Marx
and Engels frequently changed their opinion about the English working-class and
its revolutionary potential. Sometimes they viewed the English
working-class as the best organised and most advanced in Europe. At other
times, they were driven to despair by the English' workers, narrow-mindedness
and sectarianism. They ridiculed their notions of national superiority and
their bourgeois ideas and viewpoints.
Marx
and Engel's called the Chartist leader, Ernest Jones, "Citizen, Hip, Hip, Hooray." The
Irish-born, Chartist leader, Feargus O'Connor, was in favour of peasant
proprietors, and wasn't a revolutionary. He was opposed to the Chartist
movement building links with European socialists, and thought that in doing so,
it would dilute the national character of the Chartist movement.
Other
lefties and Marxists, have held similar mixed feelings about the English
working-class. The Trotskyist writer and journalist, Paul Mason, says
that Marxism got it all wrong about the English working-class. In his book
'Post-Capitalism', he wrote: "200
years of experience shows it (the working-class), was preoccupied with 'living
despite capitalism' and not overthrowing it."
Some
years ago, Raphael Samuels, in the New Left Review, wrote: "A dozen vanguard ' parties and as many
tendencies and groups, compete for the honour of leading a non-existent
revolutionary working-class."
In
my personal experience, I've never found the English working-class to be
politically savvy, or much interested in politics at all. Many of them might
vote Tory, but they have a healthy suspicion of all politicians and their
motives. The English will tell you that they vote for the lesser of the two
evils.
Yet,
I do know from British history, that there have been times when the country
seemed to be on the brink of a revolution because of working-class militancy.
The strikes and social unrest in the years leading up to WWI are a good
example. The year 1926, which saw a General Strike, is another good example.
The reformist politicians and trade union leaders, pulled the plug on the 1926
strike fearing that it might lead to a social revolution. The French Communist,
who led the CGT, did the same thing in France in 1968.
The
Liberal Prime Minister, Lloyd George, always said that the parliamentary socialists
were the best policemen for the Syndicalists, who advocated for workers control
of the means of production and for a social revolution. Some English workers
have always been more class conscious and politically clued up than others.
You
can find evidence of early communist or socialist ideas being espoused
throughout English history. It's found in the writings of people like Gerrard
Winstanley, the 17th century 'Digger', from Wigan. The priest and Lollard, John
Ball, who was executed for his part in the Peasants Revolt of 1381, said:
"Things cannot go well in England, nor ever
will, until all goods are held in common, and until thee will be neither serfs
nor gentlemen, and we shall be equal." It was John Ball who told us, "When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman?"
1 comment:
I think it should be "pigeon holed" not pigeon hold,
But however the general opinion in my view is that the general consensus is...... that you can share the wealth out when you share the work out....
I'll wait.....
Post a Comment