As
Marx said himself, he didn't invent 'social
classes' or the 'class struggle'
because that can be found in the writings of the ancient Greeks like Aristotle
and Plato. Marx's genius was that he was able to knock these various different
ideas - French politics, German and Greek philosophy and English economics,
into a coherent philosophy.
It
was Marx's belief that material conditions determine consciousness. As I
understand it, what Marx is saying is that the way in which a society organises
its economic system - its infrastructure - determines the type of social
relations that exist in that society and also its 'superstructure' i.e. its legal, political, and cultural system.
There seems to be a great deal to be said in favour of this. The ancient world
had slaves, the feudal world had serfs, and capitalism created a proletariat.
All these societies also had ruling classes who organised things to maintain
the status quo. As Marx said, the history of all hitherto existing societies is
a history of class struggle. For Marx this is what drove social change.
What
is problematic about Marx's philosophy is the belief that somehow history
follows inevitable laws of social development. There seems to be little room
for agency or spontaneity. If Lenin, hadn't arrived in Petrograd in April 1917,
there may well have been no October revolution. Marx didn't rule out a Russian
revolution in spite of the fact that it wasn't really a capitalist society but
largely a feudal society. He seems to have thought that a revolution in Russian
wouldn't be sustainable without the support of other European socialist
countries. Contrary to Marx's predictions, most revolutions have occurred in
peasant societies and not capitalist societies.
Is
it also the case that materialist conditions determine consciousness? What
really comes first - the infrastructure or the superstructure or do the two
things interact? There doesn't seem to be a great deal of evidence that
there was a sudden change in the way in which the economy was organised in
Biblical Palestine when Judeo Christianity arrived on the scene or the
Renaissance in medieval Florence. Similarly, the way in which the ancient Greek
world was organised doesn't seem to have changed much throughout the centuries
even though it's a period when great thinkers and ideas flourished.
No comments:
Post a Comment