Wednesday, August 3, 2016
GMB Slams Manchester City Council Proposals For Above
Inflation Pay Rises For Managers
Senior officers have regularly seen their pay packets swell
in the last 6 years whilst our members have faced below inflation pay awards
and job insecurity says GMB.
GMB, the union for local government workers, has commented
on proposals from Manchester City Council that would see senior managers
receive increases of up to 20%. The council has seen swingeing cuts amounting
to £300m a year while other council staff were given a pay rise of just 1%
earlier in the year.
Simon Walsh, GMB regional organiser, said:
'To say we are disappointed that senior officers have moved to bump strategic management team pay is an understatement. Senior officers have regularly seen their pay packets swell in the last 6 years whilst our members have faced below inflation pay awards and job insecurity while their jobs are outsourced.'
'To say we are disappointed that senior officers have moved to bump strategic management team pay is an understatement. Senior officers have regularly seen their pay packets swell in the last 6 years whilst our members have faced below inflation pay awards and job insecurity while their jobs are outsourced.'
Manchester City Council has faced the most savage cuts since
2010 and our members have had to bear the brunt of decisions taken by national
and local Government. We are currently bracing ourselves for further cuts
following the council’s current consultation with staff and residents which are
to be finalised by November.
With an ever decreasing workforce and ever increasing
pressure, our members are struggling to cope across all services. We find it
inexplicable that Manchester City Council can find this level of funds to
address senior officers pay. There is no way the council can justify some of
these payments, especially when paying some officers over £100,000 plus
thousands of pounds in market rate supplements.
GMB is seeking further clarification on the proposals and
have submitted comment directly to the Personnel Committee.”
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment