Friday 20 December 2019

Dispiriting election redraws political map of UK

'This is an awful result', said Dave Smith 
of the Blacklist Support Group

by Brian Bamford

 
LAST SATURDAY the Financial Times leader writer began an editorial thus:
'A dispiriting election has produced a seismic outcome.  Britain's political landscape has been redrawn as it was by Tony Blair's New Labour victory in 1997, or Margaret Thatcher's win in 1979.  The Conservative landslide is a vindication of Boris Johnson's strategy of going all-out for a new Brexit deal and building his campaign around delivering it....  Yet the result, combined with the Scottish National party's surge in Scotland and nationalist gains in Northern Ireland, will strain the integrity of the UK.'

At the same time in an e-mail written immediately following the election Dave Smith secretary of the Blacklist Support Group, which has been consistently loyal to the Labour Party wrote:
'This is an awful result for the entire labour movement.

'Whatever people's thoughts on Corbyn or Brexit; the Labour manifesto commitments on workers rights, NHS & public services, renationalisation of rail & utilities, house building and the climate were supported by the majority of the population.  All these things are now at risk from a right wing Johnson government.'

Yet prior to the election in another e-mail he had wisely warned us:  'working people should never place dewy eyed trust in politicians, lawyers or union leaders to solve our problems for us; continuing to build a movement remains essential.' 

But what really happened under the Attlee Labour Government of 1945?


MILITARY BLACKLEGS & the 1945 LABOUR GOVERNMENT 

Dave Smith does well to remind us that we should not 'place dewey eyed trust in politicians' etc.   for within six days of the Labour Government taking office in 1945, it sent conscript troops into the Surrey Docks, London, to break a ten-week-old strike against a wage-cut....

Yet in a Labour amendment to the Military Training Bill, in Hansard on May 12th, 1939, this same Labour Party had declared:
'No conscript should be required to take duty in aid of the civil power in connection with a trade dispute, or to perform, in consequence of a trade dispute, any civil or industrial duty customarily performed by a civilian.'

Surely there is some inconsistency here?

THE GREAT ILLUSION 
In 1959, on the Aldermaston CND march, some trade union critics, who described themselves as 'syndicalists', not unlike Dave Smith of the Blacklist Support Group today, claimed at that time:  'we believe many sincere but starry-eyed Labour supporters have already half-forgotten the events during those six years in which every Socialist principle was betrayed by the politicians... [and that] It is no service to the working class for the truth to be hidden, however embarrassing and unpalatable it may be for some people.'  (How Labour Governed 1945-1951 - DIRECT ACTION PAMPHLET:  Publications Committee, SWF).

 THE LABOUR PROGRAM in 1945

Like Len McCluskey said last week about the panicky policy incontinence of the current Labour Party, the 1945 Labour Government, with a vast majority, had an economic programme based on two principles - 'a give-away programme and state control of economic functions'.

Dave Smith in his generally depressing Tweet continues to argue in this gloomy vain:
'For blacklisted construction workers, our hope for a public inquiry into the Consulting Association scandal now appears to be off the agenda for the next few years at the very least.' 

Bro. Smith was here pinning his faith on Page 48 of the Labour Manifesto:
'We will establish public inquiries into historical injustices including blacklisting and Orgreave, and ensure the second phase of the Grenfell Inquiry has the confidence of all those affected, especially the bereaved families and survivors.'*

When I last spoke personally to Dave Smith in 2015, at a Blacklist Support Group conference on  'Bullying, blacklisting and whistleblowing' at a two-day event at the University of Greenwich, I expressed my concerns and doubts about his hopes about getting a future Labour Government to solve the problem of blacklisting etc. by creating a distinguished public inquires.  Since 1979, when the alternative newspaper RAP had first exposed Cyril Smith, I long had the experience of seeking public inquires owing to the work I had put in to get something done about child abuse in Rochdale and beyond.  Sadly, by the time the inquiry will finally get to publish its report many of the alleged victims will be beyond help.

The Blacklist & the Consulting Association

Tameside Trade Union Council in Greater Manchester, has been involved with what later became known as the 'BOYS ON THE BLACKLIST' during the Daf dispute in Manchester's Piccadilly in 2003.  That was well before it had been finally confirmed that the blacklist actually existed in 2009** by subsequent events in which the Information Commissioner raided an office of the Consulting Association in Droitwitch, Cheshire.

