Weathfareism: socialism for the rich and the free market for the rest of us.

 

Sir Jim Ratcliffe

During the manmade financial crisis, during 2008 to 2012, the Bank of England simply created £445 billion in digital money to bail out the banks by buying assets from pension funds and banks. This was called Quantitative Easing (QE). It was supposed to stimulate the economy, but it was a scam for the wealthy. It inflated share prices and those with assets got richer, but the asset poor, did not.

This was paid for by imposing austerity. Budgets for public services were slashed; a public sector pay cap was imposed and welfare benefits were cut or axed. At the same time, capital gains tax and inheritance tax were cut and corporations were given tax breaks.

Based on reports, companies owned by the billionaire tax exile, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, primarily INEOS, have received over £190 million in direct UK government grants and subsidies between 2020 and late 2025, alongside hundreds of millions in financial guarantees. Ratcliffe is estimated to be worth £17bn and while he takes handouts from the British taxpayer, he also wants to slash welfare spending. It's socialism and handouts for the rich and austerity and the free market for the rest of us.

NHS Hospital Cover Ups.

 

Dr Stephen Bolsin

Historically, there have been a number of doctors and nurses who have been killers, but I wouldn't tar them all with same brush. Many of them do their best for their patients. It was a Hyde GP who had strong suspicions about Dr Harold Shipman and she made her views known to the authorities.

For a number of years, I was involved in an hospital action group and I learned a lot about how hospital management tries to cover things up, or spin their way out of things. My local hospital had a high mortality rate, and the hospital tried to dismiss this as something called the "Shipman Effect." What they meant by this, is that many care homes were reluctant to have elderly residents die in their care homes, because they didn't want to come under suspicion, like Harold Shipman. Therefore, they sent them to hospital to die.  Whether this was true or not is a moot point, but it was used as an excuse to explain the high death rate at the hospital and some people fell for it. It was whitewash by the bucketful and excuses on tap. Staff at the hospital were also afraid to speak out or identify hazards because they feared they would lose their jobs. NHS hospitals are well known for blacklisting and excluding people who rock the boat.

I remember the case of the anaesthetist Dr Stephen Bolsin, who turned whistle-blower. He was responsible for exposing the scandal of the babies who had died at the  Bristol Royal Infirmary  after open heart surgery by incompetent surgeons. It was said that the babies had been “slaughtered on the altar of surgical pride.” Dr Bolson said that he couldn't bear putting children to sleep knowing that they were likely to die in the operating theatre because of incompetent surgeons. He eventually left Bristol and tried to get other work within another NHS hospital.

At one interview, a panel member actually told him that she thought that he'd never work again within the NHS. He finished up emigrating to Australia. When he was asked at one interview for an hospital job why he had left England and was seeking to work in an Australian hospital, he told them about his experiences at Bristol. After listening to him, the chair of the panel told him that she thought he was just the right kind of person that they were looking for.

Reform UK to rob disabled of their disability benefits.

 

Robert Jenrick & Richard Tice - Reform UK

There are around 20,488 people receiving Personal Independence Payments (PIP) in Tameside. Across Greater Manchester, there are roughly 235,000 active PIP claimants. Many of these now stand to lose their PIP if Reform UK form a government at the next general election.

Don't believe Reform UK's bullshit that they are just targeting welfare spending on illegal migrants. This is all a smokescreen. It stands to reason that if Reform UK wants to cut welfare spending by £50bm, then this is going to affect a lot more people than illegal migrants.

In Nigel Farage's constituency of Clacton, 10,440 of his constituents receive PIP. In Robert Jenrick's constituency of Newark, 6,010 of his constituents receive PIP. Research suggests that in Lee Anderson's constituency of Ashfield, 13.3% of the working age population in Ashfield, are receiving PIP payments or LWCRA benefits. In Kirklees, in West Yorkshire, which is led by Reform UK, 32,000 people are receiving PIP. In all these areas many of these people receiving PIP, will have voted for Reform UK, who have just repaid them, by kicking them in the arse.

Many of the people who receive PIP are in work. Almost 40% of people claiming Universal Credit, are also in work or have caring responsibilities. Those in work, claim UC to top up their low pay.

There's something positively disgusting about former Tory multimillionaires and spivs, like Nigel Farage and Richard Tice, wanting to rob the disabled of their disability benefits. 

NO COVER UP of union collusion in blacklisting - blacklisted workers.

 

Blacklisted workers have voiced their concerns about a potential 'cover up' of union involvement in blacklisting. The Blacklist Support Group issued a statement on its facebook page in which the justice campaign for blacklisted union members from the construction industry called for "union officials involved in blacklisting union members to be publicly named and shamed - irrespective of who wins the UNITE the union General Secretary election". 

