Editor
Northern Voices: ON Monday the 19 March 2018 the
Rochdale
Online website reported that in Rochdale the
Councillor's
allowances will 'top one million' pounds.
Helpfully,
Carl Faulkner, the Independent candidate for
Spotland
and Falinge, exposed how the Rochdale councillors
had
shared out their generous stipend pay among themselves.
Among
the opposition, only the Lib Dem councillors
Andy Kelly and Irene Davidson voted against the rises
and refused the increase, meanwhile on the Labour
side councillors Andy Bell, Malcolm Borriss,
Chris Furlong and Billy Sheerin also refused the increase.
Of the 60 Rochdale councillors, according to Rochdale
Online, all the others including the Tories took the
extra State stipend either in part or in full.
Andy Kelly and Irene Davidson voted against the rises
and refused the increase, meanwhile on the Labour
side councillors Andy Bell, Malcolm Borriss,
Chris Furlong and Billy Sheerin also refused the increase.
Of the 60 Rochdale councillors, according to Rochdale
Online, all the others including the Tories took the
extra State stipend either in part or in full.
Below Carl Faulkner gives his views on the way the Rochdale
municipal establishment handled the issue of their own stipend:
NO MANDATE TO UP COUNCILLOR'S ALLOWANCES !
by Carl Faulkner
NOT
a single councillor was press-ganged into becoming a councillor. It
is an entirely voluntary position. Not a single councillor has ever
stated that if elected, they will be wanting increased allowances.
If
the allowances were not sufficient, then they should have not stood
or alternatively, stepped down – there would not have been any
shortage of people willing to take their place.
The
way in which the rise in allowances was brought about was indicative
of the self-serving way in which councillors and senior council
officers often act. The public were given one week’s notice; the
rise itself was timed to come into effect in a year that there were
no elections.
It was a cynical, deliberate act to exclude public
opinion from the process. But it was entirely consistent with the
arrogant and underhanded way in which the public (and press) are
deliberately excluded from major decisions of public concern.
But
should we be surprised? It is councillors who decide on
the appointment of the Chief Executive. It is the Chief Executive, at
a time of his choosing, who hand picks the panel who then
recommended the extortionate rises. The favour returned.
******
No comments:
Post a Comment