported injuries and rumours someone had been stabbed were false.

It is uncertain where Mr Robinson,  who is campaigning for the European elections as an independent candidate for north-west England, was during the trouble.

 Tommy Robinson is running as an independent candidate to become an MEP for North West region of England, one of 11 candidates in the constituency.

**************

Friday, 28 December 2018

Tameside Council accused of political censorship over 'Che' poster!

Geoff Oliver and wife Maria who run El Cuba Libre

AS we recently reported, a furious row over civil liberties in Tameside, has erupted after a Greater Manchester GMP licensing officer, last Friday, visited the Sportsman Pub in Hyde, demanding that the pub landlord, Geoff Oliver, remove from his pub window a Cuban flag with the image of the Cuban revolutionary, Ernesto 'Che' Guevara emblazoned across it.  The pub provides Cuban food in its restaurant known as 'El Cuba libre', which is run by the landlord and his wife Maria, known as Cangui, who is from Cuba.

Although the landlord says that the flag has been on display at the pub on and off for five years, he says that the GMP licensing officer told him to remove it and warned that there could be serious consequences if he refused to do so, warning him that it could be recorded as a crime.

Mr Oliver told the Morning Star newspaper that he was woken up last Friday morning, by the local police licensing officer, who told him that complaints had been received about him displaying a photograph of a 'terrorist' in his pub front window.  He says that he was told that he could display the flag inside the pub but not from the front window and that if he didn't remove it, the officer would submit a crime report that could lead to a formal criminal investigation.

Guevara, is an iconic figure and a role model for  many revolutionaries on the left and was part of the 26th July Movement that launched a rebellion to overthrow the former Cuban Dictator Fulgencio Batista, that led to the Cuban revolution in 1959 and a Communist government led by the former president of Cuba, Fidel Castro.

Geoff, 65, from Glossop, has described the incident as attempted 'political censorship' and has refused to take down the poster. He told a local newspaper:

'I just find it unbelievable.  Every day people including many of our customers, walk round with Che Guevara's image on their T-shirts and other memorabilia. In Cuba, he's a national hero and one of the founding fathers...'

Dai Morgan, a regular in the pub, said:  'This is a disgraceful attack on free speech and no laughing matter. Who is this shocking ignoramus. Che stands with Mandela as one of the great fighters for freedom in the 20th century.'

A source told the Manchester Evening News (MEN), that the licensing officer had merely paid a visit to the pub on behalf of Tameside Council to make the landlord aware of the complaint and to 'ask if he would consider taking it down.'   According to the MEN, both Greater Manchester Police and Tameside Council declined to comment.

This type of incident is not unusual in the UK, in spite of the fact that Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998, guarantees the right of freedom of expression. In 2010, David Hoffman, a photojournalist, from Bow in East London, was threatened with arrest if he did not remove from his front window a poster that said 'David Cameron is a Wanker!'   In 2012, he received an apology and compensation from the police after they admitted it had been unlawful to insist that he remove the poster from his window and that this and other illegal actions by the police on the day, had amounted to 'unlawful interference with his Article 10 right to freedom of expression.'   Mr Hoffman, later displayed the letter of apology from the police in his front window, along with another poster that read -  'David Cameron is still a Wanker!'

Monday, 10 September 2018

Lovely Black Eyes & Agency Workers

by Brian Bamford
 Health & Safety in the Waste Manager's Office?
PEALS of laughter greeted the announcement at a meeting of the Unite Greater Manchester Activists last February, that a waste disposal manager had ended-up sporting a black-eye after an interview with an agency worker at Bury Council's Bradley Fold Waste Depot.  Last January an agency worker had been querying his own status, having been 8-years a temp working for Bury MBC on insecure tenure and unable to get a mortgage with a wife who’d just given birth.

The complaining agency worker, who'd done an 8-year unsecure stint, told Northern Voices that Mr. Stuart had claimed in justification that there were agency workers in other local authorities in Greater Manchester who had done up to 15-years as agency workers.

No-one knows for sure what took place next in the office of the waste manager, Glenn Stuart, but there seems to have been an altercation which resulted in a complaint to the police on the 23rd, January from Mr. Stuart who ended up with a black-eye. Northern Voices contacted the Greater Manchester Police in April, and asked if the police were investigating this as an allegation of common assault and requesting the crime or log number on this case?