The statement is a response to the current flood of inquiries about the ongoing Independent Blacklisting Collusion Inquiry. The KC led investigation was set up by Sharon Graham in 2021 to investigate allegations of union officials colluding with major employers to blacklist union members. The inquiry was set up after more than a decade of campaigning by union members who were blacklisted by the UK’s major construction employers - and who read the names of some union officials recorded as the source of the information on their blacklist files. 

The Inquiry lawyers - Nick Randall KC, John Townsend and Paul Heron - have taken oral evidence, statements and collated documentary evidence from over 100 witnesses. The inquiry has also carried out a forensic search of UNITE (and its predecessor unions) electronic databases. In 2025, Nick Randall spoke at UNITE Policy conference, telling delegates that:

"we have been chosen for our independence, and we have had absolutely no interference whatsoever from the union... based on the terms of reference set out by the union, we are looking at whether past or present officers or officials of the union UNITE, colluded in blacklisting in the construction industry... not limited only to obvious direct collusion but also to the suppression of information about the operation of such blacklists by union officials"

Randall ended by telling the conference that he was confident that the report would be finished within a few months. It is now a whole year since that statement. Full speech: https://youtu.be/tVoLNrCw7T8?si=oubrcShDtmOE7pZm. 

We have been told that the report should be finished soon, but further information has come to light which means that Randall’s hopeful deadline was not achievable. The inquiry assures us that they are making every effort to resolve the issues arising from that information as soon as possible, but have emphasized that, given its importance, they must investigate this line of inquiry prior to completing the report. 

As part of the inquiry, an 'Oversight Committee' was established compromising of Dave Smith, Frank Morris and Tony Seaman (all of whom have been blacklisted for their union activities).  The purpose of the oversight committee was to ensure that the inquiry remained independent from the union, and to assist the inquiry lawyers where necessary, such as identifying potential witnesses. The oversight committee added the following comments to the BSG statement:

 "For the past five years we have refrained from making public comments about the collusion inquiry. This was at the direct request of the lawyers who felt any remarks by us could hamper their ongoing investigations. Keeping quiet about the inquiry has not come easy to us. We have repeatedly voiced our frustrations to the lawyers in private - when our natural inclination has been to shout our concerns to the rooftops - but we have kept faith in the lawyers' honesty and professionalism. However, in the past few weeks’ rumours have been circulating on social media that demand a definitive statement from the Oversight Committee and the Blacklist Support Group."

We understand that the evidence the inquiry has received is not limited to entries on the Economic League and Consulting Association blacklists, but also includes documentary evidence and witness testimony of unacceptable practices that existed within the construction industry over decades. When the inquiry completes its report, if substantial evidence exists that union officers and some union officials colluded in blacklisting their own members, practices that should have no place in any independent democratic trade union, we would expect that any union member with the best interests of trade unionism at heart will want to expose any such wrongdoing or corruption. 

We are therefore calling on all candidates in the UNITE general secretary election, and all those actively campaigning for them, to unconditionally pledge to publish the Independent Blacklisting Collusion Inquiry report in full, and where there is robust evidence of wrongdoing, those union officers or officials should be named and shamed. The findings and recommendations should be made public and acted on by the union: so that the stain of union collusion in blacklisting can be finally wiped clean. 

We are not calling for a witch hunt - where there is no evidence of wrongdoing, officials should be exonerated and be able to hold their heads high. We should all strive for natural justice - but blacklisted workers have been waiting too long for justice".

Blacklist Support Group

book: http://newint.org/books/politics/blacklisted-secret-war/

video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNcgrNs6pB8

facebook: http://www.facebook.com/groups/blacklistSG/

blog: www.hazards.org/blacklistblog 

"Wolves in White Coats: Can you trust the doctor?

 

Can you trust the doctor? I read the book 'Human Guinea Pigs', by Doctor Maurice Pappworth, many years ago. First published in 1967, the book revealed how unsuspecting patients of the "hospital class" in Britain, were being used as “guinea pigs" in medical experiments by hospital doctors, often at British teaching hospitals, during the 1960s. 

The book described how some hospital doctors were treating their patients with as much respect as laboratory rats, and we're sometimes, killing them in the process. The experiments were never carried out on private patients in Britain, and were often unnecessary, for the treatment of their disease. They were sacrificed to science by "wolves in white coats", said one reviewer. 

Pappworth was considered a "pestilential nuisance" by many of his colleagues within the medical profession. When it became known that he was going to publish his findings, he was subject to threats and intimidation from strangers, in an attempt to get him to abandon the project. He was accused of doing a great disservice to his profession and of undermining the faith and trust, that lay people have in their doctor. He was repeatedly blackballed from the routine award of a fellowship from the Royal College of Physicians and was told at one interview for a consultancy post, that "no Jew could ever be a gentleman." 

Maurice Pappworth was a whistleblower before the term was ever invented. The incidents that Maurice Pappworth described in his book ranged over more than 20 years, but in the main, what had occurred within the last 10 years, within Britain and America. He wrote:

 "It must be emphasized that, whilst the vast majority of patients in hospitals are not subjected to experimentation, the number who are, is considerable, although exact figures cannot be known." 

