Sue-Ellen
Cassiana Braverman, who has just been sacked as Home Secretary, is not exactly
reliable when it comes down to telling the truth. She's was no stranger to
embellishing the truth when she wanted to make the headlines. As the Home
Secretary, she often made public statements that were at odds or were even
contradicted by evidence held by the Home Office and were inaccurate and
baseless.
Two
examples come to mind - bogus asylum seekers and the ethnicity of grooming
gangs. In December 2022, Braverman backed the assertion made by her predecessor
former Home Secretary Priti Patel, that "70% of individuals on small boats are single men who are effectively
economic migrants." In December 2021, Braverman told MPs, "There is considerable evidence that people
are coming here as economic migrants, illegally."
When
the Home Office was asked for the evidence to support the claim made by former
Home Secretary Priti Patel that the majority of those who are trying to reach
the UK are so-called "economic
migrants", they couldn't provide it. The Home Office said: "We have carried out a thorough search and we
have established that the Home Office does not hold the information requested."
However, the "Home Office's own data
did confirm that most of the people who reached the UK by small boat in 2022 -
at least six in ten (60%) - would be recognised as refugees." This is
because many of them are fleeing war, persecution, trafficking, violence
and torture, and qualify as asylum seekers.
The
fact that refugee’s/asylum seekers try to cross the English Channel in small
boats is because the British government have closed or severely restricted safest
routes to the UK. This makes room for traffickers.
According
to government figures around 70 to 75% of those claiming asylum in the UK, are
successful, with another 25% of claims being rejected. Many of these rejected
claims are won on appeal. Although the Home Office failed to provide any
evidence to support the claims made by Braverman and Patel that the majority of
those refugees trying to reach the UK are "economic migrants", the statements made by both Home
Secretary's, were never corrected or retracted. Both Patel and Braverman
deliberately gave the public misleading figures on refugees and boat people to
gain a political advantage and to pander to the base instincts of some English
voters, who fear being swamped by illegal immigrants or dislike foreigners.
Though
Braverman and Patel have vilified and demonised refugees, both their parents
are of Indian origin and came to this country as immigrants from East Africa.
Braverman's father, Christie Fernandes, who was born in Nairobi, left
Kenya in the late 1960s along with many other Asians, when restrictions were
placed on them by Jomo Kenyatta, the leader of the newly independent Kenya.
There was political turmoil in Kenya and a policy of
"Africanisation." Fernandes was offered a British passport and left
the country. Ugandan Asians were expelled by Idi Amin.
Braverman's
mother, Uma, was recruited from Mauritius to work in the NHS. As the Tory
Health Minister during 1960 to 1963, Enoch Powell, famous for his rivers of
blood speech, recruited many nurses from abroad to work within the NHS and many
were from the West Indies.
Before
being sacked as Home Secretary, Braverman falsely claimed that child grooming
gangs in the UK were "almost all
British-Pakistani." The press regulator, Ipso, found that her decision
to link "the identified ethnic group
and a particular form of offending was significantly misleading"
because the Home Office's own research had concluded that offenders were mainly
from white backgrounds. Four days after publishing the article, the Mail on
Sunday, who published the article, offered to amend the article to make clear
that the claim related specifically to high profile grooming gangs. The wording
was rejected by the complainant who took the case to Ipso. The Mail on Sunday
also said that before publishing the article they had double checked with
advisers to the Home Secretary and the prime minister about Braverman's
decision to single out British Pakistanis, who confirmed they had "no concern with this particular line."
Since
her sacking, Braverman, has been denounced as the most divisive British Home
Secretary in history and dubbed the 'Minster
for Hate' and Cruella Braverman. A Buddhist with a Jewish husband, she was
a divisive and authoritarian figure who sowed racial division and unrest and
inflamed racial tensions in this country which played into the hands of the far
right. Her language was inflammatory and dangerous. This daughter of immigrants
said she dreamt of seeing immigrants deported to Rwanda and believed that rough
sleeping was a lifestyle choice. She denounced the pro-Palestinian marches has
"hate marches" and called on the Met to ban them entirely.
It
seems some protestors were carrying placards depicting Braverman and Sunak has
"coconuts", and there have been press reports that the Met are now treating
this has a possible "hate crime."
This analogy is often used as a derogatory term for a black or Asian person who
is perceived to conform to "white
culture", at the expense of his or her own ancestral culture. The term
"Uncle Tom" syndrome, is also used. Braverman's husband, Rael
Braverman, who has lived in Israel and some sources say was born in South
Africa, describes himself as a "proud
Jew and Zionist." He works for the Mercedes -Benz Group as a manager.
No comments:
Post a Comment