Although it's clear that this case was reported to the police it seems that it turned out to be 'one person's word against another', because we're told that Mr. Stuart keeps the blinds closed in his office.

The secretive Mr. Stuart has a thing about privacy, and doesn't like the fact that in 2016 some folk in Bury took to photographing the town's overflowing bins.  At that time on May 1st, 2016 The Mail on Sunday journalist, Martin Delgardo, reporting on the management style of Stuart in a headline wrote: 'Bin tsar who slashed collections to one every THREE WEEKS tries to crack down on opposition by banning photographs of overflowing bins'.


However, after the 'violent' incident at Bradley Fold, a letter was sent out to binmen and other members of staff reminding everyone of the importance of health and safety and the Council's commitment to a safe environment.  There is talk of a 'them and us attitude' in the Bradley Fold waste depot, and some cynics among the workforce are muttering about a cover-up as to what really went on behind the Venetian blinds of the waste manager's office last January.

As the headline 'Bin Tsar' in the Mail on Sunday report in 2016 above suggests, Mr. Stuart has a reputation as something of a zealot in the realm of rubbish collection, which he seems to covert.  

As the Mail on Sunday stated he was then warning that he may get tougher still to force the people of Bury into recycling, saying:  ‘People have been given ample opportunity to fall in line. We need to formulate a plan of action in terms of enforcement.’

The scheme’s opponents claimed it had led to an increase in rat infestation.   With Iain Gartside, leader of the Conservative group on Bury council, saying:  ‘It’s an absolutely disgrace, with overflowing bins and increased fly-tipping.’

Meanwhile in last week's Bury Times the leader of Bury Council, Labour Councillor Rishi Shori said:  'Fly-tipping is a growing problem in the borough, although the council has allocated additional resources to tackle the problem in three main ways, focusing on prevention:  the installation of CCTV cameras in fly-tipping hotspots, enforcement and, where possible, by removing fly-tipped items, although this is becoming increasingly more difficult due to the budget pressures we are under.' 

Recently we can't help but notice that the 'installation of CCTV cameras in fly-tipping hotspots' has had the consequence of shifting the flytipping from the town centres and urban areas of Bury to the more posh, leafy zones like Tottington and Stubbins.  No wonder the Tories are upset.
******

Monday, 20 August 2018

Rochdale’s Collective Passion to Get Vote Out


Faisal ‘Two Votes’ Rana shows civic spirit

by Brian Bamford

Councillor Rana’s Poster Calls for Honesty & Integrity

MOST people in Rochdale didn’t even bother to vote in the local elections on the 3rd, May this year.  But not so Labour Councillor Faisal Rana, a resident of Bronte Close in Norden, and until recently also at an address in the Spotland & Falinge ward, who was so keen to cast his vote that he managed to contrive to vote more than once. 
 
Councillor Rana told Sky News last Tuesday that‘I have accepted a police caution for an electoral offence, which relates to me casting separate votes for two different wards in two different 
Constituencies (Spotland and Falinge, and Norden Ward) in the local elections earlier this year.
I legally registered my votes by providing my genuine national insurance number, date of birth and addresses and when I received these through the post I thought it would have been OK and that is why they issued me two ballots for two constituencies.

I did not realise this was an offence and misinterpreted the rule that says it is possible to vote in two different electoral areas.

As soon as this was brought to my attention I went for a voluntary interview at local police station and co-operated with police fully in this regard.’

Voting 'Often' to Uphold Confidence in the Ballot
Northern Voices was tipped-off about a pending complaint to the authorities of possible unorthodox multiple voting in the Rochdale election on the 3rd, May.  Since then the local police having first hesitated about pursuing the case, have discovered that Councillor Rana had entered into the election spirit by voting more than once.
Last Tuesday, the complainant Carl Faulkner, who stood as an independent candidate against Councillor Rana in Spotland and Falinge, gave the following statement to Northern Voices:
  
‘This is what we have with Labour councillor Faisal Rana, who actually expects people to believe his laughable claim that he mistakenly obtained two votes due to his ignorance of basic electoral law.
Labour councillor Faisal Rana did not innocently obtain his fraudulent second vote by “mistake”. Firstly, he purposely selected an address of convenience, where he did not live.  He then wilfully completed the registration process, which if answered honestly, is designed to prevent someone obtaining two votes. He then went on to apply for a postal vote.  At the subsequent election he carefully completed and returned that unlawfully obtained postal vote.
I informed the police of my suspicions on the day of the election. At the time, it was made clear to me that it was not something that would be investigated.  It was only because of my persistence that an investigation actually did commence some weeks later.’
Delivering 'HONESTY', 'INTEGRITY', & 'VISION'
Leader of Rochdale council, Labour's Allen Brett, addressing the issue of Councillor Rana told Sky TV:  'It is vital that councillors do all that they can to uphold the integrity of the democratic process.'

