by Brian Bamford
I first became aware of the importance of politics of Saudi Arabia in the late 1980s, at
the time of the idict by the Iranian Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini against Salman Rushdie over his book Satanic Verses. A friend of mine, Zafar Khan, who was from
Kashmir and then living in Luton told me that the campaign against Mr. Rushdie
had allowed Shiite Iran to gain the initiative in the Islamic world over the
sunni House of Saud.
What I scarcely realised until more recently was that the
politics of oil as deployed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia had dominated the
world economy throughout the last half of the 20th century. It began with the House of Saud using an oil
embargo to do what the journalist Andrew Scott Cooper describes as a
'willingness to weaponize the oil markets'.
In October 1973, a coalition of Arab states led by Saudi Arabian stopped
oil shipments in retaliation for America's support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War. After that the price of oil quadrupled leading
to a big rise in the cost of living, mass unemployment and rising social disruption.
The brutal effect of the flooding of the oil markets by the
Saudis that occurred in 1977 was one of the consequences of the problems that
faced the Shah of Iran. It was not the
only cause of the Iranian revolution but it was one important issue: The Shah regime was destabilised at a time
when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini started his campaign to replace a pro-Western
monarchy with a theocratic state. The
journalist Andrew Scott Cooper suggests that the oil markets 'fuelled the rise
of political Islam'.
Today, most of us in the west don't remember this because we
are not now the Saudis' main target. Now
the oil crises are more to do with regional politics, as well as being an
attempt to hurt the American fracking industry by undermining prices to make it
uneconomic to frack.
More recently the Saudis have shown that they see the oil
markets as a front line in the Sunni Muslim-majority kingdom's battle against
its Shiite-dominated rival Iran. Mr.
Scott Cooper writes that the favourite tactic of thre Saudis is 'flooding' or
pumping surplus crude into a soft market, which amounts to war by economic
means; 'the equivalent of dropping the bomb on a rival.'
In 2006, Nawaf Obaid, a Saudi security adviser, said that
'Riyadh was prepared to force prices down to “strangle” Iran's economy.' Then in 2008, the Saudis acted on this with
the aim of undermining Tehran's ability to support Shiite militia groups in
Iraq, Lebanon and other places.
In this way the price of oil helped to end the Cold
War. At that time, the Soviet Union,
like Russia today, as a Communist superpower was a global energy producer
heavily reliant on incomes from oil and gas.
In 1985-86, the Saudis decision to flood the market led to a collapse in
prices that sent the Soviet regime into decline. 'The timeline of the collapse of the Soviet
Union can be traced to Sept. 13, 1985,' wrote thre Russian economist Yegor
Gaidar, 'on this date Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani, the minister of oil of Saudi
Arabia, declared that the monarchy had decided to alter its oil policy
radically.'
Currently in Russia, fully half of government revenue comes
from oil and gas. Inflation in Russia
has exceeded double digits last year; its special fund which bails out Russian
companies in difficulties, is low; and factory closures are encouraging labour
unrest.
Venezuela, whose economy has been damaged by lost revenues
from oil, that amounts to about 95% of its export earnings. Inflation in Venezuela is predicted by the
International Monetary Fund to reach 720% this year, and it is expected to
become 'financial zombie state'. The
Left is blaming the USA for President Maduro's plight but his Venezuelan regime is in reality at the mercy of the oil
markets.
It's all a cautionary tale of what can happen to countries
that depend on heavily on a single unstable commodity price. Russia for example is in fiscal crisis at a
time when it is making military interventions in the Ukraine and Syria.
1 comment:
To extrapolate your argument vis-a-vis oil politics. Why is the UK Government spending on the Army and RAF being slashed but the Navy is getting TWO super carriers (HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Queen Elizabeth)? answer Oil around the Falklands and the antarctic region renamed "Queen Elizabeth Land" in 2012. the Oil will be protected by the carriers
Post a Comment