Medical experiments were not just carried out in hospitals, but we're also carried out in prisons, orphanages and psychiatric centres, too. Pappworth had been told by medical students how they were coerced into finding 'volunteers' for their bosses research projects and that such patients often believed the research was part of their treatment, and were rarely told what was involved. 

Delving into medical journals, Pappworth found that abuses were happening on a shocking scale, involving thousands of victims. He wrote letters of protest to medical journals, but few were published. Human Guinea Pigs, catalogued more than 200 examples of abusive research carried out in the U.K. and U.S. Pappworth named names and many publisher's backed off from publishing the book. Among those he named, no doctor or hospital ever sued him. 

Doctors injected unsuspecting people with malaria parasites, meningitis bacteria, live polio virus and live cancer cells. More than 40 people with diabetes, including children, had their insulin withheld so they became comatose, after which samples of their liver and kidney, were taken for analysis. 

Pappworth discovered that U.S. hospitals were carrying out experiments for the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory, to inject plutonium into people with cancer, to find out what was a "safe" dose of radiation for those working on nuclear bombs. 

Two four-month-old hydrocephalic infants were used to investigate the safety of giving ammonium chloride intravenously in large amounts of children. In 1962, a new antibiotic designed to treat acne vulgaris (pimples), was investigated. The antibiotics was given to 50 people with acne who were either juvenile delinquents or mental defectives. After oral administration of the drug, for two weeks, fifty percent of the children, were found to have sustained liver damage. 

 An anonymous author, with a sense of wit, wrote to the British Medical Journal saying: 

"Juvenile delinquency in the USA, seems to carry with it hazards not previously suspected. The pimpled gangster of today may find himself the bilious guinea pig of tomorrow. It seems a little hard, perhaps, for a boy who has spent his formative years learning how to dodge flick knives, to fall victim to intercostal perforation by a liver puncture needle." 

In January 1963, 'Pertinax' wrote in the British Medical Journal: "One of the nicest American scientists I know, was heard to say, 'Criminals in our penitentiaries are fine experimental material - and much cheaper than chimpanzees! I hope the chimpanzees don't come to hear of this'."

In 1944, in a Chicago prison and a New Jersey reformatory, convict volunteers were infected with malaria to try a new cure. On 12 July 1963, 'Time' magazine wrote that volunteers at the Ohio State Penitentiary in Columbus, had been injected with live cancer cells. None of them developed cancer. At Cook County Jail in Chicago, prison volunteers were injected with blood from patients who had leukaemia. None of those contracted the disease either. At the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, the medical director had made deals with pharmaceutical companies to test out new drugs on prisoners. 

In his book, Maurice Pappworth pulled no punches, comparing the situation to the foul work that had been carried out by doctors in the Nazi concentration camps. The book led to a rethinking about ethical standards in medicine. But this was an era, when British doctors could seemingly do no wrong. Pappworth noted that many doctors had near contempt for both their patients and the notion of consent. One researcher told him that it was "useless to explain to a charwoman what was going to be done, because she couldn't possibly understand." 

The world needs more whistleblowers like Maurice Pappworth, but they won't be thanked. It was only in 1993, 57 years after he qualified for it, and a year before he died, aged 83, that Pappworth was sufficiently forgiven to be made a fellow of the Royal College of Physicians.

Bev gets elected Greater Manchester mayor on a 25% turnout.

 

There were over 2 million people eligible to vote in the Greater Manchester (2026) Mayoral Elections and just over 500,000 bothered to do so. The turnout was just over 25%. This was the lowest turnout since 2017. 

Can Bev Craig really say that she got a ringing endorsement from the voters of Greater Manchester or that she's got any mandate? If she intends to be the mayor for everyone, then she needs to escape from the LGBT bubble that she's in. She must look further than canal street and widen her horizons. 

Last December, two homeless men, Michael Heaton and Anthony Horn, were found frozen to death on the streets of Manchester. One was found dead on a car park and the other under a bridge next to the canal. Despite these appalling deaths, Bev, has been talking about an exclusive housing project for the LGBT community and how Labour are turning Manchester into a gender-neutral world. This is all nonsense upon stilts - trendy left politics. Affordable rented housing should be allocated on the basis of need. Being a 'gay' person shouldn't give you a priority for housing in Greater Manchester. The vast majority of people who live in Greater Manchester are not homosexuals. Eradicating homelessness, low pay and child poverty, is what Bev Craig needs to focus on.

Piccadilly Gardens is now called Crackadilly, because of the drug users who hang around the place. There's a ghastly Victorian underclass that inhabits the place. Like Balzac's Second Empire Paris, wealth and poverty sit cheek by jowl in Labour controlled Manchester, now known as Dubai on Deansgate. Bev Craig needs to clean the place up so decent people can use it. I can remember a time when people sat in deckchairs in Piccadilly Gardens.