Well yes, indeed, and so Councillor Rana ran for Council on a conscientious platform of 'HONESTY, INTEGRITY and VISION', with the forethought, and creative vision to get in early; balloting from different addresses to place his postal votes.

And Labour's imaginative public spirited Councillor Rana is really spoilt for choice when it comes to addresses to claim a vote from, with rows of houses in the Rochdale Borough at his disposal to choose to claim his vote from; as anyone who seeks to cast their eyes over vast list of properties in his Register of Members Interests can see for themselves.

Council Leader Allen Brett is naturally disappointed 'in Councillor Rana's error because [as he says] he is a very talented and hardworking individual who shares our collective passion to improve our borough.'

Kill-joys & Representation of the People Act
The sad thing is that there are kill-joys in our midst who insist on side-constraints of the kind of creative passion promoted by Councillor Rana's inventiveness in spreading the voting habit.  As a consequence Greater Manchester Police gave statement:

'On Monday 13 August 2018 a 51-year-man was cautioned with engaging in an act at an election intending to deprive another of a vote contrary to sections 62A(1) and 168(1) of the Representations of the People Act 1983.'

Alas, the talented Councillor Rana's spirit of expanding the franchise falls foul of the Representations of the People Act 1983', and despite the general war cry of both Councillors Brett and Rana that it was all a dreadful mistake; in law it amounts to 'engaging in an act at an election intending to deprive another of a vote', and this is  'contrary to .... the Representation of the People Act 1983'.  

We politicians can waffle on as much as we want about voting 'often' or even twice 'by error' or 'by mistake', but the key words in the Act are the mens rea of 'intending to deprive'.

Northern Voices approached both Councillor Brett and Councillor Rana on Thursday (16th, August) before publication, Councillor Brett we were told is 'not in the office till Monday', and someone called 'Vicky' in the Council Leader's Office promised somebody called 'Dan' would get back to us, but we're still waiting for enlightenment, and Councillor Rana had a message put on his answer-phone, but 'Reply Came There None!'.

***************** 

Sunday, 5 August 2018

Police Probe Rochdale Election Fraud Claim!


THIS weekend, Greater Manchester Police have said that they are investigating a complaint of potential electoral fraud in Rochdale.   The police received a report on the 24th, May that related to the local elections on the 3rd, May 2018.  It is understood that a local candidate is being investigated. 



A police spokesman has told the BBC that a 51-year-old man had attended a voluntary interview and that inquires are still ongoing.



Northern Voices has been aware for some time of a number of allegations and complaints that have been circulating regarding the conduct of candidates in local elections in the Rochdale area.
******

Monday, 12 June 2017

Home Secretary says she doesn't know how many Brits have returned to UK after fighting with ISIS!

 Manchester Bomber - Salman Abedi

IT seems quite extraordinary that when the Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, was recently questioned about the Manchester suicide bomber, Salman Abedi, she admitted that the authorities didn’t know how many Britons had returned from fighting with ‘Islamic State’ or other extremist groups, and declined to say, how many times ‘exclusion orders’ had been used; “We have started to use them”, she said. Such an admission, is astonishing, from a government that claims that Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, is ‘soft on terrorism’.

What many British people will find bewildering, is how a 22-year-old Manchester man of Libyan origin, who grew up in the Whalley Range area, could have carried out such a cowardly attack. After fleeing Libya, Abadi’s family, had been given political asylum in the UK. They were given housing, state benefits and their children were educated. Salman Abedi, had been a former student of Salford University.

Described as the “worse terror attack to hit northern England”, many of his victims who were injured in the bombing, were innocent young girls who had gone to the M.E.N. arena in Manchester to watch the American pop idol, Ariana Grande. Of the 22 people killed, his youngest victim, Saffie Roussos, was only eight-years-old. Another 120 people were injured, some, suffering serious life-threatening injuries.

