Showing posts with label Sun on Sunday. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sun on Sunday. Show all posts

Friday, 26 August 2016

The Humbug of Professional Feminism


by Les May
I AM not a feminist.  I dislike feminism as a philosophical stance, because I see no reason to privilege one section of society over another and as a political stance it seems to me self serving, inherently reactionary, intent upon perpetuating unfairness and hierarchies, and destructive of personal relationships.  

Now simply writing this is probably (certainly?) enough to get me lumped with the men that Julie Bindel was writing about in her 2006 opinion piece for the Guardian, 'Why I hate men'.  Seemingly writing that you 'hate' men is OK but writing 'I hate EMOs or Goths or..' well fill in you own list here, could get your remarks logged as 'hate crime'.

Perhaps the height of absurdity has now been reached when a recent piece in the 'i' newspaper turned out to be an interview with a 'professional' feminist, a job which I assume is more lucrative and less tiring than say working for Sports Direct or Amazon.

But whilst 'professional' feminists are still mercifully rare, building a career around feminism is not.  I've already mentioned Julie Bindel who certainly falls into this category, but she is almost unknown outside feminist circles.  Much better known is Labour's  Harriet Harman, she of the 'pink bus' and cousin to David Cameron.  The 'pink bus' campaign did not go down well with some women as you will see from Ella Whelan's comments at Spiked Online.

Harriet's silence on Simon Danczuk's past and recent activities in Spain is telling and suggests she is a bit of a humbug.  In 2002 the BBC reported:

'Crown prosecutors are to be urged to press on with prosecutions in cases of domestic violence, even if the victim wants the case dropped.

Solicitor General Harriet Harman is backing the move as part of a range of measures to crack down on domestic abuse.

'It is about where the public interest lies when the victim is insisting the case be dropped," she will tell a police conference on domestic violence on Tuesday.

'She might want to forgive him, but the next time he assaults her she could be killed.'

So why did she not speak up when the Mail on Sunday reported at length in July 2015 on what Karen Danczuk's family claimed happened in Spain in 2008.  And why, after Mr Danczuk was arrested in Spain recently following an incident which has striking similarities with the 2008 incident, is she still silent?

And before anyone tells me that Mr Danczuk is suspended from the Labour party at present and does not hold the Labour whip, you should know that he is once again trying to sail his ship with a Labour flag, as you will see if you check out his job advert.

Labour MPs have other things to think about at present, like their holidays, but even if they are wise to keep their mouths shut about Simon's recent constituency office tryst, the story Karen Danczuk told in the Sun on Sunday only a few days ago merits a response.  At least from a woman who was once a Labour Solicitor General.  Ironically it is a group of men who were expelled from the Labour party who have made the link between the events in Spain in 2016 and 2008, and want the fallout from the latter re-opened.









Monday, 22 August 2016

Danczuk, Feminism & Family Violence?


by Les May
A REVIEW of Erin Pizzey's book 'Prone to Violence' on Amazon has the title 'A revelation that has remained buried for decades'.  Although, as the reviewer says, Pizzey founded the first refuge for the victims of domestic violence in West London in the 1970s she seems to have been largely forgotten by present day feminists who are more concerned with how many women CEOs there are in the FTSE 100 or whether enough women appear on UK banknotes.

The reasons why are explored in the Amazon review and on Wikipaedia but they can be said to revolve around her claim, based upon her research, that one must distinguish between 'genuine battered women' and 'violence-prone women'.  The former she defined as 'the unwilling and innocent victim of his or her partner's violence' and the latter defined as 'the unwilling victim of his or her own violence.'  Essentially she was arguing that in at least some cases one must recognise a 'mutuality of domestic violence.'

Now you may be tempted to apply this thesis to the Danczuk's. Certainly it would explain why Karen initially made to her family accusations against Simon about an incident in Alicante in 2008, only to withdraw them a short while later and why we have recently seen a rerun of the same behaviour after Simon was arrested, again in Alicante, only for Karen to decline to confirm statements she had made to the police two days earlier, when the matter came to court.  But don't be too hasty.  There may be another explanation.

If Karen had followed through and pressed charges the Danczuk 'gravy train' would have come off the track.  Even Danczuk, brass necked though he is, would have found it difficult to resist the pressure to resign as an MP if he had been found guilty of being a 'wife beater'.  If he can stick it out until 2020 he will receive a further £274,000 in salary during that time.  And then there's the generous expenses, parts of which fund his constituency office which in April re-hired Karen as a part-time employee at a reported salary of £12,000.  If she sticks with him after the recent incident that's going to amount to £40,000 by 2020.

As I pointed out in my article 'Simon Danczuk on his way to the bank' from January of this year, as soon as he ceases to be an MP he is 'Mr Nobody' again.  His lucrative line in 'assisting' newspaper with stories of his indiscretions would dry up immediately. Stories like, 'I was drunk and horny' and 'I need counselling for my sex addiction' are only of interest to the press so long as he is an MP.

But it's not just Simon who appears to benefit from his indiscretions.  Check out the pictures which appeared in the Sun over the past week or so.  Initially Karen was shown with a scarf discretely draped over her right shoulder hiding her wound and the picture credited to 'News Group Newspapers'.  Next day we got the works (a.k.a the full monty) with her 'gruesome' wounds on display and the pictures credited to 'Fame Flynet'.  Was this a 'nice little earner' for Karen?