Rosa Luxembourg & the dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

Louis Auguste Blanqui

It was the nominal President of the Paris Commune, Auguste Blanqui, who coined the term the "dictatorship of the proletariat" to mean rule on behalf of the common people. But most of the Communards were not socialists. 

The Paris Commune of 1871, was Marx's main model for popular self-government, but it only lasted three months until it was suppressed by the regular French army. Lenin used phrases like "all cooks shall govern" and "all power to the Soviets" but I don't think that he believed a word of it. He wasn't even in favour of workers' control. 

Rosa Luxembourg warned Lenin that revolution can move swiftly from the dictatorship of a class to the dictatorship of a party, to be followed by the dictatorship of a committee of the party and eventually by the rule of a single man who will soon enough dispense with that committee. Her Cassandra like prediction and warning, is exactly what occurred in Soviet Russia. Before Rosa Luxembourg, the Russian socialist Alexander Herzen, had said that communism was just Russian autocracy turned upside down. 

The Marxist German SDP preached international working-class solidarity but when war broke out in 1914, they supported the war and became jingoistic. The Marxist, Karl Liebknecht, was the only member of the Reichstag to vote against Germany's participation in the war and he campaigned against the war. As a punishment, he was sent to the front, despite his immunity as a member of parliament.

"We Know All About You". Britain's surveillance police state.

 

Much of the publicity surrounding the spy cops (Mitting) inquiry has focused on women who were deceived into sexual relationships with undercover Special Branch Officers.

This is shocking enough, but what I think as received less attention, is the role these undercover police officers played as agent provocateurs. They tried to instigate people into committing criminal acts like arson and then shopped them.

It has been alleged that one undercover police officer carried out an arson attack on a Debenhams Store and tried to encourage others to do so. Another undercover police officer, tried to get other activists to fire bomb a shop that he claimed was the property of an Italian fascist.

Much of what we get told about the work of the British security services, tends to be about countering espionage. What they're less happy to talk about, is the role they play in spying on British citizens.

In his book, 'We know all about you: The Story of Surveillance in Britain', Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones, writes there is a "Tendency in the UK for people to be put under government surveillance for political purposes which sometimes had little to do with national security."

In 1986, Duncan Campbell estimated that one citizen in five was the "subject of police local intelligence files." He drew attention to MI5's Joint Computer Bureau in Mayfair which had 20 million people in its system.  Yet some British people like to be under the thumb of authority. In a TNS poll in 2014, some 64% of respondents thought that the UK intelligence agencies should be able to monitor the communications of all citizens not just likely suspects.

There's little doubt that blacklisting in some British industries, wasn't just about identifying so-called "troublemakers" but was also about weakening and undermining the labour movement. Many workers became afraid to report hazards because they feared being put on a blacklist. 

Blacklisting was made illegal in the U.S. in 1935. The 1959 'Landrum Griffin Act', required firms to disclose to the U.S. Department of Labour, payments made to firms engaged in labour espionage and blacklisting. Despite this and the introduction of a Freedom of Information Act in 1966 and a Privacy Act in 1974, unions in the U.S. still complain of blacklisting. Union busting is still big business in America and many American workers fear joining a union because of blacklisting.

Crowborough residents protest about camp for illegal immigrants.

 

I recently watched a TV program on GB News about illegal migrants who have been sent to an army camp in Crowborough, in East Sussex. The Home Office appointed ‘Clearsprings Ready Homes’ owned by multi- millionaire, Graham King, to run the Crowborough Army Camp which is now being used to accommodate asylum seekers and illegal migrants.

Local residents who complain that they weren't consulted about the scheme to house illegal migrants, are now saying that house prices in the area have plummeted and they're having difficulty selling their homes. Although King doesn't own the army camp, but runs it, he's made himself a fortune out of public contracts to house illegal migrants. Some of the refugees compared the army camp to a prison but according to GB News, they're free to come and go as they please and can leave the camp for up to seven days before returning. Many of these illegal migrants have travelled to Britain without valid documents and very little is known about them.

Residents living in the area, say that the migrants are often seen around the town and golf course, drinking cans of beer. Some female residents complained that they no longer feel safe walking in more remote parts of the town like Ashdown Forest. It seems that the camp provides transport so the illegal migrants can visit Crawley where they are less conspicuous.

GB News presenter, Patrick Christys, who was in Crowborough talking to residents, never mentioned Graham King, or Clearsprings Ready Homes, or the vast amounts of taxpayers' money that is going into the pockets of people like Graham King and Serco.

Jalil Ahmad, a young Afghan refugee, who spoke fairly good English, who was interviewed by GB News, told Christys that he'd been told that if he stayed at the camp for three or four months, he would be given accommodation in a House of Multiple Occupation, (HMO). He said that he'd left Afghanistan because it wasn't a good country to live in under the Taliban and that he thought that Britain offered him more opportunities as an MMA professional fighter, with UFC aspirations. Young Jalil, who was probably far too honest for his own good, did say that the migrants living in the camp generally got on with one another because they were all in the same boat, but he also compared the situation to living in a jungle.