Friends have described Salman Abedi, as:

A young man quick to anger, who was involved in drink and drugs and supported Manchester United. A young man who found it difficult to fit in and cut a contradictory figure, who reacted violently to western sexual norms – once punching a woman for wearing a short skirt – and got into random fights.”

Investigators believe that Abedi, may have had help in making the explosive device, storing the materials, and buying the chemicals. People who knew Abedi, have claimed that they do not believe that he had the acumen’ to “formulate the terrible plan he enacted on Monday,” (22nd May 2017).

Yet, it is known, that teachers and religious figures in Manchester, who knew Salman Abedi, had raised concerns about his extremist views with the authorities on multiple occasions over several years using the Terror Hotline’ and the ‘PREVENT’ strategy, introduced by the government. US intelligence sources also told NBC News, that some members of his family had alerted officials and told them he was ‘dangerous’. It is also known that five years ago, students at Salford University, had called the terrorism hotline after claiming that Abedi had allegedly said being a suicide bomber was OK’.

Before his arrest, Ramadan Abedi (a.k.a. Abu Ismail), the father of Abedi, who has been in Libya since 2011, protested his son’s innocence. He told the press: We don’t believe in killing innocents. This is not us.” However, another son, Hashem Abadi, who was arrested in Tripoli while waiting to receive a transfer of cash from is brother Salman, is reported to have told Libyan anti-terror forces that he Was aware of all the details of the terrorist attack,” and that he and Salman, were members of ‘Daesh’ (ISIS). Following the attack, ISIS claimed responsibility for the Manchester bombing.

Ramadan Abedi, fought with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group’ (LIFG) in Libya. The group was opposed to Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, and sought to replace him with an Islamic state. It also proclaimed allegiance to Osama bin Laden. In 2004, LIFG, was classified as a terrorist organisation, when the U.S. sought to break-up ‘al-Qa'ida's network of sympathisers. On 28 May 2017, it was reported in the Guardian’ newspaper, that “Abedi senior’s Facebook page shows that he supported the ‘Shura’ Council, a bitter enemy of ISIS in Libya’. The same article also claimed that earlier this year, Ramadan Abedi, had summoned Salman Abedi to Libya, because of concern about his son’s “erratic behaviour” and had confiscated his passport.

Given the reports about Abedi, and the ease with which, he shuttled back and forth between Manchester and Tripoli over many years, it is extremely surprising that the security services didn’t have him under closer scrutiny. He was known to the security services, but was “not one of the 3,000 people under active investigation’. Some reports have suggested that he was in Libya for the uprising in 2011 and “was injured in Ajdabiya in eastern Libya while fighting for an Islamic faction.” French intelligence sources have also claimed that Salman Abedi, was one of 3,500 Libyans who went to Syria to fight, an allegation that “has been played down by British intelligence.” Moreover, Abedi, had travelled back to England from Libya via Turkey and Düsseldorf, just four days before the attack.

In spite of his background, Ian Hopkins, the chief constable of Greater Manchester Police (GMP), told BBC Radio Manchester that the local authorities had been unaware Abedi’s ‘radicalisation’ and he was not known to the PREVENT anti-radicalisation programme. He was only known to GMP because of a conviction for theft, receiving stolen goods and minor assault in 2012.

Since the bombing in Manchester, people have rightly sought explanations for why Salman Abedi, carried out the attack at the M.E.N. Arena. His sister, Jomana, told the Wall Street Journal’ that her brother had been angered by what was happening in Syria:

I think he saw children – Muslim children – dying everywhere, and wanted revenge. He saw explosives America drops on children in Syria and he wanted revenge. Whether he got that is between him and God.”

If this was the motive that drove Salman Abedi to carry out his cowardly attack, then it seems to have been driven by a most twisted and perverted kind of ‘Jihadi’ logic. Few of us, cannot help but feel appalled at the suffering we have seen meted out to innocent children and Syrian civilians, by various factions fighting in the Syrian conflict. But it isn’t just American and English bombs that kill Muslim children! Russian bombs and the barrel bombs of the Syrian ‘Shia’ Muslim leader, Bashar al-Assad, also kill Muslim children. And how many of us, would feel, that the way to avenge the deaths of Muslim children, is by murdering other people’s children in the west?

