by
Les May
ANTROPOGENIC
climate change,
it’s the story with everything; aged gurus issuing warnings
of an
imminent
ecological
disaster,
self
righteous protesters
gluing themselves to garden fences, kiddies ‘going
on strike’,
teenagers meeting party leaders and
best of all, the blame can be dumped on the usual suspects, people
like Trump
‘the
climate change denier’
and the politicians
who
should ‘do
something’,
but
don’t.
But
if you want to know who is really
responsible
go
to the nearest mirror and the face you see in it is the person
responsible. The
uncomfortable truth is, It’s
you, or to be strictly accurate,
it’s us. And
if the politicians were persuaded to ‘do
something’
we would not like it one little bit.
Doing
something about climate change, which requires us to drastically
reduce the amount of carbon dioxide we release into the atmosphere,
can only be brought about by reducing the amount of energy we
consume.
We
need to be listening not just to those who style themselves ‘greens’
or ‘ecologists’
and are very good at telling us what the problems brought on by
climate change are, but to physicists who will point out the problems
of doing something about it. Not the physics of Einstein,
black-holes or the Higgs boson, but the old fashioned 19th
century physics developed to explain
the limits on the efficiency of the steam engine.
In
all these discussions about climate change and how to do something
about it there are two very large ‘elephants in the room’. They
are called the First
and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
You may not like what they say and what it means for your future
lifestyle, but if you think you can ignore them you are peeing in the
same pot as Trump and his ilk.
The
First law says in essence ‘The
Universe Does Not Provide Free Lunches’.
What this means in practice is that if you want to move something or
change something from one form to another, there
is a price
which you pay in the form of energy. Whether
you fly, take the car, get the bus, cycle or walk to the shop it
requires the expenditure of energy to get you there. Flying, taking
the car or getting the bus means burning an energy rich fuel which
pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Walking
or cycling means burning the energy stored in our food. This does
not add any additional carbon dioxide to the atmosphere because the
plants we ate have removed this much carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere already whilst they were busy making
the carbohydrate which stores
the energy derived from sunlight.
The
Second Law says in essence ‘Heat
Energy Moves From Places With A Higher Temperature To Places With A
Lower Temperature’.
If you want to make energy move the other way you have to pay a cost
in the form of energy. (You almost certainly have something in your
kitchen doing exactly this. It’s called a refrigerator.) This
law shows itself as an ‘energy
tax’
when we turn one substance into another. That
means that recycling of materials also
carries
a cost which has to be paid In the form of energy.
So
if you read in the papers
that the solution to global warming is to heat our houses with
electricity, travel in electric cars or to move to a hydrogen
economy, don’t believe it. Just
ask
yourself where the energy is to come from to generate the electricity
and where is the energy to come from to split the water into hydrogen
and oxygen so that the hydrogen can later be burned (cleanly) to
produce
the energy to drive the engine of the plane/bus/car.
The
solution to human induced climate change is to be found in our
consuming less energy, whether that be for transport, heating, making
new things or recycling old things. It will mean changing what and
how much we eat, how we package things,
how
we transport
our food
and
other goods, substituting
natural (i.e. plant and animal derived materials)
for synthetic materials based on oil, what
we wear, where and how often we holiday and
what our built and natural landscapes look like.
In
turn this will mean a shift in the jobs we do and the nature of
employment.
If
after reading this you still have a massive sense of entitlement and
a belief that you have a right to
consume as much energy and materials as you can afford you
will see why none
of the political parties, be they Greens,
Tiggers, Kippers, Farage-ophiles, LibDems, Tories or Labour
want to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,
about what needs to be done to halt climate change.
But
if you do, don’t blame the politicians. Blame yourself.
**********
No comments:
Post a Comment