Starmer's crusade against bogus anti-Semitism in the Labour Party.

 

Margaret Hodge

The ousted UK Prime Minster, Keir Starmer, told the House of Commons, "I ripped anti-Semitism out of my party."

Its never been clear to me when the Labour Party and Jeremy Corbyn, suddenly become anti-Semitic? We were told that a Corbyn led Labour government would pose "an existential threat to Jews living in Britain." It was nonsense upon stilts.

The whole issue of antisemitism was weaponized to get rid of Jeremy Corbyn and to replace him with Keir Starmer. I have never quite understood why an anti-Semite would join the Labour Party.

Both Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner served in Corbyn's shadow cabinet. If they thought that Corbyn posed a threat to Jews living in Britain or was an anti-Semite, why didn't they say so at the time.

Margaret Hodge, allegedly denounced Jeremy Corbyn as a "f..king anti-Semite” in the House of Commons. When she received a letter from Jennie Formby, the General Secretary of the Labour Party, regarding alleged abusive behaviour, Hodge acted as though she'd received a summons from Himmler and the Gestapo. She said that receiving the letter had reminded her of what her father had always told her. That she should always have a suitcase packed and left behind the front door, in case they had to leave in a hurry. Despite refusing to apologise, any investigation or probe into Margaret Hodge was quietly dropped.

Is Britain becoming more authoritarian and restricting free speech?

 

Johann Most

When I was growing up in Britain in the 1950s and 1960s, you didn't hear about people being prosecuted for hate speech, or using language that was likely to cause alarm, harassment or distress. There was no cancel culture, no platforming or racially aggravated offences. There was a Board of British Film Censors who had a say in what films were shown and there were obscenity laws. British comedians like Bernard Manning were deliberately provocative and often used racism as part of their act.

What has changed is that people now have access to the internet and social media which has given people a medium, a public voice, in which to express their opinions. At one time you would have written a letter to a local newspaper, if you could write a letter and get it published. Many British people today, are more likely to make complaints to the police about injured feelings or opinions that they find unacceptable. Many Brits also seem to like being under the thumb of authority, which can lead to a kind of creeping totalitarianism and the police state.

I find Britain today far more authoritarian than what it was when I was growing up. Boris Johnson, the former Conservative Prime Minister, claimed that 10,000 people are year are being arrested in Britain for comments posted on social media. This is broadly in line with Freedom of Information data showing over 12,000 annual arrests in England and Wales for online communication offences. Arresting British people for comments they have made on social media and jailing some of them, would have been unthinkable not very long ago.

However, I don't believe that there ever was a time when the English had an unfettered right to free speech. During the reign of King Henry VIII, John Wycliffe was burnt at the stake for translating the Bible into English. In 1881, The anarchist Johann Most, got 18 months in Clerkenwell Gaol for celebrating the assassination of the Russian Tsar. In 1763, Peter Annet, a 70-year-old school master was jailed and stocked for translating Voltaire and other free-thinking tracts.

Nowadays, requests to remove books from library shelves are on the rise in Britain. Some classic books are being sanitised or rewritten for the modern British market. Publishers frequently hire "sensitivity readers" to review or remove language deemed offensive, racist, sexist, or non-politically correct and many books contain trigger warnings for snowflakes. It's not actually book burning but book binning. 

The 'Uniparty' and the legacy of Tony Blair.

 

Margaret Thatcher called Tony Blair and New Labour, her greatest legacy to the country. Blair not only lied us into going into war in Iraq, but he was also the chief architect of Brexit. Blair and New Labour were responsible for the political exclusion of the working-class. They welcomed immigration in 2004 when other E.U. countries placed a five-year restriction on it.

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), during thirteen years of a New Labour government, almost 80% of new jobs created in Britain, went to immigrants from Eastern Europe. When Gordon Brown encountered Mrs Gillian Duffy on a council estate in Rochdale, she expressed her concern about the levels of immigration into Britain. He was then heard to call her a "bigoted" woman. 

New Labour failed to understand how society in Britain had changed. They obliterated any mention of the working-class and blurred any distinction between New Labour and the Conservatives and filled their ranks with middle-class MPs. This strategy was known as the prawn cocktail offensive. We were all told to get under Tony's "big tent." 

In 1979, 40% of the Parliamentary Labour Party had done working-class jobs. Today, only around 6 or 7% of Labour MPs, have done working-class jobs. Many working-class traditional Labour voters stopped voting Labour because they felt ignored or they felt there was no difference between Labour or Tory. Many stopped voting altogether or started to vote for UKIP. 

Tony Blair and his modestly named 'Tony Blair Institute for Global Change' are behind the national digital ID scheme that Labour want to introduce to keep us all under surveillance. Blair's institute is funded by tech billionaires like the American Larry Ellison of Oracle, who have a financial vested interest in it. Blair, who is estimated to be worth around £60 million, is also lobbying to end the triple lock that uprates the British state pension and he wants to reform the British state pension because he says it's unaffordable and unsustainable. 