Jihad's, like Abedi, may well feel outrage at western intervention in Muslim countries, but turn a convenient blind eye, when ISIS bomb schools, mosques and markets in those very same countries. This week, an Islamic State car bomb targeted families eating ice cream, after breaking their Ramadan fast, in the Karrada district of Baghdad, killing 17 people and wounding 32 more. This month, a bus carrying Egyptian Coptic Christians’ was attacked leaving 29 dead and 20 more injured. ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack, declaring Christians in Egypt, Our first target and favourite prey.” It is a fact, that ISIS regularly target civilians, including children, Shia shrines and Christian churches.

Many on the British left, are loathe to condemn the atrocities carried out by ISIS and their adherents, and to do so, runs the risk of one being accused of ‘Islamophobia’. Like the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, and the journalist John Pilger, they feel that it’s all the fault of western foreign policy and that if we didn’t involve ourselves in foreign wars, these things would be less likely to happen. No doubt, groups like ISIS have benefited from the campaigns waged by western governments to overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and have taken advantage, of the chaos, brought about by the collapse of the State of Iraq. But this, it’s all the fault of the west’ attitude, has seen some on the left, defending radical Islamist movements like ISIS, who decapitate apostates and unbelievers, enslave women, murder homosexuals and Jews, and are prepared to wipe out whole communities that will not submit to their ultra-fundamentalist and twisted interpretation of Islam. Notwithstanding, western foreign policy, it should be clear to most people who are not deluded, that groups like ISIS are anti-western, anti-democratic, and anti-human rights’.

Professor Gareth Stansfield, professor of Middle East politics at Exeter University, believes that Abedi is typical of many second generation migrants drawn to Islamist groups -

It’s the classic thing of being dispossessed, of having no roots. They see the perceived immorality of the west around them and these seeds are planted and become extremely toxic and poisonous.”

Since the bombing, thousands of people across Greater Manchester have attended vigils to remember the victims of this terror attack by the suicide bomber Salman Abedi. Far from spreading fear, hatred and division, as he intended, we have seen people of all communities and faiths in Greater Manchester coming together to show solidarity with everyone affected by the events in Manchester. A JustGiving’ page set up to support the victims and their families, has so far surpassed £1.5 million. The We Love Manchester Emergency Fund” has raised £6 million for people who have been injured or bereaved following the bombing. And this Sunday, Ariana Grande, is to perform a benefit concert for victims of the bombing at ‘Old Trafford cricket ground’. The ‘One Love Manchester’ concert includes Justin Bieber, Coldplay, Katey Perry and Miley Cyrus.

Thursday, 26 January 2017

'Musical Beggars' and one disreputable MP

by Brian Bamford
TODAY, Northern Voices' did a survey of Rochdale town centre looking for the beggars reported to have been infesting the area between the Rochdale Exchange part way up Yorkshire Street, and the Wheatsheaf Centre entrance.
During my unscientific investigation I didn't discover one beggar, and began to worry if the tribe of beggars had been intimidated by the local MP for Rochdale, Simon Danczuk, who was whingeing in parliament last week, and in the media about the level of begging in Rochdale town centre.  He even castigated the Greater Manchester Police for not being more proactive in moving Rochdale's paupers on.
I spoke to one shopkeeper on The Walk, and she claimed the beggars come in shifts:  'it's like musical beggars, not musical chairs, round here,' she said. 
I said that I'd toured the area on Monday afternoon, and hadn't seen the lad who usually sits begging at the end of Yorkshire Street.  The shopkeeper insisted that the beggars didn't come until later, and that they kept away when the cops were around.  'The police do move them on!', she said.
But everyone was critical of the paupers and beggars, I approached a 'Busker' half way up Yorkshire Street, and I asked him where had all the beggars gone:  He told me they were still around and hadn't been frightened off my the belly-aching Mr. Danczuk.
I wondered if the good MP for Rochdale, who himself is down on his luck having been suspended from the Labour Party for disreputable behaviour, could possibly have mistaken Busking for begging when he took to counting the beggars on the short walk up Yorkshire Street to his office, where once he himself is reputed to have spent time bonking a lass on the office desk before breakfast?
The Busker said 'he can class me how he likes but I've got a license from the Council for what I do!'
He then told me how he 'felt guilty' when sometimes the local beggars throw money into his collecting tin, and he expressed surprise at how Mr. Danczuk had got away for so long in this town with his own disreputable conduct.
As I wandered off, the Busker began singing:  'I'll Do It My Way'
Meanwhile yesterday, when it comes to spare change Danczuk's former wife, Ms. Karen Danczuk, tweeted cheerfully about 'That moment when you find money in a coat you've not worn for a few weeks'.*


