I've
watched the footage of this altercation between a London police officer and
Gideon Falter, a journalist and Chief Executive of the Campaign Against
Antisemitism (CAA). That police officer was trying to prevent a "breach of the peace" and seems to
have handled the situation correctly and reasonably. Falter, who was wearing a
Kippah skull-cap, said he just wanted to cross the road. Where he wanted to
cross, was directly where a pro-Palestinian march was taking place. The police
officer told Falter, "You are quite
openly Jewish, this is a pro-Palestinian march. I'm not accusing you of
anything but I'm worried about the reaction to your presence." He
accused Falter of trying to antagonise others by deliberately trying to walk
"right into the middle" of
the march. He also told him that he was being "disingenuous."
Falter
was there to provoke a reaction for political purposes and the police officer
suspected that. The police officer threatened to arrest Falter after he tried
to push past police officers, but said he preferred not to do so. He then
politely offered to escort Falter and his group, to a more appropriate crossing
point, but Falter refused his assistance. After the incident, Falter told the
BBC that he'd found the experience "frightening"
and said he felt like he "was being
treated like a criminal for being Jewish." He accused the Met's
Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, of "curtailing
the rights of law-abiding Londoners including the Jewish community to appease
lawless mobs." He told ITV's Good Morning Britain, that his members
often attend pro-Palestinian marches to "force the police to make sure these things are safe for Jewish people"
- and he would turn up at the next one.
Although
the Met have apologised twice to Gideon Falter and have offered to meet with
him, he has called on Sir Mark Rowley to resign. A Downing Street spokesman
said that the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, was "as appalled as everyone else by the officer calling Mr Falter
"openly Jewish."
The
Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, is understood to have full confidence in the
commissioner. The CAA was at the forefront of antisemitism allegations against
Labour under Jeremy Corbyn's leadership. The organisation Jewish Voice for
Labour (JVL), which has had dozens of members investigated by Labour for
alleged antisemitism, has alleged that the CAA - a registered charity- is a
"partisan political campaigning
group." JVL have alleged that the CAA engages in "persistent conflation and equating of
antisemitism with criticism of the state of Israel."
Charity
regulations state that "an
organisation will not be charitable if it's purposes are political."
In 2023, the Charity Commission opened a regulatory compliance case against the
CAA, after receiving complaints that the organisation was "politically partisan." The Labour
MP, Margaret Hodge, a former CAA patron, tweeted that the charity was "more concerned with undermining Labour than
rooting out antisemitism." In 2016, a number of British Jews wrote to
the Guardian dissociating themselves from what they described as "the pro-Israel lobbyists of the Campaign
Against Antisemitism" after the CAA criticised a report into
antisemitism by Shami Chakrabarti.
No comments:
Post a Comment