The English historian David Starkey, talks about the 'Uniparty' to describe the pernicious influence that Blairism has had British politics. He basically thinks you can't get a gnat's whisker between any of the mainstream political party’s in Britain? 

Darwin & the survival of the fittest.

 

Leading Fabian's like the Webb's (Sidney and Beatrice Webb), and George Bernard Shaw, were huge fans of the dictator Joseph Stalin and his so-called Soviet Communist Regime. The Webb's wrote a two-volume study called 'Soviet Communism: A New Civilization?' which was published in 1935. They also supported Stalin's show trials and the purges. They believed in a kind of enlightened despotism and rule by technocrats and experts.

Shaw was a eugenicist who advocated compulsory sterilisation for people deemed "feeble minded", but so did Winston Churchill. He advocated for the sterilisation of the mentally unfit. Winston Churchill did say that the best argument against democracy was a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

I recently saw film footage of George Bernard Shaw which is circulating on Facebook where he was arguing for tribunals to set up which we would be forced to attend, to justify our existence. He was basically saying that some people have no right to exist because they're not useful to society. If some people have no right to exist, then what are you going to do with them?

What is called "social Darwinism" and the "survival of the fittest" has nothing really to do with Charles Darwin. He never used the term and didn't support its core premises. It has more to do with the ideas of Herbert Spencer and Darwin's cousin Francis Galton. It was used to justify social inequality, imperialism, laissez-faire capitalism and eugenics.

Charles Darwin once asked a breeder of racing dogs, how he got a winner. The dog breeder told him that he bred many and hanged many. It is a bit more difficult to do that with human beings.

Farage and the convicted fraudster.

 

George Cottrell

Nigel Farage hasn't got a leg to stand on.

Baby Face George Cottrell is a convicted fraudster who has donated money to Reform UK. He's not a fairy godmother. He served time in a U.S. jail when he pleaded guilty to wire fraud in return for other charges being dropped. He was caught in an FBI sting operation and initially charged with 21 offences including conspiracy to commit money laundering, wire fraud, blackmail and extortion. Undercover agents posed as drug traffickers and Cottrell was caught agreeing to launder money for them.

Farage knew all about this because Cottrell was arrested in the U.S. when he visited America with Farage and others, in 2016. Despite this Cottrell is still hanging around with Farage. They say that a man is known by the company he keeps. Farage is not fit to be the UK Prime Minister.

I'm surprised that the British mainstream press has been so quiet about Cottrell's links to Nigel Farage when this has been well publicised on social media. How George Cottrell makes his money seems to be clouded in mystery but much of it seems to come from speculation and gambling.

British sympathies with fascism.

 

There were many English upper middle-class Conservative types that admired the Italian fascist, Benito Mussolini. 

The English novelist Evelyn Waugh, supported Mussolini's invasion of Ethiopia and supported General Franco and the Croation fascist Ante Pavelic, the leader of the Ustase. Winston Churchill called Mussolini the "Roman Genius" and praised him for ridding the world of Bolshevism.The Daily Mail admired Mussolini and supported Oswald Mosley, the leader of the black shirt British Union Fascists, who was financed by Mussolini. Churchill visited Italy in 1927 and declared that had he been an Italian, he would have been a fascist. 

King George V, gave Mussolini an honorary knighthood that was only withdrawn when he declared War on Great Britain. Lady Austen Chamberlain, the sister-in-law of Neville Chamberlain, was a Fascist sympathiser who idealised Mussolini.

Italian fascism in its early days wasn't anti-Semitic and many Italian Jews were fascists. They became fascists out of a sense of patriotism or to get on. The Italian fascists didn't target Jews until they hooked up with Hitler. What they targeted was the left - communists, socialists, anarchists, trades unionists. 

In May 1924, the secretary general of the Italian Socialist Party, Giacomo Matteotti, denounced the Fascist Party and Mussolini to the Chamber of Deputies. He challenged the results of the recent elections and denounced the violence and abuses that had brought the party to power. He declared, "I've said my piece...now get ready for my death." Less than two weeks later, on 10 June, six fascists squadristi kidnapped him as he walked along the banks of the Tiber in Rome. In August, his mutilated body was discovered buried just outside the city, near Riano Flamino.

Mussolini took full responsibility for the murder of Matteotti and dared his critics to prosecute him. After a prolonged judicial inquiry into the murder, the six suspects arrested for the murder, were allowed to walk free. Mussolini established a police state in Italy and suppressed opposition parties and killed lefties. Despite this, many people in Britain, accepted Mussolini and subsequently Hitler, as modernizing reformers.

Burnham appoints James Purnell as his chief of staff.