Thursday, 19 January 2017

Andy Burnham Says 'I'll be a people's Mayor!'

by Brian Bamford
TODAY at The Albert Halls in Bolton's Victoria Square the Labour candidate for the Greater Manchester Mayor's job told those who gathered to hear his manifesto for 'A safe, inclusive and diverse Greater Manchester' that he would be a 'People's Mayor' and a 'Grass-roots Mayor'
Mr. Burnham declared himself in favour of 'Safer Streets' and promised to work with the Chief Constable to start recruiting new police officers that reflect the diversity of Greater Manchester.  He promised to create 'a different relationship between the State and the Voluntary sector'
We were told that 'Crime is on the rise' and that 'Deep inequalities remain', and that 'we have seen an increasing amount of young people sleeping on the streets'.
The Labour candidate for Mayor worried about the cost of transport and bus fares, though he never said how often he used a bus, he spoke of housing problems and it was claimed that many young people will never be able to own their own house.  It was said that pensioners were made to feel guilty for claiming state pensions.  That scapegoating was prevalent in what was called the 'blame culture' of British society were everyone knows his or her place and fears the disruption that foreigners may bring:  it was said that one Polish nurse had been abused by people who she was treating in the Bolton community, telling her to 'Get back to Poland!'
Andy asked us 'Why has Mental Health shot up the social agenda?', and suggested that the 'voluntary sector' was 'person sensitive' while the 'Statutory sector' was much less inclined to address a 'personalised approach'
He claimed that he had in mind a new apprenticeship system which would draw upon the good things in the traditional apprenticeship and blend it with new concepts:  saying that he had had contact with the union UCATT. 
Regarding care in the community he said that he wanted to recruit the help of the Communication Worker's Union (CWU) to get the post-men to keep an eye on old and frail people in society.  This, he claimed, would reduce the isolation and insecurity people felt.
What was wanted was 'a young-people's cabinet to advise the Mayor on all areas of policy and ensure young peoples' voices are heard'.
Then in keeping with the latest fashion, Mr Burnham stated:  'I am proud that Greater Manchester has such a thriving LGTB community, rivalling London as the LGBT capital.'
Nothing was said about the Labour councillors in Rochdale who last month voted themselves a 34% increase, though one of the Rochdale Labour councillors at the Burnham manifesto meeting quietly told me that he was not going to take the rise, and when asked what the Rochdale Council leader, Richard Farnell, was thinking of by forcing the rise through on a whipped vote he said:  'He's Big Headed and doesn't care about UKIP!'
Nothing was said about the Labour Council leader of Manchester City Council, Richard Lees, who had addressed a meeting of Voluntary Organisations on Devo-Manc at which he said he wanted to see ward and hospital closures across Manchester, including Tameside because he believed that many people are in hospital who ought not to be, and could have their needs better met elsewhere.
Fear of the threat of UKIP was ever present in the workshops.

Friday, 25 November 2016

Tony Lloyd PCC: Is there a conflict of interest?


by Les May
WHEN, following the Greater Manchester Police investigation into allegations of widespread sexual abuse at Knowl View special school, the Crown Prosecution Service decided that there was insufficient evidence to justify bringing a prosecution against anyone, Rochdale’s very own ‘loose cannon’, MP Simon Danczuk, fired off one of his usual ill considered broadsides saying ‘I believe that there has been a catalogue of failings by Greater Manchester Police during the investigation of these crimes.'  He went on to call for the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPPC) to investigate the handling of the inquiry.

This attack on the police service did not go down well with the Greater Manchester Police Federation and led to its chairman Chief Inspector Ian Hanson calling upon Mr Danczuk to ‘put up or shut up’.  Danczuk of course did not have any firm evidence to back up his claims of abuse and unable to ‘put up’ he has had to ‘shut up’.

Given the seriousness both of the initial allegations and Danczuk’s claim that the inability of the CPS to bring a prosecution resulted from GMP failings, one might have expected that the Greater Manchester Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC), Tony Lloyd, would have issued a statement to reassure the public that Operation Jaguar had been conducted properly or, if he agreed with Danczuk, that he was going to refer the matter to the IPCC.

If you were expecting this you would be disappointed.

