Wednesday 16 January 2019

Cllr. Rowbotham, Big Cyril & Single Issue Politics


by Brian Bamford

ON the 5th, December Carl Faulkner, an independent analyst and investigator concerned about the decline of common decency in local political life, published a video skillfully outlining the attitude of most Rochdale councillors to the importance of democratic procedures in local politics.  The video entitled 'Birds of a feather:  Protecting the Guilty' * and commenting on the Rochdale  full council meeting of Oct. 2018, that  describes in detail how councillors of a Labour complexion gave spirited support to one of their brethren who is a self-confessed fraudster using postal ballots to vote more than once in the last municipal elections in Rochdale.

This artfully designed video superbly captures the depth to which Rochdale politics has sunk, with the now disgraced Council leader Allen Brett calling on the Council to let the culprit fraudster, councillor Faisal Rana, be 'allowed to continue his good work'.  Councillor Brett was responding to a formal motion from the Tory leader of the opposition inviting Councillor Rana to 'just reflect on the positon that he's in and the position that he's put the Borough in'.

The Rochdale Labour councillors are by now well immune to controversy and scandal having endured pantomime politics for decades under the tutelage of such tacticians as Simon Danczuk, Richard Farnell, and now Allen Brett.  Perhaps we ought to mention that at the time the tragedy of Cambridge House was in being as a going concern in the 1960s, Cyril Smith was a big noise in the Rochdale Labour Party.

The now disgraced Council leader Allen Brett is merely the ultimate conclusion of a rather bad bunch.  Alongside him Sara Rowbotham cuts a curious figure as his deputy, it was she who rose to fame when Maxine Peak portrayed her in the 'Three Girls' dramatisation on TV.  She is interesting because she has a following among a campaign group called 'Parents Against Grooming' or PAG.**

PAG supporters were out in force at the Council meeting at which Allen Brett defended the self-confessed fraud Faisal Rana.  But they were clearly less interest on electoral swindling than on the exploits of a dead man in the last century at Cambridge House etc.  Historical memory is not to be ignored, as we know that even today that Spaniards are anxious to unearth the bones of victims of General Franco in the Spanish Civil War of 1936-39.  If the supporters of PAG want to explore and campaign for what they call the 'survivors' of Cyril Smith they are entitled to do so.

What is worrying is that in doing so, and pursuing a single issue, the PAG campaigners  may be overlooking what is now under their own noses:  that is that they themselves may be being used as 'useful idiots' by an ambitious politician to feather her own nest.  I can't say this for certain, but their own heroine Sara Rowbotham has gone on record of making allegations against other Rochdale councillors, yet at the meeting PAG attended Sara had no qualms about joining the 'Roll of Shame' and backing the electoral fraud, Faisal Rana.

In this respect by getting carried away with the virtue signals and grandstanding of these half-baked ambitious politicians aren't you being a bit myopic?   Before you start to 'Look Back in Anger', just consider that I was one of those folding RAP in the cellar on Spotland Road, when in May 1979 the allegations against Cyril Smith at Cambridge House were first about to be put into the public domain.  Also, this Northern Voices Blog together with John Walker former joint editor of RAP; the Westminster Blogger, Paul Waugh; and the much lamented former Rochdale MP, Simon Danczuk,   created the conditions for PAG to exist after Danczuk made his speech in Parliament in 2012 (see the excerpt from the Northern Voices Blog archive in November 2012 below).***


***********
*    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFFKrkQaKqw&feature=youtu.be

** See the video link in which Sara Rowbotham denounces Councillor Allen Brett entitled
'3 BOYS , A GIRL AND A GROOMER ROCHDALE COUNCIL PART 5': 
PART 5 OF SURVIVORS MATTERS EXPLANATION AS TO WHY ROCHDALE BOROUGH COUNCIL HAVE REPEATEDLY MADE PROMISES TO THEM ONLY TO LEAD SURVIVORS ON THE ROAD TO NOWHERE , WHILST ROCHDALE COUNCIL TRYING TO PORTRAY ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND CHANGE
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9gXUO6bK0qRQxCqmjKBenQ

***   Monday, 19 November 2012


It Was The Voices That Did It!

Cyril Smith - the Legend Falls

LAST WEEK, Northern Voices was party with others to the opening up of a story that has lied in the shadows for decades.   We cannot claim all the credit as we did not do the original research into Cyril Smith:  that was performed by the editors of the Rochdale Alternative Paper (RAP) in May 1979, when they first published the story and were threatened by Cyril Smith's solicitors at the time with a 'gagging writ'Private Eye and the New Statesman followed through with reports but the case against 'Smith the Man' was killed before it reached the mainstream media.  Later attempts to resurrect the story also failed because those giving evidence against Sir Cyril Smith lacked the confidence to put their names in the public domain. 

***********

8 comments:

Councillor John Blundell said...

Dear Mr Bamford,

Can you please remove from your mailing list, I do not wish to see your articles.

Kind regards,

John Blundell

Cllr Phil Burke said...

Mr Bamford

Please remove all my details from your emailing list

I am not interested in reading any of your articles

Regards

Cllr Phil Burke

Les May said...

I have always had a low opinion of politicians who try to build a career around the issue of child abuse not least because some seem to have bit of trouble in distinguishing facts from fantasy. (Remember the ‘Satanic Abuse’ cases of the late 1980s?)

I’m also a bit confused about why members of a group calling itself ‘Parents Against Grooming’, a name which indicates concern about an ongoing problem, seems to be concerning itself with Cyril Smith. Apart from what was documented in 1979 about his antics at Cambridge House, and which must have been known to everyone who voted for his Freedom of the Borough, no ‘smoking gun’ has been produced. Simon Danczuk’s 2014 book so muddied the waters and contaminated any evidence from possible witnesses to other events that I don’t think we will ever know the truth.

Anyone still having faith in politicians knowing what they are talking about when it comes to child abuse might like to read the following.

http://northernvoicesmag.blogspot.com/2015/10/no-comment.html

Les May

Carl Faulkner said...



Councillor John Blundell writes:

'Can you please remove from your mailing list, I do not wish to see your articles.'
******************************************************************

There is none so blind as those who will not see.

A common thread over the years in the ‘look the other way and say nothing’, Rochdale Council.

If they don’t want to see them, let them ignore them or block you.

Obviously touching a nerve.

Carl

Cllr C Gloster said...


Brian,

Thanks, interesting viewing, I presume Andy Kelly Leader of Rochdale Lib Dem Group has a view?

Cllr Andrea Simpson said...

Mon 14/01/2019, 19:46
Please remove me from your mailing list
Cllr Andrea Simpson
Councillor for Besses
Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Health and Wellbeing
Bury Council

Councillor Sue Haworth said...

Dear Brian,

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. Keep in touch

Best regards, Sue

Councillor Sue Haworth

Mick Coats said...

THE rotten borough of Rochdale has brought the antics of the councillors of Musborough up to date, or rather back to the future. At the recent meeting of our good councillors, the matter of the transgressions of one of their number was discussed, or rather not discussed.

Observing from the gallery, we expected the leader of the opposition to express severe criticism of the recently elected councillor [Faisal Rana] for voting twice in the recent election.

However, he proceeded to take the transgressing councillor to task with all the vigour and effectiveness of a caterpillar eating a wet lettuce. Going through the motions, he gave the impression of not wanting to be at the meeting, fearful of upsetting the class bully.

He was not alone acting in a lackluster way, all the councillors seemed to have been told to say nothing. They obsequiously complied and behaved like good little boys and girls. The guilty person himself said nothing, not even sorry for his criminal actions.

What a sorry lot of people, who do they represent; certainly not the electorate!