Thursday, 22 December 2022
Britain's worst built school to be demolished!
Ngozi Fulani's charity now under investigation.
Sinn Fein leader denies IRA man was a Nazi collaborator.
Did the IRA seriously believe that if Hitler and
the Nazis had won WWII, he would have given them an independent Ireland?
The policy was one of Britain's difficulties
are Ireland's opportunities. This led to some people like the IRA Chief of
Staff, Sean Russell, collaborating with the Nazis. Although Russell trained
with the Abwehr in Germany and died on a German submarine off the coast of
Ireland in August 1940, (Operation Dove), Mary Lou McDonald, the President of
Sinn Fein, denied that he was a Nazi collaborator. In May 2020, she said that
Russell was a "militarist" and not a Nazi collaborator, despite his
links with the Nazis. In 2003, she spoke at a commemoration event for Sean
Russell.
The IRA man, Frank Ryan, was also involved with
the Nazis, but I suspect that he was less enthusiastic about his involvement
with the Nazis. He died in Dresden in 1944, of pleurisy and pneumonia. He'd
been handed to the Germans as a prisoner, after fighting fascism in the Spanish
Civil War of 1936-39.
When Hitler died, the Irish Prime Minister,
Eamon da Valera, sent condolences to the German government. Had Hitler won the
war, I suspect that IRA men like Russell, would have been sent to the
concentration camps and Ireland would have been put under the control of some
Nazi sympathiser, like Oswald Moseley, or Lord Haw-Haw, the Irish American,
William Joyce.
Following criticism, I believe that Mary Lou
McDonald, admitted that Russell's involvement with the Nazis was
"misguided."
Friday, 16 December 2022
Bailey and his 10,000 Dresses.
Should children aged between two and four years old, be used as guinea pigs in a social engineering experiment by the "gay rights" organisation Stonewall?
A transgender toddler, Bailey, is now the hero of a children's book published by Stonewall. In one chapter, entitled "10,000 Dresses", Bailey, dreams of dresses every night but his mother tells him that boys don't wear dresses. When Bailey says, "I don't feel like a boy" his mother replies, "well you are one, Bailey, and that's that." However, Bailey's dream does come true when he's shown living as a girl instead of a boy.
Academics like the Hungarian, Marxist sociologist, Frank Furedi, have warned that there's a danger in subjecting children to queer politics and dogma of this kind about transgenderism. Furedi, thinks it may well lead to children becoming very confused about themselves and having an "identity crisis' in later life. I think he makes a good point.
A grandmother told me recently that she was astonished by the encyclopedic knowledge her young granddaughter had about gender identities, which she'd mainly acquired from her school. I asked her what her maths and English were like, because I thought that was more useful to her than a headful of nonsense about multiple gender identities.
I no more believe in "transgenderism" than I do believe in the religious doctrine of "transubstantiation." Although I accept that some people do suffer from gender dysphoria or may be of indeterminate sex, and that gender is a social construct, I still think reality is worth defending and I have no intention of abandoning it, even if other choose to do so.
Trans women are not women i e. a biological female, an adult female human being. I also believe that we should be wary and sceptical when it comes to the ruinous nostrums peddled by either political, economic, or theological quacks.
Ayn Rand and McCarthyism!
Rowling sets up woman only support services.
Daughter of Jan Morris says he was a "lousy parent."
Baroness Bra takes indefinite leave from House of Lords.
Wednesday, 7 December 2022
Methinks the lady protests too much.
Like many showbiz marriages, the marriage between Harry and Meghan is not likely to last. Personally, I get sick to death of hearing all the trivia about them and the British Royal Family. What both of them seem to have in common, is that they see themselves as both entitled and as victims.
Although the couple live a cloistered and wealthy existence that sets them apart from the hoi polloi, they share a passion for wanting to transform the world and to make it a better place in which to live. Both of them also admit to having had suicidal thoughts. Although she's extremely wealthy and lives in an $11 million dollar house in the rich ghetto, of Montecito, California, where there are no sidewalks (pavements), Meghan Markle, perceives herself as a victim of racism and discrimination. She also thinks her mixed race children are also victims of racial discrimination because they've been relegated in the Royal Pecking order. Pictures of her children are extremely rare.