On 11 November I wrote to Tony Lloyd asking ‘Could we have a single and unambiguous public statement from you either that you repudiate Mr Danczuk's assertions and that you consider that the GMP investigation was thorough and carried out to the highest standards or that you agree with Mr Danczuk's assessment of the investigation and believe that GMP failed in its responsibility to carry out a thorough investigation into these allegations.’

Having received an acknowledgement of my e-mail, but no response, I wrote again on 18 November.  Today, 24 November, I have still had no response from Mr Lloyd.

Quite why Tony Lloyd has chosen to bury his head in the sand in this way and hope that this little local difficulty will go away, I do not know.  The cynical amongst you might think that it is something to do with the fact that Lloyd was once a Labour MP and Danczuk, though suspended from the Labour party, still seems to think there is chance that he will be readmitted.  So it looks like its ‘the old pals act’.  The irony of Danczuk being ‘protected’ in this way will not be lost upon those of us who remember the unsubstantiated claims in his book that Cyril Smith was ‘protected’ by the security services.

By failing to repudiate Danczuk’s claim of police ‘failings’ Lloyd gives credence both to the initial allegations and to the notion that GMP have not done their job properly.  But there is another aspect of this which is important and should not be overlooked.

Police and Crime Commissioner is an elected office.  Those who hold it can be expected to behave in an even handed and impartial manner.  Even giving the appearance of acting in acting in a way that puts party allegiance before public duty, will bring the whole system of elected mayors and PCCs into disrepute.  It’s time for Tony Lloyd to ‘put up’ or ‘stand down’.  I for one have no faith in Tony Lloyd either as PCC or acting mayor.  And I don’t think I’m alone.

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

Mr. Tony Lloyd PCC: The Silent Man!


by Les May
'The Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester has been elected by local people and is accountable for how crime and community safety is tackled throughout the region.  Your commissioner is Tony Lloyd.'
I HAVE taken this quote directly from the web page of the Greater Manchester Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) at https://www.gmpcc.org.uk/about/
In other words Mr Lloyd was elected by the people of Greater Manchester and one would assume is therefore to be considered in some degree to be accountable to them.  But just how accountable is he really?  Does he act like a man who thinks he is accountable?
At the beginning of October my local paper carried an article with the headline 'MP slams police "failings" as abuse inquiry closes.'  The MP in question was of course Simon Danczuk, MP for Rochdale.  According to the ITV website his words were 'I believe that there has been a catastrophic catalogue of failings by Greater Manchester Police during the investigation of these crimes.'
Responding to this the GMP Police Federation Chairman Ian Hanson said:
'Yet again we see a Manchester MP launching an ill-informed attack upon police officers in an attempt to raise their own media profile.'  
When Danczuk repeated his criticism Ian Hanson responded as follows:
'He continues to criticise GMP for its work on historical sexual abuse allegations.
I do not now intend to get involved in a public slanging match with Simon Danczuk over this matter.
Instead I will publicly call him out to deliver the firm evidence that he bases his criticism of GMP on to my office by 12 noon on Monday - and I will personally deliver it to the IPCC.
'If as, I know, there is no firm evidence, then he should back out of this with what little credibility he has got left in tact. His behaviour is not helping the victims of this terrible abuse.
The people of Rochdale expect better.'
As Northern Voices reported on 28th, October Danczuk neither delivered any firm evidence nor accepted the invitation to attend the Police Federation meeting which was held the previous night.  But we do know that the Police & Crime Commissioner, Tony Lloyd, did attend the meeting as Northern Voices had a reporter present inside the Renaissance Hotel in Blackfriars when Lloyd arrived in the lift, and he says that downstairs 'You could have cut the atmosphere with a knife.'   http://northernvoicesmag.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/dodger-danczuk-doesnt-deliver.html
Now Danczuk has form when it comes to accusing a police force of failing to carry out its duty properly. This is what Mr. Danczuk had to say in his book about the failings of Northamptonshire police with regard to Cyril Smith:
‘His car had been pulled over on the motorway and officers had found a box of child porn in his boot.  The police were naturally disgusted and wanted to press charges.  But then a phone call was made from London and he was released without charge. Senior officers had threatened the officers involved with dismissal if he was not released immediately. The mood was tense and sullen as officers stood back while Cyril breezily walked past them to freedom.  All the staff who knew about it were threatened with the Official Secrets Act if they discussed the matter any further. Once again Cyril walked out of the police station knowing he was a protected man.'
A lovely story with just one problem, it wasn’t true! http://northernvoicesmag.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/the-humbug-of-simon-danczuk.html
So how did the PCC for Northamptonshire respond to this attempt to blame his officers?  Well he wasn’t pleased with Messrs Danczuk and Baker to say the least.  He went to the trouble of appearing on the BBC Regional programme Look East when amongst other things he said that his force had been ‘maligned’ that ‘The force should expect an apology.  Northamptonshire Police are not guilty of covering up a crime and indeed letting someone go on to perpetrate more.’ and then the killer line, 'Everything in that book's got to be evidence-led and -based, otherwise you are alerting people to the wrong information.'
And what has our very own PPC Tony Lloyd had to say in defence of GMP and its officers in response to Danczuk’s attack?  So far as I can tell the answer is absolutely nothing.  Now if I’m wrong about this I am willing to hold up my hand and admit it.  But I searched through the news section GMPPC website as far back as the beginning of October and could find nothing.
So how about it Mr Lloyd?  Your electorate and the officers of GMP deserve an explanation.

