People will obviously question the
legality of the kidnapping of the leftist Venezuelan President, Nicolas Maduro,
in terms of international law. The kidnapping of the Venezuelan President, and
the bombing of the Venezuelan capital, is illegal under international law, but
the Americans have never bothered too much about that. The Americans consider
Maduro a 'Narco-Terrorist' and a New
York court indicted Maduro in March 2020, and issued an arrest warrant for him.
The American government wants to put him on trial. They don't consider Maduro
to have diplomatic immunity.
They did the same thing in 1999 when they invaded Panama and captured the dictator, Manuel Noriega. The U.S. courts ruled in (United States v Noriega) that "jurisdiction is not defeated by abduction." If the U.S. military can physically drag you into a courtroom, even illegally, you can still be tried. This is backed up by the U.S. Supreme Court which relies on the doctrine based on the legal case (Ker v Illinois) which essentially states ("Bad capture, good detention").
Despite their abductions, both Maduro and Noriega, have fared better than Patrice Lumumba, the first democratically President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Salvador Allende, the democratically elected Marxist President of Chile, and Maurice Bishop, the leftist Prime Minister of Grenada, who all died following CIA inspired coups.
The Yanks will install a Transitional puppet Government in Venezuela, who will retroactively consent to the U.S. operation, and transform the kidnapping into a legal "cooperative extradition." This is what happened in Panama in 1990. It says something that the Americans were able to capture Maduro so easily and to take control of Venezuela and its oil supplies. Will Iran be next? Many Iranians are hoping so.


