Friday 3 July 2020

Slavery, Fitzwilliam College & Dr. Starkey

VARSITY 3rd, July 2020*


IN an interview with Reasoned on Tuesday, the controversial historian Dr. David Starkey argued, “Slavery was not genocide, otherwise there wouldn’t be so many damn blacks in Africa or in Britain would there?”

Since then Cambridge's Fitzwilliam College has announced it will discuss Dr David Starkey’s Honorary Fellowship at a Governing Body meeting on Wednesday, following widespread condemnation of “racist” comments by the historian.

Dr. Starkey has argued:  “You cannot decolonise the curriculum because you, Black Lives Matter, are wholly and entirely a product of white colonisation. You are not culturally Black Africans. You would die in seconds if you were dumped back in black Africa.”  He went on to say, “Of course, slavery was not the same as the Holocaust.”

In response Fitzwilliam College said:  “We support and promote freedom of speech in our academic community, but we have zero tolerance of racism. Dr David Starkey’s recent comments on slavery are indefensible.”

Varsity understands that it is “almost certain” that his fellowship will be revoked.

Meanwhile Fitzwilliam College has issued the following statement:
'Fitzwilliam College does not tolerate racism.
We support and promote freedom of speech in our academic community, but we have zero tolerance of racism. Dr David Starkey’s recent comments on slavery are indefensible.
Fitzwilliam was founded upon values of fairness and mutual respect and we are proud of the College’s inclusive and diverse membership.
The matter of Dr Starkey’s Honorary Fellowship will be considered by the Governing Body at its meeting next Wednesday.'

*******************

*  Varsity is the independent newspaper for the University of Cambridge, established in its current form in 1947. In order to maintain our editorial independence, our newspaper and news website receives no funding from the University of Cambridge or its constituent Colleges.
We are therefore almost entirely reliant on advertising for funding, and during this unprecedented global crisis, we have a tough few weeks and months ahead.
In spite of this situation, we are going to look at inventive ways to look at serving our readership with digital content for the time being.
Therefore we are asking our readers, if they wish, to make a donation from as little as £1, to help with our running cost at least until we hopefully return to print on 2nd October 2020.
Many thanks, all of us here at Varsity would like to wish you, your friends, families and all of your loved ones a safe and healthy few months ahead.

1 comment:

Agatha Runcible said...

He's now apologised unreservedly for saying that slavery was not genocide because of the survival of "so many damn blacks." This is not the first time Starkey has been accused of racism.

In 2011, he told the BBC2 Newsnight: "The whites have become black; a violent, destructive, nihilistic gangster culture has become the fashion." He also told the Daily Telegraph that the statistics "appeared" to show a black propensity for violence.

So,why the sudden change of heart? Why is Starkey now so apologetic for using what he now says was a term of racial abuse and clumsy? It may have something to do with the fact that publishers like Harper Collins have ditched him and universities like Cambridge, are turning their backs on him.

Yet, it's interesting to compare how a certain sector of what some, now term, 'woke' public opinion, has reacted to various allegations of 'Racism'.

While Starkey is at risk of becoming a social pariah,the Cambridge Don, Priyamvada Gopal, who said "White Lives Don't Matter", was promoted by Cambridge University,to full professorship, after the university said it was defending her academic freedom. But, when the Burnley/Tommy Robinson fan, Jake Heppel, took responsibility for flying the banner with "White Lives Matter Burnley" written on it, over the Etihad Stadium,he lost his job as a welder after being sacked.

Though racism should be resisted, there does seem to be a certain amount of hypocrisy in what is deemed to be 'racism', and how certain people react to it. It seems some people are allowed to sin, and others are not.