I don't doubt that racism and discrimination are very real, but in the case of Meghan, if she's a victim of it, then she doesn't to seem have done too badly for herself, in spite of it. She was a successful wealthy American actress and she managed to ingratiate herself with an English Prince, become a Duchess, and marry into British Royal Family.
Prince Harry, who has no profession or trade like most of his otiose family, is no longer a working Royal, and he sees himself as a victim, because he's the 'Spare' - spare heir to the British Throne. He also thinks his wife and kids have been overlooked and not given the respect they deserve.
Both of them now seem to spend their time suing newspapers or dishing the dirt on that dysfunctional family called the Windsor's and making money out of it. Its been reported that they will be paid around $100 million (£88m), for their Netflix, "docusery. Methinks the lady protests too much.
Will Starmer do a U-turn on removing charitable status from public schools?
Who is looking after the patients interests?
How are GPs getting away with this nonsense of remote GP appointments?
Despite reported cases of people dying because they couldn't get a face-to-face appointment with their GP, remote GP appointments are on the increase. Many GP practices no longer offer walk-in surgery appointments, and sometimes cannot offer an appointment.
There have been reports of GPs asking patients to cough into the phone. How do you take someone's blood pressure or examine their chest by a video link or telephone consultation? When they ask a patient to stick their tongue out, do they tell them it looks heavily pixelated?
It's unbelievable that the doctors union, the British Medical Association (BMA), are also the regulatory body for the medical profession. In effect, they mark their own homework and are the judge and jury of themselves. Surely, there's a conflict of interest here. Who is looking after the patients best interests? It certainly isn't the self-employed GP's who've basically thrown many of their patients under a bus. Many GPs are not offering patients adequate medical treatment.
Last week, I was told by somebody that I know, that his GP practice referred him to A&E with a suspected water infection because they couldn't offer him an appointment and he was told he would be seen quicker at the local hospital. After a 4 hour wait, he was seen by a doctor. This is putting the NHS under strain.
Friday, 2 December 2022
Why does Bocelli receive bad reviews but is so successful?
Feminist protestor tells Sturgeon that women have been raped by 'Trans Women'!
At a recent Zero Tolerance conference in Edinburgh, on Tuesday, attendees were told not to discuss the "definition of a woman.'
Scottish First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, was attending the conference to speak about tackling male violence against women and girls. Despite the best efforts of the conference organizers to stage manage the event, Alexandra Darroch (pictured above), a feminist protestor, managed to land a punch on Sturgeon when she shouted at her, "shame on you" and then proceeded to accuse the First Minister of "allowing paedophiles, sex offenders and rapist to self ID" as women. Darroch told conference attendees that some women had been raped by trans women, yet didn't give examples. Most of the other faint-hearted feminists in the room, looked on with dismay and remained shtum, as Darroch launched her rant at the First Minister.
The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, is designed to make it easier for people to undergo gender reassignment. Under the Bill, which is currently progressing through Holyrood, the minimum age of applicants would be dropped from 18 to 16 years of age. It also removes the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a condition for acquiring a gender recognition certificate. The qualifying period that applicants need to have lived in their acquired gender, is also reduced from 2 years to 3 months. Critic's say that the Bill is wide open to abuse and will make it easier for predatory males to enter women's safe spaces to sexually abuse women and girls.
The author, J.K. Rowling - who sent her congratulations and a crate of champagne to Alexandra Darroch - has accused Nicola Sturgeon of being a "destroyer of women's rights." After Darroch had been removed from the room, Sturgeon apologised, and said that the organisation 'Zero Tolerance Scotland', did not seek to close down anyone's right to freedom of speech.
Is social class still a barrier to many in English society?
I recently read an interesting article in the Guardian, about class barriers in English society, by the journalist Jamie Fahey. One might well ask how many Guardian editors went to comprehensive schools?
Yet, newspaper journalism, wasn't always a degree profession, nor were journalists required to have had a university education. Charles Dickens managed to break into journalism after a relative pulled strings for him to get a job as a roving reporter.
Harold Evans, from Daisy Nook, near Ashton-under-Lyne, left school and got a job on the Ashton Reporter, and worked his way up to be Editor of the Sunday Times. This sort of social mobility is almost unthinkable today in a society that boasts about equality, inclusivity, and diversity.
Monday, 28 November 2022
British soldier convicted for the death of innocent Irish civilian!