As the Financial Times leader above indicates the political landscape of the UK  has changed substantially.  But it is not the end of history which some may claim.  The nationalist issues both in Scotland and Northern Ireland, as the FT editor suggests, may still come back to haunt the Tory Government.

Dave Smith is right in his blunt response to be 'gutted' by the outcome!  It is a slap in the face for what passes for the British left.  But we at Northern Voices have always been clear that we have historically even less faith in politicians than Dave Smith has ever had.  George Orwell told the poet Stephen Spender that he always avoided going to cocktail parties to mix with literary folk for fear it may interfere with his own critical judgement of their literary work.  

Could it be that being based and rooted in London that Dave Smith and some of the Blacklist Support Group, may well have become too close to the some of the Labour politicians down there and that it could have clouded their judgement?

In the years since the late naughties that I have known them; Dave Smith and the Blacklist Support Group, have always struck me as one of the most decent phenomena on the British left in this country bar none, aside perhaps from my own personal friends among the Boys on the Blacklist in the North of England, and I don't think that those associated with my own political persuasion among the English anarchists are a patch on them.  Other parts of the British left, especially including the British anarchists, who have presented us with the politics of a shabby little shocker.  Although I believe that Dave Smith and the Blacklist Support Group are wholly committed to fairness and common decency they will be well aware that the Labour party, when in Government, has failed to make serious in-roads towards the abolition of British blacklisting. 

Despite what Dave Smith declares about us placing our faith 'dewey eyed trust in politicians'; I fear that these honourable activists may suffer from being too trusting of people inside the Westminster bubble.      

****************

Page 48 of the Labour Manifesto:
"We will establish public inquiries into historical injustices including blacklisting and Orgreave, and ensure the second phase of the Grenfell Inquiry has the confidence of all those affected, especially the bereaved families and survivors. We will also consider a public inquiry in the case of Zane Gbangbola.
We will require judicial warrants for undercover operations and retain the Mitting Inquiry into undercover policing.
We will release all papers on the Shrewsbury 24 trials and 37 Cammell Laird shipyard workers and introduce a Public Accountability Bill".

The Blacklist Support Group are proud to have stood shoulder to shoulder on shared platforms for more than 10 years with campaigners fighting for justice for Orgreave, Grenfell, Zane Gbangbola, victims of undercover political policing, the Shrewsbury Pickets and Cammell Laird ship workers. We have demanded and fought for a public inquiry for over a decade - its is our campaigning that has led to this manifesto commitment.  We therefore whole heartedly support this pledge towards getting the truth we, and other working class miscarriages of justice, deserve.  But working people should never place dewy eyed trust in politicians, lawyers or union leaders to solve our problems for us; continuing to build a movement remains essential.  

Full manifesto available to view here: https://labour.org.uk/manifesto/

**  'During 2008/09 the Iinformation Commisioner's Office carried out an investigation into employment blacklisting in the construction industry.  As part of that investigation, the ICO seized information from a company called The Consulting Association.  Some of the information we seized amounted to a 'blacklist' of individuals who were considered to pose a risk to their employers if employed within the construction industry.'

***  
Following the blacklisting scandal the Labour Government came forward with regulations. These regulations are so weak that they will not deter blacklisting. The only recourse for someone who has been blacklisted still remains taking a case to an employment tribunal and financial loss has to be proved. UCATT has constantly argued for the regulations to be strengthened. They necessary changes are:
  • Make blacklisting a criminal offence
  • When a blacklist is discovered all those on it are automatically told.
  • An automatic right to compensation for everyone blacklisted.
  • For the regulations to be widened from the narrow confines of “trade union activities” to the wider “activities associated with trade unions”. Ensuring trade unionists can’t be blacklisted for taking unofficial industrial action, such as a ban on voluntary overtime.

7 comments:

Dave Douglass said...

Whose dispirited?

Dave Douglass said...

I want an end of the UK state and our part in the Eu proto super state things going OK so far

Anonymous said...

