Had the anarchist
newspaper Freedom still been in existence, and still have been being edited by someone of the abilities of say Vernon Richards or Charles Crute, I
could well imagining them writing an editorial welcoming this action by people,
while many governments dispute the pros and cons. Of course, for well over a decade Freedom has not
had a proper editor who could do the job convincingly.
Last Friday, as the
humanitarian crisis involving tens of thousands of migrants worsened, the
Hungarian authorities introduced changes to the penal code that would place
tougher measures on migrants, including a law that would make crossing or
damaging the new fence 110-mile fence on its boarder with Serbia punishable by
prison or expulsion.
So bad is Hungary's
seeming animosity for migrants that the United Nations has said that the
Hungarian leaders had rejected assistance from the agency that supports
refugees, including for the migrants at Keleti, the main Budapest railway
station, where thousands were stranded last week.
In Britain, David
Cameron shifted his ground last weekend following criticism of what some
critics called his apathy to the crisis, and has now agreed to accept 20,000
more Syrians, but only from camps in Syria.
Dan Bilefsky in the New York Times wrote:
'Mr. Cameron, who is trying to manage
anti-immigration sentiment in the country as well as in his own Conservative
Party, had been critized for dismissing on Wednesday (last week) the idea of
Britain's adherence to a quota system for taking in asylum seekers who searched
Europe.'
Cameron had originally
declared: 'I don't think there is an
answer that can be achieved simply by taking more refugees.'
Mr.Cameron was later
shamed into a u-turn by the photos of victims floating in the sea. In contrast, the German government under Mrs
Merkel has agreed to take millions of
refugees.
No comments:
Post a Comment