The successful military insurrection of the Spanish military
in July 1936, which ultimately led to the dictatorship of General Franco, was military
sedition against the then legally elected Republican government, just as the ousting of
Mr. Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt is military
sedition today. Commenting on the whether
Franco and the Spanish military had a case George Orwell wrote in a letter dated 1st, August
1937:
'I should not say that the (right-wing) rebels had no case, unless
you believe that it is always wrong to rebel against a legally-established
government, which in practice nobody does.'
Some have tried to justify the seizure of power by the
Egyptian military by saying that Mr. Morsi and his government were introducing
an Islamic constitution that would overwhelm the opposition. And yet, what is now happening in Egypt ought
to give us real cause for concern.
On Saturday, the editorial in the International Herald
Tribune (IHT) declared:
'The generals who now call the shots in the world's leading
Arab country and their handpicked
civilian government have halted efforts to reach a compromise with the
Islamic supporters of the man they ousted:
Mohamed Morsi... Instead, they
have threatened to forcibly disperse tens of thousands of pro-Morsi civilians
from sit-ins in Cairo.'
However much we may dislike Islamic extremism, it is
impossible for those of us believe in civil liberties to defend this kind of thing, and the editorial in last Saturday's
IHT persuasively argued:
'The Brotherhood, having been tossed out in a coup, might
legitimately wonder whether the democratic process can ever be trusted.'
1 comment:
The Morsi government were elected with a small majority and there were moves being made towards making Egypt more Islamist which many Egyptians fundamentally oppose. What your report fails to mention, is where the money comes from to support the Egyptian army. It comes from Uncle Sam and the U.S. So who is really calling the shots in Egypt?
Post a Comment