 

Burnham & Purnell

This is Andy Burnham's first big mistake. He's just appointed the former disgraced Labour minister and failed politician, James Purnell, as his future chief of staff, if he becomes the next UK Prime Minister. Purnell is an odious wretch and a right-wing slime ball. Niccolo Machiavelli famously said in his book 'The Prince' that the first way to measure a ruler's intelligence is to look at the people he chooses to surround himself with.

In 2010, Purnell suddenly resigned as the Labour MP for Stalybridge & Hyde after he launched a failed abortive coup aimed at getting rid of the Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Purnell put on his helmet and went over the top with his rifle and bayonet, only to find that his troops were still in the trenches. They hung him out to dry.

During his time as the MP for Stalybridge & Hyde, Purnell decimated Labour's majority. He then connived with Peter Mandelson to make Jonathan Reynolds his successor after he'd been rejected as a candidate by Labour's NEC.

When Purnell was the minister for work & pensions, he even proposed charging benefit claimant's interest on a social fund loan. Even the Tories found that sickening and appalling. Purnell was also embroiled in the expenses scandal having been found to have claimed Parliamentary expenses for fridge magnets and flowers. 

Joe Stalin & Khrushchev

 

Khrushchev & Stalin

Nikita Khrushchev survived the Stalinist era and was a close friend of Lavrentiy Beria. Khrushchev certainly had plenty of blood on his hands and had signed many death warrants, but he managed to distance himself from it, by basically blaming it all on Joe Stalin. Khrushchev did say that all those in Stalin's inner circle knew that they were temporary men.

I believe many of them dreaded getting an invite to dinner at Stalin's dacha at Kuntsevo. These dinners went on into the early hours and there was forced binge-drinking. Stalin intentionally got his inner circle drunk to make them talkative and exposed. These dinners were a form of political control.

Stalin seems to have been close to Sergei Kirov and was rather upset, when he heard about his death. But Kirov's popularity within the party certainly rankled Stalin. It was rumoured that Stalin had Kirov bumped off but that has never been proved. The man that shot Kirov appears to have been a disgruntled party member who had an axe to grind.

For most of his time, Stalin was the boss but he wasn't the head of state or the Russian President. He ran things as the General Secretary of the party from a room in the Kremlin known as the Little Corner. He was a tyrant but he was also a complicated man. He would send money to old friends, give lifts to people standing in the rain at a bus shelter while he was driving home to his dacha, and pose for photographs with holiday makers in Sochi, where he had a holiday home. He once asked his doctor if he read the Russian newspapers, 'Izvestia' and 'Pravada'. The doctor told him that he did and Stalin told him there was no truth in either newspaper. 

Artem Mkoyan, the brother of the Soviet minister, Anastas Mikoyan, recalled being at Stalin's dacha in Sochi. He had an angina attack and went to bed early. He said he felt somebody tucking him in and when he looked up it was Joe Stalin. 

Zionist Starmer resigns.

 

Keir Starmer

I thought Keir Starmer was a duffer when he was the leader of the opposition, and I knew that he wouldn't last long. He was a politically correct dipstick who told us that 99.9% of women didn't have a cock.

In a TV interview with Emily Maitlis, this former Trot and Marxist, told her that he would always put the interests of Davos first before that of Westminster. He was also an absolute authoritarian who was obsessed with imposing bans, surveillance, and controlling people's behaviour. As Labour leader, he pursued a witch-hunt against leftists in the Labour Party. Starmer couldn't shoot straight and is political judgement was lousy which led him to making numerous U-turns. Only a clown would have made Peter Mandelson the Ambassador to the U.S.

He supported the Israeli genocide in Gaza and told us that he supported "Zionism without qualification." He even denounced the pro-Palestine activist, Roger Waters, the former Pink Floyd musician as an anti-Semite, and called on people to boycott and cancel his concerts after Marie van der Zyl, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, called on him to do so. 

When he was asked what Labour's strategy was for growing the economy, he couldn't say, because as we now know, there wasn't one. All Starmer could say was wait and see. He told us that we would all be better off under a Labour government and many people will tell you that they feel worse off. Energy and water prices have gone through the roof and other prices for food and goods, are spiralling.

A lot of it in Britain is greed inflation and catch-up since Brexit, but the increases in taxes, the National Minimum Wage (NMW) and N.I. have also increased business costs and are detrimental to growing an economy. An Increase in the NMW does at least put more money in the workers pockets and increases consumer spending but it also increases costs. 

If Andy Burnham does become the next PM, the first two things he should do, is scrap that stupid national digital ID scheme to save money and the blanket ban on under 16s having access to social media. That ban is likely to impact on all of us, because it will be assumed that we're all children until we can prove otherwise. Many ISP's already block access to websites deemed "adult content", so why is it necessary. The ban is a way of getting us all using digital ID which is something that Tony Blair and his modestly named 'Tony Blair Institute for Global Change' have been pushing for since he set it up. Many of Blair's financial backers like Larry Ellison, are tech billionaires. 

Sylvia Pankhurst.