A very rare conviction of a British soldier serving in Northern Ireland for the death of an innocent Irish civilian. The ex-soldier, David Jonathan Holden, 53, shot dead Aidan McAnespie, 23, when he was crossing a check point, on 21 February 1988. He was convicted of manslaughter, but as yet to be sentenced. The former soldier, claimed his finger slipped on the machine gun.
McAnespie, was on his way to a Gaelic football match when he crossed the checkpoint at Aughnacloy, County Tyrone. The British army considered McAnespie, a "person of interest" a potential IRA member, but he was unarmed.
Despite crimes of this nature, the British government are pressing ahead with legislation that effectively proposes an amnesty for British soldiers accused of killing or maiming people during the 30-year troubles.
Although the family of Aidan McAnespie (see picture above), welcomed the verdict, it angered veterans groups, who along with Conservative MPs, denounced the prosecution as vexatious.
What some might find curious, is that while Holden is facing a possible prison sentence for manslaughter, countless IRA fugitives who were wanted for terrorist offences during the 30-year troubles, were effectively amnestied by Tony Blair under the Good Friday Agreement in 1988. Many who were convicted of terrorist offences, were also released from prison. Holden is expected to appeal.
Does the benefit system make people risk averse?
The Government are looking into why there are so many economically inactive people claiming state benefits when there is low unemployment, record vacancies, and employers are finding it difficult to fill certain vacancies. They seem to think that the way the benefit system is set up, is making people risk averse.
There are many reasons why people may be reluctant to take jobs, but I don't think, that trying to live on just over £77 Jobseeker's Allowance or Universal Credit, is one of them. This is what a single person over 25, would receive each week along with help with rates and Housing Benefit.
Rates of pay are an obvious factor. Some 41% of people claiming Universal Credit are already in work and that includes people who work for the DWP in their Jobcentres. Although, we have a National Minum Wage (NMW) in Britain, a great deal of the work available can be through agency's or temporary or part-time. It has become increasingly difficult for people to obtain decently paid, full-time, secure paid employment, but this varies in different parts of the country. Many people can be working on zero hour contracts and the NMW, for many workers, has become the going rate for a job, rather than a state guaranteed minimum wage.
The lack of employment protection is also another factor. For most people employed after 6 April 2012, the qualifying period for claiming unfair dismissal is now 2 years, unless they're dismissed for an "automatically unfair" reason. This means that employers can dismiss someone at will or on a whim, and there is little that you can do about it.
If you left your job voluntarily, and claimed unemployment benefit, you would have to show just cause or a good reason for leaving your job. If you fail to do so, the DWP could refuse you unemployment benefit for 3 months or even longer depending on the circumstances. If that happened your only option would be to try and claim an hardship payment. If you're sacked, you would have to show this wasn't for "misconduct" which is interpreted very widely and includes conduct that is reprehensible, blameworthy, and wrong. If you can't surmount this hurdle you will be refused unemployment benefit for a specified period.
People in receipt of benefits, may consider it risky to take some jobs because if they're dismissed or leave because they don't consider it suitable, they could finish up without any income, state benefits, and homeless, because that is how the system works to penalize people.
Monday, 21 November 2022
Housing boss sacked over infants death!
The death of two-year old Awaab Ishak is both tragic and scandalous. On Tuesday, a coroner found that the infant had died in 2020 because of exposure to persistent black mould on the the walls of the family's rented home and that the landlord had repeatedly failed to fix it, blaming the mould on "family lifestyle."
Gareth Swarbrick, the Chief Executive of Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBH), the slum landlords who owned the home, refused to resign over the issue and had to be dragged out of office.
Rochdale Borough Council are now calling for a charge of corporate manslaughter to be brought against the landlord and for the houses to be taken back into local authority control.
Unions declared illegal and "western agents" by Commie Dictator Lukashenko.
Locals call for property tycoon's palace to be requisitioned to house the homeless.
Friday, 18 November 2022
Union leader says Home Secretary is to use British troops as strikebreakers!
Playwright loses lifetime drama award because of support for Palestinians.
Qatar World Cup built on a mountain of corpses.
The focus in Qatar has been on LGBT and human rights, but we should not forget that the Qatari world cup 2022, has been built on a mountain of corpses.
According to the Guardian, 6,500 migrant workers have died constructing football stadiums since Qatar was awarded the world cup in 2010. Many of these poor migrant workers came from the Asian subcontinent.
