We've been hearing a lot recently from Starmer-oid's Labour government
about idle and indolent Brits who are on state benefits and are economically
inactive.
Does Starmer-oids Labour government consider Prince Andrew "economically inactive" and bone idle? What does Prince Andrew contribute to British society and what does he do for a living? It has been reported in the press that he now looks after the Royal corgis.
In 2015, I can remember reading in the newspapers that his father, the legendary sponger and gaffe-prone Prince Philip, had visited a community centre in East London where he asked a group of women volunteers, "Who do you sponge off."
Are people who live off investment income - the labour of others - economically inactive? Are landowners who live off rents, economically inactive? The Royal Family are the biggest parasites, yet they live a life of dignified otiosity off the backs of the British taxpayer. What purpose do the Royal Family really serve? Hasn't the House of Windsor just become an expensive and embarrassing soap opera that we can well do without?
No comments:
Post a Comment