 

Sylvia Pankhurst

In my opinion, Estelle Sylvia Pankhurst, was the best one of the Pankhurst family because she was a staunch socialist, anti-imperialist and anti-fascist, throughout her life. Sylvia was imprisoned far more times and spent more time on hunger strike, than any other member of her family. Her elder sister, Christabel Pankhurst, spent a long time living in exile in Paris from where she ran the WSPU. It was from the safety of Paris, that Christabel instructed Sylvia to burn down Nottingham Castle, which she didn't carry out.

Sylvia Pankhurst wrote and published an article about her mother entitled "From Radical to Reactionary." In her younger days Mrs Pankhurst had been a member of the ILP, had opposed the Boer War, and had been in favour of common law marriage or free union. When WWI broke out Mrs Pankhurst and Christabel became jingoistic and all WSPU suffragette activity was suspended. Suffragettes gave out white feathers to men not in uniform. Sylvia Pankhurst opposed WWI because she saw it as an imperialist war and a fight over colonies, but she supported the war against fascism and Ethiopia's resistance to Mussolini. Mrs Pankhurst became a Conservative and stood as a Tory candidate. Adella Pankhurst, the youngest sister, had been banished to Australia by her mother many years before. Mr Pankhurst also had two sons, Frank and Harry, who both died young.

I think both Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst, treated Sylvia badly over the years. Sylvia never had a paid position in the WSPU and never wanted one. Sylvia's face never appeared on WSPU merchandise. Mrs Pankhurst and Christabel became autocrats within the WSPU and they ostracised Sylvia, because she lived with the Italian anarchist Silvio Corio and had an illegitimate child with him called Richard. They also despised her socialist opinions. Yet Mrs Pankhurst never said anything about Sylvia's relationship with Keir Hardie, who was married with children.

The Pankhurst family are associated with Manchester but they spent more time living in the London and the South of England. Mrs Pankhurst moved to Vancouver Island where she lectured on venereal disease (VD) and also spent some time living in the Bahamas and the South of France, where she ran a tea shop, before returning to England where she died.

Christabel never married and became a Seventh Day Adventist and emigrated to America. She died of a heart attack in her home in Santa Monica in California, in February 1958, aged 77.  

Adella Pankhurst never returned from Australia and Sylvia emigrated to Ethiopia where she lived, worked and died of a coronary thrombosis in 1960. Her son and daughter-in-law lived with her. In Britain there were no state honours or streets named after Sylvia Pankhurst. There is a statue of Mrs Pankhurst in Manchester and one was erected beside Westminster Palace in 1936. Christabel Pankhurst was given the OBE. Sylvia Pankhurst is revered in Ethiopia but not in Britain. In Addis Ababa, a street was named after Sylvia in her honour. 

The obnoxious Godfrey Bloom.

 

The former UKIP MEP, Godfrey Bloom, seems to have been squeezed out of every organisation that he's belonged to because he's got foot and mouth, especially when he's in his cups.

UKIP withdrew the whip from him when he hit the journalist Michael Crick in the street with a conference brochure. He was even removed as the Honorary President of the Ludwig von Mises Institute because they found his comments abhorrent. He's referred to women as sluts and said that women were better at finding mustard in the pantry than driving a car. At an Oxford Union debate, he asked a disabled student speaking against a motion on immigration control, if he was Richard III. He describes himself as an "economist" but it doesn't appear that he's an academic economist or that he's even been to a university. He also describes himself as having been to Sandhurst, but this appears to have been on a two-week course with the T.A.

A free market crackpot like Bloom, can't really be in favour of immigration control or closed borders, because he has to be in favour of the free movement of labour. But he gets round this by saying that Britain is too small a country, and it has a welfare state, which he doesn't support. He seems to be in favour of laissez-faire free market capitalism, but if that was ever introduced, it would be the mother of all economic chaos.

The free market is a myth. Capitalism is full of deliberately constructed order governed by rules and regulations and political decisions. The Austrian school of Hayek and Ludwig von Mises, fails or refuses to accept this. Unlike Bloom, the economist Friedrich von Hayek, who was a founder of the Austrian school, did argue in favour of a state education system and some measure of welfare state provision, and you will find this in his book 'The Road to Serfdom'.

Adam Smith was critical of unregulated markets which he thought could result in a dire predicament and he was deeply concerned about inequality and poverty that might remain in an otherwise successful market economy and he defended free education and poverty relief. In his book ‘The Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations’ (1776), he refers to three women who were found dead from starvation in 1763 in an empty house in Stonecutter Street, London. Adam Smith did think that individuals pursued their own economic self- interest, which had an unintended beneficial outcome for the rest of us, but he didn't think that self-interest was the only human characteristic or motivation. He would have recognised that a society comprised of an aggregate of self-interested egoists, is no society at all. Sympathy is a central concept of Smith's ethics. He seemed to be more interested in promoting the great good of society and not just the interests of a wealthy few.