Friday, 28 October 2016

Dodger Danczuk Doesn't Deliver!


by Les May
Last night, as predicted Simon Danczuk didn't deliver his evidence of historic child abuse to the meeting of the Greater Manchester Police Federation at the Renaissance Hotel as requested by Chief Inspector Ian Hanson chairman of the Joint Branch Board of the GMP Police Federation.  Instead Tony Lloyd, the Manchester Police and Crime Commissioner, turned up to explain to the serving police officers present what was going on as the disgraced Rochdale MP, Simon Danczuk, indulges himself in attacking the police for failing to dig-up enough evidence to satisfy the Crown Prosecution Service.  Below Les May questions Simon Danczuk's tactics in attacking the police. (Editor)
THE response by Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk to Chief Inspector Hanson’s challenge to him
'.... I will publicly call him out to deliver the firm evidence that he bases his criticism of GMP on to my office by 12 noon on Monday - and I will personally deliver it to the IPCC.’

He is trying to use the same tactic which was so successful when he appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee in July 2014, when instead of being questioned about his book ‘Smile for the Camera’  he managed to get the spotlight shifted onto Leon Brittan.  Now he wants to shift the spotlight from his inability to provide the evidence asked for, onto debating what he calls the ‘poor policing around Rochdale’. 

This is just a smoke screen to hide the fact that he does not have any evidence to back up his claims about Knowl View.  He knows perfectly well that Chief Inspector Hanson is speaking for the GMP members of the Police Federation who he feels have been very unfairly criticised by Danczuk.  Chief Inspector Hanson is not, and does not represent himself as, speaking for GMP.   

To put it bluntly Danczuk’s claims:
‘Everyone knows that child abuse took place on a frightening scale at Knowl View’ and ‘We've seen shocking reports documenting this...’ are bunkum.  ‘Everyone knows...’, isn’t evidence and Danczuk continually repeating it does not make it evidence. 

And no, we have not seen ‘shocking reports’ because the two reports which might throw some light on what was happening at Knowl View, the 1991 report of Philip Shepherd and the 1992 report of Valerie Mellor, have not been published by Rochdale Council and it shows no inclination to let us see them for ourselves.   

I have seen a copy of the Shepherd report and whilst it is certainly ‘shocking’, what it refers to is sexual activity between the boys at the school and to some boys who were visited Rochdale town centre accompanied by care staff, ‘cottaging’ at the Smith Street toilets.   

In other words what it reveals is poor supervision by some care staff.  Whether the responsibility for this being allowed to happen should lie with the care staff involved. the headteacher, the governors or the Director of Education is a subject for discussion after the reports have been published in full.   

As to what Danczuk means by his comment, ‘...ensure the public understand how the police reach decisions regarding serious crimes like child abuse’, I do not understand unless he is trying to blame Chief Inspector Hanson’s colleagues for the decision that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone, which was in fact taken by the CPS.   

I hope that Chief Inspector Hanson and his GMP colleagues in the Police Federation will keep the pressure on Danczuk to produce thevery specific information that backs up his comments’, not let him shift the debate onto things which suit his agenda of getting himself back in the limelight and will publicise as widely as possible his inability or unwillingness to ‘put his money where his mouth is.

If Danczuk wants to do something useful he could try putting pressure on his friends in Rochdale Council to publish the Shepherd and Mellor reports.  Until these have been published he should refrain from making any more inflammatory comments about Knowl View.