Then there's today's little offering in 'The Sun on Sunday'.  I was expecting 'My night in a Spanish hell-hole' and 'I need anger management' from Simon.  On expenses of course!  What we got was a double page spread of 'Karen Danczuk on terror of hubby's crazed bust up', 'Wild MP yelled and kicked in glass door', 'I feared he was going to kill me', 'Violent row left me paralysed with fear', and 'I woke up in a pool of bood.. I'm scarred for life'.  And that's just the captions!  Was this another 'nice little earner' for Karen, or was she just being public spirited?

Now call me Mr. Cynical but I cannot help noticing that if Karen had been willing to confirm what she appears to have initially told the Spanish policeman it would have been reported world wide as news and there would have been no Sun exclusive.  Just as 'I'm sorry I haven't a Clue' fans know that 'points mean prizes', seasoned Danczuk watchers know that 'exclusives mean cash'.

Explaining her unwillingness to press charges of domestic violence with, 'Do I want to be the person that finally ends his career?  Do I want to be the person who tells my sons their dad is in prison? No.' this interview may bring about both of these.

We already know that a complaint has been lodged with with Greater Manchester Police asking the force to investigate the allegations.  The seriousness of Karen's claims in the newspaper article are of such a nature they may give an impetus to this and will not doubt provide a basis for further complaints.

I'd be surprised if Rochdale Lib-Dems did not have a finger in this particular pie.  But who can blame them?  Throughout 2014 every possible attempt was made to smear them using the using the real and imaginary claims about Cyril Smith's antics.  Now it must be like Christmas and Birthday all rolled into one, courtesy of the Danczuks!

But don't write off the Danczuk duo just yet.  Karen still has the minor problem of earning a living to pay the bills and no doubt Simon still has access to a smartphone and Twitter.

I have repeatedly urged Rochdale Labour party to begin the process of disengaging itself from Simon Danczuk.  He's bad news and it's not going to get any better.

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Simon Danczuk | CommonSpace





 

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

Simon Danczuk on the way to the bank!

by Les May
NO wonder Simon Danczuk is smiling in the picture in last Saturday's Independent.  He must be on the way to the bank!

We now know that Simon was paid £5,000 for the 'Sun on Sunday' article of 3 January in which we were told, 'He admitted telling Sophena he wanted to spank her during booze benders on which he drank up to three bottles of wine a night'.  A story he immediately backtracked on in an interview with LBC, perhaps because he realised the public might question his capacity to do his work as an MP if he is regularly 'under the influence'.

This is just another example of him cashing in on his position as an MP to line his pockets.  His pretensions to being a 'working class' guy just earning an honest crust takes a bit of a bashing when you realise it would take someone working a forty hour week, on the over 21 minimum wage of £6.70p an hour, nearly 19 weeks to earn this sum.

And it doesn't stop here.  Last week he admitted to receiving £1,100 from FameFlyNet, a company which "prides itself on helping people in the public eye to raise their media profile'.  Check out the 'business as usual' photos at the 'Mail Online' website and you'll see the same company copyright imprint.  Another 'nice little earner' for Danczuk.  As he indignantly says there's nothing illegal in doing this, but it does make him look like a greedy money grubber in some people's eyes.

Much as I disliked Thatcher I came to think of her as 'one of the perils of democracy'.  I see Danczuk in the same way.  He's here and he'll stay as long as he can.  When he goes as an MP he'll just be 'Mr Nobody' again and all those little 'perks' from appearances in the media will dry up. Even if he gets booted out of the Labour party he'll stay as an MP.  Each extra year he can stick it out he get his £74,000 salary, a 'severance allowance' worth another £12,000 a year and a pension of up to 1/40th of his final salary.

In the past his antics of briefing against Miliband and Corbyn have been a threat to Labour on the national stage.  But in the next four years he's going to be a liability to the Labour party in Rochdale and any hope of winning the seat in 2020.  Simon isn't going to change.  He's going to be the story for the next four years.  Come election time people are going to remember his antics even if he's been expelled from the Labour party by then.  He's already said he stand as an independent if he is.

Even if he does stand against Labour he'll still be unwanted baggage for the next Labour candidate.  The remedy for this is for Rochdale Labour party to dissociate itself from Danczuk as smartly as possible.  Whether that happens lies in the hands of ordinary Labour members who need to make their feelings known.  They need not feel any qualms about distancing themselves from Mr Danczuk.  It is self evident that he has repeatedly brought the party into disrepute and no doubt will go on doing so.  
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/simon-danczuk-mp-sold-interview-about-sexting-scandal-to-tabloid-for-5000-a6804121.html
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/09/simon-danczuk-5000-sun-on-sunday-interview
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6836303/Simon-Danczuk-breaks-silence-on-sex-text-shame.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35229346
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3391978/Selfie-loving-councillor-Karen-Danczuk-pictured-working-personal-trainer-days-vowing-clear-ex-husband-Simon-s-rape-claim.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salaries_of_Members_of_the_United_Kingdom_Parliament