Every cloud as a silver lining. The 2019 General Election got a rid of a lot of Labour right-wing shite: Frank Field in Birkenhead; the 'protected CIA asset' and Zionist, Ruth Smeeth, in Stoke-on-Trent North, Zionist Luciana Berger, and her former swain, Chuka Umunna, plus Caroline Flint. Many of these 'Blairite' bastards did their level best to put the Tories into power because they much preferred a Boris Johnson Conservative government in power than a socialist one led by Jeremy Corbyn. And any one who was stands in Corbyn's shoes and espouses the same socialist policies in Britain, will get the same treatment from Britain's toxic right-wing pro=capitalist press. Is it any wonder that Labour has governed in the UK for just 30 of the last 85 years.

bammy said...

The situation is a much more complicated than as claimed by Anonymous here surely?
As Len McCluskey declared just after the election:
'The next leader needs to understand the communities that gave birth to the Labour movement, and realise that the whole country is not very like Labour London.'
'As important as it is, too often, Labour addresses the metropolitan wing of its electoral coalition in terms of values – openness, tolerance, human rights – and the "traditional" working-class wing simply in terms of a material offer, as if their constituencies did not have their own values of solidarity and community. That must change.'
The result of last week's election showed British workers can't be bought off by free broadband.

Les May said...

Anonymous makes the claim that Ruth Smeeth is a 'protected CIA asset'. If you check out Smeeth using the WWW you will find she ‘has form’ in twisting critical comments made about her into claims of anti-semitism. Although contributors to Northern Voices have in the past been critical about the reality of many of the claims of anti-semitism directed against the Labour party, the people who promote them and of interference by the state of Israel in UK politics, none of these criticisms have been directed at Jewish people because they are Jewish.

I suggest that ‘Anonymous’ should be asked to provide evidence for his claim that she is ‘a protected CIA asset’ and if he or she cannot do so, then this portion of the comment should be withdrawn.

Anonymous is perfectly at liberty to repeat this comment elsewhere, in public or in private, so this is not an attack on freedom of expression. Northern Voices, or any publication, is not obligated to publish lies.

Les May

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth

Anonymous said...

See Wikileaks Les May,paragraph 5. Won't be retracting.The anti-Semitism campaign against Corbyn was pure horseshit, covert destabilisation.





https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON956_a.html

Les May said...

A Serious Strategy?

By Les May

With reference to the Labour party the Morning Star recently said in an Editorial:

‘A future leader will likely receive the same barrage of smears and institutional resistance. The left needs to develop serious strategies to address this’ (my emphasis)

Commenting on a NV post of 20 December someone who was unwilling to put their name to it wrote ‘The 2019 General Election got a rid of a lot of Labour right-wing shite’.

http://northernvoicesmag.blogspot.com/2019/12/dispiriting-election-redraws-political.html

Does this qualify as part of a ‘serious strategy’? With ‘friends’ like this, does Labour need enemies?

Instead of including Ruth Smeeth amongst the ‘shite’ thus giving her the chance to once more play the ‘you’re only saying this because I’m Jewish’ card s/he could have could have made good on the claim that Smeeth is/was a ‘protected CIA asset’ by publishing the relevant section (see below) of the Wikileaks material showing that she, amongst others, was prepared to give information to a foreign power. This would be much more serious if the person she disclosed information to was a ‘covert agent’. (You don’t need to be strictly protected if what you are doing is above board.)

5. (C/NF) Perhaps most damaging of all, however, Smeargate effectively ended what may have been Brown's plan to call a general election this spring, based on the rise in the polls he received following his solid performance at the G-20. Labour Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Burton Ruth Smeeth (strictly protect) told us April 20 that Brown had intended to announce the elections on May 12, and hold them after a very short (matter of weeks) campaign season. Labour had been "just" 7 points behind the Conservatives in some polls taken right after the G-20 Summit, which other Labour contacts had told us was close to an acceptable standing from which to launch a campaign, but the drop in Labour's poll numbers following Smeargate forced Brown to abandon his plan, a despondent Smeeth said. (Note: This information has not been reported in the press. End note.)

Smeeth has claimed that she has received 25,000 abusive messages and requires police protection. We are left to infer that all these came from Labour party members, that anti-semitism is rife in the Labour party and that Corbyn ‘should have done something about it’.

Smeeth ‘has form’ in twisting things said about her into accusations of anti-semitism. Why give her ammunition?