Will multi-millionaire footballers like Harry Kane and David Beckham, be leading tributes in Qatar to recognise these victims of Qatari sweated exploited labour, and be demanding that the government of Qatar pay their families compensation.
Tuesday, 15 November 2022
Tory hack, says we can pay nurses by robbing British pensioners.
Journalist, Ben Wilkinson of the Daily Tory-graph, says we can finance a decent pay rise for our nurses by taking it off the pensioners. He says the country cannot afford to retain the triple-lock on pensions.
The state pension in Britain ranks as one of the lowest pensions in Western Europe. We also retire much later than they do in other European countries like France (62), and Spain (65). The new state pension is currently £185.15 p.w. if you're a man born on an after 6 April 1951 or a woman born on or after 6 April 1953. This is less than the national minimum wage for a 40-hour working week. If you're a man born before 6 April 1951 or a woman born before 6 April 1953, you will receive the old basic state pension which is currently £145.85, even if you've paid national insurance contributions for over 40 years.
Wilkinson seems to think that the British state pension is far too generous. He says it would be better to link it to average earnings. He seems to forget that this year, the state pension was only increased by 3.1% because the government wouldn't increase the pension in line with average earnings which had risen to 8%, because they said the statistics on average earnings had been skewed by the Covid lockdown, when workers came off furlough and returned to work. So pensioners got a pay cut because pensions didn't rise in line with in inflation or average earnings. Retaining the triple-lock, was also a 2019 Conservative Party manifesto commitment.
One of the most generous pensions schemes in Britain is the governments own pension scheme for politicians. Liz Truss, the former UK Prime Minister, who almost trashed the British economy, was only 45-days in her job, but when she was ignominiously slung out of office by another Tory coup, she received a severance payment of £19,000 and a lifetime annual pension of £115,000 a year. They obviously don't believe in payment by results in the Palace of Westminster, because if they did, Truss would have got nowt! The House of Commons is more like a thieve's kitchen.
Self-styled Revolutionary Communist, condemns eco-activist protests!
"Zionism During The Holocaust" - Tony Greenstein.
I haven't read Tony Greenstein's latest book, "Zionism During The Holocaust", so I'm not in a position to comment on it. Nevertheless, I'm aware of the stance he takes regarding Zionism and the issue of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict because I've been reading his blog posts for a long time and I am familiar with his views.
Although Tony is Jewish, controversial, conceited, and the son of a Rabbi, some of his critics and detractors have denounced him as being a self-hating Jew and he was even accused of being a "notorious anti-Semite", by an equally notorious Zionist group, called the 'Campaign Against Antisemitism' (CAA). Tony, started defamation proceedings against the CAA, but lost the action. However, it's true to say, that many Jewish people who have pro-Palestinian sympathies and are critics of the Israeli state, frequently face accusation of this kind by the Zionist lobby.
What I can say, is that like Asa Winstanley, of the "Electronic Intifada" I have always found Tony Greenstein's articles well researched and very informative. Much of what he writes about the history of Zionism and the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, I generally tend to agree with. Although he has tendency to skate on thin ice and to stick his neck out, he's generally truthful as far as he sees it, and is uncompromising when it comes to establishing the facts, however embarrassing that might prove for some.
In 2018, Tony was expelled from the Labour Party because they found some of his views and opinions unpalatable. They thought him far too honest. He was accused of "online abuse" but Greenstein says it was because he'd spoken out against the Israeli lobby within the Labour Party.
Jon Lansman, the wealthy Jewish founder of the pro-Corbynite group 'Momentum', described Tony Greenstein as "probably the rudest man in politics". Tony Greenstein wrote that he was outraged by Lansman's comments insisting that he was the 'rudest' and not 'probably the rudest' man in politics.
Tony Greenstein was expelled from the Labour Party when Jeremy Corbyn was the leader. Since the election of Sir Kier Starmer, as leader of the Labour Party, there has been a McCarthyite purge of left-wingers within the party including Jeremy Corbyn and left-wing organizations have been proscribed.
Thursday, 10 November 2022
Update: UNITE collusion investigation.
Representatives of Blacklist Support Group recently met with lawyers carrying out the independent investigation into possible collusion by union officials in blacklisting. The meeting took place at the chambers of the law firm, 33 Chancery Lane, adjacent to the Royal Courts of Justice.